Hello Maxim,
you should consider storing the Splash images in program folder (instead
incorporating in exe) and resize dependant on DPI of output device.
--
Regards
Gwen
Using The Bat! Version 8.6.0.21 (BETA) (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 17763 )
pgpWDURc5bHlj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Title: The Bat!
Hello Tbbeta,
PC left doing nothing for several hours - with TB! running. Came back to it and saw this
5.3.2.2 Beta
--
Best regards,
gandalfmeister mailto:gandalfmeis...@gmail.com
Current beta
Title: The Bat!
Hello Tbbeta,
Config = IMAP based Google account, running Folder analyse on the inbox. I select "recommended actions" and get this as an error message.
I just installed the latest beta 5.3.2.1 - and as I'm new here I don't know if this is a known issue. This problem also occur
Hello All,
I have just had the attached error message appear. Can anybody tell me what
it really means? I had just shut down the Connection Centre because it
could not connect to my service provider.
--
Best regards,
Roger
:flag-SouthAfrica:
The Bat! v5.0.18.2 (B
Hello Tbbeta,
IMAP didn't get message bodies in 4.2.36, we've made 4.2.36.4, please test it
and let me know.
If you had 4.2.36 installed, please uninstall it prior to installing 4.2.36.4
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_rus_4-2-36-4.msi
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/theb
Здравствуйте, Tbbeta.
--
С уважением,
Sergey Voronov
svo...@gmail.com
Current beta is 4.2.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
--
Rick
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss
people. - Eleanor Roosevelt
v4.2.13.3 ALPHA on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 3
Current beta is 4.2.13.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
htt
After viewing several messages or folders the following error starts
---
The Bat!
---
System Error. Code: 1410.
Class already exists.
---
OK
---
Restarting the bat will stop the error for a few min
Hello Tbbeta,
The Bat! 4.2.10.3 is available at
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb42103.rar
What's new in 4.2.10.3 since 4.2.10.1:
[*] Prepare for "Certified for Windows 7"
[-] When inserting a block from file in MicroEd, the editor window went to
background, and the main The
test
--
Art
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.
:flag-cayman:
__
TheBat! Pro v4.1.11.12 on Windows XP Service Pack 3
Current beta is 4.1.11.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current beta is 4.0.34.13 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
+OK
Received: from hpsmtp-eml32.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.77.179]) by
CPEXBE-EML29.kpnsp.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 2 Oct 2008 19:56:22 +0200
Received: from cpbrm-eml21.kpnsp.local ([195.121.247.250]) by
hpsmtp-eml32.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959
Hello tbbetas,
Sorry about the previous wrong submission however it was as a result
of a bug!
I had opened a new mail from TBBETA folder and seeing this then
deleted it and selected the correct addressee. Although the deletion
appeared visually to work in practice it did not and it retai
Hello,
hhf reeer 44334 rrr aswssd jjj
Best regards, Graham
--
Graham Howe mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using TheBat 4.0.12.2 on Windows 5 SP2
Current beta is 4.0.12.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.sil
2/7/2008 12:31 PM
Hi Rick,
On 2/7/2008 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG> Hmmm - one can highlight the lines and just Align ...
RG> It the department of Redundancy department working overtime? :))
Better than missing! This type of redundancy is everywhere. Why do we
have buttons and menu commands for th
> As far as I can tell, "alignment" works on one line and "format
> block" will change the alignment for the entire block that the
> cursor is in. You can highlight the entire block and use "alignment"
> to get the same results.
Maybe then Alignment should be "Format line"?
But now tha
>> I dont see any functional difference...
> As far as I can tell, "alignment" works on one line and "format
> block" will change the alignment for the entire block that the
> cursor is in. You can highlight the entire block and use "alignment"
> to get the same results.
That is true, I
I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
before release In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block
options are wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
Confirm?
>>> Why do you think this is incorrect? The block is very general na
RG>>> I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
RG>>> before release
RG>>> In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block options are
RG>>> wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
RG>>> Confirm?
