On Sunday, November 7, 2004, at 21:13:26 [UTC+0100] (Sunday, November 7,
2004 21:13 my local time) Marcus Ohlström wrote:
>> Only way I can see is to set up a fresh install with encryption
>> enabled and then forward/redirect all your mail from another
>> installation on another PC.
> Not as a so
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong typed on:
07 November 2004 at 20:52:57 GMT +0100
GS> To be honest I don't really have anything worth encrypting.
Me neither but I'd like to have a play if only from the beta testing aspect.
It's not hard to switch between two installations even thou
Hello Tony,
A reminder of what Tony Boom typed on:
07 November 2004 at 21:21:23 GMT +0100
TB> I was just going to try that until I got banned from this list for some
TB> reason ???
Three times I tried to reply to Greg and all I got was this...
,-
| You are not allowed to post to this
Hello Marcus,
A reminder of what Marcus Ohlström typed on:
07 November 2004 at 21:13:55 GMT +0100
MO> Not as a solution, but maybe as a workaround: Has anyone tried setting
MO> up a fresh TB! with encryption turned on and then *imported* (not
MO> restored) their old message bases?
I was jus
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 20:34, Tony Boom wrote:
> Only way I can see is to set up a fresh install with encryption
> enabled and then forward/redirect all your mail from another
> installation on another PC.
Not as a solution, but maybe as a workaround: Has anyone tried setting
up a fresh TB
Hello Tony,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 1:34:01 PM, Tony Boom wrote:
J>> Any solutions to keep the old mails (and configs) and to use this
J>> encryption tool ??
> Only way I can see is to set up a fresh install with encryption enabled and
> then forward/redirect all your mail from another install
Hello JakeLM,
A reminder of what JakeLM typed on:
07 November 2004 at 18:45:11 GMT +0100
J> otherwise TB doesnt encrypts nothing :(
The Bat does encrypt nothing.
J> Any solutions to keep the old mails (and configs) and to use this
J> encryption tool ??
Only way I can see is to set up a fre
Hello Dierk!
On Sunday, November 07, 2004, 10:01 AM, you wrote:
Maxim M>> If you switch between encrypted and unencrypted mode, how
Maxim M>> would we deal with the attachements that are kept in a
Maxim M>> separate directory? In encrypted mode, attachments aren't
Maxim M>> stored separately. Thi
Hello Maxim,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 9:47:46 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
If you simply run this EXE, it will ask the user what edition it is.
>>>Never asked here.
> Did you delete "The Bat!" registry entry before running The Bat!?
No see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] where I acknowledged
my misund
Hello Maxim!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 4:42:47 PM you wrote:
> If you switch between encrypted and unencrypted mode, how would
> we deal with the attachements that are kept in a separate directory?
> In encrypted mode, attachments aren't stored separately. This is
> needed to protect the att
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong typed on:
07 November 2004 at 15:37:45 GMT +0100
GS> Never asked here.
,-
| *BACKUP* and then delete HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT and then try again.
| ^^
`
--
Best regards,Tony.
___
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 16:42, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> "Save old message base unencrypted and only encrypt message base
> from now on" might have been possible, but not secure.
Besides, it might be difficult for TB! to keep track of to different
bases for each folder, one encrypted and one
Hello Tony,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 4:41:20 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
>>> If you simply run this EXE, it will ask the user what edition it is.
DH>> I wasn't asked, or do I misunderstand your statement?*
> All I did was replace the exe file, deleted the RIT registry entries and
> ran TB as normal
Hello Maxim,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 1:16:21 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> If you simply run this EXE, it will ask the user what edition it is.
Never asked here.
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
_
Hello Dierk,
A reminder of what Dierk Haasis typed on:
07 November 2004 at 09:27:33 GMT +0100
DH> You are right, I didn't do a clean install - as I don't see a way to
DH> do it with only the EXE ...
See my previous post of a minute or so ago.
I did backup properly first though, just as we
Hello Dierk,
A reminder of what Dierk Haasis typed on:
07 November 2004 at 09:25:18 GMT +0100
>> If you simply run this EXE, it will ask the user what edition it is.
DH> I wasn't asked, or do I misunderstand your statement?*
All I did was replace the exe file, deleted the RIT registry entr
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong typed on:
07 November 2004 at 03:30:39 GMT +0100
GS> And Stefan wonders why people use other compression utilities such as
GS> 7-Zip to backup and restore TB.
