Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:38 AM Zygmunt Wereszczynski
wrote:
> On Friday, July 7, 2023, at 19:11:34 [UTC+0300] (Friday, July 7, 2023
> 18:11 my local time) Stefan Tanurkov via TBBETA wrote:
>
> > Version 10.4.0.9 is now available from
>
> The bug in scheduler appeared in 10.4 version an
Hi George,
I am glad that the process you described works for you... even if the need
to "press Enter" is a bit unusual, given that the red Delete button never
changes to a green Check button (as happens for other fields). But...
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:55 PM Георгий, Белрус wrote:
Anyway, I
Hi Marck
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:59 PM Marck Pearlstone
wrote:
> This was my solution to any new address book issues, adopted very early
> on. I find the new one unusable. Perhaps things have improved in it since
> its first introduction, but it was so unworkable I haven't risked looking
> a
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM Георгий, Белрус wrote:
> Open address book - find your contact - click on it - press green plus
> symbol near "add email", add email, press Enter
>
With all due respect, George, have you actually tried doing that? I have
tried it on 2 different computers, and clic
Hi all,
Could someone explain to me how to add an email address to an existing
contact in the TB10 address book. On Ritlabs.com, the instructions all
relate to the previous... less snazzy but much more convenient... address
book. In TB10 it's not at all clear to me how to edit an existing contact.
Hi all,
Just a bit of feedback...Probably it's just me, but over the last 5 major
versions (or thereabouts) I haven't seen much significant change in TB. And
that is really fine with me, because the modest improvements that have been
made were (for me) quite necessary. And, no question about it, T
Hi Miguel
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:13 PM MAU wrote:
Which was the sorce of the problem?
>
It was related to the email address. TB's OAUTH does not seem to work with
Gmail if "@gmail.com" is omitted (though that worked fine before). So, for
example, if the email address is x...@gmail.com, it wa
Hi all,
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:22 AM Thomas Fernandez ML
wrote:
> We care. At least, I do. However, I could not replicate your problem, I
> have mo problem using Gmail. Let's hope it stays that way after 30 May.
>
Thanks, Thomas. This was the second time I asked what for me was an
interesti
Hi all
On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 4:07 PM Jay Walker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:34 PM Jay Walker
> wrote:
>
>> Until now I've used Gmail with "less secure apps", and that worked fine
>> for me. Now, under the gun so to speak, I have
Hi all,
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:34 PM Jay Walker wrote:
> Until now I've used Gmail with "less secure apps", and that worked fine
> for me. Now, under the gun so to speak, I have disabled "less secure apps"
> and set up OAUTH authentication. And this works f
I know everyone has probably heard this many times and figured it all out.
But I'm not finding the solution, and I am stumped for days.
Until now I've used Gmail with "less secure apps", and that worked fine for
me. Now, under the gun so to speak, I have disabled "less secure apps" and
set up OAUT
Under Preferences>>Address history, there is a list of accounts. That list
of accounts corresponds exactly to the list presented with a "send to The
Bat!" command, the mailto: order. Hence, it would be useful to be able to
reorder the list. Is there any way to do that?
--
jaywalker
Windows 10 Pro
Hi Gwen and Thomas,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:35 PM Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
> Hello Gwen,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:11:18 +0200 GMT (22-Jun-20, 18:11 +0700 GMT),
> Gwen wrote:
>
> > Fixed in 9.2.0.5
>
> Confirmed.
>
Also confirmed. Thnks, Stefan.
--
jaywalker
Windows 10 Pro
The Bat! Pro 9.2
Hi Daniel
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:23 AM Daniel van Rooijen wrote:
> See https://www.ritlabs.com/en/support/tips-and-tricks/3831/#msg_editor
Thanks for the link. It is very helpful. Would have been easier to find if
the page
had somewhere mentioned "MicroEd". So one would naturally assume tha
Hello Gwen,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 5:41 PM Gwen wrote:
> Did you had reported the bug to https://bt.ritlabs.com/
> If yes, please give us the link so we can confirm.
