Hello Gleason,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021, at 12:36:59 [which was on Sunday at 17:36 where I live]
you wrote:
>>> the macro WINDOWSMAJORVERSION still displays a 10 even when The Bat is
>>> running on Windows 11.
>>> Anyone else seeing this? I updated the OS via Windows Update, not via clean
>>> inst
Dear Stefan,
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, at 00:48:18 [which was on Monday at 22:48 where I live] you
wrote:
< ... >
> Now, it's time to reveal our development plans. At least, what I think
> our current plan is.
< ... >
Sounds like a great time to get back onto the beta after sticking with the last
Hello Maxim,
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, at 22:15:14 [which was on Wednesday at 20:15 where I
live] you wrote:
> Could you please test the The Bat! 5.1 MSI files and let us know if
> whey install well.
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_5-1-0.msi
Installed and running.
--
Dear All,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, at 19:53:07 [which was on Saturday at 19:53 where I
live] you wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, at 11:27:04 [which was on Friday at 09:27 where I live]
you wrote:
> The Bat! 5.1.0.1 (BETA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5101.rar
Hello Maxim,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, at 11:27:04 [which was on Friday at 09:27 where I live]
you wrote:
> The Bat! 5.1.0.1 (BETA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5101.rar
Not installed and not running.
My Reg code does not go to 5.1.
So I have gone to the la
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, at 23:16:36 [which was on Wednesday at 05:16 where I
live] you wrote:
> Does anybody run The Bat! under Windows Server 2008? Are there any problems
> under this operating system?
I was up to a month ago, and had no problems. I had to change my OS for other
reas
Hello Tbbeta,
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, at 23:43:08 [which was on Saturday at 00:43 where I
live] I wrote:
> OK so this is old version of TB!. I have gone up to 5 yet. I am waiting for it
> to settle down before I do.
I wish I had not upgraded. V5 has more bugs in it that the first version I was
usi
Hail RS,
On Sun, 8 May 2011, at 15:39:21 [which was on Sunday at 08:39 where I live]
you wrote:
>> When I move from one message to another (using CTRL + >) TB! disappears, in
>> one of the quickest shutdowns possible (AKA crash).
>> The 'normal' practice of switching it off and on again goes not
Hello Tbbeta,
The TB! is really starting to annoy me. This was happening with previous
versions, but I can not tell you when it started.
When I move from one message to another (using CTRL + >) TB! disappears, in
one of the quickest shutdowns possible (AKA crash).
It was present in the first pub
Dear Simon,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, at 08:52:33 [which was on Tuesday at 12:52 where I live]
you wrote:
>> This version of TB! is really starting to annoy me. This was happening with
>> previous versions, but I can not tell you when it started.
>> When I move from one message to another (using CTRL
Hello Tbbeta,
This version of TB! is really starting to annoy me. This was happening with
previous versions, but I can not tell you when it started.
When I move from one message to another (using CTRL + >) TB! disappears, in
one of the quickest shutdowns possible (AKA crash).
It was present in t
Dear Maxim,
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, at 13:53:11 [which was on Sunday at 11:53 where I live]
you wrote:
> The Bat! 5.0.9.3 (BETA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb5093.rar
> What's new in 5.0.9.3 since 5.0.9.2:
> [*] When encrypting a message, The Bat! will no l
Hello Rick,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, at 20:47:02 [which was on Sunday at 01:47 where I live]
you wrote:
DE>>> And frankly I am disappointed.
>> There are lot's of us who are disappointed
< ... >
> It is a "beta test" group in order to FIND these issues so they can be
> fixed.
Ok this is a beta
Greetings Dwight,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, at 07:37:59 [which was on Saturday at 13:37 where I
live] you wrote:
> On Friday, April 15, 2011, 11:46:52 PM, David Elliott wrote:
>> As far as I am concerned the only reeal difference between the last beta
>> version of 4 and the first pu
Hello All,
Since there was going to be no more developmet of Ver 4 as quoted in
I decide to move to 5.
I have taken the version publicly available from the web and installed
straight over the 4.2.44.2.
And frankly I am disappointed.
