Hi,
when deleting Emails i get the error message (see pic).
After this error message appears i can not use any keyboard shortcut
anymore! I have to close and restart TB! in order to use it again!
Even the menus don´t work anymore!
Confirmations?
--
Christian Grams
<>
___
Hi Greg,
Monday, March 20, 2006, 4:54:49 AM, you wrote:
> I created a QT with an Editor shortcut. The editor shortcut does NOT
> work. If I type in the 'handle' with Ctrl+SpaceBar it works. So there
> appears to be a problem with the shortcut. The only option chosen is
> 'Shared with other accoun
Hello Richard,
On Monday, March 20, 2006, 12:38:18 AM, among other things, you wrote:
RP>> I am just making a stab in the dark, but perhaps your user.def file
RP>> has become corrupt; I know it does have items in it which refer
RP>> to printing.
RN> Well I let TB
RN> create a new user.def. The r
Hello Zygmunt,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 6:17:54 PM, you wrote:
ZW> Have you looked at Message / Print Setup / Font layout / Default font?
That is the same Courier.
ZW> Is the printer the default one in Windows?
Yes and same thing happens in non-default printers. Fineprint is
my normal d
Hello Richard,
M>> So yes, there is something strange, peculiar or however you want to
M>> call it, with TB's 'print engine'.
>Yep and it's a change from 3.71.03
Not in my case because I got the same bad results with 3.71.03
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The
Hello Goncalo,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 8:34:43 PM, you wrote:
GF> TB settings. It must be something specific to your setting that
GF> nobody else is using. I had a problem with the TB's backup system
Makes sense. I have 23 pages of screen shots from Bat Preferences and
not sure how many you'd li
Hello mark,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 1:18:35 PM, you wrote:
md> i don't specifically recall the cause of the problem or the
md> solution but think it had to do with a printer font mismatch where
Changing fonts had no difference. Thanks for the idea.
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
Hello MAU,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 1:34:45 PM, you wrote:
M> Smile! Because I think you are not totally alone.
:-))
M> I was able to replicate your problem. Well, not identical but quite
M> similar.
Quite similar.
M> So yes, there is something strange, peculiar or however you want to
M> call
Hello Roger,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 9:28:00 AM, you wrote:
RP> I am just making a stab in the dark, but perhaps your user.def file
RP> has become corrupt; I know it does have items in it which refer to
Thought, gee that's a great idea . . . so obvious. Well I let TB
create a new user.def. The res
3/19/2006 4:53 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 3/19/2006 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK> I seem to be unable to finde a note dealing with HTML "allowed for
ASK> testing purposes" in http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/subtbeta.txt
ASK> Maybe it should be added (or I simply overlooked it).
Stated by a true m
Hi Jon,
Friday, March 17, 2006, 4:36:36 PM, you wrote:
> Could this have anything to do with your customizations?
> Perhaps trying without any customizations would provide a clue.
I'm not sure what customizations could be affecting this, did you have anything
particular in mind? As you should be
Hi Charlene,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 7:48:11 PM, you wrote:
> Thanks for all your invested time to let us see what happens on your PC.
> I did the same with another word than "Paris" to have some results
> (FWIW) and I swear it doesn't happen here.
I tried it quite a few times and everything wor
Hi Paul Meathrel,
Sunday, March 19, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> If you have time take a look and you should be able to see.
Thanks for all your invested time to let us see what happens on your PC.
I did the same with another word than "Paris" to have some results
(FWIW) and I swear
Dear Goncalo,
@19-Mar-2006, 12:14 Goncalo Farias [GF] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
...
MDP>> Please do not discuss list management issues on list in future. There
MDP>> is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] to use for such issues.
GF> Is that list open to everybody or is it a close forum?
It is a
Hi Charlene,
Friday, March 17, 2006, 3:59:50 PM, you wrote:
> I have tried several times, too, and I can't confirm. The "Options"-tab
> stays, does not vanish or flicker.
Thanks to Dwight, Charlene and Jon for checking I appreciate your help in this.
I've recorded a video of this so you can see
Hello Richard,
> I have tried on a different system and been able to replicate problem
> in it's entirty.
> 1) I went to a system that still had 3.6 on it. I replaced the .exe with
> 3.72.04 and replicated the problem (per attached) on four printers.
> 2) I removed the installation and installed v
hi richard,
> I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
> printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not happen
> when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly the same files.
i've not experienced this with TB but something similar did once occur to me
when u
On 19/3/2006 at 7:14:49 AM [GMT -0500], Goncalo Farias wrote:
> I use text emails 90% of the time.
HTML mail is not necessary. However, there is potential for abuse and
inappropriate use that leads to the discomfort of many readers. This
abuse of use is inevitable and far more difficult to contro
Hello Goncalo,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 8:34:43 PM, you wrote:
GF> My question is, was it with a different set of accounts or did you
GF> replicate your installation in the new machine?