>
No, Gwen, I have not reported a bug. Frankly, I was not even sure it is a
bug
until just now. For all I knew, it was just a pr
Hi all,
For some time I have noticed that every time I use Alt-L in MicroEd to
reset the flow of a paragraph, the Windows system sound (Windows
Background.wav) plays. This is quite annoying. The Alt-L command works as
expected, but the sound suggests there is a problem of some sort... and it
is ju
Hi all,
Sorry, but I have not been testing TB9. But I do have a problem with TB8
that seems to persist in TB9. Does anyone have a step-by-step process for
switching from access to Gmail over POP3 regular authentication to Gmail
with OAUTH authentication? When I make the switch under Transport opti
Hi Luko
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 11:52 PM Lüko Willms wrote:
>Such a global change should be possible to make by one stroke for the
> more than one address at the time
>
That would be convenient. But I don't see any way to do it. I'm not even
sure on what level that information is stored. It
Hi Viktor
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 6:29 PM Viktor Kabelac
wrote:
> Just from reading your problem description and the original issue - it
> seems to me that the secondary e-mail addresses are only being "dug up" if
> the option "Automatically add secondary addresses to the following field"
> of th
Hi Maxim
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:44 PM Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA <
tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com> wrote:
> The Bat! 8.6.0.3 (BETA) is available at
> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb8603-32.rar
> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb8603-64.rar
>
> What's new
One more issue - don't know if others have it - is that when I send a
message with a CC, it often remains in the Outbox after being
successfully sent.
This takes place in 5.0.18.1. I cannot say for sure whether it happens
in 5.0.18.2, because I had to revert after 18.2 created some
problematic dis
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Tony Hoare wrote:
> Some of my filters have conditions which filter by sender ONLY have had
> the sender value blanked out and therefore the filter matches all
> senders.
I can confirm that 5.0.18.2 broke my filters in a bizarre fashion,
necessitating
reversion to
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Rick wrote:
> That error when trying to associate file types with the Bat when loading
> should really be fixed. That is not a good one for new users
>
> ---
> Configure file & protocol handling
> ---
> Some of exte
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:44 PM, NetVicious wrote:
> domingo, 18 jul 2010 at 06:45, it seems you wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Mike. But I don't find any subfolder for my Inbox.
>
> 1. Press ESC key in the folder you have the problem for refresh it.
> 2. Do a maintenance check of that folder.
> 3. Close TB!
Problem solved... mysteriously.
I right-clicked the Inbox and clicked New and then Folder. I clicked
Cancel in the Create A New Folder dialogue box. And lo and behold the
(1) simply disappeared from the Total column for my Inbox. I guess
that was part of Ian's "etc." :)
--
jaywalker
Windows XP P
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Ian A. White wrote:
> The first number is the number of messages in the Inbox, and the
> second number is the number of messages in the sub-folders off the
> Inbox. If the numbers are bold, then that indicates there are unread
> messages.
Ian, thank for your help
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 8:54 PM, MikeD wrote:
> The number in parens is the number of unread messages in sub folders.
> So it sounds like you have a folder in your Inbox Folder and there is
> one unread message in that sub folder.
Thanks, Mike. But I don't find any subfolder for my Inbox.
--
Okay, while we are waiting for a new version of TB to talk about,
maybe someone can answer a small question for me.
In my list of folders I see the total for my inbox is 12(1). My
question is what does the "(1)" mean? If I delete all of the messages
in my inbox, then the total appears as "0(1)". 1
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 3:46 PM, Foster, Graham wrote:
> Where has the option gone to change the vile green text colour in the
> mail ticker gone. You can change the background - but I was convinced
> you could also change the text colour. Not in RC9 though. Anyone
> confirm it has gone (or was it
2010/6/14 Ian A. White :
> So I take it that The Bat! is going to move to a subscription model?
Ian, it doesn't strike me as much of a move. For just about all
practical purposes, TB licensing has been a subscription model since
v2.0. :)
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP3
The Bat! Pro 4.2.36.4 OTFE
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
> I have interest in seeing anyone else's email
Dwight, if that is your fetish, then perhaps you should join the FBI
or its equivalent is in your country. :)
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP3
The Bat! Pro 4.2.36.4 OTFE
_
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Feli Wilcke wrote:
> I'm quite sure that TB is not the only mailclient that has a different method
> for displaying HTML than Outlook.
