Re: Spammers Using "TheBat"

On 27 June 2003, 04:54, Greg Strong wrote: > ,- [ 4 line from the bottom of your headers ] > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > `- > Looks like a forgery to me. ~~~ However, these headers guarantee that the message is spam. FWIW, I've just set up a filter to delete without downloading anythin

Re: Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:34am -0400, Mark Wieder wrote: > Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of > why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the > correct filtering event would have occurred... Well I have to admit that I have my address in my Family

Re: Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:23am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote: > On Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:54 PM, Bill wrote: >> I don't like the Know filter at all and don't use it because of its >> bugs on replying from Inbox-Known. > What bugs? There's an inconvenience (no folder templates). The bugs are related. (1

Re: still problem with TB cleaning up when shutting down

On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:44am -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote... >> [..] I guess TB has a problem with multi-user XP? > I don't think so... I run it here just fine... and same on Win2k as > well. Do you use separate mail stores for each XP user? If you use

Re:still problem with TB cleaning up when shutting down

Hello Jonathan, Friday, June 27, 2003, 7:44:33 AM, you wrote: > On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote... >> I still have this problem with TB getting stuck when cleaning the >> folders at shut-down. It's not happening on my user (Win XP, two >> users), it's on my girlfriends side (which m

Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

MW> Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of MW> why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the MW> correct filtering event would have occurred... I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody? I appreciate the responses on this subject, and I

Re: S/MIME X.509 Thawte Certificate for TB?

Hello Greg, Thursday, June 26, 2003, 8:08:02 PM, you wrote: GS> Funny thing is there is a certificate there on the web that I GS> fetched, but it doesn't have a private key when I try to export. I GS> suppose this has to be added by Thawte? So when you go to export it, you're checking the "Export

Re: Detecting HTML Spam

Hello Francis, Thursday, June 26, 2003, 8:15:22 PM, you wrote: FM> Isn't there an add on for The Bat for filtering? Has anyone used FM> it? Is it available? Please don't top post (meaning that when you reply you reply above the quoted text of the original message). This is in the list rules. A

Re: S/MIME X.509 Thawte Certificate for TB?

Hello Leif, On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, at 08:24:39 GMT -0600 (6/27/2003, 9:24 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : GS>> Funny thing is there is a certificate there on the web that I GS>> fetched, but it doesn't have a private key when I try to export. I GS>> suppose this has to be

Re: Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

Bill- I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on, sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some external webmail accounts so I can see the kludges. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Be

reply as a new thread

Hello, What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a new thread ? For example in many mailing list many people just hit reply to start a new thread. I want for example answer to sutch mail with same subject and with quotes, but at the same time start a new

Re: reply as a new thread

27-Jun-2003 20:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a > new thread ? I usually go CTRL-A (mark all) CTRL-C (copy) then CTRL-N (new message) and ALT-INS (paste as quotation). Have to manually add the TO: field (and subject, b

treating an attachment as a text file

I used to use mutt for a mail client, and it has some really cool abilities. For one thing, it is the fastest mail client I've ever used when it came to opening up a large mailbox (no separate index file, to boot). It also has the nice ability to forcibly open an attachment as a text file. For ins

Re: Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:09pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote: > I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered > putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on, > sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some > external webmail accounts so I can see

Re: reply as a new thread

On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:39pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote: > What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a > new thread ? I think you're stuck with the method neurowerx outlined. Or, you could modify a hot-key activate filter to remove the references and in-reply-to f

Re[2]: reply as a new thread

Hello Bill, BM> With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method: I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ? -- Rgds, Wilfried http://www.mestdagh.biz Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Cur

Re: ly as a new thread

Hi Wilfried, on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 20:39:15 +0200GMT (27.06.03, 20:39 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : WM> What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a WM> new thread ? I hit reply on the message. Then I copy the text to clipboard, open a new

Re: reply as a new thread

On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:00pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote: BM>> With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method: > I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ? ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and some old QTs n

Re: ly as a new thread

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote... >> I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta >> version ? > ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta > Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and > some old QTs nee

Re: ly as a new thread

On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:31pm -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote... >> Let me know if you want a summary of the changes in each of the >> betas by private email. > Or read the respective text files in the same location That's what my summaries are - those t

Re[2]: ly as a new thread

Hello Jonathan, JA> it's a beta, use at your own risk ;) Whell I'm software developper myself. Each beta is improvement where old bugs are solved, new bugs are introduced, as it it for every official realeas :) But still thanks for warning me ;-) -- Rgds, Wilfried http://www.mestdagh.biz

Re: reply as a new thread

Hello Wilfried, On Jun 27, 2003, 20:39 +0200 GMT (1:39 PM CST) you [WM] typed: WM> What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a WM> new thread ? Have you tried removing the "Follow-Up" content in the message editor? -- Regards, Sergey _

Re: reply as a new thread

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bill, @27-Jun-2003, 15:45 -0400 (20:45 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Wilfried: >> What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message >> ..but.. start a new thread ? ... BM> With the 1.63 Beta, here's ano

Re: treating an attachment as a text file

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wl, [W] wrote: W> For instance, if somebody sends me a batch script as an attachement, W> ``opening'' the file would actually run the file. Mutt has the W> ability to ``open as text for viewing'' the file, as well as ``open W> for running'' the file.

New thread

Hello neurowerx, On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, at 20:48:34 GMT +0200 (6/27/2003, 1:48 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : > I usually go CTRL-A (mark all) CTRL-C (copy) then CTRL-N (new message) > and ALT-INS (paste as quotation). Have to manually add the TO: field > (and subject, bu

Re: New thread

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, @27-Jun-2003, 21:43 -0500 (03:43 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> While I think this is already pretty good, I would be glad to >> know an even more comfortable way. :-) ... GS> However according to Marck per GS>

Re: Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

Hello Coyle306, On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:07:12 -0400 GMT (27/06/03, 18:07 +0700 GMT), Coyle306 wrote: > I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody? I used to. Namely when I was replying to private mails while I was in the office; when I bcc'ed myself, I could download my replies at home as wel

Re: Unexpected Behavior of "Known" Filter

Bill- Friday, June 27, 2003, 12:21:56 PM, you wrote: BM> We all work a little differently, Mark. BM> I have AutoCompletion turned BM> off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me BM> to the setting page, so Alt-NA toggles it) - and I often like BM> to edit the outbox f