Removing angle-bracket from quote prefix

Hello: I am trying to customize my TB installation, but I'm confused on the way that the %QUOTESTYLE macro is used and the help file is not very helpful in these matters. In particular, I am trying to get rid of the '>' character, which seems to persist. For example, if I set the macro to:

Remove attachments

Is there a way to build a filter to remove (automatically) the attachments of an incoming mail ? -- Ciprian > An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstone

Re:SOT: How to kill Winmail.dat?

On Sunday, June 1, 2003 at 18:00 (which was Sunday, June 1, 2003 at 8:00 where I am) Allister Jenks [AJ] wrote: AJ> A guy who normally sends me <200k HTML emails, this time sent me a AJ> whopping 1.5Mb email that had about 1.5k of text and a AJ> Winmail.dat. Welcome to the world of Microsoft. AJ

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

To all of you having problems: just for the fun of it, enable port 113 tcp incoming (identd authentication) or set it to reject. Some mail servers might try to query identd and wait for the timeout when there's no response. This has helped my with my primary mail server and Kerio PFW. Roman --

Re: gnupg help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Harrison [PH] wrote: PM>> The Nullify release of GnuPG comes with a plugin for The Bat!, Are you sure of this? PM>> so you can select it via Tools -- PGP -- Choose version. Have a PM>> look at http://www.nullify.org. That menu choice is as a r

Re[2]: gnupg help

Hello Peter, Monday, June 2, 2003, 9:49:16 AM, you wrote: PH>> Can anyone give any advice on how to implement GNUpg in TB? I am struggling to PH>> work out how to install it, let alone how TB can use it. PM> The Nullify release of GnuPG comes with a plugin for The Bat!, so you PM> can select it

Re: gnupg help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, on Mon, 2 Jun 2003 07:45:24 +0100GMT (02.06.03, 08:45 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PH> Can anyone give any advice on how to implement GNUpg in TB? I am struggling to PH> work out how to install it, let alone how TB c

gnupg help

Can anyone give any advice on how to implement GNUpg in TB? I am struggling to work out how to install it, let alone how TB can use it. Thanks in advance, Paul Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000 Current version is 1.62r | "Us

Re[2]: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello DZ-Jay, Sunday, June 1, 2003, 6:13:31 PM, you wrote: > I rolled back to the previous version of TB (1.61) and everything > works fine again. I started having problems with ZA using TB (1.61). shrug Thanks, Terry Current version is 1.62r

Re[2]: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello Allie, Monday, June 2, 2003, 2:16:02 AM, you wrote: AM> Dz-Jay [DJ] wrote: DJ>> I am sorry, but I cannot accept the (now common) "solution" of DJ>> ignoring the problem and trying a different firewall. AM> You don't have to. I wish you good luck then. :) AM> I really hope that it continu

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dz-Jay [DJ] wrote: DJ> I am sorry, but I cannot accept the (now common) "solution" of DJ> ignoring the problem and trying a different firewall. You don't have to. I wish you good luck then. :) I really hope that it continues to be problem free for y

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Some time around 6/1/03 18:43:03, I think I heard Allie Martin say: ::> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ::> Hash: SHA1 ::> - From my personal experience, as well as the experience of quite a few ::> other TB! users, when ZA starts being problematic with TB!, this heralds ::> the onset of other

Re[2]: HTML Images not showing!!

Hello Marck, Sunday, June 1, 2003, 9:05:12 PM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Cjc, MDP> @1-Jun-2003, 20:30 -0400 (01:30 UK time) CJC [C] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: C>> The images in HTML messages are not showing. Just blank boxes with C>> r

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello DZ-Jay, Sunday, June 1, 2003, 2:48:39 PM, you wrote: DJ> Hello: DJ> I recently upgraded from the bat v1.61 to 1.62 and I DJ> encountered a problem (BTW, great program! still evaluating but plan DJ> on registering soon!). If I have ZoneAlarm running and try to do any DJ> TCP operati

Re: HTML Images not showing!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Cjc, @1-Jun-2003, 20:30 -0400 (01:30 UK time) CJC [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: C> The images in HTML messages are not showing. Just blank boxes with C> red X's.. what is wrong?! Nothing! TB is a mail reader and not a browser. If the images

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Some time around 6/1/03 19:10:54, I think I heard Allister Jenks say: ::> It sounds like ZoneAlarm already thinks it knows the program (how ::> would be an interesting question). Have you checked through all the ::> program definitions in ZoneAlarm to see if there is an entry that ::> could be mat

HTML Images not showing!!