1 So far it has disappeared on me three times, in about 3 d
Hello All,
Since V5 is out in the wild, will there be any more development of ver 4?
--
Best regards,
David mailto:da...@elliott.uk.com
running TB! ver 4.2.44.2
on Windows 7 6.1.7600
Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | '
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, at 01:28:07 [which was on Monday at 23:28 where I live]
you wrote:
> 4.2.44.2 fixes transparent images in HTML and a rare AV when printing to
> non-default printer. This AV was introduced in version 1.62r.
> - If you have used 4.2.42 or earlier, just install the
Hello All,
OK so this is old version of TB!. I have gone up to 5 yet. I am waiting for it
to settle down before I do.
It is possible to create a folder with non printable characters if you
highlight a message and press Ctrl+shift+F
If you do and start it with * and use shift+ctrl+alt+l then you
Hi Maxim,
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, at 22:44:17 [which was on Sunday at 20:44 where I live]
you wrote:
> Could you please test 4.2.38 so we could release it on the website and
> continue the development ov v5?
Up and running here.
FYI
Have never gone 5.
--
Cheers
David
mailto:da...@ellio
tp3.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail)
with ESMTPA id <0kvj000re6b5o...@smtp3.clear.net.nz> for xx...@xx.xxx;
Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:04:19 +1300 (NZDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:04:45 +1300
From: x
Subject: family
To: David Elliott
Message-id: <9d9b7ffca8ce3550b5e0fe133f88a...@clear.
Hello Rick,
Historians believe that on 03 August 2009 , at 09:41:17[GMT -0400](which was
14:41 where I live) you wrote:
> I just changed the sort order in one folder. I left the folder and was
> prompted as expected and said yes to the change
> I went in to other folders and found that the sort
Hola Roelof,
Historians believe that on 18 July 2009 , at 18:02:20[GMT +0200](which
was 17:02 where I live) you wrote:
> I wanted to switch from otfe to plain, so I created a full backup,
> according to its settings including general options and address book
> and removed TB's registry se
Hi Roelof,
Historians believe that on 21 June 2009 , at 23:13:17[GMT +0200](which was
22:13 where I live) you wrote:
DE>> I pick an email to reply to and reply to it and then put it into the
outbox.
DE>> After this I can not send it with (any combination of) F2.
> What if you don't place it in
Hello Roelof,
Historians believe that on 21 June 2009 , at 23:13:17[GMT +0200](which was
22:13 where I live) you wrote:
DE>> I pick an email to reply to and reply to it and then put it into the
outbox.
DE>> After this I can not send it with (any combination of) F2.
> What if you don't place it
Hello Tbbeta,
I think that I have found my problem.
Account is set as follows.
Delivery type Immediate
Combined delivery.
Periodic checking each 5 minutes.
I pick an email to reply to and reply to it and then put it into the outbox.
After this I can not send it with (any combination of) F2.
H
Hello tbbeta,
I keep getting a problem sending messages.
It goes like this.
Get messages via pop.
Read messages and hit reply to all
save the messages.
Go back to the out box and finish replying.
put the messages back into the out box (not as draft)
The message then stick in the out box and it
Hola Maxim,
Historians believe that on 14 May 2009 , at 19:14:34[GMT +0300](which was
17:14 where I live) you wrote:
>>>running TB! ver 4.1.11.23
> Why are you running 4.1.11.23 while .28 was out on 13-May-2009?
Because I did not have time to update it.
--
Cheers
David
mailto:da...@elliott.uk.
Hola TbBeta,
Historians believe that on 10 May 2009 , at 22:37:02[GMT -0400](which was
03:37 where I live) you wrote:
> I have had 4 or 5 instance of "Cannot write to canvas" and some other
> messages that cannot be read that totally crash The Bat.
> I have been getting them when generating new
Hi Stuart,
Historians believe that on 07 April 2009 , at 18:32:29[GMT -0500](which was
00:32 where I live) you wrote:
DE>> I have this problem with mail sticking in the out box.
DE>> It has been happening for a few beta's but I can not remember when it
DE>> started.
> Is this IMAP?
