On Tue, 10 May 2011 07:00:03 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
>A "mid" URL with only a "message-id" refers to an entire message.
Yes. In HTML language.
|The following message points to another message (hopefully still in
| the recipient's message store).
|
| From: b...@none.com
| To: pho...@a
Hello all,
Monday, May 9, 2011, Arjan de Groot wrote:
> Do you remember Bayes-It? And Themida? The point is: if it is useless
> and doesn't serve any purpose, throw it out!
BayesIt was transformed to free application Agnitum Spam Terrier when his
developer left Ritlabs...
>From my POV, Themida f
Hi Thomas,
> I still consider v5 in a beta state,
So do I.
> and v4 the best POP client in the world.
Agreed.
> Eventually, v5 will catch up (I have no doubts about that) and
> become releasable.
Yes, I'm waiting for that too and advised other TB-users to do the same.
--
Regards,
Gunivortu
Hello Arjan,
On Mon, 09 May 2011 17:15:17 +0200 GMT (09/May/11, 22:15 PM +0700 GMT),
Arjan de Groot wrote:
>>I don't come here to engage in a completely fruitless debate on whose
>>is longer [no, not what you think; I meant breath].
AdG> I don't either. I just mentioned some examples of outdated
On Mon, 9 May 2011 15:01:42 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote:
>I don't come here to engage in a completely fruitless debate on whose
>is longer [no, not what you think; I meant breath].
I don't either. I just mentioned some examples of outdated,
superfluous, useless and irritating leftovers, in order to
Hello Arjan!
On Monday, May 9, 2011 at 12:16:21 PM you wrote:
> It's quite probable that after this you won't hear from me for
> another year (or 2 or 3). Or perhaps you won't hear from me ever
> again. I don't know.
Ok, this is annoying. I am - as the very few posts I had here over the
past few
On Sun, 8 May 2011 23:22:51 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
>> Yes, and 10 years ago headers were named "kludges".
>and point is?
Do you remember Bayes-It? And Themida? The point is: if it is useless
and doesn't serve any purpose, throw it out!
>>There is even less reason to keep this "feature" in. A
Hello all,
> Yes, and 10 years ago headers were named "kludges".
and point is?
> There is even less reason to keep this "feature" in. All it does is
> cause confusion. Nothing more.
OK, You are confused, still there is no reason to remove any feature You do
not understand or not use.
> The que
On Sun, 8 May 2011 14:54:09 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
>RFC can not contain anything what any developer implements and there is no
>reason to remove feature which exists 10 years, BTW it is turned off by
>default.
Yes, and 10 years ago headers were named "kludges".
There is even less reason to ke
Hello all,
Sunday, May 8, 2011, Arjan de Groot wrote:
> Some examples of code left untouched:
> - Numbered Re in follow-up Subject lines. Like Re[1]:, Re[2]: etc.
> This is Beta! specific, non RFC behaviour. It breaks threading-by-
> subject in other mail clients. It's just as awful as the errone
On Sun, 8 May 2011 02:47:37 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> v5 is a completely new software, as it is written from scratch,
It's not. I'll quote from the original v5 announcement:
|To: tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
|Subject: New versions of The Bat!
|From: Maxim Masiutin
|Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19
Hi Thomas,
> Personally, I currently depend on email for both my own company as
> well as my PhD studies, and I don't have a spare computer to test a
> risky software.
I wouldn't call v.5 a risky software but rather premature and fixing
it takes time - teething problem as you said. I'm rather
Hello Joe,
On Sat, 7 May 2011 07:18:55 -0400 GMT (07/May/11, 18:18 PM +0700 GMT),
Joe wrote:
J> If find it so hard to believe, that it has been almost two months
J> since the dreaded release of v5 and there is still no fix for major
J> basic functionally such as filters, virtual folders and hangs
Hi Simon,
> I hope you feel better. I must admit that I don't actually have any
> of your problems. Windows 7 64 bit, filters work most of the time
> (there are some filters that only work manual, if there's a problem
> with the IMAP connection then filtering stops), refilter works
> flawlessly, n
Hi Gene,
>>Weird how the same program can behave so differently on different platforms.
> Let me paraphrase that a program that has REAL problems with its
> installation process is going to have some pretty strange results from
> computer to computer
Today got onto another issue while tr
Title: Re: No Filters fix yet. Hardd to believe
Hi Joe,
Saturday, May 7, 2011, 8:18:55 AM, Joe wrote:
I hate what this product has made be become... a list ventor... Sorry to all reading this
I hope you feel better. I must admit that I don't actually have any of your pro
On Sat, 7 May 2011 07:18:55 -0400, Joe wrote:
>To be honest, I read these lists and I usually get a laugh
>out of people venting.
At least there's nothing wrong with your sense of humor.
Arjan
--
I am here to lose control
Current beta
If find it so hard to believe, that it has been almost two months since the
dreaded release of v5 and there is still no fix for major basic functionally
such as filters, virtual folders and hangs. Is it really too much to ask? I
am begging, not shouting... PLEASE FIX THE FILTER ISSUES. (Yes, a
18 matches
Mail list logo
