On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 05:21:11 +0300
vitalie vrabie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, be a RealMan™ when this FemaleLogic® animal tells ya you CANNOT
do any transfers with an expired certificate. :)
Those who say cannot do should step aside for those who just do: You
can indeed do transfers with an
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
so, be a RealMan™ when this FemaleLogic® animal tells ya you CANNOT
do any transfers with an expired certificate. :)
Those who say cannot do should step aside for those who just do: You
can indeed do transfers with an expired cert, unless the email software
says
On Thursday, June 7, 2007, 12:19:45 PM, Goncalo Farias wrote:
Nonetheless, I agree that one shouldn't have the possibility to edit
a received message. I've seen that one is now able to remove
attachments from a received message. Personally I don't like that.
once you concede they should be
Hello Goncalo
On Thursday, June 7, 2007 you wrote:
I've seen that one is now able to remove attachments
from a received message. Personally I don't like that.
They key is ABLE. You can choose. I persoanlly LIKE to be able to
remove attachments especially from Incredimail users :))
--
Rick
The
Hello vitalie
On Wednesday, June 6, 2007 you wrote:
and further on with psychology, it means they're completely ruled by
their wives at home?
In my house *** I *** am the captain of the ship
... but I know who the admiral is :))
--
Rick
The Bat Version 3.99.8
Rick Grunwald wrote:
In my house *** I *** am the captain of the ship
sure. and it's YOUR duty to navigate around expired certificates and
other sort of underwater rocks.
... but I know who the admiral is :))
mmm... Ritlabs?
or Mother Nature, that 'stated' that rocks could deadly
Hello Rick,
In my house *** I *** am the captain of the ship
... but I know who the admiral is
Real men always have the last word.. Yes, dear! :-)
--
George M. Menegakis
Using The Bat v3.99.3 on Windows XP Service Pack 2
George M. Menegakis wrote:
Real men always have the last word.. Yes, dear! :-)
exactly.
so, be a RealMan™ when this FemaleLogic® animal tells ya you CANNOT do
any transfers with an expired certificate. :)
...or don't fear the expenses of the divorce, considering the benefits
of
On Saturday, June 2, 2007, 8:54:04 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Ritlabs is of the opinion that that it is in your best interest if
they deny you the option of accepting an expired certificate.
They have a strong paternalistic streak. Lots like not letting one
edit messages after receipt.
--
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
Ritlabs is of the opinion that that it is in your best interest if
they deny you the option of accepting an expired certificate.
They have a strong paternalistic streak.
and further on with psychology, it means they're completely ruled by
their wives at home?
--
Jim Brown wrote:
I can see RitLabs Point... BUT after 30+ years of Eng and support
experience I'd have to second the suggestion that Alerting a User
is Imperative... Denying a (knowledgeable) user after the Alert is
excessive and Not in the best interest of the user OR product :(
Hello vitalie,
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:48:12 +0300 GMT (04/06/2007, 06:48 +0700 GMT),
vitalie vrabie wrote:
I can see RitLabs Point... BUT after 30+ years of Eng and support
experience I'd have to second the suggestion that Alerting a User
is Imperative... Denying a (knowledgeable)
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
vv AFAIR, Max commented on this already. if your user is qualified indeed,
vv he/she'd put something like stunnel.
Does Max want to call each
sysad and remind him to please update his cert, as otherwise TB!-users
are unable to do their mailing?
why don't you
Hi Folks,
6/1/2007, 14:00:36: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 432AECC1000303CF, algorithm:
RSA (1024 bits),
issued from 27 Mar 2006 to 27 Mar 2008, for 1 host(s): email.cisco.com.
6/1/2007, 14:00:36: FETCH - Owner: US, CA, San Jose, CIsco Systems, EMS,
email.cisco.com.
6/1/2007, 14:00:36: FETCH -
Hello Jim,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:57:32 -0400 GMT (03/06/2007, 00:57 +0700 GMT),
Jim Brown wrote:
A secure connection to the server could not be established. Account:
'email.cisco.com', Server: 'email.cisco.com', Protocol: POP3, Port:
995, Secure(SSL): Yes, Error Number: 0x800CCC1A
JB
JB
So, that's why folks who need to accept an expired certificate and
really know what they are doing, cannot use TB! but must use Outlook.
I'm a bit sad that Ritlabs is not interested in those customers who
know what they are doing any more.
Can this be true?
--
Rick
The Bat Version 3.99.8
Hi Thomas,
JBThough Outlook would have let me ignore this fault... :)
JBSorry to bother the list...
Ritlabs is of the opinion that that it is in your best interest if
they deny you the option of accepting an expired certificate. They say
that they have heard of a grandmother who
Hello Rick,
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:06:00 -0400 GMT (03/06/2007, 09:06 +0700 GMT),
Rick Grunwald wrote:
So, that's why folks who need to accept an expired certificate and
really know what they are doing, cannot use TB! but must use Outlook.
I'm a bit sad that Ritlabs is not interested in those
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
So, that's why folks who need to accept an expired certificate and
really know what they are doing, cannot use TB! but must use Outlook.
or Icedove..
--
C.K.
Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA'
19 matches
Mail list logo