This is POP
Hi NetVicious,
Historians believe that on 06 April 2009 , at 23:09:36[GMT +0200](which was
22:09 where I live) you wrote:
>> A very old question I would like to ask.
>> When backing up the window "Maintenance Center" has no minimize icon -
>> why? It's quite annoying because when TheBat is backi
Hi Martin,
Historians believe that on 06 April 2009 , at 13:56:18[GMT +0200](which was
12:56 where I live) you wrote:
> A very old question I would like to ask.
> When backing up the window "Maintenance Center" has no minimize icon -
> why? It's quite annoying because when TheBat is backing up t
Hello Tbbeta,
I have this problem with mail sticking in the out box.
It has been happening for a few beta's but I can not remember when it
started.
The mail just sits there no matter what I do.
Including Alt + F2, Shift + F2, Park then Unpark.
Once this happens it sometimes stops all messages
Hola Francis,
Historians believe that on 06 April 2009 , at 11:56:51[GMT +0200](which was
10:56 where I live) you wrote:
DE>> The number is left aligned with the symbol (of a paperclip) floats behind
in
DE>> the centre.
> The paperclip in centered; it should be right-justified.
Personally I th
Hello MAU,
Historians believe that on 05 April 2009 , at 02:41:06[GMT +0200](which was
01:41 where I live) you wrote:
>> Also the Attachments glyph now shows the NUMBER of attachments
> Not until you focus on the Message List pane for the first time and not
> for all messages. See attachment.
Hello Tbbeta,
I keep getting this on start up.
---
thebat.exe - Application Error
---
The instruction at "0x7c84afb2" referenced memory at "0x0014". The
memory could not be "written".
Click on OK to terminate the program
Click on CANCEL to deb
Hello Tbbeta,
I have
TB! 4.0.39.27 (ALPHA)
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition 5.2.3790
AVG 7.5 (Server version)
I have is set to do automatic backups.
On a start it was performing an automatic backup, and AVG was updating.
AVG needed TB! to be shutdown. As it was in the middle of a backup I
Hola Dwight,
Historians believe that on 24 November 2008 , at 18:06:46[GMT -0600](which
was 00:06 where I live) you wrote:
>> I started this thread, and at no point did state I had a problem with
>> Gmail. I just had a problem.
> are you saying that you didn't mention gmail at first, or that the
Hello Kertész,
Historians believe that on 24 November 2008 , at 03:29:03[GMT +0100](which
was 02:29 where I live) you wrote:
KV>>> IT IS NOT ABOUT GMAIL. Please read the mails we exchanged.
>> I have been reading the thread. For practical purposes it is about
>> Gmail.
> No. If you really rea
Hola Thomas,
Historians believe that on 24 November 2008 , at 09:26:50[GMT +0700](which
was 02:26 where I live) you wrote:
>>> Also, all users are taught how to use the webmail interface for
>>> their account(s).
DE>> Some account don't have such a thing.
> www.mail2web.com
LOL.
--
Cheers
D
Hello Paul,
Historians believe that on 23 November 2008 , at 17:14:49[GMT -0500](which
was 22:14 where I live) you wrote:
KV>> IT IS NOT ABOUT GMAIL. Please read the mails we exchanged.
> I have been reading the thread. For practical purposes it is about
> Gmail.
I started this thread, and at n
Hello Rick,
Historians believe that on 22 November 2008 , at 13:48:08[GMT -0500](which
was 18:48 where I live) you wrote:
> I received mail from all accounts this morning. Once I upgraded to
> 4.0.39.27 I was no longer able to send mail to (at least) the Gmail
> accounts. Back to .26 and the mail
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that on 22 November 2008 , at 17:02:57[GMT +0700](which
was 10:02 where I live) you wrote:
>>> I don't want any red windows. I'm not user v1.0, the log is enough.
DE>> Sorry you are wrong here.
