A piece of information about Secure Bat!

2003-02-27 Thread Claude Renaud
Hi All, I recently bought the Secure Bat! software and I would like to have more information about it. First I know that Secure bat! is based on The Bat! core but I would like to know if their are special mailing lists to discuss about its particular functionnalities ? And, where can we o

Re: distaster strikes :-(

2003-02-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Jos, An archeological dig discovered that on Friday, February 28, 2003 at 08:10 GMT +0700, Jos Flachs [JF] typed the following: JF> No idea why my Bat all of a sudden requires me to log on. Under Options -> Network and Administration, did you change any of the account privileges to user?

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread James Senick
Hello Thomas, On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:55:49 [GMT +0700] (which was 9:55:49 PM in NY, USA) Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> Export -> Edit -> Import. That easy :) Not easy enough for those who have to do it often. > I know this, but it is an old circular discussion Pit was referring > to: Should it

Re: macro for specifying word wrap column

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Sean, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:43:31 -0600 GMT (28/02/03, 10:43 +0700 GMT), Sean wrote: > It does wrap them, but the line breaks in my message cause the lines > to look something like poetry ;) What's wrong with poetry? ;-) >>> There is probably an obvious solution, TF>> No, I am afraid t

Re:macro for specifying word wrap column

2003-02-27 Thread Sean
Thursday, February 27, 2003, 9:00:09 PM, Thomas wrote: TF> Interesting. Does her email-client not wrap incoming mails to fit the TF> window? What does she see when your mails are wrapped at standard TF> length? It does wrap them, but the line breaks in my message cause the lines to look something

Re: upgrade from 1.51 to 1.62i

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mark, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:30:08 -0800 GMT (28/02/03, 05:30 +0700 GMT), Mark Wieder wrote: > The new structure is: > main TB folder: > TheBat! executable >| >MAIL folder > | > ---account1 > | > ---account2 > etc., where the old system didn

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Miguel, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:59:08 +0100 GMT (28/02/03, 01:59 +0700 GMT), Miguel A. Urech wrote: >> I am not. I receive messages with non-sensical subjects. I would like >> to edit those. > Export -> Edit -> Import. That easy :) I know this, but it is an old circular discussion Pit was

Re: macro for specifying word wrap column

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Sean, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:37:24 -0600 GMT (28/02/03, 06:37 +0700 GMT), Sean wrote: > Hi all - is there a macro for specifying at which column lines should > wrap? I have a contact who's e-mail client has a width of something > like 40 characters for displaying message text, and I'd like

Re: Sobig

2003-02-27 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Robert, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 3:09:58 PM, you wrote: RS> Hello Mike, RS> Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 9:16:06 PM, you wrote: MA>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit First I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't broadcast my address to all and every spammer who trawls through the web site bu

Re: distaster strikes :-(

2003-02-27 Thread Daniel Rail
Hello Jos, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 9:10:11 PM, you wrote: > Hi all, > Yesterday I got into some problems with my Bat: I suddenly have to submit > username and password. No matter what username I type in, the answer is > always 'user "xyx" does not exist'. > No idea why my Bat all of a sudd

distaster strikes :-(

2003-02-27 Thread Jos Flachs
Hi all, Yesterday I got into some problems with my Bat: I suddenly have to submit username and password. No matter what username I type in, the answer is always 'user "xyx" does not exist'. No idea why my Bat all of a sudden requires me to log on. Who can help me out? -- Best regards, Jos Flac

macro for specifying word wrap column

2003-02-27 Thread Sean
Hi all - is there a macro for specifying at which column lines should wrap? I have a contact who's e-mail client has a width of something like 40 characters for displaying message text, and I'd like to create an address book template so that messages to her get wrapped at 40 characters rather than

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Miguel, @27-Feb-2003, 23:13 +0100 (22:13 UK time) Miguel A. Urech [MAU] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MAU> I guess TB does the right thing in your case to compensate what it MAU> does wrong in mine :) Generally, TB does what it is told to in the

