Re: Delete & filter bug?

ON Friday, November 1, 2002, 10:07:55 PM, you wrote: L> If, in your filter, on the advaced tab you enable "message is not L> flagged" and then flag the message before reading and hit delete, it doesn't get L> filtered. Hi Luc, I have filters using the "message is not flagged" functions but t

Re: %ACCOUNT macro in personal template

ON Saturday, November 2, 2002, 9:56:41 PM, you wrote: DW> And now it gets even more weird - it appears to be working now even DW> when I use the toolbar button or Ctrl-N. I haven't changed *anything* DW> about it since - oh, Wednesday? Thursday? - and it didn't work DW> yesterday - but now it doe

Re[2]: Export All Messages & AddressBook to MS Outlook/ Eudora ?

Hello, Thank You! For your reply. Im *very* satisfied with TB, the reason why I asked this question: We use MS Outlook at work, me TB at home and my parents use Eudora. So I must easily switch between the 3. MDP> TB has the ability to export message is various formats, including MDP> .msg files.

Sorry for the OT but ....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, November 03, 2002 8:17:31 AM RE: "Sorry for the OT but " Greetings, All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else experiencing this problem? Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to ask this question. -

Re: Sorry for the OT but ....

Hi DG, on Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:19:56 -0500GMT (03.11.02, 14:19 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:145772801.20021103081956@;myrealbox.com : DRS> All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else DRS> experiencing this problem? DRS> Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT t

Re: Sorry for the OT but ....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:' DRS> All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else DRS> experiencing this problem? DRS> Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to ask DRS>

Re: Sorry for the OT but ....

On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 08:19:56 -0500 GMT (which was 14:19 local time), DG Raftery Sr. wrote: DRS> All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else DRS> experiencing this problem? The last message I received from tbot is dated Sun, 3 Nov 2002 03:03:59 +0700. DRS> Sorry Mr./Mrs

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

Hello, Thomas: Thank you very much. Your instructions were very clear -- and I broke new ground today creating a special TBUDL Reply template that guards against inadvertent top-posting. Here it is, from TBUDL in my address book: Hello, %OFromFName: Best regards, %FromFName Best wishes, Da

Re: sorry about the top-post

Hello David! On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 5:39:09 PM you wrote: Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)): > Hello, %OFromFName: ((^ Why that?)) %QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply)) %CURSOR ((putting you one line beneath

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

Hello Dierk, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 10:52:24 AM, you wrote: DH> Hello David! DH> DH> Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)): >> Hello, %OFromFName: DH> ((^ Why that?)) DH> %QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply)) DH> %CU

Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

My server requires authentication for smtp, but does not allow cram-md5. (I assume that is a type of authentication.) I do not have MD5 checked under transport, but nonetheless in the log I can see that TB is trying to use 'software' cram-md5 authentication. Bottom line, I am unable to send ema

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi John, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 12:54 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": J> essage has not been sent. Server reply - sorry, that domain isn't in my J> list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) this sounds like a qmail server. J> It is not a se

Message list and attachments

Hello, I have an address list of 55 people and, the last time I sent a message with an attachment, 55 individual mail attachments were sent along with 55 individual messages after I had used the "Mass mailing using template" option to invoke a quick template. I can't remember this happening before

Re[2]: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

> Try just plain SMTP auth..account/properties/transport/SMTP > authentication, then click "perform SMTP auth check "use settings > of mail > retrieval. Uncheck "Require MD5, and do *not* check on the bottom >"Pop before SMTP" I have done all that- that is the problem- I can't see how to act

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi John, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 2:12 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": >> Try just plain SMTP auth..account/properties/transport/SMTP >> authentication, then click "perform SMTP auth check "use settings of >> mail retrieval. Uncheck "Require MD5, and do *not* chec

Re[2]: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

> Did you double check also on the transport POP auth (Receive Mail) > to see > that MD5 was not checked? Also the account/properties/transport > > > panel was okay and set to regular. Yes, did all of that. Any other ideas? TB is set to automatically use cram if it can, even if you don't chec

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi John, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 2:30 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": J> Yes, did all of that. Any other ideas? TB is set to automatically J> use cram if it can, even if you don't check the box. Fresh out of ideas, except what version of TB! did you try this wi

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hello John, > My server requires authentication for smtp, but does not allow > cram-md5. (I assume that is a type of authentication.) I do not > have MD5 checked under transport, but nonetheless in the log I can > see that TB is trying to use 'software' cram-md5 authentication. >From TB's Help

Re[2]: AV Tagline

Hello Melissa, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 5:35:22 AM, you wrote: MR> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MR> Hash: SHA1 MR> On Saturday, November 02, 2002, at 2:57:51 PM PDT, Tom Sadler wrote: >> I'm currently using NOD32 as my AV scanner, and I'd like to put a >> tagline in all outgoing mail to

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi Gary, On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 14:47:15 [GMT -0600], you wrote: J>> For some reason, my server must look like it accepts cram checks, J>> even though it doesn't. G> No, TB! does not automatically change from just plain delivery to an SMTP G> auth if the server looks like it accepts them.