> Interesting. I checked again and I still don't want any red window
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that on 22 November 2008 , at 13:08:00[GMT +0700](which
was 06:08 where I live) you wrote:
< ... >
KV>> If this is the case, I suggest showing a big red alert window to let
KV>> the user know about the unsuccessful import, with some possible
KV>> reasons
Hi Maxim,
Historians believe that on 20 November 2008 , at 21:52:20[GMT +0200](which
was 19:52 where I live) you wrote:
> The Bat! 4.0.37.26 (ALPHA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb403726.rar
> What's new in 4.0.37.26 since 4.0.34.25:
< ... >
> [*] (#00041
Hola Stefan,
Historians believe that on 19 November 2008 , at 23:31:14[GMT +0200](which
was 21:31 where I live) you wrote:
DE>> I think my point is that the message temp file wan able to be saved but it
DE>> appears the the server was told the the messages had been saved. (I could
be
DE>> wrong
Hola Marek,
Historians believe that on 19 November 2008 , at 21:11:56[GMT +0100](which
was 20:11 where I live) you wrote:
> Hello all,
> Wednesday, November 19, 2008, David Elliott wrote:
>> !19/11/2008, 19:47:08: FETCH - could not store message (file name -
>> C:\DOCUME~1\Da
Hello All,
I was looking at my logs and saw this.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 8< -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
19/11/2008, 19:46:31: FETCH - receiving mail messages
19/11/2008, 19:46:33: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake
>19/11/2008, 19:46:34: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 1A2280FB, alg
Hi Maxim,
Historians believe that on 20 October 2008 , at 13:15:32[GMT +0100](which
was 13:15 where I live) you wrote:
> Historians believe that on 20 October 2008 , at 12:36:31[GMT +0300](which
> was 10:36 where I live) you wrote:
>> The Bat! 4.0.34.16 (ALPHA) is available at
>> http://www.ritl
Hi Maxim,
Historians believe that on 20 October 2008 , at 12:36:31[GMT +0300](which
was 10:36 where I live) you wrote:
> The Bat! 4.0.34.16 (ALPHA) is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb403416.rar
> What's new in 4.0.34.16 since 4.0.34.15:
< ... >
> [+] Backup/R
Greetings Jens,
Historians believe that on 10 October 2008 , at 22:13:18[GMT +0200](which
was 21:13 where I live) you wrote:
> when trying to subscribe to TB-Tech
> does anybody know, what is wrong here:
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
> its recipients. The fol
Dear MAU,
Historians believe that on 07 October 2008 , at 01:01:33[GMT +0200](which
was 00:01 where I live) you wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>> I've just created several messages in the Outbox and sent them out by
>> mistakes, sorry. Please accept my apologies.
> Don't you wish you could have created
Salutation Jernej,
Historians believe that on 04 August 2008 , at 17:41:29[GMT +0200](which was
16:41 where I live) you wrote:
>> It did find the folders but all the names have become 8.3 names of random
>> letters and numbers.
>> I also have multi folders / accounts linked on to one folder.
>>
Hello Dan,
Historians believe that on 04 August 2008 , at 08:42:47[GMT -0600](which was
15:42 where I live) you wrote:
>> Well I have just had a power cut just as I was closing down TB.
>> Disaster.
> Too late of course for this time, but a good reminder to always have a
> UPS (unless you're on
Hello All,
Well I have just had a power cut just as I was closing down TB.
Disaster.
All my folder and account have disappeared.
I did the ctrl+shift+alt+L or what ever it is to find lost folders.
It did find the folders but all the names have become 8.3 names of random
letters and numbers.
I
Dear Ian,
Historians believe that on 13 June 2008 , at 16:28:35[GMT + (UTC)](which
was 17:28 where I live) you wrote:
> I have noticed that a number of toolbar options including the delete,
> forward & reply options are grayed out on my toolbar. If I quit the bat
> and restart, all is restore
Hi Vili,
Historians believe that on 08 April 2008 , at 09:32:24[GMT -0400](which was
14:32 where I live) you wrote:
>>> Voyager 4.0.18.4 is available at
>> See attached screen shot.
>> Installed on one computer in E: drive. Picture is from another computer
>> running it from F:
> I would say it
Hello Vili,
Tuesday, April 8, 2008, 2:32:24 PM, you wrote:
>>> Voyager 4.0.18.4 is available at
>> See attached screen shot.