>> No. They appear correct to me.
> Hmmm - one can highli
>>> I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
>>> before release In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block
>>> options are wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
>>> Confirm?
>> Why do you think this is incorrect? The block is very general name,
>
> 2/7/2008 12:03 PM
> Hi Rick,
> On 2/7/2008 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG>> I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
RG>> before release
RG>> In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block options are
RG>> wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
RG>>
2/7/2008 12:03 PM
Hi Rick,
On 2/7/2008 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG> I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
RG> before release
RG> In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block options are
RG> wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
RG> Confirm?
Hello Rick,
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 5:39:20 PM, you wrote:
RG> I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed before
RG> release
RG> In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block options are
RG> wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
RG> Confirm
> On Thursday, February 7, 2008, at 11:39:20 [UTC-0500] (Thursday,
> February 7, 2008 17:39 my local time) Rick Grunwald wrote:
>> I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
>> before release In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block
>> options are wrong (the are
I posted this yesterday with no confirmations. It should be fixed
before release
In the Edit Messsage Menu - the Format / Format Block options are
wrong (the are the alignment options) Graphic enclosed
Confirm?
--
Rick
Bush - 7 years of shame
v4.0.0.22 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pa
Hello Henk,
Friday, January 11, 2008, 1:44:27 PM, you wrote:
HMdB> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 13:33:29 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:33 where I
HMdB> live) Charles Hinchliffe wrote:
>> Hello Tbbeta,
HMdB> Who's calling?
Sorry, I must have sent that by accident and didn't realize it.
--
Best reg
Hallo Charles,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:33:29 -0600GMT (11-1-2008, 20:33, where I
live), you wrote:
CH> Hello Tbbeta,
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel sing
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 13:33:29 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:33 where I
live) Charles Hinchliffe wrote:
> Hello Tbbeta,
Who's calling?
- --
Henk M. de Bruijn
_
The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.0.9 (ALPHA) Pro on Windows XP SP2
A
Hello Tbbeta,
--
Best regards,
Charles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.0.9 (ALPHA) on Windows Vista
AntispamSniper for the Bat! 2.7.1.5
__
Hello Cees,
hlmr>> Здравствуйте, .
> pity I ain't at work because I have the flue; otherwise I could have asked
> for a translation with my Russian colleague.
> But let me take a wild guess: Viagra: special offer!
No. She said "Hi". (8 years of learning Russian :))
--
Vili
The Bat 3.99.6
Het was zondag 2 december 2007 om 23:12 uur dat jij iets schreef over '(no
subject)' :
Hallo heilga-lj,
hlmr> Здравствуйте, .
pity I ain't at work because I have the flue; otherwise I could have asked
for a translation with my Russian colleague.
But let me take a
Здравствуйте, .
--
С уважением,
heilga-lj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Sean,
on Monday, 29. October 2007, at 02:35:35 [GMT +0100] you wrote
regarding "(no subject)":
> I would like to participate in beta testing. Please forward me a link if more
> testers are needed/wanted. Thanks.
New Beta will be anounced on this list plus download
I would like to participate in beta testing. Please forward me a link if more
testers are needed/wanted. Thanks.
Sean Greenwood
2302 Fannin, Ste. 500
Houston, TX 77002
713.659.7617
Fax 713.659.7641
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web www.csj-law.com
_
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:20:05 +0100 GMT, Jens wrote:
> Guten Tag Perry Nelson,
> am Samstag, 3. März 2007 um 12:06 schrieben Sie:
>> , so I conclude the error is being thrown by Firefox,
>> not by any of the recent betas. I am using Firefox version 2.0.0.2.
> It seems like you are using some kind
Hello Simon,
A reminder of what Simon typed on:
Saturday, March 03, 2007 at 09:26:55 GMT +
S> Hi Maxim,
S> In your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent on Friday,
S> March 2, 2007, 5:50:37 PM, you wrote:
MM>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
S> I am sure th
Hi Alexander,
Friday, March 2, 2007, 10:51:27 PM, you wrote:
> For me, the downloads from ritlabs.com are rather slow for a while now,
> between 25kb/s and 35kb/s at best. Is it only me?
