Re: Today's Mail Only

2000-11-30 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello OK3, On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 at 11:05:36 GMT +0400 (which was 11:05 PM where I live) witnesses say OK3 typed: >>> When do you forsee that we might be able to set our default view to >>> View ONLY today's mail? JA>> I don't think you can do that directly, but what about creating a > He-

Re[2]: Today's Mail Only

2000-11-30 Thread OK3
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, December 01, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote to Raoul Comninos about Today's Mail Only: >> When do you forsee that we might be able to set our default view to >> View ONLY today's mail? JA> I don't think you can do that directly, but what about creating

Re: Today's Mail Only

2000-11-30 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Raoul, On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 at 06:26:34 GMT +0200 (which was 8:26 PM where I live) witnesses say Raoul Comninos typed: > When do you forsee that we might be able to set our default view to > View ONLY today's mail? I don't think you can do that directly, but what about creating a f

Today's Mail Only

2000-11-30 Thread Raoul Comninos
Dear TBUDL, When do you forsee that we might be able to set our default view to View ONLY today's mail? -- Best regards, Raoul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This letter was composed ON 01 December 2000 AT 06:25:55 BY: Rev. Raoul Comninos (M.A.) Cell: 083 96 45788 Wor

Re: Want to delete mail from the ticker bar.

2000-11-30 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Christian Dysthe, Responding to your article on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 at 01:23:06 GMT -0600 (which was 30/11/2000 14:23 GMT +0700 my Local Time) : CD> to me the ticker is my first encounter with incoming mail. Being able CD> to delete mail directly from the ticker bar would be a great f

Re: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Marck, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:52:42 +GMT (01/12/2000, 06:52 +0800GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: TF>> Marck? What's wrong? MDP> I know it doesn't always seem that way but I really don't like to MDP> speak on subjects about which I know little or nothing ;-). I don't buy that. I thoug

Re: question

2000-11-30 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Egle, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 at 19:20:51 GMT -0500 (which was 4:20 PM where I live) witnesses say Egle typed: > I have just joined this list, so I don't know whether anyone has > answered this question. Sorry, if you have. Welcome. > How could I view my messages in Arial font? Ah, ano

question

2000-11-30 Thread Egle
Hi, I have just joined this list, so I don't know whether anyone has answered this question. Sorry, if you have. My question is: Is it possible to set another font in OPTIONS>EDITOR PREFERENCES>>DISPLAY>FONT I would like to view my messages' content in Arial font, however, it is not possibl

Re: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 30 November 2000 at 02:38:50 +0800 (which was 18:38 where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote and made these points: MDP>> Not I - anyone else? TF> Marck? What's wrong? I know it doesn't always seem that way but I really don't like to

Re[2]: First impressions and wishes

2000-11-30 Thread SyP
Hello Thomas, You wrote on 11/30/2000, 4:21 AM MK>> 4) Sometimes, people send us messages in the UTF-8 encoding. Is it MK>> planned to implemented UTF in The Bat! ? At the moment, I have to keep MK>> those messages in Outlook Express... TF> We were playing with UTF-7 and UTF-8 in one of the bet

Re: How to generate auto-replies?

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Kiyan, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:40:20 -0500 GMT (01/12/2000, 02:40 +0800 GMT), Kiyan Azarbar wrote: KA> Is there a way to filter incoming messages and if the subject contains KA> a special trigger, redirect that message to another email address (for my KA> cellphone?). Account / Sorting Off

Re: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Jamie, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:25:11 + GMT (01/12/2000, 00:25 +0800 GMT), Jamie Dainton wrote: TL> 3. is there a possibility to see if the message is still on the TL> server or if it has been deleted there JD> You could telnet over to port 110 and have a look. I know this doesn

Re: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Marck, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:08:22 + GMT (01/12/2000, 00:08 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: TL 3. is there a possibility to see if the message is still on the TL server or if it has been deleted there MDP>>> Possibly with the message dispatcher - I don't know. I don't

How to generate auto-replies?

