-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 22 February 2002 at 23:00:09 -0800 (which was 07:00 where I live)
Nick Andriash wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> But when I have GnuPG selected as my OpenPGP version, those menu
>> choices are ineffective; they're no
Hello Serge,
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 at 21:23:34 [GMT +0100] (which was 21:23 where I live) you wrote:
SLD> Salut bbx !
SLD> A french mailing liste about TB exists on :
SLD> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe_thebat
Je ne savais pas ;)
but yes, there is a couple of french user here, on
Hi,
Ed Colaianni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote today:
> I need to get the attachments out of my message bodies to save space.
> Clicking the option to save them in the attachments folder seems to just
> make a copy, but doesn't make the folder turn out any smaller, even if
> that box is clicked well
On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 18:36:12, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> Bad idea ... there're regular expressions around build exactly for
> this purpose: stripping these killers off.
Hi Peter,
can you give me a hint? I'd like a regex like that to strip this prepended
sh...stuff from another mailin
Hi,
> When filtering using Kludges, I'm kind of puzzled ...
> For example, I get mail from a mailing list where the sender may be
> one of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> etc
> There is no guarantee as to what node it will come from or whether
> they'll introduce a
I know this isn't the Beta list, but there are several (many) Beta
users here. I use TB! for business and medium-high volume, so it
needs to work without a hitch. Still, I am, after all, a closet
techno-nerd and can't go too many days without trying out some new
piece of s/w. Can someone let me
Hello Stuart,
On Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 1:52:14 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
SB> What I really would like to be able to do is say
SB> sender: list xyz.com
SB> Is there any way to do that ?
What about filtering for:
^Sender: list@.+\.xyz\.com$
and for the other list:
^Sender: l
On 22 February 2002 at 3:19 pm Joseph wrote:
> I know this isn't the Beta list, but there are several (many) Beta
> users here. I use TB! for business and medium-high volume, so it
> needs to work without a hitch. Still, I am, after all, a closet
> techno-nerd and can't go too many days without
On Friday, February 22, 2002, 10:16:16 AM, Joseph N. wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I'm glad to hear there aren't major problems,
> although personally I consider either GPF's or slowness to take
> *any* software out of the running. If the current Beta has both,
> I'll not only wait for further
Friday, February 22, 2002 at 4:04 PM
Hello Everyone,
When I put mail in the trash it is marked as read. I
get a ton of spam and do not want to mark email as read
as I'm afraid I am sending them some sort of
confirmation that I got and read the stuff.
How do I prevent this? I've trie
On 22 February 2002 at 21:06 Shoebuddy wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> When I put mail in the trash it is marked as read. I
> get a ton of spam and do not want to mark email as read
> as I'm afraid I am sending them some sort of
> confirmation that I got and read the stuff.
> How do I pre
Hi Shoebuddy,
On Friday, February 22, 2002 at 16:06:30 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
SJ> When I put mail in the trash it is marked as read. I get a ton of
SJ> spam and do not want to mark email as read
It's a feature. This way, you will not have unread messages in your
trash that you deleted *delib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 1:06:30 PM PST, Shoebuddy Jones
wrote:
> When I put mail in the trash it is marked as read. I get a ton of
> spam and do not want to mark email as read as I'm afraid I am
> sending them some sort of confirmation that
On Friday, February 22, 2002, 3:39:40 PM, Alastair Scott wrote:
> Curiously, it's hardwired into TB!; mail in the Trash _cannot be_
> unread.
That isn't so. When I filter spam straight to the trash folder, I have
to set the filter action to mark as read, or it shows up as unread
mail.
--
Dwigh
Hi Alastair,
On Friday, February 22, 2002 at 21:39:40 [GMT +], you wrote:
AS> Curiously, it's hardwired into TB!; mail in the Trash _cannot be_
AS> unread.
You can mark mails in the trash as unread. Only messages sent to trash
by manually deleting them are automatically marked read.
--
Reg
Hello Melissa Reese,
On Friday, February 22 2002 at 01:23 PM PDT, you wrote:
> With TB!, you don't have to worry about it. The "mark as read" is only
> for your eyes. TB! will not go to the web to download external images,
> etc., so there's no way the spammers can track you. As long as you
> do
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 21:39:40 [GMT +] (which was 22:39
where I live) Alastair Scott wrote:
AS> Curiously, it's hardwired into TB!; mail in the Trash _cannot be_
AS> unread.
Actually, I'm thankfull for that. It was one of the things that was
driving me crazy in OE because it kept
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 16:06:30 [GMT -0500] (which was 22:06
where I live) Shoebuddy Jones wrote:
SJ> How do I prevent this? I've tried all sorts of
SJ> different settings but it's still marking them as read.
The only solution to this is probably to create a separate folder and
se
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 14:04:39 [GMT +0900] (which was 6:04
where I live) Yuki Taga wrote:
YT> But whenever I purge and compress and subsequently reopen a folder,
YT> the message list has lost the focus, and because of that the message
YT> list has scrolled all the way up to the beginn
Saturday, February 23, 2002, 9:20:07 AM, Maurice wrote:
MS> Just press Ctrl-] and you'll be at the first unread message in
MS> the folder.
Not for me, it doesn't. Wonder why. I just did a purge and
compress, leaving two unread messages in the folder. Focus was lost,
of course, after that, bei
Friday, February 22, 2002 at 10:06 PM
Thanks everyone, I'm glad to know that spammers are not
getting any acknowledgement back from me. In OE they
were getting my email address sent back and who knows
what else!
Best regards,
Shoebuddy
--
Saturday, February 23, 2002 at 12:14 AM
SJ> Is there an easy way to exporting from the BAt multiple
SJ> mail boxes
SJ> and all the email in many folders with in each account?
SJ> I have hundreds of folders! So I don't want to select
SJ> mail in each folder, etc.
Have you already tryed the
How did that happen in OE? I used it before going to a
registered version of TB and no acknowledgements/receipts ever went out of OE.
Elaine
> Friday, February 22, 2002 at 10:06 PM
> Thanks everyone, I'm glad to know that spammers are not
> getting any acknowledgement back from me. In OE t
Hello,
Hope this works. I just recently got TB. I have poured over the
online archives, and it seems to me that Norton Anti Virus 2001
is *the* virus scanner to use. The problem that I am having, is
that I cant find a place to purchase it. I went to Amazon.com,
but they a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John
Thank you for your email dated Saturday, February 23, 2002, 6:26:20 AM, in which you
wrote:
JD> it seems to me that Norton Anti Virus 2001 is *the* virus scanner to
JD> use
Before you spend your hard-earned cash have a look at NOD32 at
25 matches
Mail list logo