Okay, but so what? All I said is that Outlook displays the HTML that I
receive much better than TB. Since you don't receive my
It seems to me that there is no argument that the HTML handling of TB
has great scope for improvement. On this thread alone, several persons
have reported problems, and the most that anyone has said about TB
HTML handling is that it is "sufficient" (for him). No one has said
that the handling of HT
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Feli Wilcke wrote:
> As for the comparison between HTMLrendering in outlook and TB: I have
> one account running in both MUA and cannot see there any major
> difference. For me, TB's HTML rendering is sufficient.
I have no idea what is MUA (make-up artist?), but
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
> seriously, team is finishing with new IMAP integration, but this spends much
> time, because a lot of other code needs to be changed.
I see. Thanks for the clarification. Seriously.
> BTW I do not know, what You think about HTML support, wha
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Rick wrote:
> Nope - we are all waiting for the next release with some major enhancements.
> :)
Well, Rick, I don't know if you are serious. That smiley is somewhat
confusing. But, if you are serious, could you maybe outline some of
the major enhancements. For exa
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
>> Just had a look in here after a long absence. Seems awfully quiet. Did
>> the old bat die?
>
> No recent betas and that diminishes the flow.
I understand. But is anything in the works? I looked and didn't see a
hint of things to come. Hence I
Just had a look in here after a long absence. Seems awfully quiet. Did
the old bat die?
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP3
The Bat! Pro 4.2.36.4 OTFE
Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/T
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
wrote:
> I just upgraded to 4.1: Got the message that the message base was being
> converted. Right after that, The Bat displayed the message "older version's
> index files found. It looks like an older version of
> Now whenever I st
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Robin Anson
wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 at 09:07:21 +1100, I wrote:
>> I downloaded the latest version from the Ritlabs download page, v 4.1.5 and
>> installed it over my v 4.0.38. It seemed to install correctly, and it
>> correctly updated 4 of my 5 accounts. Ho
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:57 PM, NetVicious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the current ALPHAs Ritlabs did a mailbase format change. In the
> firsts ALPHAs TB! detects the old format and asks for conversion. I
> don't remember which ALPHA was the first.
Thanks, but I don't think that this
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Hendrik Oesterlin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You might know that 4.0.34 had a bug in editing folder
>> properties. We have fixed that bug and and made a new version,
>> 4.0.36, available on the website.
>>
>> There is nothing new in 4.0.36 since 4.0.34 excep
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Jay Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My two questions are:
>
> o Is there a safe and sure way to upgrade to 4.0.38?
>
> o Is there some way to clean up my mail folders to reduce that huge
> 1.85Gb size to something closer to the
Hi,
I am using 4.034.8 OTFE. I tried to upgrade to 4.0.38 with the msi
downloaded from Ritlabs, but I lost messages and folders seemed to get
irreparably corrupted.
So I reverted to my stable 4.0.34.8 and restored from backup. But when
I look in my MailPwd folder, I see some subfolders with a lar
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Roland Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 15:52 you wrote in message
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> among others:
>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Livio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Livio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb402413.rar
>
> it does not recognize my thebat registration...
Confirmed. I am now in 30-day trial mode.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.24.13
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Hendrik Oesterlin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ian A. White" wrote on 19/03/2008 at 19:26:53 +1100
> subject "4.0.18: Two TB! entries in Task Manager" :
>
> > In Task Manager it is in the Applications tab.
Confirmed regarding Task Manager for Windows XP OTFE.
I
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's new in 4.0.20.3 since 4.0.20.2:
> [-] There might be a redundant square in the password prompt dialog.
Confirmed for Account Password dialog box in 4.0.20.4. (Never tried
4.0.20.3.) Presumably it is fixed for othe
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JW> Thomas, have you tried to drag a message from TB to a new message that
> JW> must be restored from the taskbar?
