-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 29, 2002, Nathan J. Yoder wrote...
JA It's almost this kind of thinking (no offence) that starts
JA getting programs in trouble. I know mailto: URLs won't cause any
JA halm (unless you do permit certain headers to be set), but
Hello Nathan!
On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 8:21:30 AM you wrote:
The be lenient in what you accept, strict in what you send
So, TB should send mailto links correctly coded and accept (in
other mails) them wrong?
First, I am not sure what that means in this context.
Second, how the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:'
DH So, TB should send mailto links correctly coded and accept (in
DH other mails) them wrong?
DH First, I am not sure what that means in this context.
DH Second, how the hell should TB know what part after a mailto:
DH
Friday, November 15, 2002, 6:24:20 PM, Marck scribbled:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi 3w,
MDP @16-Nov-2002, 01:04 +0100 (00:04 UK time) 3w [3] in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
3 Any suggestions?
MDP I really must put this on the FAQ.
MDP AV
Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 6:23:52 AM, Daniel scribbled:
DS Hi,
DS 1) I just wanted to know, if this bug is fixed for you:
DS [-] Fixed a bug of Beta/2 with S/MIME internal implementation. It didn't
DS check correctly the signatures.
DS For me, it isn't.
DS If I change the S/MIME engine to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael Disabato [MD] wrote:'
MD Nope. Didn't work.
moderator
You quoted the entire message just to answer with three words, and
worse, you put the three words at the bottom of the entire quote.
This
Hello Allie!
On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 12:52:20 PM you wrote:
You ask the question. How is TB! to know when the mail-to link
ends???
You can't compare an incorrectly formatted mailto link embedded in
text to an incorrectly formatted url or other link put in a browsers
address field.
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
I've seen a few references on this list to an AVG plugin for TB.
However, I can't find anything on Grisoft or Ritlabs' sites.
Can someone tell me where to get the AVG plugin?
TIA,
--
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A
Fellow TB users,
I just noticed that in the 'View' menu of a new message there is an option of
'Follow Up'
What is the function of this option ? Never used it before.
--
Best regards,
Raj
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thought/Joke for the mail : Change is inevitable,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Geoff,
@29-Nov-2002, 14:33 Geoff Lane [GL] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
GL Can someone tell me where to get the AVG plugin?
http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_avgbat.htm
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
@29-Nov-2002, 20:25 +0530 (14:55 UK time) Raj [R] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
R I just noticed that in the 'View' menu of a new message there
R is an option of 'Follow Up'
R What is the function of this option ?
Marck,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, at 15:10:20 [GMT +] (which was 8:40 PM where I live) you
wrote:
MDP It exposes the References header data for you to modify should you
MDP wish to associate a reply with (or disassociate a reply from) a
MDP thread.
How is it different from the 'Comments'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bat! people,
I got the recommendation from a member on this list to go check Nod32
for a good virus protection, and so i did. It seems to be very good at
catching viruses and the like, but i have a question, and/or a cry for
help:
When i scan
Hello Nathan,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:13:50 -0500 GMT (29/11/02, 10:13 +0700 GMT),
Nathan J. Yoder wrote:
JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters such as
JA spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex version.
...
JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules.
Hello Jonathan,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:38:04 -0600 GMT (29/11/02, 12:38 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Case in point ;) IE is very buggy, and has security holes in it that'd
scare a lot of people if they knew about them. Maybe if they
considered following the RFCs, rules and standards
Hello Michael,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:05:05 -0600 GMT (29/11/02, 19:05 +0700 GMT),
Michael Disabato wrote:
There is a fourth choice if your VS supports it. Use it as a proxy to
get to your POP3 account. Trend Micro's PCCillin does this. I have to
enter the POP3 Server as localhost/servername.
Hello Nathan,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:21:30 -0500 GMT (29/11/02, 14:21 +0700 GMT),
Nathan J. Yoder wrote:
JA I think RitLabs have done the correct thing in following the RFCs
JA correctly. The more compliance you have with standards, the more
JA likely you are to do well. Start changing things,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 29, 2002, Dierk Haasis wrote...
The be lenient in what you accept, strict in what you send
So, TB should send mailto links correctly coded and accept (in
other mails) them wrong?
First, I am not sure what that means in this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 29, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
JA I think RitLabs have done the correct thing in following the
JA RFCs correctly. The more compliance you have with standards, the
JA more likely you are to do well. Start changing things, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
@29-Nov-2002, 20:43 +0530 (15:13 UK time) Raj [R] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP It exposes the References header data for you to modify
MDP should you wish to associate a reply with (or disassociate a
MDP reply from)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:'
DH Yes, I see what you mean. But, AIUI, the original poster asked
DH about a bug in TB - the application not recognising a space in
DH a link correctly. As my example showed, there is a good reason
DH to *not* have spaces in a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Krister Ekstrom [KE] wrote:'
KE When i scan incoming mail and/or attachements and Nod32 finds a
KE virus, i hear a system beep and the mail downloading process is
KE halted and here's where my problem comes in.
Are you sure the downloading process is
Hello Raj,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:43:15 +0530 GMT (29/11/02, 22:13 +0700 GMT),
Raj wrote:
MDP It exposes the References header data for you to modify should you
MDP wish to associate a reply with (or disassociate a reply from) a
MDP thread.
How is it different from the 'Comments' option.
I'm going to respond to a bunch of e-mails from different people, so
in order to avoid sending a bunch of replies I've combined them into
this one. Also please read it all, including my previous lengthy post
on other software that uses the be lenient in what you receive...
policy. Also, I'm
Bats-
Bringing this back on topic again:
Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote:
NJY You can see http://www.gummibears.nu/test.html for an example of one
NJY correct mailto, and one incorrect if you'd like to test for yourself.
The correctly formed url still is not handled correctly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 29, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote...
Bats-
Bringing this back on topic again:
Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote:
NJY You can see http://www.gummibears.nu/test.html for an example of one
NJY correct mailto, and one
Hey everyone,
Is there a easy way to automatically mark a message as read once a
reply has been written/sent.
I realise I could set up a filter to do this, but I want it to do it
for every folder... - if i write a reply to a unread message, I want
it to be marked as read, regardless of
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:23:07 -0600
Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 29, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote...
Bats-
Bringing this back on topic again:
Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote:
NJY You can
28 matches
Mail list logo
