Hi Paul,
PC> amazing how many people either ignored the notes or didn't read
PC> them... but this was inevitable, considering the way they put
PC> out the betas. First free, then policy to be detailed later.. I
PC> don't like going from a registered version to an evaluation
PC> copy, not know
Hi Tony,
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 4:39:27 PM, you wrote:
TB> A reminder of what Yuki Taga typed on:
TB> 03 September 2003 at 09:56:00 GMT +0900
YT>> Is this a TB problem, or an XP problem? Anyone else notice this?
TB> All mine change colour when the mouse passes ov
Hi Alexander,
Monday, September 22, 2003, 4:10:39 AM, you wrote:
AL> Hello Yuki,
AL>On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:59:29 +0900 (21.09.2003 19:59 my local time)
AL>you wrote about "Viewer settings incorrect?",
AL>at least in part:
YT>> I still think the option to download the images or not i
This is a nice baby-step forward for iso-2022-jp reading, however it
is only partially implemented, and the implementation still fails to
even match 3rd-party capabilities that have been around for years.
To wit: Absolutely no message subject lines are readable. They are
not readable in the subje
Hi MaXxX,
Monday, November 10, 2003, 11:42:54 PM, you wrote:
M> On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 2:01:10 PM, Yuki Taga has typed
M> the following text:
>> NEXT unread is always that, the NEXT unread. It should have no
>> connection with PREVIOUS unreads, whether they exist or
MG> interesting, yet probably unrelated:
MG> In the email header pane the Cyrillic text appears properly, yet when I
MG> select it by clicking once in the line, I get to see 'funny' characters.
MG> (I use the font Microsoft Sans Serif.)
MG> Regards,
MG> Markus
Anyone know why I can read this Cy
Hi Stefan,
Friday, February 6, 2004, 9:26:16 PM, you wrote:
ST> Hello Yuki,
YT>> Stefan . . . is this EVER going to be fixed?
ST> Yes, serious changes will be made in the next release - we're going to
ST> replace the current HTML and Windows editors completely with a more
ST> sophisticated one
Hi Allie,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 10:44:56 AM, you wrote:
AM> Greg Strong, [GS] wrote:
MDP>>> ... and look! Keeping Symantec cost her two message base folders.
MDP>>> I'm not perpetuating a flame war here, but I stand by my advice,
GS>> You should because the individual's problem was fixed.
Hi Marck,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 9:38:31 AM, you wrote:
YT>> Now, if this happens again, I understand I have an option to
YT>> delete these messages on the server via the dispatcher.
MDP> Correct.
YT>> I have never used this feature however, and it appears the only
YT>> 2 options are 'all me
Hi Marck,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 9:39:49 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Greg,
MDP> @7-Feb-2004, 18:15 -0600 (08-Feb 00:15 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in
MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
GS>> I'm not looking for a flame war here. I am not defending Symantec
GS>> because I do feel they do hav
Hi Greg,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 9:47:57 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hello Yuki,
GS> Saturday, February 7, 2004, 6:27:45 PM, Yuki Taga wrote:
YT>> Well, the big thing for me right now is I'm whole again. Restored
YT>> the message files, deleted the index files, and new indice
Hi Peter,
Sunday, February 8, 2004, 12:26:39 PM, you wrote:
MDP>>> That makes no sense. Clearly Symantec has switched itself into
MDP>>> an aggressive AV stance that *will* impede you again. Like I
MDP>>> say, it has done this to others before. Why should you now be
MDP>>> immune again?
AM>> Are
Hi Peter,
Friday, May 28, 2004, 1:45:42 AM, you wrote:
PM> I'd think so too. I don't know why such a thing should be
PM> implemented in a mailer. For IM I'll stick to Miranda. *s*
I will *never* download another edition of TB, beta or otherwise. The
program is careening off course (IMO), in grea
Hi Peter,
Monday, February 25, 2002, 2:43:45 AM, you wrote:
PH> Good evening DG,
PH> on Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:17:11 -0500 GMT your local time you wrote:
DRS>> 1] Upon opening The_Bat! the display windows remain black for 1 to 3
DRS>> seconds. This did not happen in beta 42.
PH> not confirmed.
Hi Alexander,
Thursday, March 7, 2002, 6:02:22 AM, you wrote:
TMB>> Personally, I find it odd that Address Book and
TMB>> Sorting Office can't be found in the same place.
AL> Dammn, why???
AL> AddressBook is part of information stores, SO - tool for
AL> management... There are also rather weak
Hi Lars,
It doesn't seem to be that. I already have TweakUI, so checking this
was rather easy. That setting is unchecked for me. So I wonder what
else it might be.
