Hi George,
I've followed this thread, but at this juncture, I can't help putting
in my 0.02 worth. My connection has recently improved by some 50% to
avarage at around 1.5K/s. Receiving 100 to 200 messages per day, 5K
more or less per messages does still make a difference over here.
On Mon, 1
Hi TBUDL,
I have some problem with the "Mass Mailing using
template":
Address book group: 1586 people
Sent with the template [placed in the outbox]: 1325
Missing: 261: Where did they do?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
REAL PROBLEMS / REAL SOLUTION
ISSN: 1492-7829
A
Hello George & others on TBUDL following this interesting thread,
Monday, January 01, 2001, you stated regarding the length of your
signatures and the practical issues of wasted bandwidth involved:
GFS> I'll stop signing my messages to the list with PGP.
That would help me hold out until the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:34:00 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote these
comments:
>> Remember that when you reply to one of my messages to the list, you're
>> replying to the list and not me.
JA> Not quite. Jan is using %ABofromPPP which means TB compares th
Hello Marck,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 4:47:51 PM, you wrote:
MDP> This is a list with rules. If you repeatedly flout those rules,
MDP> eventually you're going to offend someone, and eventually a moderator
MDP> will have to intervene to reenforce the list rules.
Irregardless, the only t
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 at 20:20:07 GMT -0500 (which was 5:20 PM
where I live) witnesses say A . Curtis Martin typed:
JR>> Hi %ABofromHANDLE='%ABofromFIRSTNAME="%OFROMFNAME"'
JR>> which should yield "Allie" because in my address book I have A
JR>> Curtis Martin entered as foll
Hello Jan,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 at 19:41:48 GMT -0500 (which was 4:41 PM
where I live) witnesses say Jan Rifkinson typed:
> Now here's my ABxxxPPP problem: I replied to a portion of a msg
> from Allie on the list. Using F4, The reply msg began with "Hi
> A.". The problem is that my greeti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01 January, 2001, 8:16 PM, I saw Jan's comments made on
Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:41:48 -0500, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
JR> Now here's my ABxxxPPP problem: I replied to a portion of a msg
JR> from Allie on the list. Using F4, The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought I'd comment on Kari Jakobi's contribution to the list,
sent on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 02:07:06 +0100:
JR>> Can you direct me to the reference for these aforementioned rules
JR>> as I would like to have them on file for other lists that I belon
Hello Jan,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, 19:19:00 h [GMT -0500] (which
was 01:19 h [GMT +0100] where I live) you wrote:
JR> Can you direct me to the reference for these aforementioned rules
JR> as I would like to have them on file for other lists that I belong
JR> to. Thanks.
http://www.landfield.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi George,
On 02 January 2001 at 16:22:13 -0800 (which was 00:22 where I
live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points:
GFS> I'll stop signing my messages to the list with PGP.
That's not what was asked of you. It has been clearly stated
Hello Allie,
On Monday, January 01, 2001 @ 17:34:52 -0500 you wrote the
following in regards to Plain text by default?:
Allie> Here's an excerpt that covers most of what we commonly request here:
Allie> - Be brief without being overly terse. [...]
Allie> - Limit line length [...]
Al
Hello BatListers,
First, Happy New Year to you all.
Now here's my ABxxxPPP problem: I replied to a portion of a msg
from Allie on the list. Using F4, The reply msg began with "Hi
A.". The problem is that my greeting template looks like this:
Hi %ABofromHANDLE='%ABofromFIRSTNAME="%
Hello A.,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:58:23 PM, you wrote:
ACM> I am therefore requesting that for these lists, TBUDL and TBBETA, you
ACM> cut down the length of your signatures and please realize that there are
ACM> practical issues of wasted bandwidth behind such a request and that we
ACM> me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought I'd comment on Kevin's contribution to the list,
sent on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 21:38:36 +:
K> I always thought it was 4 lines.
