Re: Digest (02/14/2000 06:00) (#2000-386)

2000-02-13 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hey list, I no longer participate in the list because of the flame wars instigated by Steve Lamb. I peruse the digest on occasion, but he has certainly turned me off of the program. His attitude of "If you don't like it, go elsewhere", certainly must be affecting RIT Labs' sales. Best Regards,

Re[2]: OT: Newsreaders (Was Re: Usenet - Batology)

2000-02-02 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Tony, Okay okay, you got me ;) I forget about offline reading now that I have ADSL :) Best regards, Derek In response to your message fromWednesday, February 02, 2000, 3:05:52 AM: Tony> This message: 02/02/2000 08:04 GMT. Tony> Hello cid, Tony> Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 5:47

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello John, Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 10:46:37 PM: [SNIP] JS> ii) I occasionally have need to approve news postings on a private moderated JS> newsgroup. Since these arrive via mail, it would be nice to be able to JS> inject them into the news system direc

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Steve, *ACK* You mean we agreed? ;) Derek Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:32:06 PM: SL> Monday, January 10, 2000, 7:55:48 PM, Derek wrote: >> I guess the masses want bundled apps. I hate 'em. I'm mad at opera >> for considering an email client and an

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Paul, Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 10:31:21 PM: P> I don't need a Gravity replacement, just an excellent email program P> that can post to newsgroups when needed and run local newsgroups via P> its own internal server. Really, try to give

Wishlist: Seperate Broswer, Email, Newsreader, linked by plugin

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello again TB!ers,, Here is my wish for V2.X. Although I don't like a company branching out in so many directions at once, this is RITLABS choice. I just hope they can do it well. They have my hat's off if they do. My only concern is for the Email program to suffer because of this.

Re[3]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Jason, Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 9:25:00 PM: JT> Hello Steve and Bat Buddies, JT> Usenet, on the other hand...Well, I know none of the technical aspects JT> of Usenet, but I've seen that MS Outlook smoothly integrates news and JT> mail into one clie

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Mark, *exactly* Derek Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 8:06:44 PM: MA> Hi Steve, MA> Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:28:21 AM, you wrote: >>> but that does not really appeal. Any suggestions for another Windows MUA >>> that come close to TB, as it is n

Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!

2000-01-10 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Mark, I agree with you mark. I REALLY like TB from the short time I've used it. And planned to complete my migration from Pegasus Mail shortly... I don't like do-all apps. I use Xnews for news, and Opera for web browsing, and wanted to use TB for email. They should only be integrated in as

OT: Windows Recycle Bin Was (Re[2]: Enough already)

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
2000 21:31:39 -0500, Derek Cedillo wrote: AM> [..snip..] >> No, MicroSoft product *tells* you what you want. They never ask. 90% >> of the people I work with complain regularly about MS and how they >> added features that they never need. The difference here is, we are >

Re[2]: Enough already (Was: Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!)

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Steve, Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:25:47 PM: SL> Hey, lemme ask this, honestly. How many people saw me say that having the SL> option to apply filters to all accounts would be a good thing? I bet not SL> many. I sure didn't, it was hard to read

Re[2]: Wish list from a new user of The Bat

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Januk, EXCELLENT COMPROMISE! I love the idea. (note, that's not yelling, that's cheering ;) Derek Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 9:10:38 PM: JA> Hello Steve, JA> Friday, January 07, 2000, 3:32:14 PM, you wrote: JA> >> OK. I'd like to request a

Re[2]: Enough already (Was: Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat!)

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Steve, Thanks for another arrogant reply, you must be proud. Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 2:03:38 PM: SL> Friday, January 07, 2000, 10:36:54 AM, cid wrote: >> Steve, although you offer "workable" solutions, there are easier ways >> to deal with the The

Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Steve, I still think the way to do this is to keep account seperate...but just have "Global filters" that work an all accounts or a subset of accounts. In fact, that almost goes against bloat...because you wouldn't have to run duplicate filters ever. (This is of course particular to my situ

Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Alexander, Pretty much the same reason I'm here too. I like the features of pegasus, but the features of the bat as well. I'm pretty torn on the two programs. And for what it's worth...even with Pegasus at 4.5 MB or whatever it is, it is the fastest mail system I've ever used. Faster than