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Sergey, > Might be your Reply template that strips quotes, not the program. Hmmm, I didn't think of that. I will check it. Thanks. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | "Us

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Sergey Kalabekov
Miguel A. Urech typed: MAU> Yes, I know the problem comes because of the comma, but still I don't MAU> understand why TB strips the quotation marks. Might be your Reply template that strips quotes, not the program. Sincerely, -- Sergey E. Kalabekov Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re[2]: upgrade from 1.51 to 1.62i

2003-02-27 Thread Mark Wieder
I, on the other hand, went through the same pain of having to move folders, etc. The new structure is: main TB folder: TheBat! executable | MAIL folder | ---account1 | ---account2 etc., where the old system didn't have a MAIL folder enclosing the var

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Luc, > I don't know if this is of any assistance for you Miguel, but i don't > receive From: "Joe Blow, Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I receive From: Joe Blow, > Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> without quotes. However on replying, TB! inserts the > quotes and doesn't give any errors. I never had that prob

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Sergey, > I think the problem with comma after "Blow" and when you put the name > in quotation marks the program recognizes prefix "Jr" as a part of > name. Otherwise prefix "Jr" seems like a part of the e-mail address. > My thoughts. Yes, I know the problem comes because of the comma,

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Sergey Kalabekov
Miguel, Correction to my last message: "Jr" is suffix. Regards, -- Sergey E. Kalabekov Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBU

Re: Sobig

2003-02-27 Thread Kim
Hi Scott, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 10:23:48 AM, you wrote: > I have been using The Bat! now for several months, and I wouldn't want > to use anything else at this point. I have used both Trend Micro > PC-cillin and Norton Anti-Virus 2003 with it, but several weeks ago I > purchased Kaspersky

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Sergey Kalabekov
Miguel A. Urech typed: MAU> I receive a message with: MAU> From: "Joe Blow, Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MAU> When I reply to it, TB includes this address in the To field but MAU> without the quotes: MAU> To: Joe Blow, Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think the problem with comma after "Blow" and when you

Re: Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Luc
Good evening Miguel, It was foretold that on 27-2-2003 @ 21:53:44 GMT+0100 (which was 21:53:44 where I live) Miguel A. Urech would mumble: MAU> Obviously, if I manually include the quotes, the message is sent MAU> just fine. Does anybody know why TB strips the quotes when MAU> reply

Stupid problem with quoted names

2003-02-27 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello all, I receive a message with: From: "Joe Blow, Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> When I reply to it, TB includes this address in the To field but without the quotes: To: Joe Blow, Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And if I click send I get the following error: --- Message has no

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Thomas, > I am not. I receive messages with non-sensical subjects. I would like > to edit those. Export -> Edit -> Import. That easy :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 |

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Pavel Kuznetsov
Hi Peter, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 8:19:49 PM, you wrote: > there are good reasons why The Bat! does not allow to alter an > incoming message directly; and yes: I'm one of those guys that prefers > it's current behavior :-) Why? Can you sort of summarize the reasons behind your opinion? No f

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:19:49 +0100 GMT (28/02/03, 01:19 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: > And: yes, there are good reasons why The Bat! does not allow to alter an > incoming message directly; and yes: I'm one of those guys that prefers > it's current behavior :-) I am not. I re

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Pavel, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:36:09 +0200 Pavel Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail? > In particular I wish to process Subjects of received letters > removing some extra information like [this-list] or [that-list] etc. > Is there a way to do t

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Pavel, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:36:09 +0200GMT (27-2-03, 18:36 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PK> Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail? You can't do that with TB, neither automatically nor manually. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current

A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread Pavel Kuznetsov
Hello there, Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail? In particular I wish to process Subjects of received letters removing some extra information like [this-list] or [that-list] etc. Is there a way to do this automatically on message arrival? -- Pavel Kuznetsov ___