>> Installed on one computer in E: drive. Picture is from another computer
>> running it from F:
> I would say it is a video card error on that PC. Tried to run it on
> a
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 12:40:57 PM, you wrote:
> Voyager 4.0.18.4 is available at
See attached screen shot.
Installed on one computer in E: drive. Picture is from another computer
running it from F:
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<>
Hello Maxim,
Saturday, March 29, 2008, 1:14:56 PM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 4.0.20.0 is available at
< ... >
Up and running.
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpQBOpvc4YoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 1:27:49 PM, you wrote:
> Voyager 4 BETA URL
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_install_4_0_18.exe
Installed Voyager Ok
Said I want to restore from a backup taken fro TB
The browse window is behind the main and the main window
Hello Rick,
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 11:37:29 PM, you wrote:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home_4-0-16-2.msi
> Not working
LOL
(not part of the TB dev team)
As a developer when any states that I take out a big bat and hit them. It
is as useful as a chocolate teapot.
The
Hello Rick,
Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 4:28:13 PM, you wrote:
PVN>>> years. The "Parked in Outbox" concept is not intuitive and I cannot
PVN>>> recall a single user figuring this out on their own.
>> I don't actually buy that.
>> Fact: you are editing a message. You have 4 disposition buttons at
Hello All,
Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 5:47:55 PM, you wrote:
> Hello MAU,
> Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 9:53:00 AM, you wrote:
>>> I would like to open a discussion for the need for a draft folder.
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
> :)
> You will find me adding my 2 penny worth on 11
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 9:42:40 AM, you wrote:
> Dear David_E,
> @4-Mar-2008, 03:54 David Elliott [DE] in
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DE>> I would like to open a discussion for the need for a draft folder.
DE>> Views ?
> Create a new folder.
> Name
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 9:42:40 AM, you wrote:
> @4-Mar-2008, 03:54 David Elliott [DE] in
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DE>> I would like to open a discussion for the need for a draft folder.
DE>> Views ?
> Create a new folder.
> Name it "Draft&qu
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 9:53:00 AM, you wrote:
>> I would like to open a discussion for the need for a draft folder.
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441
:)
You will find me adding my 2 penny worth on 11 Dec 2005 at 12:36
--
Best regards,
David
Hello Tbbeta,
I am trying to get ny old QT back in place and I am sure that I had one
with the handle of <> this would then expand out to < ... >
entering in theis handle and then pressing Ctrl + space brings up the list
of QT and not the QT it's self.
Has this behaviour changed?
--
Best regar
Hello All,
I would like to open a discussion for the need for a draft folder.
Views ?
It is something I have been asking for since ver 1.3.
Personally view.
I want a draft folder because to me there is a difference between
1) A message in the outbox that is complete but you do not want to sen
Hello Jernej,
Sunday, March 2, 2008, 8:28:25 PM, you wrote:
> I'm slightly annoyed by The Bat's insistence on colouring lines that
> contain some text followed by the greater-than (>) character as if the
> text was quoted. I know that the reason for this is because of support
> for putting initia
Hello Marek,
Saturday, March 1, 2008, 5:44:20 PM, you wrote:
>> 1) Trying to refilter a common filter to an inbox.
>> I highlighted a piece of mail in my in box and go to create a filter
>> for it. As it is a list email which I am on with more that one
>> account I think a common filter would be
Hello All,
Well I have been only using TB for less than 24 hours and it is
driving me mad. This is after a break of about a 5 months.
It is nice (or not) to see how something have not changed.
1) Trying to refilter a common filter to an inbox.
I highlighted a piece of mail in my in box and go t
Hi All
I hope this is in text format but as I have been reduced to using
gmail I can not guarantee it.
I have been using TB since about 1.3 but I do feel that even this
version 3.99.24 is not really any better.
Some things just have not improved.
e.g. backup up and restore.
Ok so I want to do
Elliott
So I can not use it to reply to.
- --
Good Bye, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| When someone hugs you, let
and my family.
:)
- --
See you in Cyber space, ___________
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| Looking for a car pool on the Infomation Highw
o problem,
but if the folder is at the same level as the account then it you get the
problem.