Same here.
--
Warmest regards,
Paul
Created using TheBat! 3.98.1 on Windows XP
__
Guten Tag Perry Nelson,
am Samstag, 3. März 2007 um 12:06 schrieben Sie:
> , so I conclude the error is being thrown by Firefox,
> not by any of the recent betas. I am using Firefox version 2.0.0.2.
It seems like you are using some kind of DynamicDNS Service - such a
page is usually needed to fi
Hi Simon and fellow beta testers,
Friday, March 2, 2007, 3:30:44 PM, you wrote:
RS>> Up & running fine here except for the attached that
RS>> happens with the last couple of betas when I click on a
RS>> link inside a message like the one above. After getting
RS>> that error, TB! continues on and
Hello all,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, Simon wrote:
> I am sure this worked correctly in an earlier Beta I have the
> settings as detailed below via the Url's. I 'think' the Backup file
> should simply be named by date, which is fine for me. There is no
> duplicate filename in the destination
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, at 14:57:23 [GMT -0500] (which was 20:57 where I
live) Ron Secord wrote:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
RS> Up & running fine here except for the attached that happens with the
RS> last couple of betas when I click on a link inside a messag
Hi Alexander S. Kunz,
Friday, March 2, 2007
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Hello Maxim Masiutin & everyone else,
> on Friday, March 2, 2007 at 18:50 you (Maxim Masiutin) wrote:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
> For me, the downloads from ritlabs.com a
Hi Maxim,
up and running with OTFE.
--
Regards,
Martin
The Bat! v3.98.3 powered by Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000
ConCarne cooks best since 1998
http://www.concarne.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current bet
On Friday, March 02, 2007 Maxim Masiutin, [MM] wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
Up & running fine here except for the attached that happens with the
last couple of betas when I click on a link inside a message like the
one above. After getting that error,
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, at 19:50:37 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:50 where I
live) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
Up and running, so far so good ;-)
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
Th
Maxim,
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
> [*] (#0006188) Possible data loss after editing opened attachments!
> Now the attachments are being saved with read-only attribute files
> to disk, so the external editor should not allow the user to edit the file.
> [-]
Hello all,
Friday, March 2, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> [*] (#0006188) Possible data loss after editing opened attachments! Now
> the attachments are being saved with read-only attribute files to disk,
> so the external editor should not allow the user to edit the file.
fixed
> [-] Removed the
On Friday, March 2, 2007, 11:50:37 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
> [*] (#0006188) Possible data loss after editing opened attachments!
> Now the attachments are being saved with read-only attribute files
> to disk, so the external edi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39803.rar
[*] (#0006188) Possible data loss after editing opened attachments! Now the
attachments are being saved with read-only attribute files to disk, so the
external editor should not allow the user to edit the file.
[-] Removed the "Ser
Hallo Rick,
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:00:55 -0500GMT (17-2-2007, 18:00 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
[moderator on]
Please use a proper subject when posting to this list.
[moderator off]
RG> I think it may have been reported before but threading isn't working
RG> properly i.e. it does not always
I think it may have been reported before but threading isn't working
properly i.e. it does not always maintain the correct date order
(please see the enclosed graphic)
--
Rick
The Bat Version 3.96.8 (BETA)
<>
Current beta is 3.96.07 | 'U
2/3/2007 9:00 AM
Hi Eddie,
On 2/3/2007 Eddie Castelli wrote:
EC> Dear all,
EC> I have being actually waiting for this. I have again a 'ntdll.dll'
EC> Error. This time with the v3.95.6. The ERROR is exactly the same as
EC> with my prior version. I my latest posting from Jan 21. 2007 (see:
EC> m
Dear all,
I have being actually waiting for this. I have again a 'ntdll.dll'
Error. This time with the v3.95.6. The ERROR is exactly the same as
with my prior version. I my latest posting from Jan 21. 2007 (see:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Maxim replied on
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,-[ Maxims reply in
Dear Zygmunt,
-->> Freitag, 22. September 2006, 16:54:16:
> I made small mistake because body of the message should be separated
> by "&" character (not by "?"). This causes the message has only the
> subject, but the URL works. The following working example is
> correct:
> mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Dear Zygmunt,
-->> Freitag, 22. September 2006, 11:23:08:
>> Any Idea what I do wrong?