(no subject)

G> Fresh out of ideas, except what version of TB! did you try this with? TB! G> by default, is not set for MD5 auth. V 1.61 G> No, TB! does not automatically change from just plain delivery to an SMTP G> auth if the server looks like it accepts them. There is no protocol for G> this automatic

Re: Message list and attachments

Hello Richard, > Apart from using a BCC (which then does not allow for the personal > hello that the Quick Template allows) how do I stop the attachment > being sent 55 times. Fortunately it was only a small one this time > :-) Although I have never used it myself, I believe the idea of "Mass mai

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi Miguel, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:01 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": M> ,- [ SMTP Authentication ] M> | M> | Once connected to an SMTP server, The Bat! checks which of the M> | server's RFC-2554-authentication mechanisms is available, and chooses M> |

Re[2]: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

G> Now that is interesting... I don't remember TB! doing that before ... G> (long ago).. G> For reference, qmail does not support auth or MD5 auth, or POP before G> SMTP, or SMTP before POP, in its basic installation. One must add G> additional packages and actually build them into qmail. If tha

Re: Message list and attachments

Hello Miguel, Sun, 3 Nov 2002 at 22:10:26[GMT +0100](21:10 where I live) you wrote in mid:7035679314.20021103221026@;ermspain.com : MAU> If the message includes an attachment it will be send MAU> along with each message, in your case 55 times. If you want to only MAU> send the attachment once you

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi Lars, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:03 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": L> So, if John's server reports the ability of CRAM-MD5 authentication, L> TB! will (try to) use it, no matter whether "Require secure (MD5) L> authentication" is checked or not. Of course this f

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi John, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:14 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": G>> For reference, qmail does not support auth or MD5 auth, or POP before G>> SMTP, or SMTP before POP, in its basic installation. One must add G>> additional packages and actually build them int

Re[2]: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

G> This is what I thought.. I believe you have cable. They don't usually G> support auth, cable companies that is.. G> Can you call tech support and ask them why you are getting the 5.7.1. G> error, or more specifically the G> Server reply - sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthos

Re: Help with from / to Eudora Pro

Friday, November 1, 2002, 11:54:51 AM, you wrote: LL> Just downloaded The Bat 1.61 and noticed it does convert *from* Eudora LL> (Though converting the other Eudora account will be tricky, its not in LL> Qualcomm/Eudora.) but to be truthful I am out of work at the moment. If I LL> like The Bat

Re: Can't stop CRAM-MD5?

Hi John, On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 3:49 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Can't stop CRAM-MD5?": J> I had this problem with pocomail, but there was a setting in the ini J> file to disable md5. I was hoping there was a similar setting J> somewhere with TB, apparently not. Not that I am awar

Tuning up: a standard template for replying to TBUDL posts

Hello, Dierk: Sunday, November 03, 2002, 11:52:24 AM, you wrote: DH> Hello David! DH> On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 5:39:09 PM you wrote: DH> DH> Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)): >> Hello, %OFromFName: DH> ((^ Why that?)) DH> %QUOTES ((that

Re: sorry about the top-post

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mary, @3-Nov-2002, 12:38 -0600 (18:38 UK time) Mary Bull [MB] in mid:16337465292.20021103123801@;premiernet.net said: MB> This is a big help to me, too, Dierk. And so much more concisely MB> done than my long Reply post to David. Which really didn

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

Hello Marck, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 5:16:48 PM, you wrote: MDP> Here's another tip (and your cut mark works beautifully BTW)... Thanks. >> Best regards, >> Marymailto:xxx MDP> I recommend that you remove the mailto link for all public postings. MD

Re[2]: Sorry for the OT but ....

Hello Andre, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 1:46:19 PM, you wrote: AW> Why can't you post to tbot? If you're subscribed you should also be AW> able to post.. Maybe he means it's possible to post but since he doesn't get mail from TBOT he doesn't know if it gets there ?? Hopefully Allie will be able

Re[2]: Converting to IMAP and common folders

>> I have an account with about 9,000 messages. I would like to convert >> it to IMAP so that I can access them when I am away from my main >> computer. I have my own email server (ALT-N Mdaemon) so I can tell >> it what folders I want, but I do not know how to get my messages >> that exist in my P

Re: AV Tagline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Tom Sadler [TS] wrote:' TS> I'm currently using NOD32 as my AV scanner, and I'd like to put TS> a tagline in all outgoing mail to the effect that the mail has TS> been scanned by NOD32, version such and s

Re[2]: AV Tagline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gi'day Allie, Thanks to both yourself and Thomas Fernandez for the helpful replies. It's reassuring to see that some people can get past their personal pet hates and help. On Monday, 4 November 2002 at 20:30:56GMT -0500 (which was 12:30 PM where I li

Re: Tuning up: a standard template for replying to TBUDL posts

Hello David, On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:41:31 -0500 GMT (04/11/02, 05:41 +0700 GMT), David R. Austen wrote: DH>> -- ((this is two dashes then a space followed by a Return)) >>> Best regards, > I hope this is fine. Thank you very much for your able coaching. > -- > Best regards, > David

Re: Message list and attachments

Hello Richard, On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:21:01 + GMT (04/11/02, 04:21 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: MAU>> If the message includes an attachment it will be send MAU>> along with each message, in your case 55 times. If you want to only MAU>> send the attachment once you will have to include t

Re: Language Switcher

Hello Thomas, On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 10:52:59 +0700 GMT (02/11/02, 10:52 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: > I had to go to Options / Editor Prefs / Display / Font: change, and > change the font manually to a Thai font in order to be able to read > the message. Of course, after reading it, I had to

Re: Message list and attachments

Hello Thomas, On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:30:24 +0700 GMT (04/11/02, 12:30 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: > If you want to send the attachment only once, why is BCC is an option > you would want to chose? Typo. Why is BCC *not* an option -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat!

Re[2]: OT [ Message list and attachments]

Hello Thomas, More than slightly Off Topic reply here, to you: Sunday, November 3, 2002, 11:30:24 PM, you wrote: TF> Hello Richard, And then you appended this sig: Warum hatte Bach so viele Kinder, Kant jedoch kein einziges? - Weil Bach sich auf die Kunst der Fuge verstand, waehrend Kant nur d