>
> That's because messages are dragged using internal drag-and-drop
> facilities, but you can switch wi
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JW> Thomas, have you tried to drag a message from TB to a new message that
> JW> must be restored from the taskbar? I used to be able to do that in
> JW> 3.99.29. In 4.0.20.2, I can only drag to a message that is not hid
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Confirmed. 4.0.14.9 works the same way as 3.99.29 did in this respect.
>
> JW> It seems that this is broken once more in 4.0.20.2.
>
> Not confirmed. Works fine here.
Thomas, have you tried to drag a message from TB
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Paul Van Noord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are Master, Account & Token PIN passwords used in TB to gain
> access to the program and/or specific accounts.
I mentioned that this "smudge" occurs on the Master Password dialog
box. Peter confirmed that it occurs
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Jay Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> until 3.99, You could select messages in messages list or in finder
> > >> >> and
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Paul Van Noord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/11/2008 Jay Walker wrote:
>
> JW> Sorry, Paul, but I don't follow you. What is the different purpose? In
> JW> both cases, is not the purpose to gain access to TB and its stored
>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Paul Van Noord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JW> I am not clear on why there are these language changes: "Start-up"
> JW> versus "Master Password" and "input" versus "enter". Wherever
> JW> possible, consistent language and grammar is probably better.
>
> They're dif
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Peter Hampf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Answering a current message (Thursday, April 10, 2008, 16:46)
> JW> When launching TB in OTFE Pwd mode, the initial password screen has a
> JW> small dark gray area on the bottom left side.
>
> I guess you are talking about t
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Peter Hampf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JW> When launching TB in OTFE Pwd mode, the initial password screen has a
> JW> small dark gray area on the bottom left side.
>
> I guess you are talking about this:
Yes, that is what I am talking about. Just now I tried it
When launching TB in OTFE Pwd mode, the initial password screen has a
small dark gray area on the bottom left side. It does not affect
functionality. It just looks funny/curious.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.20.2
Curre
Here's a weird one. This morning I was looking at the last message in
one folder. I changed folders, and when I went back to the previous
folder, the message was gone... along with several preceding messages.
Then I went to my inbox, and the last 9/10 of the messages were
missing. Okay, I knew this
Sorry, if this is OT, but I am talking about something that is
advertised on the Ritlabs Web site as "a new email service from
Ritlabs and Google" and "only for users of The Bat! v4".
As far as I can tell, thebat.net is a standard service offered by
Google to anyone with a registered domain for wh
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's new in 4.0.18.3 since 4.0.18.2:
> [-] Docking of toolbars in the main window is back to normal
Confirmed.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.18.3
__
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Art <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Confirmed in 4.0.18.1. Art's workaround - reverting to 4.0.14.3 - also
> > confirmed.
>
> Looks like it's been fixed in 4.0.18.2!!! Yay! Now I can get rid of the
> 4.0.14.3 executable.
Art, I regret to say that it is not complete
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Hendrik Oesterlin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kertész Vilmos" wrote on 18/03/2008 at 11:46:51 +1100
> subject "Alt-L issue" :
>
> >> using Alt-L to reformat a paragraph, reforts it, but doesn't return
> >> the cursor at the beginning of the paragraph as it used to
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Art <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The toolbar locations appear not be positioning correctly. On 4.0.14.3 it
> works fine ie. you can position/snap the tool bars correctly. From 4.0.14.4
> and on you cannot and they will only snap into the message list pane, or the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's new in 4.0.18.1 since 4.0.18:
> [-] (#0006911) MicroEd: Pasting multiple lines after EOT did not work
Confirmed.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2
The Bat! Pro 4.0.18.1
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> Wednesday, March 12, 2008, MikeD (2) wrote:
>
> > OK ... it has been quiet here for a while. I didn't think much
> > about that (it has happened before right after a big release), but
> > I just got an ema
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, MAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Jay,
>
> > Anyway, I have now filed a bug report at
> > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6911.
>
> Just added a note saying:
>
> ,- [ ]
> | Confirmed with 4.0.18.