Re: new feature wished

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:23:42 +0100 GMT (28/02/03, 00:23 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: TF>> Currently there is no way of knowing when the message was actually TF>> sent. > It could be done with an outgoing filter. (Maybe a series, I'm not > sure whether it can be done with only on

Re: new feature wished

2003-02-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:51:35 +0700GMT (27-2-03, 17:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TF> Currently there is no way of knowing when the message was actually TF> sent. It could be done with an outgoing filter. (Maybe a series, I'm not sure whether it can be done with only one.) Ex

Re: Restoring old mail

2003-02-27 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi stuart, on Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:51:34 +GMT (27.02.03, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : s> I have directories on my system with lots of old mail from earlier s> versions of TB! but these directories are only the MAIL files I guess that should suffice. Create folder

Re[2]: Urgent needed info: What version of TLS does TB! use?

2003-02-27 Thread Charlie Law
Hello Thomas, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 4:42:26 PM, you wrote: TF> I have read the same about the release version, but would still TF> recommend that you post your question on the beta list. TBUDL is a TF> list where users help each others, TBBETA is the list on which also TF> the developers a

Re: new feature wished

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello DG, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:36:51 -0500 GMT (27/02/03, 19:36 +0700 GMT), DG Raftery Sr. wrote: > Electronic Arts, as you, does not care when I created the message but I > do. Should a programming problem arise I can go back to my sent folder and > get an extremely good idea of when "I" creat

Re: More SPAM fighting

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Deborah, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:10:07 + GMT (27/02/03, 19:10 +0700 GMT), Deborah W wrote: > I do all of this - but have a family member who will insist on sending > e-cards from a site who then repeatedly spam me :-( Tell your family member you have a new email address especially for e

Re: upgrade from 1.51 to 1.62i

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jernejcic, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:08:10 +0100 GMT (27/02/03, 23:08 +0700 GMT), Jernejcic Alexander wrote: > are there any caveats, hints or points to information regarding an > upgrade from 1.51 to 1.62? > i would like to make it as painless as possible to my users. i did the > upgrade on a

Re: Urgent needed info: What version of TLS does TB! use?

2003-02-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Charlie, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:00:57 + GMT (27/02/03, 23:00 +0700 GMT), Charlie Law wrote: > Thanks for the info. Actually, while I'm using a beta, I know that the > behavior of the release version is the same. So my question stands, > but with reference to any of the current release o

upgrade from 1.51 to 1.62i

2003-02-27 Thread Jernejcic Alexander
hi, are there any caveats, hints or points to information regarding an upgrade from 1.51 to 1.62? i would like to make it as painless as possible to my users. i did the upgrade on a testinstallation and it created a new folder structure beside the old folders - what i do not like to happen to my us

Re[2]: Urgent needed info: What version of TLS does TB! use?

2003-02-27 Thread Charlie Law
Hello Roelof, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 3:38:12 PM, you wrote: RO> Since this is obviously a beta issue, you'd better take this to RO> tbbeta. On that list the developers are present too and they're most RO> likely to know this. Thanks for the info. Actually, while I'm using a beta, I know th

Not Really related TB

2003-02-27 Thread Raj
Fellow TB users, This message is not really related to TB. Just that I find the people in the group very helpful and wanted some assistance. I am NOT a technical person (would say technically inclined). In my new role I am heading a project to design a Test Engine for assessment and want

Re: Urgent needed info: What version of TLS does TB! use?

