Hello Thomas,
> Oh please, no. The order of the display *must* be the same as the
> order in which the filters are processed. This is the first time I am
> against even an option to make soemthing happen.
Agree 100%
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Hello St,
> I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
> in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice
> if one could group related rules:
I can agree to that.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Il 16/01/2003 alle 5.50, Allie Martin ha scritto:
>
> TBUDL is for discussion on official release versions of TB! only.
> If you wish to report on and/or discuss beta version issues, then
> please do so on TBBETA.
> You many subscribe by sending a subscribe message to the listserv
> mailt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Giampaolo,
@16-Jan-2003, 12:18 +0100 (11:18 UK time) Giampaolo Bellavite [GB]
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
GB> Dear Allie, I've sent a lot of subscribe message, without any
GB> response. How we could talk about the beta versio
Hallo tbudl,
I'm going to install WinXP next week or so. It will be a fresh
install, so I'll have to install all programs again. Oh my... :-(
Waht about TB? I will backup the whole folder, install TB anew, and
copy everything from the old folder back to where it belongs. This
should save all pref
> What about TB? I will backup the whole folder, install TB anew, and
> copy everything from the old folder back to where it belongs. This
> should save all preferences etc.
> Am I right? Or is there a better way to do it?
If you make sure the folder you are installing TB into is 100% equal
Hello Joseph,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:46:07 -0600 GMT (16/01/03, 11:46 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
> Why is RITlabs producing beta versions of 1.63 at the same time as
> they are producing refinements of the 1.62 series at the same time as
> they are supposed to be developing the 2.0 series?
Con
Hello St,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:38:13 +0100 GMT (16/01/03, 11:38 +0700 GMT),
St - Musaic.Net wrote:
> I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
> in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice
> if one could group related rules:
I now see what you
ON Thursday, January 16, 2003, 2:20:16 PM, you wrote:
HK> Hallo tbudl,
HK> I'm going to install WinXP next week or so. It will be a fresh
HK> install, so I'll have to install all programs again. Oh my... :-(
HK> Waht about TB? I will backup the whole folder, install TB anew, and
HK> copy everyth
Hey St,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 11:38:13 PM.
SMN> I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
SMN> in the order they are processed) - BUT it would
Hey Joseph,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/3) Business' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 11:46:07 PM.
JN> Why is RITlabs producing beta versions of 1.63 at the same time as
JN> they are producing refinements of the 1.62 series at
Hallo Gerard,
am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2003 schriebst Du:
> The best and easiest way is to use the backup function.
> When you do the backup you will find you can select each account,
> address book, and preference file to be included.
> You then simply install TB! on the new machine and loa
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:42:13 PM, Joseph N. wrote:
> Anyone who is not interested in Outlook should look into
> IBM/Lotus Organizer. It's quite powerful despite its ease of use; it
> syncs flawlessly with Palms (can't vouch personally for other types of
> handhelds); and it imports/expor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
@16-Jan-2003, 16:37 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP> This cross posting brings the announcement that a new list has
MDP> been born today.
MDP> TBDEV is now open for subscriptio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
@16-Jan-2003, 16:37 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP> This cross posting brings the announcement that a new list has
MDP> been born today.
MDP> TBDEV is now open for subscriptio
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 1:10:56 PM, Adam wrote:
> Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
and SEARCH them!!!
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1
__
Hello Heiko,
and Gerard,
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, 10:28 AM, you wrote:
>> The best and easiest way is to use the backup function. ...
>> You then simply install TB! on the new machine and load the backup.
>> No worries and easy peasy :-)
H> Hmmh well... of course, that's what it's for.
Hello Deborah,
PK>> Try "Time and Chaos" http://www.isbister.com/ I use it for a number
PK>> of years.
>
> I've been using T&C for only a few months, but I'll second the vote.
> It's terrific.
Does it somewhat "interface" or "talk" to TB to send mail, etc.?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (E
Howdy,
Is it possible to set up TB to integrate with an RSS feed?
--
Chris Montgomery
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:'
JN> Why is RITlabs producing beta versions of 1.63 at the same time as
JN> they are producing refinements of the 1.62 series at the same time
JN> as they are supposed to be developi
Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are
downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very
slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes!
Has anyone seen this? I'm running 1.52 on Win2K.
Thanks!
Mike
Curre
Hello Michael,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:55:05 -0600 GMT (17/01/03, 07:55 +0700 GMT),
Michael Disabato wrote:
> Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are
> downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very
> slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes!
> Has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, Michael Disabato wrote...
> Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are
> downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very
> slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes!
> Has any
Good morning, Michael.
Sometimes, 17.01.2003, 05:55, you wrote us about
"Bat Running Slow":
MD> Yesterday, I noticed The Bat! running very slow. The messages are
MD> downloaded at normal speed, but processing through the filters is very
MD> slow. 10 messages take about 15 minutes!
Do you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TB list members,
*** MODERATOR'S ANNOUNCEMENT ***
This cross posting brings the announcement that a new list has been
born today.
TBDEV is now open for subscription.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subscribe
T
25 matches
Mail list logo