Mod: Top posting (was: Images in HTML mail)

Hallo Gleason, On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:29:02 -0400GMT (6-7-2012, 15:29, where I live), you wrote: GP> Steven P Vallière, GP> This is not confirmed here. >> >> Before I start, let me say that I've asked this several >> times before and I expect to get shot down again just like >> I did back then

Mod: Top posting (was: 5.0.34 MSI files)

Hallo Curt, On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:28:15 -0500GMT (28-1-2012, 23:28, where I live), you wrote: CAD> Installed with success Win7/32. CAD> -- CAD> Best regards, CAD> Curt CAD> Sent from my office desktop by The Bat! CAD> I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless CAD>

Mod: Top posting (was: 5.0.22.3)

Hallo Carsten, On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:22:38 +0200GMT (4-8-2011, 20:22, where I live), you wrote: CGS> Even when the Connection Centre is set to "Show always", it is not displayed CGS> upon start of TheBat. I observe this for quite some time now with 5.x. CGS> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Etha

Mod: Top posting (was: 5.0.9.7 (Priority List))

Hallo RS, On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:02:31 +0800GMT (30-4-2011, 12:02, where I live), you wrote: R> Best regards, R> RS R> Saturday, April 30, 2011, 4:44:20 PM, you wrote: >> Hi, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if thei

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: TLS + Self Signed Certificate)

> Wow! This is becoming pandemonium! One individual has already been > blocked for ignoring moderations on top posting. It is one of the > rules we don't let slide because of how badly illegible threads > become. Please read the moderation notice properly. Sorry, I didn't quite read the list's rule

Mod: Top posting (was: .136 Sections Leak)

Hallo Simon, On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:41:50 +GMT (7-2-2011, 16:41, where I live), you wrote: SM> I actually reported this about a month ago, but was ignored. Glad SM> someone else has reported it. SM> -- SM> __ _ Debian GNU User Simon Martin SM>/ /(_)_ __ _ ___ __ __ Project Manager

Mod: Top posting (was: 5.0.0.117)

Hallo Andreas, On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:05:13 +0100GMT (14-12-2010, 12:05, where I live), you wrote: AS> Grüße AS> Andreas AS> 2010/12/14 Feli Wilcke : >> Hello Andreas, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their pos

Mod: Top posting (was: Error from TB when shutting down computer)

Hallo Alireza, On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:36:53 -0800 (PST)GMT (15-11-2009, 12:36, where I live), you wrote: AN> Regards, AN> Alireza AN> AN> From: Roger Phillips AN> To: TBBETA Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the p

Mod: Top posting (was: HTML Templates in AB Groups)

Hallo Dmitry, On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:46:39 +0300GMT (26-11-2008, 12:46, where I live), you wrote: DN> Best regards, DN> Dmitry Novikov DN> Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 2:00:02 PM, you wrote: >> Send TBBETA mailing list submissions to >> tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com Note: This moderator'

Mod: Top posting (was: 4.0.34.21 U+R)

Hallo Axel, On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:11:45 +0100GMT (13-11-2008, 20:11, where I live), you wrote: AF> Hallo Maxim Masiutin, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't fee

Mod: Top posting (was: IMAP update)

Hallo Rimvydas, On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:43:08 +0200GMT (28-10-2008, 14:43, where I live), you wrote: RZ> I think you know the answer:) RZ> Vilius Šumskas wrote: >> Hello, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their pos

Mod: Top posting (was: 4.0.28.2)

Hallo Carsten, On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:00:57 +0200GMT (18-8-2008, 15:00, where I live), you wrote: CGS> BRgds, CGS> Carsten CGS> Saturday, August 16, 2008, 10:12:41 AM, you wrote: >> The Bat! 4.0.28.2 is available at >> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40282.rar Note: This

Mod: Top posting (was: Access Violation when saving QT editor)

Hallo Andrew, On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:55:45 +0200GMT (20-6-2008, 14:55, where I live), you wrote: AG> Confirm, this scenario also gives AV for me. AG> Using The Bat! v4.0.24.23 on Windows XP SP3 AG> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello all, Note: Th

Mod: Top posting (was: Damaged folders in Voyager)

Hallo [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:28:38 +0100GMT (18-4-2008, 16:28, where I live), you wrote: HAN> Best regards, HAN> Hamish HAN> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HAN> ===8<==Original message text=== HAN> Reply to message sent 04/18/2008, @ 08:33:06 (1:33 AM Locally)

Re: [?? Probable Spam] Mod: Top posting (was: Window Split Mode after change of screenresolution)

Hi Roelof, funny :-) Your moderating message got from my Antispamsniper at the subjectline the addition [?? Probable Spam] -- Regards, Gunivortus Using The Bat Vs. 4.0.20 under Vista Ultimate 32 bit Current beta is 4.0.18.7 | 'Usin

Mod: Top posting (was: Window Split Mode after change of screen resolution)

Hallo Carsten, On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:37:27 +0200GMT (1-4-2008, 10:37, where I live), you wrote: CGS> Rgds, CGS> Carsten CGS> Tuesday, April 1, 2008, 10:32:13 AM, you wrote: >> Hi Tbbeta, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied t

Mod: Top posting (was: Plugins for Hotmail and Yahoo ?)

