-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 4:08pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
Just a little addition: providing an easy way to forge
X-Mailer/Received headers would immediately classify The Bat! as
spamware.
BM This just sounds like paranoia.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 12:12am -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
JA It seems to me that RITLabs has just saved themselves a world of pain
JA for now.
You've just saved me from a lot of typing. Thank you! ;-)
That was exactly what I was going to say.
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 11:35am -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
At 12:33 AM on Sunday, July 27, 2003 it seems you posted the
following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to
%SETHEADER etc. macros:
How about an option to not show any X-Mailer?
Of course
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
Just a little addition: providing an easy way to forge
X-Mailer/Received headers would immediately classify The Bat! as
spamware.
BM This just sounds like paranoia.
BM For sending mail, there are more than enough net tools available to
BM spammers the provide far
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
BM X-Ray is a fine tool but is a bit buggy. I regularly run into it
BM hanging on output filtering when I send longer emails or emails with
BM attachments.
I've noted this as well. However, if you use X-Ray with a local
mailserver, negotiations are rapid and the
Hello Allie,
I do think that this falls out of the scope of a simple MUA. This sort
of processing should be done by the MTA, nuh? It would seem that with
a good mailserver you should be happy. :) It would do all you want,
i.e.,. MDaemon is certainly capable of all that.
There are other
Greg Strong, [GS] wrote:
GS There are other things to consider such as available ISPs, their
GS TOS, your individual purpose for email, and costs. If you use email
GS professionally, then you may want a business account that provides
GS the ability to have your own mailserver.
You don't need a
Hello Allie,
You don't need a 'business' account to use your own mailserver. I've
never had a business account and my only regret is that I took so long
to start using my own mailserver. It was actually saving me money in
the early stages of using one since it avoided my having to pay for an
Greg Strong, [GS] wrote:
I'm cc'ing this response to TBOT so we can continue there.
GS Ok my error. I should have simply stated you need a ISP whose
GS internet gateway will provide the ability for having a mailserver. I
GS should probably check into such an account due to my interest here.
I
Hello Allie,
GS I have to many Pop accounts. Once they are set up in TB it isn't
GS much of a problem, but still to many. I'd like to check into your
GS configuration, but it would require a change in my ISP.
Why?
I believe the TOS expressly states use of enterprise solutions. ISPs in
the
Hello Bill,
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 15:39 GMT -0400, engineers were awed when
Bill Mccarthy [BM] constructed:
BM First of all, you are only addressing pre-Inbox (not pre-Outbox)
BM filtering.
Very true, which is why I said it might not be elegant enough.
BM Secondly, this approach, AFAIK,
Hi!
How do they work? I cannot make them work for me...
%SETHEADER(field,value)
%ADDHEADER(field,value)
no action at all... What am I doing wrong?
--
|\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ WWW: http://none :(
| \/ | /\ \~/ E-M: maxxx[at]rpg.pl
|| /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\ ICQ: 3146019
B-stok/PL, Saturday, July 26, 2003
Hello MaXxX,
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, at 10:44:43 (which was 10:44 where I live)
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
M no action at all... What am I doing wrong?
You have to add it to the list in Messages - Message headers
in TB!
Hi MaXxX,
On Saturday, July 26, 2003 at 10:44:43 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
How do they work? I cannot make them work for me...
%SETHEADER(field,value)
%ADDHEADER(field,value)
no action at all... What am I doing wrong?
The header fields you try to change have to be set as Allow to edit
this
14 matches
Mail list logo
