Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:22:58 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, December 24, 1999, 3:22:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi tracer,
Thomas On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 15:06:10 +0700GMT (12/24/1999, 16:06 +0800GMT),
Thomas tracer wrote:
t
Hello Frank Farance,
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:06:54 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, December 24, 1999, 11:06:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Frank Farance wrote:
Frank The Bat somehow corrupts the registry when you select it as the default mailer.
The following test should recreate
Hello Roel,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:31:05 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, December 25, 1999, 2:31:05 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Roel wrote:
Roel does anybody know an editor that works like TB's editor?
Roel (it would be a real surplus if it would also support
Roel
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:34:37 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, December 25, 1999, 4:34:37 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Hello The Bat! developers,
Steve There are some features I would like to see in your program:
Steve There is a
Hello,
Saturday, December 25, 1999, You wrote:
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:22:58 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, December 24, 1999, 3:22:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi tracer,
Thomas On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 15:06:10 +0700GMT
Hello Marek Mikus,
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999 13:41:14 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, December 25, 1999, 7:41:14 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marek Mikus wrote:
Marek Hello,
Marek Saturday, December 25, 1999, You wrote:
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:22:58 +0800 GMT
Hello all,
on Fri, 24 Dec 1999, at 14:16:48 local time (GMT +), Mark wrote:
To All Atheists...er.Hi!
well, if you atheists/heathens want to celebrate something too ; celebrate
the pagan part of Xmas ... the Winter Solstice ; the days are getting
longer again and Spring's coming !!
At 16:34 1999-12-25 +0700, tracer wrote:
Hello Frank Farance,
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:06:54 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, December 24, 1999, 11:06:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Frank Farance wrote:
Frank The Bat somehow corrupts the registry when you select it as the
I am unable to bring up the list of favorite addresses under TB
v1.38e. It had been working all along, however.
Best regards,
Julio
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 12:01, Frank Farance wrote
about "Re: Other windows crashes":
Also, you post this on Eudora and you still got that damn line length
set wrong!
My line length in Eudora is set just right. The problem is a
*display* issue, not an E-mail generation issue.
Hi Frank,
On 25 December 1999 at 12:01:43 GMT -0500 (which was 17:01 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
FF There's a difference between a bug report (which I was providing),
FF a higher quality bug report (a method for reproducing the
FF problem), and a
Hello, The Bat Users!
MDP Many of us (including myself) prefer to use the %SINGLERE macro in our
MDP reply templates (especially for mailing list submissions) to disable
MDP this incremental "Re[n]:" behaviour.
I have a question: is this a part of Netiqette? Are there any reasons
for
Hello, The Bat Users!
Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/)
do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that
package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...)
KR Well, it certainly isn't English. I'm not about to run the executable
KR without having
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 09:06:33PM +0300, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
I have a question: is this a part of Netiqette? Are there any reasons
for disabling this (wonderful, IMVHO :) feature except for that you
don't like it (I don't know why?!)?
Because TB! is the only client that I know
At 23:07 1999-12-25 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 12:01, Frank Farance wrote
about "Re: Other windows crashes":
Also, you post this on Eudora and you still got that damn line length
set wrong!
My line length in Eudora is set just right. The
At 16:29 1999-12-25 -0500, Frank Farance wrote:
At 23:07 1999-12-25 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 12:01, Frank Farance wrote
about "Re: Other windows crashes":
Also, you post this on Eudora and you still got that damn line length
set wrong!
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 16:40, Frank Farance wrote
about "Regarding the RFCs":
The headers of *this* your message:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
What QP you are speaking about? And now, just FYI:
RFC822.
Let's start from the very beginning:-)
Presumably, you mean there are some
It breaks the threading in other mail programs i.e. your re[number]
will start a new thread if someone is viewing by thread. I consider it
a breach of netiquette (along the lines of forcing html mail on
someone), even if there is no 'formal' definition as
such.
Roy
Saturday, December 25, 1999,
At 01:42 1999-12-26 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 16:40, Frank Farance wrote
about "Regarding the RFCs":
The headers of *this* your message:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I just checked my E-mail as it leaves my SMTP server (sendmail 8.9.1) and it
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:17:58 PM, Frank wrote:
So RFC 822 makes no restrictions on the lengths of text lines in the *body*
of an E-mail message. RFC 822 *does* make restrictions on the length of
lines in E-mail *headers*, but that is not the issue we're discussing.
Gah, wrap your
At 15:28 1999-12-25 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:17:58 PM, Frank wrote:
So RFC 822 makes no restrictions on the lengths of text lines in the *body*
of an E-mail message. RFC 822 *does* make restrictions on the length of
lines in E-mail *headers*, but that is not
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:49:26 PM, Frank wrote:
Wrapping lines is *one* convention and not the only one. I used to do that, but I
found that many messages got messed up when people copied and pasted my words.
Really, for almost 20 years I did
what you describe. I've come around to
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Frank!