Hallo Bob, On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:42:44 -0700GMT (15-1-2007, 17:42, where I live), you wrote: BR> retrieve hotmail via the http link. BR> Bob Riley BR> On 1/15/07, Martin Schoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the perso

Mod: Top posting (was: strange behaviour)

Hallo Aurel, On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:18:06 +0200GMT (8-12-2006, 19:18 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AB> No, would you file one? AB> 07.12.2006 10:24 you wrote: PH>> Answering a 4 days old message (Sunday, December 3, 2006, 17:00) Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers a

Mod: Top posting (was: could not open attached files)

Hallo Aurel, On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:05:54 +0200GMT (3-12-2006, 16:05 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AB> Thank you for suggestion - all the extensions were missing. Reset helped. AB> 03.12.2006 16:20 you wrote: MM>> Hello all, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and n

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Help backup)

Sorry about that responded with the crackberry. -- Tim Current beta is 3.81.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ri

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: The Bat! 3.65.03 is now available)

Marck, > Dear Gleason, > @16-Jan-2006, 12:18 -0500 (16-Jan 17:18 here) Gleason Pace [GP] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to 9Val: > ... GP>> .. OK, TB, you get another chance. > ... but not the list rules, huh? ;-) Arg. It was such a dainty little top post. -- Gleason Using Th

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: The Bat! 3.62.12 is now available)

Hallo Marck, zaterdag 5 november 2005, 9:32:01, schreef u: > Dear Renate, > @4-Nov-2005, 19:30 +0100 (04-Nov 18:30 here) Renate Brentjes [RB] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: RB>> yes here also up and running with no problems > > Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all reader

Mod: Top posting (was: The Bat! 3.51.4 is now available)

Hallo Gleason, On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:39:09 -0700GMT (15-7-2005, 23:39 +0200, where I live), you wrote: GP> Yes, still getting AV errors when trying to reply to certain messages. GP> It will happen every time I try to reply to that message. Replies to GP> other messages are not affected. >>> Th

Mod: Top posting (was: AV in Network and Administration)

Hallo cmwilliams, On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:06 +0100GMT (3-7-2005, 22:06 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> change settings from LAN to dialup, not ideal for automatic periodic checking! C> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 16:35:00 +0200 you wrote: C> Hi Mary, C> on Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:14:45 -0500GMT (03.07.2

Mod: Top posting (was: rc6: add rest of addresses yes/no dialog buttons are reversed)

Hallo Arthur, On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:40:32 -0700GMT (13-5-2005, 6:40 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AT> Thanks for confirming this Stuart. I hope this is fixed in the AT> upcoming release. AT> Take care, AT> Arthur >> Hello Arthur, >> Monday, May 9, 2005, 1:09:41 AM, you wrote: Note: This m

Mod: Top posting (was: Icons Standard Toolbar - difference in versions)

Hallo Michael, On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 10:22:53 +0200GMT (10-4-2005, 10:22 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MM> work with a screen resolution of 1280x1024 (32bit) in W2K SP4. MM> Regards, MM> Michael MS>> Hi tbbeta MS>> I already asked the question - but now again. Note: This moderator's i

Re: Mod: Top posting

Stuart, On 10-01-2005 16:49, you [SH] wrote in : PF>> Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that PF>> version has a number of bugs. SH> So what do you want, a rushed version that may still have big holes in SH> it or to wait a while for one which, we

Re: Mod: Top posting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that PF> version has a number of bugs. So what do you want, a rushed version that may still have big holes in it or to wait a while for one which, we /all/ hope, has these major problem

Re: Mod: Top posting

Stuart, On 10-01-2005 09:55, you [SH] wrote in : SH> So what? I'd happily wait as long again for a full release that was SH> - relatively - bug free and functional. Why the rush? Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that version has a number of bug

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

EJM> The question still remains. We are now into the second week of EJM> January. So what? I'd happily wait as long again for a full release that was - relatively - bug free and functional. Why the rush? -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Aided