> |
> | Not if I just position cursor at EOF, but YES
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Zygmunt Wereszczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday, March 10, 2008, at 20:02:40 [UTC+0200] (Monday, March 10,
> 2008 19:02 my local time) Jay Walker wrote:
>
> > 3. Do a Ctrl+V (or paste by any other means).
>
> > I invar
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Dwight Corrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. Click the Reply button for any message.
>
> > 2. Copy some text from the new message, and scroll down to a new line
> > after the end of your new message.
>
> > 3. Do a Ctrl+V (or paste by any other means).
>
> I can c
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Volker Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Reply to: »Jay Walker« · 2008-03-10 · 07:37 h (CET)]
>
> Moin, Jay!
>
> > When I try to paste anything at the very end of a message - as
> > little as one line below the end of the mess
When I try to paste anything at the very end of a message - as little
as one line below the end of the message - TB now coughs up the
following error:
List index out of bounds (7)
Hope it's not contagious.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 4.0.16.2
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> until 3.99, You could select messages in messages list or in finder and
> >> >> drag them to editor window, message were attached as MIME.
> >> >>
> >> >> This is broken in 4.0
>
> It's fixed in the current beta ve
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [-] (#0006860) Messages could not be dragged from messages list to Editor
> > window
>
> partially fixed, because when I select messages and drag them to editor in
> taskbar, editor window is not focused. Only way is to us
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello MAU,
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:16:51 +0100 GMT (26/02/2008, 19:16 +0700 GMT),
> MAU wrote:
>
> >> until 3.99, You could select messages in messages list or in finder and
> >> drag them to editor window, message we
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for the problem with 4.0 and copy-paste from UNIX text, if someone
> > confirms this, can you please post a bug notice for me (assuming it
> > does not yet exist). Sorry, though I am still an avid Bat user, I
> > don't
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jens Franik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think, the Guys at Ritlabs do for their dayly
> work? This bug was already fixed silently...
Jens, thanks for the information, but I would like to have
confirmation before I upgrade to 4.x again. Please underst
On Feb 19, 2008 11:09 PM, Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Bat! 4.0.14.3 is available at
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40143.rar
>
> What's new in 4.0.14.3 since 4.0.14.2:
Not to nag or anything, but I guess it cannot hurt to remind. Until
the bug with copy
On Feb 18, 2008 2:29 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> JW> When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line
> JW> is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is
> JW> stripped off.
>
> Could you tell me what editor you were using for copying
> text in UNIX format pl
On 2/18/08, Jay Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line
> is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is
> stripped off.
>
> For me this makes TB unusable. The problem is I don't know how to
When I copy and paste from a text file in UNIX format, the first line
is okay, but with every subsequent line the first character is
stripped off.
For me this makes TB unusable. The problem is I don't know how to
safely go back from 4.0 to 3.9. Any advice?
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The
On 10/29/05, Leif Gregory wrote:
> I'm sending this through Gmail.
The only problem I have with Gmail is that the Web interface (which I
am using now) currently strips trailing spaces and hence corrupts the
sig delimiter. However, this does not happen when sending over the
Gmail server from TB.
-
On 10/28/05, Jay Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not necessarily. Since 3.62.01, I cannot delete some attachments,
> notably the ones with long names with unknown characters (derived from
> unsupported languages). I can save the files to disk, but when I try
> to delete the a
On 10/26/05, Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
>
> >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5232
> > You consider this bug *major*? Wow, how often do you cancel saving an
> > attachment? ;-)
>
> :)) Maybe I overstated that :))
Not necessarily. Since 3.62.01, I cannot delete some
On 10/6/05, Peter Meyns wrote:
> JW> Peter, this is simply not logical. OTFE is not a factor for you, but
> JW> that does not mean it is not a factor for others.
>
> That's why I added "(alone)".
Peter, I am sorry that I misunderstood you, although now your remark
seems to be theoretical on an ent
On 10/6/05, Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it true that the problem only exists when dealing with large folders, e.g.
> more than 5000 messages per folder?
No, the problem occurs with much fewer messages as well.