I use a simple little batch file in combination with Winrar. It backs up
the registry
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 9:53:58 AM you wrote:
> Wouldn't it work to install 3.0.1.33 from the MSI file and then, before you
> start the program for the first time, replace the executable with the
> 3.0.2.5 version?
Sounds interesting. I will not try that, though, since th
Hello Dierk Haasis & everyone else
07-Nov-2004 09:26, you wrote:
>> I wasn't asked, or do I misunderstand your statement?*
> You are right, I didn't do a clean install - as I don't see a way to
> do it with only the EXE ...
Though I'm not a v.pro user, but since I already have my first cup of
c
Hello Dierk!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 9:24:19 AM you wrote:
> I wasn't asked, or do I misunderstand your statement?*
You are right, I didn't do a clean install - as I don't see a way to
do it with only the EXE ...
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 3.0.2.5 on Windows XP
Hello Maxim!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 8:16:21 AM you wrote:
> If you simply run this EXE, it will ask the user what edition it is.
I wasn't asked, or do I misunderstand your statement?*
> What will happen with the old (unencrypted) data if you enable encryption?
Make it a choice (if poss
Hello all,
Friday, November 5, 2004, 9Val wrote:
> The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [*] Message base and configuration data encryption can be now
> activated for Professional Edition (see comments belo
Hello Peter,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 8:51:15 PM, Peter Ouwehand wrote:
> A pain in the youknowwhat is always having to select the address books
> to include in the backup.
Well I've made some minor changes to batch program Marck provided on
7-Zip. I created batch file on TB which runs from T
Hello Tero,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 7:39:01 PM, Tero Ripattila wrote:
>> 9> Please note that this is a beta version and The Bat!
>> BACKUP/RESTORE 9> may not yet work properly.
>>
>> May not? It certainly does not!
> Unfortunately I have to confirm this. B/C havent worked for ages :-( I
Hello Tony,
--On 6. marraskuuta 2004 10:59 + Tony Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
9> Please note that this is a beta version and The Bat!
BACKUP/RESTORE 9> may not yet work properly.
May not? It certainly does not!
Unfortunately I have to confirm this. B/C havent worked for ages :-( I
ca
Hello Allie,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 11:02:55 AM, you wrote in part:
>> This causes a complete AV every time for me, and I cannot then
>> retrieve any other email... solution is to log off then log on the
>> account again and go to that folder, or restart TB! completely. I
>> cannot use the a
Hi 9val,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 00:24:20 +0200, 9Val <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [*] IMAP: new mail sound improvements
> [*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Use precise counters'
> [*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Retrieve only text'
>
> A little description for IMAP users:
> First tune option is suitable for
Hello Tony!
On Saturday, November 6, 2004 at 3:50:42 PM you wrote:
> Perhaps that's his Wife's name :)
Or a corrupted Kipling (for you younger boys and girls: Robbie
Williams by way of Frnak Sinatra) reference: Mandalay ...
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 3.0.2.5 on Wind
Hello Michael,
A reminder of what Michael Acklin typed on:
06 November 2004 at 15:04:37 GMT +0100
MA> This one is spelled "manday".
Perhaps that's his Wife's name :)
--
Best regards,Tony.
_
The Bat! v3.0.2.
Hello Allie,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 11:02:55 AM, you wrote in part:
>> This causes a complete AV every time for me, and I cannot then
>> retrieve any other email... solution is to log off then log on the
A> Yes. I can confirm this. See attached av.png
yep, looks very familiar :)
A> If I e
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 11:17:27 AM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
> This causes a complete AV every time for me, and I cannot then
> retrieve any other email... solution is to log off then log on the
> account again and go to that folder, or restart TB! completely. I
> cannot use the above fi
Hello Allie,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 4:43:07 AM, you wrote in part:
>> [*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Retrieve only text'
A> This now works. However, opening the attachment doesn't lead to the
A> attachment being retrieved. For example, I selected a message with
A> attached images. The message
Hello Zeynel & everyone else
06-Nov-2004 01:51, you wrote:
> Yes there is also spelling errors in the "Anothe options":
> "Sheduler"
> "Manday" ;)
Maybe those are the opposites of "Heduler" and "Womanday"... *gg*
SCNR
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
usi
Hello Michael,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:03:35 -0600 GMT (06/11/2004, 21:03 +0700 GMT),
Michael Acklin wrote:
MA> Also when you select the option, it shows the "Work Days" of the
MA> week. I am not familiar with German, but do they spell Monday the same
MA> way as the Americans? This one is spelled
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
05 November 2004 at 23:20:51 GMT +0100
9> Please note that this is a beta version and The Bat! BACKUP/RESTORE
9> may not yet work properly.