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting

JS> On Saturday, January 8, 2005, 21:18:27, Goncalo Farias wrote: >> Just to clarify a little, some people I know, using MS Outlook, attach >> images using 'copy & past' and when I get their emails the images are >> not there but the same message, when opened with Outlook, has the >> attach

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

ASK> Hello Goncalo Farias & everyone else, ASK> on 08-Jan-2005 at 21:14 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: EJM>>> As for waiting, I'm all for waiting. However, the last beta round, as EJM>>> well remember, was dropped with a new version issued. >> A new PAID version, if I remember correctly. ASK> The

Re: Mod: Top posting

On Saturday, January 8, 2005, 21:18:27, Goncalo Farias wrote: > Just to clarify a little, some people I know, using MS Outlook, attach > images using 'copy & past' and when I get their emails the images are > not there but the same message, when opened with Outlook, has the > attachment wher

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

Hello Goncalo Farias & everyone else, on 08-Jan-2005 at 21:14 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: EJM>> As for waiting, I'm all for waiting. However, the last beta round, as EJM>> well remember, was dropped with a new version issued. > A new PAID version, if I remember correctly. The last beta cycle re

Re[5]: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

GF> Attachments tend to disappear, ie. images attached by copy&paste GF> means. Just to clarify a little, some people I know, using MS Outlook, attach images using 'copy & past' and when I get their emails the images are not there but the same message, when opened with Outlook, has th

Re[4]: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

EJM> Saturday, January 8, 2005, 10:03:19 AM, you wrote: >> I would wait much longer just to see some long time reported bugs >> corrected. In a couple of days I'll post an email criticizing some >> annoying, reported and unsolved (so far) bugs. EJM> I too am very interesting to see

Re[3]: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

Saturday, January 8, 2005, 10:03:19 AM, you wrote: > I would wait much longer just to see some long time reported bugs > corrected. In a couple of days I'll post an email criticizing some > annoying, reported and unsolved (so far) bugs. I too am very interesting to see what the new rele

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

RT> Hello Ethan, >> Is there an update on the next full release version of The Bat as >> indicated prior to Christmas? RT> I can wait till it is ready. Let Ritlabs take the time they need to RT> get all the changes they plan done. I would wait much longer just to see some long time report

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

Hello Raymund Tump & everyone else, on 08-Jan-2005 at 14:33 you (Raymund Tump) wrote: > I can wait till it is ready. Let Ritlabs take the time they need to > get all the changes they plan done. Well said. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using TB! v3.0.2.1

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

Hello Ethan, > Is there an update on the next full release version of The Bat as > indicated prior to Christmas? I can wait till it is ready. Let Ritlabs take the time they need to get all the changes they plan done. -- Best regards, Raymund __

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

Friday, January 7, 2005, 11:38:21 AM, you wrote: > Friday, January 7, 2005, 5:01:59 AM, you wrote: E>> Any time line on the next beta or release? I'm following up to the E>> time line suggested in the December 15, discussion on the next E>> release. The question still remains. We are now into t

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 01:08:04 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > The trout is the fish used in the Asterix comic books by the fish > dealer called Verleihnix in German (don't know his name in other > languages). He slaps people with this dead and wet and apparently > smelly fish when they do somethi

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

Hello Avi, On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:19:41 +0200 GMT (17/11/2004, 21:19 +0700 GMT), Avi Yashar wrote: >> )<)))'> AY> Roelof and Marck and maybe Mary, I've been wanting to ask about that AY> trout. I know that this is not a term that was made up here on tbbeta, AY> but I am still curious. What does

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Dear Paul, @17-Nov-2004, 13:40 -0500 (17-Nov 18:40 UK time) Paul Van Noord [PVN] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: >>I don't understand what you mean by this? PVN> It is necessary for me to read all the redundant messages to be PVN> certain something is new or different. It is necessary f

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Hello Paul, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 10:40:38 AM, you wrote: > However, if the tone is to repeat, repeat, repeat the same > information or make cute remarks I may need to unsubscribe and spend > time someplace more informative. I may be way out of line here but... In the years I have been

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Received From: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul, Please do no include your reply after a (-- ) + new line. This way it is automatically removed on reply. The (-- ) is a signature delimiter. Try to reply to your own message (in TB!) to see what happens. On 17-11-2004 18:20, you [PVN] wrote

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Hello Paul, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 10:20:04 AM, you wrote: Paul> I did not realize it takes 15 swats with a sledge hammer by Paul> several people to pound a single carpet tack. Why wasn't there a Paul> welcoming message explaining the rules? There was. When someone subscribes they are alw

