Re: Sorting Office

Hello Thomas, > Oh please, no. The order of the display *must* be the same as the > order in which the filters are processed. This is the first time I am > against even an option to make soemthing happen. Agree 100% -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61

Re: Sorting Office

Hello St, > I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted > in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice > if one could group related rules: I can agree to that. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61

Re: Bat v2?

Il 16/01/2003 alle 5.50, Allie Martin ha scritto: > > TBUDL is for discussion on official release versions of TB! only. > If you wish to report on and/or discuss beta version issues, then > please do so on TBBETA. > You many subscribe by sending a subscribe message to the listserv > mailt

Re: Bat v2?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Giampaolo, @16-Jan-2003, 12:18 +0100 (11:18 UK time) Giampaolo Bellavite [GB] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: GB> Dear Allie, I've sent a lot of subscribe message, without any GB> response. How we could talk about the beta versio

Transfer from ME to XP

Hallo tbudl, I'm going to install WinXP next week or so. It will be a fresh install, so I'll have to install all programs again. Oh my... :-( Waht about TB? I will backup the whole folder, install TB anew, and copy everything from the old folder back to where it belongs. This should save all pref

Re: Transfer from ME to XP

> What about TB? I will backup the whole folder, install TB anew, and > copy everything from the old folder back to where it belongs. This > should save all preferences etc. > Am I right? Or is there a better way to do it? If you make sure the folder you are installing TB into is 100% equal

Re: Development Focus

Hello Joseph, On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:46:07 -0600 GMT (16/01/03, 11:46 +0700 GMT), Joseph N. wrote: > Why is RITlabs producing beta versions of 1.63 at the same time as > they are producing refinements of the 1.62 series at the same time as > they are supposed to be developing the 2.0 series? Con

Re: Sorting Office

Hello St, On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:38:13 +0100 GMT (16/01/03, 11:38 +0700 GMT), St - Musaic.Net wrote: > I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted > in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice > if one could group related rules: I now see what you

Re: Transfer from ME to XP

ON Thursday, January 16, 2003, 2:20:16 PM, you wrote: HK> Hallo tbudl, HK> I'm going to install WinXP next week or so. It will be a fresh HK> install, so I'll have to install all programs again. Oh my... :-( HK> Waht about TB? I will backup the whole folder, install TB anew, and HK> copy everyth

Re: Sorting Office

Hey St, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 11:38:13 PM. SMN> I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted SMN> in the order they are processed) - BUT it would

Re: Development Focus

Hey Joseph, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/3) Business' was used to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 11:46:07 PM. JN> Why is RITlabs producing beta versions of 1.63 at the same time as JN> they are producing refinements of the 1.62 series at

Re: Transfer from ME to XP

Hallo Gerard, am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 schriebst Du: > The best and easiest way is to use the backup function. > When you do the backup you will find you can select each account, > address book, and preference file to be included. > You then simply install TB! on the new machine and loa

Re: Should I stay or should I go...? (PIM's; OT)

On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:42:13 PM, Joseph N. wrote: > Anyone who is not interested in Outlook should look into > IBM/Lotus Organizer. It's quite powerful despite its ease of use; it > syncs flawlessly with Palms (can't vouch personally for other types of > handhelds); and it imports/expor

Re: TBDEV now up and running

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, @16-Jan-2003, 16:37 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP> This cross posting brings the announcement that a new list has MDP> been born today. MDP> TBDEV is now open for subscriptio

Re: TBDEV now up and running

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, @16-Jan-2003, 16:37 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP> This cross posting brings the announcement that a new list has MDP> been born today. MDP> TBDEV is now open for subscriptio

Re: Sorting Office

On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 1:10:56 PM, Adam wrote: > Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? and SEARCH them!!! -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1 __

Re: Transfer from ME to XP

Hello Heiko, and Gerard, On Thursday, January 16, 2003, 10:28 AM, you wrote: >> The best and easiest way is to use the backup function. ... >> You then simply install TB! on the new machine and load the backup. >> No worries and easy peasy :-) H> Hmmh well... of course, that's what it's for.

Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

Hello Deborah, PK>> Try "Time and Chaos" http://www.isbister.com/ I use it for a number PK>> of years. > > I've been using T&C for only a few months, but I'll second the vote. > It's terrific. Does it somewhat "interface" or "talk" to TB to send mail, etc.? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (E

RSS Feed?

Howdy, Is it possible to set up TB to integrate with an RSS feed? -- Chris Montgomery Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Development Focus

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph N. [JN] wrote:' JN> Why is RITlabs producing beta versions of 1.63 at the same time as JN> they are producing refinements of the 1.62 series at the same time JN> as they are supposed to be developi

Bat Running Slow

Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes! Has anyone seen this? I'm running 1.52 on Win2K. Thanks! Mike Curre

Re: Bat Running Slow

Hello Michael, On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:55:05 -0600 GMT (17/01/03, 07:55 +0700 GMT), Michael Disabato wrote: > Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are > downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very > slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes! > Has

Re: Bat Running Slow

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, January 16, 2003, Michael Disabato wrote... > Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are > downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very > slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes! > Has any

Re: Bat Running Slow

Good morning, Michael. Sometimes, 17.01.2003, 05:55, you wrote us about "Bat Running Slow": MD> Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are MD> downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very MD> slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes! Do you have

TBDEV now up and running

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TB list members, *** MODERATOR'S ANNOUNCEMENT *** This cross posting brings the announcement that a new list has been born today. TBDEV is now open for subscription. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subscribe T