May not? It certainly does not!
I first created a complete backup the way I always do, with a batch
Friday, November 5, 2004, 8:26:45 PM, (Internet Time - @143) you wrote:
Hello Allie,
>> I have a strange new entry into "Options / Preferences" called "Anothe
>> Setings" What is this for ?? Are you sure of the spelling of these
>> options
AM> The spelling is definitely wrong. :)
AM> I'm not
9Val [9], wrote:
>>> [*] IMAP: new mail sound improvements
AM>> I haven't tested this much since filtering no longer works. I drag and
AM>> drop the few unfiltered messages to their various locations after
AM>> reading them.
9> Strange, for me works as expected, even auto-filtering, has some
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 6:24:32 AM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote:
AM>> Work-around - disable the option and reload the message so that
AM>> attachments are retrieved.
> Work-around - 'Reload' from popup menu which always loads full message
Ah. Ok. I had not tried that. :)
Will this always b
Hello Chris,
CW> What do you class as a 'fast connection'?
It is very relative - if you have fast enough connection, you'll get
rare long-staying wrong counters. TB! gets message counter, shows them
and with enabled option tries to retrieve real message counters, with
fast enough connectio
Hi 9Val,
On Saturday, November 6, 2004 00:24 your local time, which was Friday,
November 5, 2004 at 22:24 my local time, 9Val 9Val [9] wrote;
9> The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from
Just received my first AV;
00975708 thebat.exe 00B8
:-(
--
Regards,
Chris
Created using The Bat! v
Hello Allie,
>> [*] IMAP: new mail sound improvements
AM> I haven't tested this much since filtering no longer works. I drag and
AM> drop the few unfiltered messages to their various locations after
AM> reading them.
Strange, for me works as expected, even auto-filtering, has somebody
else t
On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 5:24:20 PM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote:
> [*] IMAP: new mail sound improvements
I haven't tested this much since filtering no longer works. I drag and
drop the few unfiltered messages to their various locations after
reading them.
> [*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Use pre
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 10:38, Sean Rima wrote:
> I installed it over my .4 setup and it never asked me if I wanted to
> use the encryption. Still trying to find the location in the menu to
> see if I can switch it on :)
You can't. Read Max's note again:
,-
| Please be aware that
9Val,
Friday, November 5, 2004, 10:24:20 PM, you wrote:
> Hello All,
> Sorry, if it will be duplicate
> The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [*] Message base and configuration data encryption can be now
>
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:26:45 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
> The spelling is definitely wrong. :)
>
> I'm not sure what they really wish to put there since, even with correct
> settings, it doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> It could be meant to be 'Other Settings' or 'Miscellaneous' where the
> set
On Friday, November 05, 2004 at 7:31:09 PM [GMT -0500], Julien Ranc
wrote:
> I have a strange new entry into "Options / Preferences" called "Anothe
> Setings" What is this for ?? Are you sure of the spelling of these
> options
The spelling is definitely wrong. :)
I'm not sure what they really
Hello Dierk,
Friday, November 5, 2004, 11:46:33 PM, you wrote:
DH> I'd really like to see an option later on to enable message base
DH> encryption without having to do a clean install.
I agree
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush
MyMacros 1.11
Hello testers,
9> Hello All,
9> The Bat! 3.0.2.5 Rush is now available from
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
I have a strange new entry into "Options / Preferences" called "Anothe
Setings" What is this for ?? Are you sure of the spelling of these
options ;-)
--
/
Hi 9Val,
On Saturday, November 6, 2004 00:24 your local time, which was Friday,
November 5, 2004 at 22:24 my local time, 9Val 9Val [9] wrote;
9> [*] IMAP: Fine-tune option 'Use precise counters'
9> First tune option is suitable for IMAP users which have permanent and
9> fast enough connection to
Hello 9Val!
On Friday, November 5, 2004 at 11:24:20 PM you wrote:
> [*] Message base and configuration data encryption can be now
> activated for Professional Edition (see comments below)
From what I've seen in Maxim's note (cited by you) I'd say this is a
little bit useless at the m
50 matches
Mail list logo