Re: Import from PEGASUS 3.11

2000-01-07 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Marek, I did it from 3.12b...worked great. It didn't bring in trays, but all the folders made it. Derek Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 5:11:22 AM: MM> Hello, MM> Tried somebody import messages from PEGASUS 3.11 by IMPORT WIZARD? -- Best regards, De

Re[2]: (No Subject)

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Thomas, Yep, that would do it! Thanks! Derekf Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 12:46:58 AM: TF> Hi Derek, TF> On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 00:16:10 -0500GMT (07/01/2000, 13:16 +0800GMT), TF> Derek Cedillo wrote: DC>> Is there a way to NOT auto-p

Re[2]: RITLABS interview almost...

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Steve, Very much agreed! Written in response to your letter of Friday, January 07, 2000, 12:26:33 AM: SL> On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 07:24:57AM +0900, Leif Gregory wrote: >> Can you say good-bye to IE, NN, and Opera?!? We'll be seeing some very >> interesting software developments coming fr

Re: RITLABS interview almost...

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Leif, Written in response to your letter of Thursday, January 06, 2000, 5:24:57 PM: LG> Hello users, LG> Now to tease you all some... LG> Version 2.x is gonna wipe the walls with the other e-mail software LG> currently out there (including TB v1.x!) Can you tease us even a bit more...p

(No Subject)

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello again TB!ers,, Is there a way to NOT auto-preview whatever message is highlighted when I open a folder? Sometimes I like to just peak in a folder and see what's there...and I don't want it to automatically mark whatever message it wants to highlight (usually the first message) a

Re[2]: Massive Download Message Size bug

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
: SH> Hello Derek Cedillo, SH> On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 at 22:35:45 GMT -0500 [Friday, January 07, 2000 SH> 10:35 GMT +0700], you told to the list: DC>> I sent myself a couple of large messages yesterday from work...one DC>> a 1.8 MB file, and the other a 7.8 MB file (Don

Wishlist: "Multiple accounts filter" was: Re: Pegasus vs. The Bat

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Alexander, Written in response to your letter of Thursday, January 06, 2000, 6:43:06 PM: AVK> Hi there! AVK> On 6 Jan 00, at 15:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote AVK> about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!": >> So let me get this straight... TB!'s filters only work on a >> particular account?

Re[3]: default e-mail address

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Lone-Wolf, Thursday, January 06, 2000, 9:29:18 AM, you wrote: LW> Hello Derek, LW> Friday, January 07, 2000, 12:33:36 AM, you wrote: DC>> Hello Lone-Wolf, DC>> Thursday, January 06, 2000, 8:29:48 AM, you wrote: LW>>> Hello Bat, LW>>> Is there any way to have a default e-mail address

Massive Download Message Size bug

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello TBUDL, I sent myself a couple of large messages yesterday from work...one a 1.8 MB file, and the other a 7.8 MB file (Don't worry, I have ADSL ;) In anycase, the 1.8MB file downloaded okay...the 7.8MB file would crash TB with an out of memory error. I tried this 5 times, and got the same e

Re: default e-mail address

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Lone-Wolf, Thursday, January 06, 2000, 8:29:48 AM, you wrote: LW> Hello Bat, LW> Is there any way to have a default e-mail address for a folder? LW>For instance I highlight the folder where I store all messages on LW> The Bat mailing list, and want to send a new message to this g

Auto Formatting

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Thanks for all the help on my other questions...and yet I still have more! I'm not sure if it's the Auto-Format, I'm having problems with, or what...but in anycase, the problem has been that when I reply to someone, some of my text gets mingled with their replies! I've had this happen two o

Re: Send from account (was:Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!)

2000-01-06 Thread Derek Cedillo
Hello Thomas,, 2000, 1:33:08 AM, you wrote: TF> Hi Steve, TF> On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:19:59 -0800GMT (06/01/2000, 03:19 +0800GMT), TF> Steve Lamb wrote: >>> 3. Changing "Send from account..." Is there a more visible way to do >>> this?