Yuki
Sunday, March 10, 2002, 6:30:44 PM, you wrote:
LG> Hi Yuki,
LG> On Sunday, March 10, 2002 at 18:15:26 [GMT +0900], you wro
Hi Eddie,
Tuesday, March 12, 2002, 6:52:53 PM, you wrote:
>> Yes, and if they upload self-extracting archives, the whole thing
>> becomes moot. Nobody has to download anything except the beta.
>> Ever.
EC> I confess having an archived file is much more convenient for me.
EC> I have three differ
Hi Jernej,
Saturday, March 16, 2002, 3:10:50 AM, you wrote:
MS>> Do they support extended character sets?
JS> Yes. They would be pretty useless for me without them, as Slovenian
JS> language uses 3 letters, not found in the standard character set (just
JS> look at my last name :)
Noticed your
Hi All,
How many sort by 'Created' and 'Descending' (old mail at the top of
the message list, new at the bottom)?
Of you folks, how many would like to see more new mail in the message
list, and less old mail?
I have brought this up once before, I think, and it still is a pain
that I think the d
Outlook and TB used to fight over associations every time one was
opened after the other had been in use. Well, actually Outlook
didn't fight; it just quietly stole. Then TB would fight back after
it was reopened.
Quite suddenly, this behavior has stopped, and opening Outlook no
longer causes T
Hi Allie,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 11:12:07 PM, you wrote:
MM>> One wish: Don't You want to change number of new version to 1.6
ACM> I agree with this completely. You can't ignore human perception.
Yes indeed. If a nine-month beta program produces a version change
of only 0.01, something is
Hi Marcus,
Saturday, March 23, 2002, 6:53:10 PM, you wrote:
MO> I installed the final 1.60 yesterday and everything worked great.
MO> Launched it and ended it a few times without any problems.
MO> However, when trying to launch TB! this morning, I got an error
MO> message (see attached file). Wh
Hi Syafril,
Wednesday, June 26, 2002, 5:01:16 PM, you wrote:
SH> Well...how if we discuss about next version of TB!, talking
SH> about :
SH> - News Reader Do we need separate program
Separate or none, is my vote. People pounding and pounding for a
darn news reader seem to think it's iden
Hi Maxim,
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 3:47:05 PM, you wrote:
>> just wondering .. when will ISO-2022-JP character set will be
>> supported. :)
MM> In version 2, this is a very specific charset.
Any time frame for a beta on that? (she asked, hopefully)
Best,
Yuki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
U
Hi Keith,
Thursday, October 24, 2002, 3:11:49 AM, you wrote:
KR> Surprisingly, I notice that you and I are both still around
KR> I'm quoting nearly your entire message because it's 8 months old
KR> and still very well stated, yet unanswered, as far as I know.
KR> Eight months ago, you were t
Hi Dierk,
Thursday, October 24, 2002, 5:14:08 PM, you wrote:
>>> I guess I keep believing in Marck. :P
>> You and I both, I guess
DH> Just one more and Marck could become the leader of registered
DH> religion.
ROTFLOL :)) Domini, domini, domini, Pearlstone espiritu sanctu, or
something l
Hi Alexander,
Monday, December 23, 2002, 10:07:35 PM, you wrote:
AL> Hello Yuki,
YT>> The sender may have a copyright, but that copyright only applies
YT>> if I do something publicly with the mail.
AL> Well, well, well ...
AL> First of all Copyright _concept_ define rights for any product in
AL
Hi Dierk,
Monday, December 23, 2002, 10:36:22 PM, you wrote:
>> No, I don't think you have thought through this issue thoroughly.
DH> Well, I guess since you don't think I am entitled to my opinion, and
DH> keep being derogatory to me, I just do what I've never ever done
DH> before, create a kil
Hi Mario,
Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 5:39:46 PM, you wrote:
MC> I am new to this list and to The Bat as well. I am currently
MC> testing the latest beta version to see whether it works well with
MC> the Japanese language too, being this the primary feature I am
MC> interested in. I would like to kn
Hi Marck,
Wednesday, July 9, 2003, 8:33:32 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Have you looked at the current beta? IIRC, DBCS is already being
MDP> tested right now.
No Marck, I'm still on 1.62. Some of the problems reported with some
of the betas have scared me off a bit. I didn't see any mention of
DBCS, s
Can we go straight from 1.62r to this version 2 beta?
Are there any changes to the DBSC capability (particularly Japanese)
from beta 11?
Yuki
Current beta is 1.63b11 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDL
31 matches
Mail list logo