÷ 18:17, 25 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ
ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "Re: Regarding the RFCs":
The headers of *this* your message:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I just checked my E-mail as it leaves my SMTP server
(sendmail 8.9.1) and it does *not* add that header, so it
Gotcha! see
Quote from RFC 2045 follows:
8---
2.7. 7bit Data
"7bit data" refers to data that is all represented as relatively
short lines with 998 octets or less between CRLF line
separation sequences [RFC-821]. No octets with decimal
values greater than 127 are allowed and neither are
Hi Rob,
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 1:28:28 PM, you wrote:
R Hello all,
R on Fri, 24 Dec 1999, at 14:16:48 local time (GMT +), Mark wrote:
To All Atheists...er.Hi!
R well, if you atheists/heathens want to celebrate something too ; celebrate
R the pagan part of Xmas ... the Winter
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 4:39:56 PM, Mark wrote:
in the spirit of your Christian/Pagan/Moslem celebrations I will go
away and dance around the nearest tree:-)
T'hell with that.
GIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMMEGIMME
*Cough* :)
--
Ok, a few remarks for anyone who installs Dr Web (keeping in mind
that I had it running since months in the English version...).
On install it seems to hang for ages.
However its working to make certain files for each of your hard disks,
so let it go.
In my case it took a very long time as my
At 03:06 1999-12-26 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Quote from RFC 2045 follows:
8---
2.7. 7bit Data
"7bit data" refers to data that is all represented as relatively
short lines with 998 octets or less between CRLF line
separation sequences [RFC-821]. No octets
At 15:54 1999-12-25 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:49:26 PM, Frank wrote:
Wrapping lines is *one* convention and not the only one. I used to do that, but I
found that many messages got messed up when people copied and pasted my words.
Really, for almost 20 years I
At 02:54 1999-12-26 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Frank!
÷ 18:17, 25 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ
ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "Re: Regarding the RFCs":
The headers of *this* your message:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I just checked my E-mail as it leaves my SMTP server
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999 23:07:09 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, December 26, 1999, 3:07:09 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Alexander Hi there!
Alexander On 25 Dec 99, at 12:01, Frank Farance wrote
Alexander about "Re: Other
Hello Frank Farance,
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999 18:49:26 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, December 26, 1999, 6:49:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Frank Farance wrote:
Frank At 15:28 1999-12-25 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 3:17:58 PM, Frank wrote:
Frank Both
Sunday, December 26, 1999
Hello Douglas..
Sorry, sofar 2 emails bounced back from your account.
No idea if that server has a problem...
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.38e
NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Saturday, December 25, 1999, 5:41:15 PM, Frank wrote:
FYI, here's what long lines look line when you respond to them in another
mailer.
Yup, wrong. When quoting it should not automatically rewrap.
It's really the *display* issue in The Bat. No one is forced to re-wrap ...
only users of
Hi there!
On 26 Dec 99, at 8:01, tracer wrote
about "Re[2]: SOT: Y2K and possible virus ":
Okay, this happened to become a lo-o-o-ng message, so to
those who aren't interested in Dr.Web: just skip it. Nothing TB-
related inside:-)
On install it seems to hang for ages. However its working
Hi there!
On 26 Dec 99, at 9:09, tracer wrote
about "Re[2]: Other windows crashes":
Alexander You are NOT a betatester then, for if you were, you'd have
Alexander read the corresponding RFCs I'm not going to enlighten you
Alexander on these, since it's clearly a waiste of *my*,
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 20:54, Frank Farance wrote
about "Re: Regarding the RFCs":
Doesn't matter. Since it's *not* QP when it leaves your SMTP, it
will *never* become one whatever server it passes...
That's not true. Some of the SMTP servers convert to/from
quoted printable,
Hi there!
On 25 Dec 99, at 20:41, Frank Farance wrote
about "Re: Regarding the RFCs":
FYI, here's what long lines look line when you respond to them in another mailer.
True. But I was mainly interested in "logical" lines ... which can be arbitrarily
long, right? That's the way I
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 05:46:25 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[]
They clearly do. If you don't understand this simple fact, I'm
terribly pity about you:-)
Ok, he unsubscribed. Are we going to stop picking at his remains or
what? :)
--
Ali Martin | Using The
Hello Frank Farance,
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999 12:01:43 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, December 26, 1999, 12:01:43 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Frank Farance wrote:
(snipped)
Your problem is much more likely to be a totally local problem due to
a windows corruption then one just caused
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 05:38:13 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, December 26, 1999, 9:38:13 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Alexander Hi there!
thanks, I guess I better install some fonts (g).
I need it anyway as one of my cd's has
Hello Ali Martin,
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999 22:09:42 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, December 26, 1999, 10:09:42 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Ali Martin wrote:
Ali On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 05:46:25 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Ali []
They clearly do. If you don't understand this
42 matches
Mail list logo