Upon rechecking the RFC's (RFC 1855), you're right on this. I was mixing
it up with an on-line netiquette guidelin
On 01-01-2001 at 21:41:49GMT + (which was 21:41 where I live)
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "Plain text by default?"
Hello Marck,
Marck> This was specifically banned for use on TBUDL and was only sanctioned
Marck> for testing purposes on TBBETA. This was for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On 01 January 2001 at 21:22:29 + (which was 21:22 where I
live) Manfred Ell wrote and made these points:
A.>> Members are therefore free to digitally sign their messages. S/MIME
A.>> signing is not allowed, since the S/MIME public ke
On 01-01-2001 at 21:27:27GMT + (which was 21:27 where I live)
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "Plain text by default?"
Hello Marck,
Marck> ... do *not* ...
ACM>> merely take pleasure out of harassing and censoring your behaviour.
No need to correct, we all understood it
Hello A,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 8:58:23 PM, you wrote:
>I also keep the list traffic on my hard drive and shudder at the
>thought of unnecessary space wastage because everyone decides to make
>their signatures longer than their messages. I have about 3
>TBUDL/TBBETA messages here. 3 x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On 01 January 2001 at 15:58:23 -0500 (which was 20:58 where I
live) A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points:
I endorse and second all comments that Allie has made here but must
hasten to correct what I must assume to be a typo in
On 01-01-2001 at 15:58:23GMT -0500 (which was 20:58 where I live)
A. Curtis Martin wrote regarding the subject of "Plain text by default?"
Hello Allie,
A.> I personally pgp sign my messages because I'm a list moderator and also
A.> because of the potential nature of my posts, this one being a p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01 January, 2001, 3:29 PM, I saw Manfred's comments made on
Mon, 1 Jan 2001 20:17:04 +, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
George>> The signature is mine and it stays no matter what.
This is a disturbing attitude to have. I'd assume
Hi Thomas,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 3:44:45 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hallo Doug,
TF> On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 15:14:28 + GMT (01/01/2001, 23:14 +0800 GMT),
TF> Doug Weller wrote:
MDP>>> I know which method *I* prefer :-).
DW>> I do to. But for use in some environments I can imagine wanting .exe
DW>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Manfred!
On Monday, January 01, 2001 at 9:17:04 PM you wrote:
> IMHO PGP signing is OK for *important* stuff. The Q&A's on this list
> are hardly *that* important to get signed.
Doesn't matter in this case; everybody *has* to make up his op
On 01-01-2001 at 11:52:58GMT -0800 (which was 19:52 where I live)
George F. Schoelles wrote regarding the subject of "Plain text by default?"
TB>> With all due respect George and I don't mean to be derogatory in any
TB>> way but is it absolutely necessary to use such a large PGP signature
TB
Hello Tony,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 6:55:27 AM, you wrote:
TB> With all due respect George and I don't mean to be derogatory in any
TB> way but is it absolutely necessary to use such a large PGP signature
TB> and such a big multi line quote with every single message to the list?
TB>
Hello Marck & others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, you answered George's question regarding
the use of Alt+L for left formatting text (Alt+J for justifying):
MDP> Position the cursor in a quoted block of text (preferably using
MDP> cursor keys rather than mouse - if
This message: 31/12/2000 14:41 GMT.
Hello George,
A reminder of what George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
01 January 2001 at 06:04:34 GMT -0800
GFS> Options =>> HTML Auto view
With all due respect George and I don't mean to be derogatory in any
way but is it absolutely necessary to us
Hallo Doug,
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 15:14:28 + GMT (01/01/2001, 23:14 +0800 GMT),
Doug Weller wrote:
MDP>> I know which method *I* prefer :-).
DW> I do to. But for use in some environments I can imagine wanting .exe
DW> files, etc. renamed. (With the option to do this passworded).
Why would you
Hi Marck,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 2:04:45 PM, you wrote:
MDP> TB's method is to stop and warn you when you try to open such an
MDP> attachment rather than to rename it to something that can't easily be
MDP> used even if it is known to be harmless.