The images in HTML messages are not showing. Just blank boxes with red X's.. what is wrong?! -- CJC mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TB

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello Allie, On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, at 18:23:29 GMT -0500 (6/1/2003, 6:23 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : AM> Let's see what happens with v4 when it's released. I'll watch and see what others experience with v4, but after my experience with v3 that is about as far as I'll

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kenneth S. Rhee [KSR] wrote: KSR> You might want to upgrade to ZA 3.x. I have been running the ZA Pro KSR> 3.x and now 4.x beta, and haven't had any problem with it. This seems to be a cat and mouse thing. Those having problems with the later version

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

On Monday, 2 June 2003, at 7:48:39 a.m., DZ-Jay wrote: > Hello: I recently upgraded from the bat v1.61 to 1.62 and I > encountered a problem (BTW, great program! still evaluating but plan > on registering soon!). If I have ZoneAlarm running and try to do > any TCP operation from The Bat!,

Re[2]: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello, Sunday, June 1, 2003, 6:43:03 PM, you wrote: DJ>> If I shutdown ZoneAlarm, TB works fine. Now, I could think it is a DJ>> problem with ZoneAlarm, of course, except that it does not happen DJ>> with any other program (that I use) and it didn't happen with the DJ>> previous version of TB.

Re: AV DLL File

Joseph N. [JN] wrote: JN> In the course of reconfiguring my AV setup, I noticed that the AV JN> setup dialog box under Options/Preferences/Protection/Anti-Virus JN> lists a "generic DLL plug-in" and reports its status as "error." On JN> the next line is listed my NOD32 BAV, which reports a status

Re: Truncated messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Webster [MW] wrote: MW> I've been using the "Windows-compatible" editor recently and this MW> seems to be the source of my problem. When reverting to Micro-ed the MW> problem goes away. I wasn't aware of any restrictions on the new MW> editor.

AV DLL File

In the course of reconfiguring my AV setup, I noticed that the AV setup dialog box under Options/Preferences/Protection/Anti-Virus lists a "generic DLL plug-in" and reports its status as "error." On the next line is listed my NOD32 BAV, which reports a status of "OK." Why might the generic DLL set

Re[2]: Truncated messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello The Bat! Users, Sunday, June 1, 2003, 11:27:34 PM, you wrote: AM> There are no restrictions in message size that I know of, except when AM> using the alternative editor that is now in beta. I've been using the "Windows-compatible" editor recen

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dz-Jay [DJ] wrote: DJ> If I shutdown ZoneAlarm, TB works fine. Now, I could think it is a DJ> problem with ZoneAlarm, of course, except that it does not happen DJ> with any other program (that I use) and it didn't happen with the DJ> previous version

Re: Truncated messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Webster [MW] wrote: MW> Are there any restrictions on the length of a message? I created a MW> message a couple of days ago, which was about 3,000 characters in MW> length and The Bat! truncated it at around 2,000 characters. The MW> message in

Truncated messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello The Bat! users, Are there any restrictions on the length of a message? I created a message a couple of days ago, which was about 3,000 characters in length and The Bat! truncated it at around 2,000 characters. The message in the Sent Mail folder

Re: where in the headers comes %OFromFName from ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, June 1, 2003, 10:28:57 PM, Wilfried wrote: BM>> Hmm, I didn't know it had a "comma rule." > for your information, I just heard that in US it is a habitude to > sign "lastname, firstname" or "firstname lastname" (so firstname > first _or_ a

Re: where in the headers comes %OFromFName from ?

Wilfried- Saturday, May 31, 2003, 2:18:40 PM, you wrote: BM>> Hmm, I didn't know it had a "comma rule." I see it's specialized. It BM>> appears to take the first name after the last comma. Commas, AFAIK, are *always* bad ideas in email address headers. The most basic rule in any of the email c

Re[2]: where in the headers comes %OFromFName from ?

Hello Bill, BM> Hmm, I didn't know it had a "comma rule." for your information, I just heard that in US it is a habitude to sign "lastname, firstname" or "firstname lastname" (so firstname first _or_ a comma). That should explain the comma rule ! thanks anyway all for all help ! -- Rgds, Wilfr

Re: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello DZ-Jay, On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, at 15:48:39 GMT -0400 (6/1/2003, 2:48 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : DJ> Anybody has heard of this problem before? Not the specifics you mentioned, but a few TB users including myself have had problems with ZA. I encountered problems

TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

Hello: I recently upgraded from the bat v1.61 to 1.62 and I encountered a problem (BTW, great program! still evaluating but plan on registering soon!). If I have ZoneAlarm running and try to do any TCP operation from The Bat!, it will just stall there endlessly. The behaviour is exactly l