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Paul, Please do no include your reply after a (-- ) + new line. This way it is automatically removed on reply. The (-- ) is a signature delimiter. Try to reply to your own message (in TB!) to see what happens. On 17-11-2004 18:20, you [PVN] wrote in : PVN> I did not realize

Re[2]: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Received From: Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul, On 17-11-2004 17:20, you [PVN] wrote in : PVN> I am ready to receive something of substance. I never cease to be PVN> amazed at how much effort is given to the insignificant. With this attitude I doubt anyone will give

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter

Paul, On 17-11-2004 17:20, you [PVN] wrote in : PVN> I am ready to receive something of substance. I never cease to be PVN> amazed at how much effort is given to the insignificant. With this attitude I doubt anyone will give you something of substance. The list rules are n

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter (was: test gmail retr)

Received From: Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Paul, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 7:43:31 PM, you wrote: P> Thanks for fixing my ignorance! I never knew TLS and SSL were P> synonymous! You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the same issues. Note: This moderator's interject

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter (was: test gmail retr)

Hello Stuart, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 8:36:19 AM, you wrote: Gregory>> You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the Gregory>> same issues. S> Is that a record? I don't believe so, but I could be wrong. -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x

Re: Mod: Top posting AND sig delimiter (was: test gmail retr)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregory> You've now been moderated by all three moderators for the same Gregory> issues. Is that a record? - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.3, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:25:17 -0500, Wolffe wrote: > A> Do you suppose the moderators could start using something like a > A> limp banana instead... something that would not offend the > A> sensibilities of vegetarian, animal-rights activists like me? :-) > > 50 lashes with a wet noodle! I reckon

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

Greetings BatPeople, Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 9:44:10 AM, Avi wrote: A> Do you suppose the moderators could start using something like a A> limp banana instead... something that would not offend the A> sensibilities of vegetarian, animal-rights activists like me? :-) 50 lashes with a wet no

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 AY> Do you suppose the moderators could start using something like a AY> limp banana instead What and have the WTO on their back from using bananas from the wrong country?! I shouldn't think so. Anyway I think that they're all kinda hooked on the fishy

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:26:47 +, Stuart Hemming wrote: > AY> What does a trout have to do with top posting > AY> and missing signature delimiters? > In of itself, nothing. The trout is what they hit you with for such > heinous crimes as Top Posting or a badly formed ssig > delimiter! Well, S

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

Hello Avi, A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on: 17 November 2004 at 16:19:41 GMT +0200 AY> What does a trout have to do with top posting AY> and missing signature delimiters? If your a naughty boy you get a slap with a big wet fish. As most moderators on here are very poor th

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 AY> What does a trout have to do with top posting AY> and missing signature delimiters? In of itself, nothing. The trout is what they hit you with for such heinous crimes as Top Posting or a badly formed ssig delimiter! - -- Stuart Hemming Using Th

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:33:53 +0100, Roelof Otten wrote: > )<)))'> Roelof and Marck and maybe Mary, I've been wanting to ask about that trout. I know that this is not a term that was made up here on tbbeta, but I am still curious. What does a trout have to do with top posting and missing signatur

Mod: Top posting (was: test gmail retr)

Hallo Paul, On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:59:54 -0500GMT (17-11-2004, 1:59 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PVN> Take Care, PVN> Paul >>=== Original Message Below ===< >> PVN> Received From: drifthat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and n

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Gmail is hot!)

Sorry about that :-) -- Doug Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.r

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Where to get latest betas)

Hello Marck, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:52:13 PM, you wrote: > Dear John, > @20-Oct-2004, 09:49 -0500 (20-Oct 15:49 UK time) John Morse [JM] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick: JM>> cold someone tell me where to get the latest beta version? > > Note: This moderator's interjection i

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: help . login to beta site)

Hello Igbar! On Wednesday, January 14, 2004 at 6:49:33 AM you wrote: > thanks for that.  as your email demonstrated I would not get the > problem solved if I top post. I don't think that this is why you haven't got an answer to your problem, yet; most folks here are very helpful even if list rul

Mod: Top posting (was: help . login to beta site)

LG> Please don't feel singled out Igbar. how could i when you used my name twice.   LG>This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting. it will never happen again   LG> You'll likely get a more responsive groupwhen you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read andunderstan

Mod: Top posting (was: Extra Blank Lines???)

Hi Avi, @21-Oct-2003, 18:29 +0200 (17:29 UK time) Avi Yashar said: > Marcus, the only changes I see in the macros that I use is that > some have been promoted to all-caps. Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their pos

Mod: Top posting (was: TB2.0 Final: Still missing folders!!!)

Hi Davide, @3-Sep-2003, 09:02 +0200 (08:02 UK time) Davide Ferrari [DF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jan: DF> interessante Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don'