- --
Regards, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTEC
- --
Best regards, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| * <- Tribble *+ <- Grandpa Tribble with his cane
ed, and I can not remember how I did it before.
- --
Best regards, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| "I'l
Hello Marek,
Wednesday, April 26, 2006, 10:19:37 PM, you wrote:
>> In a previous version I could alter the order of the menu items. This has
>> been lost.
> please specify more, I have tried to change order of menu sections (Message
> and Special) and order of items and everything works.
On the
ber space, ___
David | David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| MOM'S HINT #316: Learn to catch a boomerang.|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8 ckt
Comment:
copy different machine will download the messages.
I will try and do a better report tomorrow.
- --
Ti2GO,___
David | David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello David,
Sunday, January 29, 2006, 12:17:06 PM, you wrote:
>> The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available from:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
>> Here is a short list of changes:
>> [*] When working with Exchange server, The Bat! queries messages
>> one-by-one.
> I wi
ange server, The Bat! queries messages
> one-by-one.
I will try it with exchange on Monday.
- --
Cheers, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAI
MAPI, since this is I am trying to use.
- --
BFN, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| Religious Error: (A)tone (R)
Hello All,
Just trying to move my copy of TB over to a new machine and I am running
into a few problems.
See below.
== 8< ==
19/01/2006, 16:20:29: FETCH - receiving mail messages
19/01/2006, 16:20:29: FETCH - connected to the Exchange serv
__
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| "Star Trek is okay, but I prefer science fiction." |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8 ckt
Comment
s folder properties would not over-ride my Address Book
> templates.
- --
Cheers, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| "S
I have not said anything recently about it because
it has always fallen on deaf ears.
- --
Bye, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| 2400 baud makes you want to get ou
king for a Draft folder for the past 5 years.
- --
See you in Cyber space, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| I know my own mind,
Hello Maxim,
Saturday, December 3, 2005, 12:07:04 AM, you wrote:
> There were opinions in the list that Voyager is another product to make
> money.
And so it should do. You should be rewarded for your efforts.
> The users of The Bat! Professional will use Voyager with their keys of
> The Bat! P
s not handle MAPI properly either.
Specifically It will not get any messages. It get the number of messages
but they do not appear.
- --
Cheers, ___
David |David Elliott| Softw
Hello Alexander,
Monday, November 21, 2005, 10:05:48 PM, you wrote:
>>> A feature that would be nice is a way to get round fire walls / proxy's
>>> at my current work that will not allow contact with the outside world
>>> except via a proxy on port 80 and one or two others.
>> You can activat th
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 11:01:45 PM, you wrote:
> Please try The Bat! Voyager BETA at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager.zip
> Just extract the ZIP archive to your flash drive and start from there.
> It will ask your order number from The Bat! Profe
Hello 9Val,
Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 3:30:23 PM, you wrote:
> So the .14 version is finally released and we start new beta cycle.
> It has just some cosmetic fixes over .13, but if someone likes to see
> higher version numbers, he could download .14 here:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
Well it is back.
I have the message ticked but no unread messages.
- --
TTFN, ___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer
ticker is still active and showing unread messages when there
are no messages left to read.
- --
Thanks, ___
David | David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | P
stick.
- --
Ti2GO,___
David |David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| Virgin wool comes from *UGLY* sheep!
for your time, ___
David | David Elliott| Software Engineer|
_| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 |
| "Notice how easily it detaches."--Ro|
Hello Thomas,
Monday, July 25, 2005, 2:09:00 AM, you wrote:
DE> Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
DE> Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list folder.
DE> Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
The one that is topmost, if "Co
Hello Peter and All,
Sunday, July 24, 2005, 7:44:21 PM, you wrote:
> on Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:32:54 +0100GMT (24.07.2005, 20:32 +0200GMT here),
> you wrote:
DE>> Have I got this wrong, or did it change.
DE>> A message can get caught by a number of filters.
DE>> Filter 1 catches spam and moves i
Hello All,
Have I got this wrong, or did it change.
A message can get caught by a number of filters.
Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list folder.
Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
--
Best regards,
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