About half of the accounts that were on the first machine were on
the second machine. I did not "replic
Hello Richard,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 4:52:56 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RN> Hello Batpeople,
RN> I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
RN> printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not happen
RN> when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly
Hello Paul Van Noord & everyone else,
on 19-Mrz-2006 at 13:21 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
[ HTML ]
> It is already allowed for the reasons you have stated.
I seem to be unable to finde a note dealing with HTML "allowed for
testing purposes" in http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/subtbeta.txt
Ma
In reply to :
PVN> 3/19/2006 7:19 AM
PVN> It is already allowed for the reasons you have stated.
PVN> BTW, as you can see, there is a problem with the signature delimiter
PVN> in your message
I edit it by mistake. It seems that the undo feature didn't work as
expected.
--
Best regards,
Het was op zondag 19 maart 2006 om 0:11 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'dll
error' :
Hoi vitalie,
MSVCR71.DLL not found
No idea what it means.
vv>>> MS Visual C Runtime. needed by some plugin maybe?
>> hey, you're good!
vv> you're good too, as we don't have much of testers that are
Het was op zondag 19 maart 2006 om 0:11 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'dll
error' :
Hoi vitalie,
MSVCR71.DLL not found
No idea what it means.
vv>>> MS Visual C Runtime. needed by some plugin maybe?
>> hey, you're good!
vv> you're good too, as we don't have much of testers that are
3/19/2006 7:19 AM
Hi Goncalo,
On 3/19/2006 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF> In reply to :
PVN>> You want to bloat the messages by 2.5 to 5 times the size and
PVN>> open the door to a potential malicious act because you want to be
PVN>> entertained instead of informed? Any truthful historian
Hi Marck,
In reply to :
GF>> Do you have good reasons or is it just no?
MDP> There is no reason needed. It is against the rules because they
MDP> are the rules of the list. Don't assume that just because the
MDP> mods may be older that doesn't make us out of touch with the
MDP> trend
Hi Richard,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:52:56 -0500 (9:52 AM here), Richard Newman [RN]
wrote in :
RN> I am continuing to get miniscule, postage-stamp size pages when
RN> printing from v3.72.04. This began with v3.71.01. This does not
RN> happen when using v3.71.03, or earlier, on exactly the same fil
In reply to :
PVN> You want to bloat the messages by 2.5 to 5 times the size and
PVN> open the door to a potential malicious act because you want to be
PVN> entertained instead of informed? Any truthful historian must
PVN> acknowledge that 80% of the people are wrong at least 80% of th
Dear Goncalo,
@19-Mar-2006, 10:06 Goncalo Farias [GF] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas:
>>> Could we have the rules updates in regard to the HTML prohibition?
>>> HTML emails are a fact of life now...
TM>> big NO!
GF> Do you have good reasons or is it just no?
There is no reason nee
Hello Goncalo Farias & everyone else,
on 19-Mrz-2006 at 11:05 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote:
PO>> My vote: NO!
> Would you care to develop a little your position?
No objection folks, but please do it off list, and include the mods into
CC. Let us know the result when you're done, thanks.
--
Best
Hello Paul Van Noord & everyone else,
on 19-Mrz-2006 at 11:16 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
> You want to bloat the messages by 2.5 to 5 times the size
If thats a reason, please disallow S/MIME signatures as well.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Peer's Law:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, at 02:11:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:11 where I
live) 9val wrote:
> The Bat! 3.72.04 (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [-] (#0004597) Backuping IMAP mails fails
> [-] (#0005751) Message list header has w
3/19/2006 5:11 AM
Hi Goncalo,
On 3/18/2006 Goncalo Farias wrote:
GF>> Could we have the rules updates in regard to the HTML prohibition?
GF> --- "updates" = updated
GF>> HTML emails are a fact of life now...
You want to bloat the messages by 2.5 to 5 tim
In reply to :
>> Could we have the rules updates in regard to the HTML prohibition?
>> HTML emails are a fact of life now...
TM> big NO!
Do you have good reasons or is it just no?
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
I'm a virgin, but I'm just not very good at it.
___
In reply to :
MDP>>> Please do not send HTML messages to the list except for purposes of
GF>> Could we have the rules updates in regard to the HTML prohibition?
PO> My vote: NO!
Would you care to develop a little your position?
GF>> HTML emails are a fact of life now...
PO> As is cras
Hi MAU,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 12:59:21 AM, you wrote:
> Nice, but I agree with Zygmunt's comment, the dialog should be
> resizable. Any reason not to? Templates and filters in VFs are not easy
> to see.
I agree as well, however I would suggest that the VF properties is so badly
squashed that
Hi Roger,
Saturday, March 18, 2006, 5:34:05 AM, you wrote:
> Just a minor criticism! The first sub-title in the Template section
> is also 'Template'; this should rather be 'New message', as in the
> address book templates.
Also the filter section on the properties of a Virtual Folder is horribl
37 matches
Mail list logo