2000-11-30 Thread Kiyan Azarbar
Is there a way to filter incoming messages and if the subject contains a special trigger, redirect that message to another email address (for my cellphone?). It's dead simple to do in procmail but can't for the life of me figure out how to do it in TB. I know people have something set up like that

Re: First impressions and wishes

2000-11-30 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ming-Li! On Thursday, November 30, 2000 at 3:21:58 PM you wrote: > I also came from OE (5.0), and I'm pretty sure TB is faster than > OE5, in general or when handling large folders. I also have a few > archive folder of that size or bigger. W

Re[2]: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Jamie Dainton
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:08:22 + GMT your local time, which was Thursday, November 30, 2000, 16:08:22 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, TL 3. is there a possibility to see if the message is still on the TL server or if it has been deleted there You could telnet over to port 110 and have

Re: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 30 November 2000 at 15:23:50 +0100 (which was 14:23 where I live) Thomas Luck wrote and made these points: TL> this is not the "offline" thing i wanted. i would like a button TL> (or similar) where i could say that i'm at the moment n

Re: First impressions and wishes

2000-11-30 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Ming-Li, (ML == "Ming-Li") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ML> As Jamie pointed out, 64 MB RAM is a little marginal for Win2k to ML> work efficiently. I have a slightly slower CPU (200 MHz PPro, no ML> MMX), but with 96 MB RAM, I believe my machine run smoother than ML> yours, in general. At s

Re[2]: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Luck
Hello Thomas, Thursday, November 30, 2000, 3:30:34 PM, you wrote: TL>> No. I want him to check every... minute but I don't like him when i TL>> work on my notebook offline (without an active internet connection) TL>> and i have to change the properties of all my accounts. I would prefer TL>> a b

Re: First impressions and wishes

2000-11-30 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, November 29, 2000, 4:06:51 PM, Maksym wrote: > 1) People usually say of The Bat! as being very fast. With our > setup here (~80 folders with both corporate and my personal mail, > some of them having 5000+ messages per folder), it is _slower_ > (?!!) than Outlook Express 5.5. It is

Re: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Thomas, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:14:53 +0100 GMT (30/11/2000, 22:14 +0800 GMT), Thomas Luck wrote: TL> No. I want him to check every... minute but I don't like him when i TL> work on my notebook offline (without an active internet connection) TL> and i have to change the properties of all my

Re[2]: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Luck
Hello Marck, Thursday, November 30, 2000, 12:17:06 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi , TL>> 1. is there a way to work "offline" (so the bat does not check the TL>> mail every...) MDP> Yes - see Account -- Preferences on the Option tab. this is not

Re[2]: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Luck
Hello Mark, Wednesday, November 29, 2000, 9:06:15 PM, you wrote: MA> AFAIK if you use the Calypso Archive feature it will save your mail in MA> Unix style mailboxes which can be imported by TB! Not sure about the MA> attachments though. MA> Another thing to watch with Calypso composed mail is t

Re[2]: Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Luck
Hello Doug, Thursday, November 30, 2000, 12:00:33 AM, you wrote: DW> Wednesday, November 29, 2000, 1:21:18 PM, you wrote: TL>> 1. is there a way to work "offline" (so the bat does not check the TL>> mail every...) DW> I'm a former Calypso user (still within the evaluation period, but DW> d

Re: I love this program :)

2000-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo MartianRover, On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:54:39 -0800 GMT (30/11/2000, 01:54 +0800 GMT), MartianRover KF6KNC wrote: MK> Its fast, small, stable (never crashed even once), and well MK> thought out. It is definitely worth the money I spent. Absolutely agree. MK> By far the best email program I'

Some feature I could not find

2000-11-30 Thread thomas . luck
X Hi I'm a calypso user, who want to change to "The Bat". Now i've some features i've liked in calypso and couldn't find it in the bat. Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-MDMailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDSend-Notifications-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re

Re: First impressions and wishes

2000-11-30 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Maksym Kozub, On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 02:06:51 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, November 30, 2000, 00:06:51 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Maksym Kozub wrote: MK> 2) It produces access violations quite often (several times a day), in MK> various situations (but usually when worki