Hello Peter,
Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:14:49 PM, you wrote:
PF> Hmm, I am often using remove duplicates without having all "versions"
PF> disappear.
It is only after a purge that the message on the server disappears
and then with a second purge the original message in the local cache
disap
Hello Dwight,
Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:59:43 PM, you wrote:
DAC> Re your other question, for the brief time I had any duplicate
DAC> problems, killing duplicates never deleted any messages, but manually
DAC> deleting messages was kind of hit or miss as I recall.
It is not actually a problem
On 30 January 2006 at 17:58, Stuart wrote:
> I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
> Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
> are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete
> one of the messages, manually or by using Delet
Hello Stuart,
V>> Stuart: could you generate me up a new IMAP fastmail account, set it in
V>> your TB, reproduce the problem with it, and backup the account and
V>> send as attach in private?
> I will see what I can do. There are 9 copies of your message plus the
> original. I am only going to try
On Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:08:52 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> I am only going to try it once though. :)
If you are lucky, it will work 1st try.
Re your other question, for the brief time I had any duplicate
problems, killing duplicates never deleted any messages, but manually
deleting messages
Stuart,
On 30-01-2006 18:58, you [SC] wrote in
:
SC> Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
SC> are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete one
SC> of the messages, manually or by using Delete Duplicates, when you do
SC> a purge it will delete the o
Hello Vili,
A reminder of what Vili typed on:
Monday, January 30, 2006 at 15:41:44 GMT -0500
V> Stuart: could you generate me up a new IMAP fastmail account, set it in
V> your TB, reproduce the problem with it, and backup the account and
V> send as attach in private?
I will see what I can do.
Hello Stuart,
V>> Maybe it is a strange question, but as I NEVER seen this duplication
V>> before: if this is a test IMAP address for you, would it be possible
V>> to get it as a TBK file, so I can test it at home with the same
V>> settings, that you have at you?
> It is not strictly a
Hello Vili,
A reminder of what Vili typed on:
Monday, January 30, 2006 at 13:55:57 GMT -0500
V> Maybe it is a strange question, but as I NEVER seen this duplication
V> before: if this is a test IMAP address for you, would it be possible
V> to get it as a TBK file, so I can test it a
Hello Stuart,
SC>> Testing duplicates.
> I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
> Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
> are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete
> one of the messages, manually or by using Delete D
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Thursday, January 26, 2006 at 20:06:50 GMT -0600
SC> Hello tbbeta,
SC> Testing duplicates.
I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates.
Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they
are not
Peter,
On 30-01-2006 08:20, you [PF] wrote in
:
PF> IMAP seems to be running faster but alas I am getting more
PF> duplicates now than ever: usually one in the inbox and two in the
PF> folder it is filtered to (one ghost message).
Setting flags (marking as read for instance, seems better/more
rel
9Val,
On 28-01-2006 16:24, you [9] wrote in
:
SC>> Testing duplicates.
9> Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
IMAP seems to be running faster but alas I am getting more duplicates
now than ever: usually one in the inbox and two in the folder it is
filtered to (one ghost message).
--
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on:
Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 16:07:01 GMT -0600
9>> Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
SC> Sorry it is not completely fixed. I just received 3 new IMAP TB!
SC> messages and one of them has a duplicate. In trying to mark them al
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
Saturday, January 28, 2006 at 17:24:07 GMT +0200
SC>> Testing duplicates.
9> Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
Sorry it is not completely fixed. I just received 3 new IMAP TB!
messages and one of them has a duplicate. In trying to mar
Hi 9Val,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:24:07 +0200 UTC (1/28/2006, 9:24 AM -0500 UTC my
time), 9Val wrote:
SC>> Testing duplicates.
9> Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
There are no dups now, working well... thanks, IMAP seems much improved
overall.
However there is still a major problem
Hello Stuart,
SC> Testing duplicates.
Could you check if issue was solved in .06?
--
9Val
Current beta is 3.70.06 "Qigong" | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.
On 27 January 2006 at 14:10, Stuart wrote:
> I don't usually check this way, I only did it to expedite the problem.
> This morning I downloaded my new mail, 9 new messages. While I was
> reading some other mail an automatic refresh was done and my TB
> account still shows 9 message
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 27, 2006, 8:10:36 AM, you wrote:
> This makes it difficult to test where color filtering is failing as
> well.
Also forgot to mention that if I use remove duplicates it works, but
often keeps the duplicate and not the original, so all coloring is
useless.
Hello Dwight,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:29:58 PM, you wrote:
DAC> I marked your test message unread, making it the only unread message
DAC> in my account. I then hit alt-f2, which checks mail for all accounts
DAC> and did not duplicate your complaint.
DAC> I don't understand why you are usin
Stuart,
On 27-01-2006 03:24, you [SC] wrote in
:
SC> Can anyone using IMAP, confirm my findings.
I can. Just this morning. Reverted.
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.70.02 "Qigong" (Beta) Pro
~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs.
Windows XP 5.1 Build
On Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:24:37 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> I then pressed F2 (My Shortcut) to Check New mail for All, at
> which point a duplicate appeared in my TB folder, although the
> count in the folder remained as 1. The Inbox however changed to 0
> (2).
I marked your test mes
Hello Curtis,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:19:30 PM, you wrote:
>> Testing duplicates.
C> Have you done any cleaning of the local cache?
C> I haven't seen duplicates in a long time.
Could you check as described in my just sent message. I can reproduce
as described in that message.
--
Stu
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, January 26, 2006, 8:06:50 PM, you wrote:
SC> Testing duplicates.
I sent the test message at which time I had 0 unread messages in my TB
folder. When the message arrived, it showed up as 1 message in my TB
folder where it was filtered upon arrival. My inbox showed
On 26/1/2006 at 9:06:50 PM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> Testing duplicates.
Have you done any cleaning of the local cache?
I haven't seen duplicates in a long time.
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.70.02 Qigong(Beta) / http://specs.aimlink.name
PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name
...Ok, I
Hello tbbeta,
Testing duplicates.
--
Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.70.03 "Qigong" (Beta) on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service
Pack 4
Current beta is 3.70.03 "Qigong" | 'Using TBBETA' in
26 matches
Mail list logo