> You should encode all special characters like ()[]. etc...
> As an example use this:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> F%5B%5D
Thanks. I did change the brackets, left them out, encoded them but
nothing worke
Hello Eddie,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:31:13 +0100 GMT (22/09/2006, 14:31 +0700 GMT),
Eddie Castelli wrote:
EC> This Returns only "[Photo" in the Subject line and not even a text in
EC> the body. Even when I correct it to:
EC> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EC> it does not change.
This works fine here
Eddie Castelli wrote:
> I have a Text in Word with a Hyperlink behind. The Hyperlink looks
> like this:
>
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] selection]?body=I chose...
> Any Idea what I do wrong?
You should encode all special characters like ()[]. etc...
As an example use this:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Dear all,
I have a Text in Word with a Hyperlink behind. The Hyperlink looks
like this:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] selection]?body=I chose...
This Returns only "[Photo" in the Subject line and not even a text in
the body. Even when I correct it to:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it does not change. Ne
Hello Ron,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in
RC> Unfortunately, even though I successfully unpacked the beta, I still
RC> can't use it because my The Bat program is too far outdated.
As was told to you. You need to install the full version 3 before
installing the beta on top. There were a lot
Hello Ron!
On Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 12:09 PM, you wrote:
> The problem with the "broken header" was that my WinRar program was
> outdated.
Thanks for reporting. May help the next person who has a similar
problem.
> Unfortunately, even though I successfully unpacked the beta, I still
Hello All:
The problem with the "broken header" was that my WinRar program was
outdated.
Unfortunately, even though I successfully unpacked the beta, I still
can't use it because my The Bat program is too far outdated.
Ron
Current
Hello Greg,
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:53:01 -0600 GMT(12/18/2005, 9:53 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Strong wrote:
I changed the program file. The exact lines from the log file are
below including the header.
> ,- [ ]
> | "No","Time","Process","Request","Path","Result","Other"
Hello Henk,
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:08:07 +0100 GMT(12/18/2005, 2:08 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
>> It is just some logging done by the Windows. So, it is not TB! related
>> issue, I think.
> Checked the registry but could not find this "mount" information.
Hello Vili,
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:53:57 +0100 GMT(12/18/2005, 1:53 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vili wrote:
>> Yes, but the really strange thing is it turned up when I was
>> filtering on 'thebat.exe' which is why I asked the question here.
> It is just some logging done by
Hello Henk,
> 2920,59.15,"thebat.exe:1844","CreateKey","HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\MountPoints2
Well, I don't think it's TB! itself - at least, these points are
unknown to me. From what I found in the Net, it's something about
mounted network drives
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, at 08:53:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 8:53 where I
live) Vili wrote:
> Hello Greg,
2920,59.15,"thebat.exe:1844","CreateKey","HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\MountPoints2
>>> Well, I don't think it's TB! itself - at least, these points are
>>> unknow
Hello Greg,
>>> 2920,59.15,"thebat.exe:1844","CreateKey","HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\MountPoints2
>> Well, I don't think it's TB! itself - at least, these points are
>> unknown to me. From what I found in the Net, it's something about
>> mounted network drives. My gue
Hi Greg!
> Why are there new 'CreateKey' and 'SetValue' requests outside the
> typical 'RIT' or 'Mail' paths as per the detail below?
> 2920,59.15,"thebat.exe:1844","CreateKey","HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\MountPoints2
Well, I don't think it's TB! itself - at least,
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
