Hallo Mark,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:43:25 -0700GMT (21-9-02, 1:43 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MW I'm working on a reply template for my TBUDL folder to work around a
MW bug in the list software.
Well, that's the place I'd go for too. Because when I use reply to
all, I'm no longer using
Sh'mae tbudl-bounces,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, at 18:55:40 [GMT -0400] (or 23:55 in Wales)
regarding 'SpamPAl' you wrote:
AR DNSBL's is the main thing - the bat can filter on various things
AR but its retroactive - SpamPal is a bi more pro active
KC I guess I don't see the advantage as spam is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Wieder [MW] wrote:'
MW %CC=
MW %CC=my list of new CC entries
MW All this does is add to my existing line. Any clues?
I'm wondering why you not just use only the second of your two CC
lines in the
Hello Allie!
On Saturday, September 21, 2002 at 10:52:25 AM you wrote:
I'm wondering why you not just use only the second of your two CC
lines in the template and use the 'reply' instead of the
'reply-to-all'. Why reply-to-all and then clear the CC field with a
template? You needed to just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Greg Strong [GS] wrote:'
GS IIRC WinXP has a FW that checks inbound, but not outbound. To be
GS honest I was hoping someone knew of a KNOWN configuration issue
GS on standard install dial-up connection.
Hello,
the IMAP implementation in THE BAT! is really poor. Is there a new
release planed with real server side IMAP access?
Thanks in advance,
Wojtek
--
Best regards,
Wojtek mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wojtek,
@21-Sep-2002, 11:55 +0200 (10:55 UK time) Wojtek [W] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
W the IMAP implementation in THE BAT! is really poor.
Yes it is.
W Is there a new release planed with real server side IMAP access?
R As mentioned in this post:
R http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg47202.html
R TB freezes and has to be killed and restarted.
You appear to be using the current version or later, so the
templates do work if you have them as written in the library.
Without posting
Hello Adam
Thank you for your email dated Saturday, September 21, 2002, 9:36:35 AM, in which you
wrote:
AR SPEWS is a wonderful deterrent
Adam, you may be interested in my TBOT post.
--
Regards
William
Flying with The Bat! 1.61 www.ritlabs.com/the_bat
Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, at 04:03:57 GMT -0500 (9/21/02, 4:03 AM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ACM The only thing that I know is that the XP Firewall should be
ACM disabled when using a third party firewall. Both together invariably
ACM causes
Friday, September 20, 2002, 12:51:59 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
KC There really is no need to use a 3rd party filter if you invest a
KC little time setting up The Bats filters. The end result is effective
KC spam filtering with only one program ... your e-mail program. The
KC Bat's backup facility
--
Ravi TB! v1.62/Beta5 on Windows XP
icq: 196180805.1.2600 Service Pack 1
aim/msn/yim: r2maharaon a Pentium 233 MHz
http://shell-shocked.tk with 128 MB RAM.
Hold a hard drive to your ear -- listen to the C:
Hello buds!
well i have a weird setback. Yesterday, my printer got turned
off.. and I was trying to print a message.. TB! returned an
access violation. So, i rebooted, etc. and turned on the darn
printer...
Ever since then, I've not been able to print from TB! I can print
from anywhere else.
Hello Ravi,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:26:07 +0100 GMT (21/09/02, 19:26 +0700 GMT),
Ravi wrote:
R As mentioned in this post:
R http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg47202.html
R TB freezes and has to be killed and restarted.
Sounds like an endless loop.
Without posting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Greg Strong [GS] wrote:'
GS Do you use the Generic Host Process of WinXP which is another
GS name for the processes created by SVCHOST.EXE file? In a WinXP
GS newsgroup I've been informed that it can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alists [A] wrote:'
A Ever since then, I've not been able to print from TB! I can print
A from anywhere else.
A The TB! print... dialog doesn't come up, but the print setup
A does.
A Do i have to
Saturday, September 21, 2002, 12:54:53 AM you wrote:
RO BTWyou could add a signature delimiter dashdashspaceenter to
RO your reply template. That way TB strips the list footer automatically
RO when replying to your messages.
List footer? Ah...I'm in digest mode, so I never see a list footer.
This is my first foray into quick templates, so go easy :).
Has anyone successfully used the rewrap template found here?:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rewrap
My guess is no - I think it's because a single-quotation mark is
missing in that particular template.
Quoting the
Hello Allie,
Saturday, September 21, 2002, 11:34:24 AM, you wrote:
A Do i have to reinstall?
ACM That would be the first thing I'd do. :/ Strange that this should
ACM happen, but this is the way of computers.
ACM I'd first install over the current installation. If this doesn't
ACM help then
On the website it says:
%-%-%-%-%-%SUBPATT=6_%-
^
at this line. May that be the culprit?
I changed it, and still no go. That prompted me to do a diff
between the QT I was using, and the one on the site. The
differences (several really) helped me to fix the one on the
Allie-
In most cases, you're right. Reply-to-list is what I want, and the
macro I set up handles this properly. The bug in the list software is
that the TO line is set to go directly back to the sender instead of
to the list. That's why I needed the folder macro in the first place.
In the case
Saturday, September 21, 2002, 1:58:54 AM, you wrote:
DH And before we forget the point made by someone else: If there is an AB
DH template invoked by a %TO macro line, the %CC macro has to be put into
DH *that*. Otherwise it will override the other template.
Yes - it's with much reluctance that
Roelof-
Saturday, September 21, 2002, 12:54:53 AM, you wrote:
RO But when I add your changes to my folder template something funny
RO happens. All at once I'm getting a reply in my tbudl AB reply
RO template. Apparently something is messing up the used templates. That
RO suggests that first the
I'm trying to set up a filter to automatically open up URLs that I get
when someone replies to me on a forum. I've borrowed the method from
the Spamcop processing filter (saving a regexped part of the email to
a batch file then running it)
The problem is that the urls contain '' characters so I
Hello Bat Folk.
Why does TB! *not* call my default browser
when I click on a URL?
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V1.61/W2K_SP3
ICQ 41116329
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ravi,
@21-Sep-2002, 15:40 Ravi [R] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
stock lecture
I have a pet hate in TB. That pet hate is named Folder Templates. In
150 folders I have two and only two that have folder templates. They
are for
sábado, 21 de septiembre de 2002
10:31:58 pm
Hello Dierk,
Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 1:45:24 AM, you wrote:
DH Yip, one of my pets; this problem usually comes up when
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, at 13:23:13 GMT -0500 (9/21/2002, 1:23 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ACM It's enabled here.
I've got it enabled on this connection.
ACM However, I don't have a firewall installed on my XP system. Neither
ACM do I
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, at 13:23:13 GMT -0500 (9/21/2002, 1:23 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ACM It's enabled here.
I have it enabled here as well. The only concern I really had was with
the install of WinXP Pro from the retailer I
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 at 01:43:28 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
MDP If, at the instant you start a new message you happen to be
MDP focused on the wrong folder, the message gets given the wrong
MDP address. This happens when you click a mailto without changing
MDP folders. The results vary
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:31:46 -0400 GMT (22/09/02, 05:31 +0700 GMT),
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR Why does TB! *not* call my default browser when I click on a URL?
Why indeed. TB does call my default browser over here, and I have just
changed my default, TB happily complying.
Are you
31 matches
Mail list logo
