Re: message counter

Hallo MAU, On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 01:44:13 +0100GMT (7-2-2005, 1:44 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M> Have you tried the %REPLYCOUNTER macro and see if it works? I have not M> tried myself. Thanks, I thought it did something else, but this works: %Subject="%ReplyCounter %OSubj" -- Groetjes, Roe

Re: message counter

Hello Roelof, > I know, but how can I enable a message counter in that window, I don't > see any... Have you tried the %REPLYCOUNTER macro and see if it works? I have not tried myself. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.6 Winamp Playing: Artie Traum -

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Thomas Fernandez @ 2005-Feb-5 10:18:57 PM "Remote Images in HTML mail?" > And if I whitelist the LH newsletter and then someone sends me a > webbug from that address (not difficult to fake a From header), it > is *my* risk. People who don't want to take that risk will leav

Re: message counter

Hallo Alexander, On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:35:32 +0100GMT (6-2-2005, 15:35 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ASK>>> Maybe it works when you add it to the filters action template? >> How? ASK> When I select "create automatic reply" as filter action, a window pops up ASK> with a reply template (and it

Re: Just Discovered Bayes Filter

Some time around 01/13/2005 16:34:31, I think I heard Buiculescu Virgil say: > Thursday, January 13, 2005, 9:33:30 PM, you wrote: >> I'm just trying out Bayes Filter and it seems to answer my needs. My only >> gripe at the moment is the 'hidden' menu selections to mark mail as junk >> or not. >> C

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 11:22:51 -0600, Mary Bull wrote: M> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB>>> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello David! On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 10:48 AM, you wrote: M How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? >>> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB>> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote: M>>> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M>>> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? >> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an MB

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote: M>>> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M>>> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? >> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an MB

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 06:38:24 -0500, Allie Martin wrote: AM> Fernandez wrote: GL>>> That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and GL>>> all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the GL>>> HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want

Re: message counter

Hello Roelof Otten & everyone else, on 06-Feb-2005 at 14:37 you (Roelof Otten) wrote: ASK>> Maybe it works when you add it to the filters action template? > How? When I select "create automatic reply" as filter action, a window pops up with a reply template (and it is not my account reply templ

Re: message counter

Hallo Alexander, On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:15:27 +0100GMT (6-2-2005, 12:15 +0100, where I live), you wrote: >> Even though my account reply template has checked the 'use reply >> numbering' option, the filter doesn't add numbers to the subject line. ASK> Maybe it works when you add it to the filters

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Mary! On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 6:47 AM, you wrote: >> It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm >> off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to >> take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I >> want to do it well. .

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Tony, On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:23:02 + GMT (06/02/2005, 19:23 +0700 GMT), Tony Boom wrote: TB> Like Thomas said, the users on this list are the elite of email users, TB> maybe a version of TB! just for us with a secret, non documented option TB> for true full blown html ability... Just

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Richard! On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 2:34 AM, you wrote: > It's a lovely day here, a bit chilly at the momnent, but I'm > off to rake up the last two of the ten beds in the garden. I tend to > take about two hours for each one as there are a lot of stones and I > want to do it well. . Y

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Allie! On Sunday, February 06, 2005, 5:48 AM, you wrote: >> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an >> attachment, I would become quite wary. > Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send > fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot conce

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Greg, A reminder of what Greg Strong on TBOT typed on: Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:45:40 GMT +0100 GS> I've seen this argument on TB lists for years. It seems to be an GS> ideological issue / opinion. Why can't you provide options and keep GS> everybody happy? Exactly. Not having

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez on TBOT typed on: Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 04:29:44 GMT +0100 TF> TB's user demography will probably have a higher percentage of TF> computer savvy users than most other mailers, yet it nannies the users TF> more. Why is that? I can't st

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Allie, On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 06:38:24 -0500 GMT (06/02/2005, 18:38 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: AM> The interesting thing too is that if you open the message in your AM> browser, the risks are still there in terms of security and privacy. Persactly. So I must know what I am doing, otherwis

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:29:57 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: > I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an > attachment, I would become quite wary. Me too. The spammers know about Amazon sending ads and will send fraudulent material. I get fraudulent stuff a lot

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 10:22:59 PM [GMT -0500], Thomas Fernandez wrote: GL>> That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and GL>> all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the GL>> HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want

Re: message counter

Hello Roelof Otten & everyone else, on 06-Feb-2005 at 11:17 you (Roelof Otten) wrote: > Even though my account reply template has checked the 'use reply > numbering' option, the filter doesn't add numbers to the subject line. Maybe it works when you add it to the filters action template? -- Be

message counter

Hallo TBUDL, Currently I'm testing something with a filter that replies automatically. Even though my account reply template has checked the 'use reply numbering' option, the filter doesn't add numbers to the subject line. That was rather a disappointment since the account was created

Re: Trying to understand Bayesit

Hello BJH & everyone else, on 04-Feb-2005 at 14:56 you (BJH) wrote: > It seems to me that in simple terms the plugin assigns a 'score' to each > email, and dependent on the score allocated TB determines what ultimately > happens to that email. To be precise, by the classification of each mail th

Re[2]: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Mary, On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 you wrote in MB> And very well said. My .02 worth is to agree with all your points one MB> hundred per cent! and I'll just add a very strong "me to" here but it would have to be an option. MB> I think that the Smiley capability (also option

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hello Greg Strong & everyone else, on 06-Feb-2005 at 00:19 you (Greg Strong) wrote: >>> Giving away the IP address of the recipient when reading an HTML mail >>> with embedded images, providing feedback to spammers that the message >>> arrived. >> H... I cannot see why that is a security ris