MDP> I know which method *I* prefer :-
On January 1, 2001, at 1:49:19 AM, Remi Pach Wrote:
RP> I see that version 1.49 Beta 1 is already out. I downloaded it but
RP> could't see any new things except that the quick templates are now
RP> accessible from the Tools menu.
They are? In my install of 1.49b1 they are only accessible from th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jannik,
On 01 January 2001 at 14:28:55 +0100 (which was 13:28 where I
live) Jannik Lindquist wrote and made these points:
JL> Is it possible to set TB to show the plain-text version by default
JL> where there is a choice?
To do this, just turn o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug,
On 01 January 2001 at 13:11:05 + (which was 13:11 where I
live) Doug Weller wrote and made these points:
A>> It is the mailsafe feature of ZA renaming a potentially dangerous
A>> attachment extension to something harmless.
DW> Per
Hello Jannik,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 5:28:55 AM, you wrote:
JL> Is it possible to set TB to show the plain-text version by default
JL> where there is a choice?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Options => HTML Auto view
- --
Best regards,
Georgemailto:[EMAIL
Hello TBUDL,
Is it possible to set TB to show the plain-text version by default
where there is a choice?
Best regards,
Jannik Lindquist
The Bat! Ver. 1.49 Beta/1
Windows 98 4 10 A
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl
Hi Adam,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:29:47 PM, you wrote:
A> Hello Doug,
A> Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:20:57 PM, you wrote:
DW>> Any idea why Zone Alarm is doing this?
A> It is the mailsafe feature of ZA renaming a potentially dangerous
A> attachment extension to something harmless.
Hello Nick,
On Sunday, December 31, 2000, 6:44:43 PM, you wrote in subject of "Outgoing
attachments":
NA> Can someone explain in plain English ;o) what "Bind attachments..." actually
NA> means?
Although I'm not an Englishman, I'd try to explain it to you...
IMO "Bind Attachments..." means
Hello Remi,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 3:33:48 AM, you wrote:
RP> That PGP thing looks very unfriendly to me. I would appreciate some help.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What version of PGP and Windows are you using?
- --
Best regards,
Georgemailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hello Doug,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:20:57 PM, you wrote:
DW> Any idea why Zone Alarm is doing this?
It is the mailsafe feature of ZA renaming a potentially dangerous
attachment extension to something harmless.
A list of the renaming can be found here
http://www.zonelabs.com/support_
HellotListeros,
Any idea why Zone Alarm is doing this?
Thanks
Doug
--
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk
Co-owner UK-Schools mailing list: email me for details
--
--
This message: 31/12/2000 11:19 GMT.
Hello Nick,
A reminder of what Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
31 December 2000 at 13:47:25 GMT -0800
NA> May the year 2001 bring us Version 2.0 and a Plugin for PGP 7.0.1 :o)
But what will we have to look forward to when Version 2 finally does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Remi,
On 01 January 2001 at 13:33:48 +0200 (which was 11:33 where I
live) Remi Pach wrote and made these points:
RP> I am using the internal PGP implementation but I come a cropper
RP> when I try to import a key. I even tried with some messages s
I am using the internal PGP implementation but I come a cropper when I
try to import a key. I even tried with some messages sent to this list
which I am sure contain a perfectly valid key (Mark Pearlstone's for
instance) and every time I get the warning "There is no valid key in
this message".
Al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Austin,
On 01 January 2001 at 05:19:06 - (which was 05:19 where I
live) Austin Dennis wrote and made these points:
AD> I didn't realise it was set to HTML.
That's okay. Thanks for changing it :-).
AD> ... I just assumed it was something to
I see that version 1.49 Beta 1 is already out. I downloaded it but
could't see any new things except that the quick templates are now
accessible from the Tools menu. Surely there is something else since
there seems to be a substantial amount of extra code in the executable.
Step by step we are pr
45 matches
Mail list logo