2003-02-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Charlie, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:22:08 +GMT (27-2-03, 11:22 +0100, where I live), you wrote: CL> What version of SSL/TLS does The Bat 1.63b7 use? Since this is obviously a beta issue, you'd better take this to tbbeta. On that list the developers are present too and they're most likely t

Re[3]: Sobig

2003-02-27 Thread lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hi Robert, Thursday, February 27, 2003, 10:09:58 AM, you wrote: RS> Definition wise yes but. I have AV 2000 on this machine and it seems RS> to deal strangely with this virus. It stores temp files on disk and RS> that trigger AV pop ups to anno

Re[2]: Sobig

2003-02-27 Thread Robert Silver
Hello Mike, Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 9:16:06 PM, you wrote: MA> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MA> From: Mike Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MA> Precedence: list MA> Subject: Re: Sobig MA> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:16:06 + MA> To: Robert Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MA> References: <[EMAIL

Re[4]: new feature wished

2003-02-27 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:47:59 AM RE: "new feature wished" Greetings Philip, On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 6:46:50 PM, you wrote: PS> That's true, the headers reflect the time on the MUA, not the time on PS> your PC. Either clock could be w

Re: More SPAM fighting

2003-02-27 Thread Geoff Lane
On 27 February 2003, 11:36, Jamie Dainton wrote: > Send a mail to Jungle and they will unsubscribe you as they are a > proper company (division of argos). ~~~ However, bargain-jungle.com may not be the same company as Jungle.com Pinging: www.bargain-jungle.com returns 216.35.70.238 www.jungle.co

Re[2]: More SPAM fighting

2003-02-27 Thread Deborah W
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, 11:36:22 AM, Jamie Dainton wrote: G>> X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD> JD> Send a mail to Jungle and they will unsubscribe you as they are a JD> proper company (division of argos). It's jungle.com who are a division of Argos, not bargain-jungle.com - as far as I ca

Re[2]: More SPAM fighting

2003-02-27 Thread Deborah W
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, 11:54:55 AM, Roman Katzer wrote: RK> To avoid the annoyance, be careful with your mail address. Use RK> temporary addresses or accounts specifically set up as spam buckets RK> when the recipient of your mail or mail address is of dubious RK> reputation. Don't use yo

Re: More SPAM fighting

2003-02-27 Thread Roman Katzer
Hi Jaime, On Thursday, February 27, 2003, 12:36:22, Jamie Dainton wrote: G>> X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Send a mail to Jungle and they will unsubscribe you as they are a > proper company (division of argos). with respect, but the name "bargain-jungle.com" alone reeks of spam. And there are "prop

Re: More SPAM fighting

2003-02-27 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Gerard, Monday, February 24, 2003, 9:57:01 PM, you wrote: G> X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send a mail to Jungle and they will unsubscribe you as they are a proper company (division of argos). -- Best regards, Jamiemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Urgent needed info: What version of TLS does TB! use?

2003-02-27 Thread Charlie Law
What version of SSL/TLS does The Bat 1.63b7 use? My SSL email server uses TLS version 1.0, Key Exchange Algorithm RSA (1024bit), Encryption Algorithm RC4 (128bit), Integrity Check Algorithm SHA. Is there an obvious reason why TB! would consistenly report "invalid protocol version" when I attempt

Re: Restoring old mail

2003-02-27 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stuart [S] wrote: S> I have directories on my system with lots of old mail from earlier S> versions of TB! but these directories are only the MAIL files, the S> executable and general installation files have been deleted. OK. S> I have a spanking

Restoring old mail

2003-02-27 Thread stuart
Hello, Before the 'you're a dunce' comments start I already know! I have directories on my system with lots of old mail from earlier versions of TB! but these directories are only the MAIL files, the executable and general installation files have been deleted. I have a spanking new (well a couple

Restoring old mail

2003-02-27 Thread stuart
Hello, Before the 'you're a dunce' comments start I already know! I have directories on my system with lots of old mail from earlier versions of TB! but these directories are only the MAIL files, the executable and general installation files have been deleted. I have a spanking new (well a couple

Re: Running The Bat on the server of a web hostnig company

2003-02-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Loan, On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:34:13 -0800GMT (27-2-03, 3:34 +0100, where I live), you wrote: LO> Is there a way to install and run The Bat on the server of a web LO> hosting company instead of on one's personal computer? No. -- Groetjes, Roelof