Sorry, but I don't have anything to add to that report. It is as
si
On 10/3/05, Peter Meyns wrote:
> MS> As wrote in my first post. I click on the "Find messages" in the
> MS> toolbar on top. The first default search option is "Text" "Contains"
>
> MS> So I give a text string to find and I push the start button. When I
> MS> push the stop button to stop the search
On 10/2/05, Martin Schoch wrote:
> But then I can't stop the search - to click the button "Stop" doesn't
> end the search...
With OTFE, the search has never worked for me. Not only the Stop
button does not stop, but the search never finishes. Hence, confirmed
and reconfirmed... to the point that
On 9/2/05, Paul Van Noord wrote:
> Seems to me you have hardware problems such as too little available
> RAM, slow hard drive, etc. If you are using a notebook with a 4200 rpm
> hard drive and/or you have little _available_ RAM you are going to
> have slow searches. Also, there may be limitations w
Installed the new MSI (officially released by RL). Restored just one
account - with the least number of messages - from backup. Searching
the same directory with less than 2,000 messages in both Non-OTFE and
OTFE, here is the comparison:
Non-OTFE:
o Search starts after about 1 second
o Searc
On 8/31/05, Simon Fincham wrote:
> In the main this is working well, no major issues.
Unless the search engine stops hanging on OTFE searches that work fine
with non-OTFE, then I would not consider any release to be "working
well, no major issues". The failure of the search engine to function
in O
On 8/30/05, Roger Phillips wrote:
> JW> By the way, I note that at least some of my shortcuts no longer work.
> JW> I have tried to assign shortcuts to "Mark as Junk" and "Mark as NOT
> JW> Junk" on the Specials menu. No matter what shortcuts I assign, they do
> JW> nothing. But I can perform the o
On 8/28/05, Roger Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunday, August 28, 2005, 5:58:09 AM, among other things, you wrote:
>
> JW> Yep, that does the trick. Thanks. (But I still think that RL should
> JW> fix this bug.)
> Agreed, but I suspect that like a lot of what RL consider minor bugs
> it
On 8/27/05, Cees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TF> Or, into what directory should I put it?
>
> you can either delete it, or extract it in the directory your
> thebat.exe
> resides. It won't do any harm.
Are you sure about that Cees? I have a BayesIt subdirectory, in which
resides a file
On 8/28/05, Greg Strong wrote:
> > I am still missing at least one menu item in 3.60.05. On the Specials
> > menu, there is an empty spot under View Source that contains a submenu
> > for New Watch Replies Folder.
>
> Can NOT confirm.
>
> IIRC I had a similar problem. I think it was the 'tbuser.d
On 8/28/05, Roger Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to edit your tbuser.def file
>
> Using the Edit\Find facility, find the row "container item
> [MailerForm].[mWatchRepliesIn]" and change it
> to "container item [MsgCtl].[mWatchRepliesIn]".
Yep, that does the trick. Thanks. (But I
I am still missing at least one menu item in 3.60.05. On the Specials
menu, there is an empty spot under View Source that contains a submenu
for New Watch Replies Folder.
--
jaywalker
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No OTFE) 3.60.02
I have no problem with the "Attachments" label. I wondered about it in
the beginning, but figured it was another GUI cosmetic enhancement. I
agree with Marek that now it is here we should just leave it. However,
I think Simon raises two very good points as well. Please see below...
On 8/21/05, Sim
It starts slow and eventually hangs/freezes. Stopping is still
difficult. After stopping a frozen search, I got some AVs and a
"System Error, Code: 1400, Invalid window handle". (And, of course,
the same search works fine when OTFE is not enabled.) Reverting to "No
OTFE".
So I hope that this "fore
On 8/5/05, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> JW> Added a note to the report.
>
> Your note does not fit into the scheme: you have posted a MIME entry
> for a text/plain message part without *any* filename, which is not
> even explicitly attached. The code you posted does not relate to the
> described bug
On 8/4/05, Vili wrote:
> Could you export and send me in private the mail that has this
> part.att problem?
Not this time, Vili. I don't share personal email on principle. Think
of it as a Catholic priest sort of thing. But if I get something less
sensitive, I'll pass it on.
--
jaywalker
Windows
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
