Hallo Richard,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:13:04 +GMT (26-1-03, 1:13 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
>> When you view threads by references, the message that was replied
>> to is _always_ one level up.
RW> Now this is getting interesting because it certainly doesn't
RW> happen here.
I made a
Hello Roelof,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 00:20:44[GMT +0100](which was 23:20 where I
live) you wrote:
> When you view threads by references, the message that was replied to
> is _always_ one level up.
Now this is getting interesting because it certainly doesn't happen
here. In fact, on inspecting cl
Hallo Richard,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:07:15 +GMT (25-1-03, 15:07 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
RW> I want to be able to see the message that the poster who's message
RW> I am reading is replying to and that may be well up the thread if
RW> the poster has replied late after others have h
Hello Mary,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 at 16:24:19[GMT -0600](which was 22:24 where I
live) you wrote:
> I am afraid this exchange will soon be considered OT. Want to say any
> more on TBOT?
I don't think so. Just wait and hope that wishes are implemented by
the powers that be :-)
--
Best regards,
Ric
Hello Richard!
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, 4:16 PM, you wrote:
MB>> It was my first post to the wish-list. I got a "form" letter back, but
MB>> at least I know the request is in their files now.
MB>> Have you posted yours yet? ...
R> Yes, I posted mine about 6 hours ago but no form letter ba
Hello Mary,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 at 12:31:03[GMT -0600](which was 18:31 where I
live) you wrote:
> It was my first post to the wish-list. I got a "form" letter back, but
> at least I know the request is in their files now.
> Have you posted yours yet? I saw your post to Miguel that you were
> goi
Hello Anne,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:12:11 + GMT (25/01/03, 09:12 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:
PP>> Have you chosen the existing archive and the new archive being the
PP>> same file?
> Perhaps a note in the help file to warn of this would be useful for
> new users?
Or a kind of blockage, so that y
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 04:15:30 [GMT +] (11:15 PM EST Thu here) Anne
wrote:
> Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 3:04:37 PM, Daniel wrote:
DG>> For example, AOL members address only me (the
DG>> sender) when they hit [Reply].
> I understand from AOL users on some of my genealogy lists that they
> have
Hello Richard!
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, 8:07 AM, you wrote:
MB>> I went to the TBUDL folder and tried it. Of course, I had to scroll
MB>> for the "root," as Thomas terms it, the originating message of the
MB>> thread.
R> Ah, but that's not the one I want either :-)
R> I want to be able to
Hello Mary,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 07:11:40[GMT -0600](which was 13:11 where I
live) you wrote:
> I went to the TBUDL folder and tried it. Of course, I had to scroll
> for the "root," as Thomas terms it, the originating message of the
> thread.
Ah, but that's not the one I want either :-)
I wan
Hello Miguel,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 10:17:24[GMT +0100](which was 09:17 where I
live) you wrote:
> Are you
> using View/View threads by/Reference? That helps a bit.
Certainly am :-)
I also usually have them sorted by creation time too. The trouble is I
sometimes can't even find the original me
Hello James,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:13:42 -0500 GMT (25/01/03, 02:13 +0700 GMT),
James Van Horn wrote:
>I know this has been discussed before, but I was hoping to see some
> results by now. When toggling between windows, 95% of the time, my Bat
> hangs for about 2-5 seconds before the window
Hello Wayne,
Saturday, January 25, 2003, 5:37:32 AM, you wrote:
Wayne> Friday, January 24, 2003 at 11:29 AM (Pacific Time)
Wayne> Hello Razgo, This is a reply to your message dated
R>> 2. where do i find my liscence key or info to back up so i don't lose
R>> it?
Wayne> When I registered abou
>> 2. where do i find my liscence key or info to back up so i don't lose
>> it?
Thomas> In the registry. Back up the whole key HKCU / Software /RIT. It also
Thomas> contains your settings and stuff.
thank you :)
russ
Current version is 1.62 |
Hallo Mary,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:41:02 -0600GMT (25-1-03, 5:41 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MB> However, other subscribers to TBUDL are saying that properly
MB> written List protocols will over-ride a Poster's "reply to"
MB> configuration.
It's not really a matter of properly written pr
15 matches
Mail list logo
