Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello 9Val, V>>> It just happens with the 1st mail. If you create 2 draft mails, the V>>> 1st has problem, the 2nd not... V>> Unfortunately can't reproduce" V>> So now you find the reason with Peter or not? I mean "It was about V>> problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :)

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Vili, V>> It just happens with the 1st mail. If you create 2 draft mails, the V>> 1st has problem, the 2nd not... V> Unfortunately can't reproduce" V> So now you find the reason with Peter or not? I mean "It was about V> problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :)" in

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello 9Val, V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): >>> Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written >>> to you... :-) V>> :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation V>> of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) > :P We

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Vili, V>>> Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): >> Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written >> to you... :-) V> :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation V> of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) :P We found

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Peter, V>> Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): > Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written > to you... :-) :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) -- Vili

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Vili, On 12-07-2005 22:50, you [V] wrote in : V> Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written to you... :-) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.5.21 Pro MyGate, AVG ~11 POP

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Peter, > On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in > : >>> - I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often >>> leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in >>> the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing.

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Jonathan, On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in : >> - I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often >> leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in >> the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing. JA> I've

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Jonathan, On 12/07/2005 09:27 AM -0500, you wrote: > See, this is where I get confused. On my settings, I have "don't > synchronize" on all, and I don't have it set to peek inside certain > folders for mail counts, and yet it still goes inside every folder to > see the contents. I'm guessing

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Allie Martin, On Saturday, July 02, 2005, you wrote: I've been playing some serious catch up. Work is being incredibly evil, so I'm having issues keeping up at the moment > I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably. As have I more recently. > However, I'm now having an Inbox problem tha

Re: Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi 9Val, On 05/07/2005 04:19 PM +0300, you wrote: >> TB!'s parking and flagging are not standard. > > It is wrong suggestion - TB! uses standard flags both for flagging and > parking. Which one does it use for parking? I see that the standard 'flag' for marking a message as 'important' is wh

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Allie, > TB!'s parking and flagging are not standard. It is wrong suggestion - TB! uses standard flags both for flagging and parking. > I haven't tried to do this, but I think when you delete the HTML > component, you're deleting the HTML component from the cached copy of > the message an

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

On Monday, July 04, 2005 at 4:06:25 AM [GMT -0500], Tony Boom wrote: > As far as I remember if you park a message in TB it will show flagged as > important in Mulberry and vice versa, as far as I remember that is. I just tried it. Parking doesn't show up in Mulberry. However, flagging in TB! sho

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On 3 July 2005 11:02:20 -0500 Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However, you'll not be able to appreciate the flags when using other clients like ThunderBird or Mulberry. As far as I remember if you park a message in TB it will show fl

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

On Sunday, July 03, 2005 at 8:41:34 AM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin wrote: > Maybe there is some way I'm missing to do a few other server side > message management functions? Nope. A lot of what you can do to messages in TB! are just POP stuff which may be done only to the local cache copies of m

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Allie, Saturday, July 2, 2005, 11:22:03 PM, you wrote: >> I must say I'd sure rather make my filters in TB! than the clunky HTML >> interface at fastmail. > FastMail supports Seive scripting. It's a special filtering script. > Instead of using the filter creation interface, you can create

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 2:10:09 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon wrote: >> - I no longer use the ticker. I may revisit this since I haven't tried >> it in a long time. > I use it. It works fine Really? I just tried it and have to assume that you use it only as an indicator that new messages ha

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 8:38:33 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin wrote: > do you ever get to negative numbers, such as -7? No. I've managed to get to a -3. :) I see this when I'm browsing and marking messages read when the message count is reasserting itself. Usually, the counter goes to 1

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 8:37:19 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin wrote: > Why this has to do with the filtering topic is that I have tried using > TB! filters and they only filter at the inbox, and only when one opens > the inbox. Therefore, if one creates filters to move mail at home, > that

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Allie, Saturday, July 2, 2005, 11:56:55 AM, you wrote: > - I start TB! and there are for example 5 messages in the Inbox. > - I select the Inbox and start reading/deleting mail. > - The Inbox counts do not reflect the changes even though the deleted > messages disappear from the list and

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Manuel, Saturday, July 2, 2005, 10:52:29 AM, you wrote: >> - I don't filter much with TB! > I filter nothing with TB!, because that's one of the things that brought me > many duplicates... IMAP us good because when I read mail at home and some at the office, and some on the road. It's nic

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Allie Martin - On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, at 08:23:10 [GMT -0500] (which was 6:23 AM where I live) you wrote: After a long absence, I decided to play with the latest build of TB. To my surprise, it appears to be significantly more robust that any previous r

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 10:52:29 AM [GMT -0500], Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > What's so curious about your inbox? Why does it differ from other > folders? And what works better with an empty inbox? It's a curious problem. - I start TB! and there are for example 5 messages in the Inbox. - I s

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Allie, On Saturday, 02 Juli 2005 at 3:23 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote: > - I avoid working with large mailboxes, i.e., no more than 4000 messages > per mailbox. This may be even less if I end up having say 5 or more > folders with a large amount of messages. That's right. The same applies for

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

--On 2/07/2005 08:23 -0500 Allie wrote: However, with all that, I still somewhat prefer what it's doing now to Mulberry I admire your tenacity, Allie. How much of a bat masochist can you become before you start screaming? As far as I'm concerened TB! has become like a Ming vase - something t

IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi all, I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably. However, I'm now having an Inbox problem that doesn't seem to affect other mailboxes. I'm therefore considering a workaround. It's then that it struck me that I use a lot of workarounds with TB!. I'll list them here so that others and the develop