Good evening hmeyer,
It was foretold that on 8-12-2002 @ 10:38:04 GMT+1300 (which was
22:38:04 where I live) hmeyer would mumble:
h> Many thanks for that info, which worked fine.
I'm glad it worked out :-)
h> Now, how does one know if AVG is actually checking the mail?
Hmm, good question:
Hello hmeyer,
Sunday, December 8, 2002, 11:38:04 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
> Many thanks for that info, which worked fine. Now, how does one know
> if AVG is actually checking the mail?
Try this site:
http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/
I tweaked The Bat! so that it passed all tests
Hello Luc,
Many thanks for that info, which worked fine. Now, how does one know
if AVG is actually checking the mail?
Sorry about the "mumbles", just couldn't work out how to get into the
system at first. 8^)
Regards,
Hilton Meyer
Current ve
Good afternoon hmeyer,
It was foretold that on 8-12-2002 @ 22:09:10 GMT+1300 (which was
10:09:10 where I live) hmeyer would mumble:
h> I have downloaded avgbat9us.exe but cannot get it to work. Can
h> anyone suggest a solution to this problem?
Have you installed it manually or ha
Hello hmeyer,
h> I have only just joined the list.
Welcome Hilton :) You're going to love this ;)
h> I have downloaded avgbat9us.exe but cannot get it to work.
Is that the Avast Anti-Virus? You can get it from here
http://www.webattack.com/newapp.php?id=105009 It was just
released on 12/07/2002 a
I have only just joined the list. I have downloaded avgbat9us.exe
but cannot get it to work. I keep getting the message that my version
(1.62) of TB is obsolete and I need version 1.60 or later. Can anyone
suggest a solution to this problem?
Thank you,
Hilton M
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:'
SP> Besides this one, AVG, and Kaspersky, what other AV progs have
SP> plug-ins for TB! ?
Dr Web: http://www.dials.ru/english/inf/thebat.htm
SophosNT: ftp://www.ritlabs.com/pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Martin [TM] wrote:'
TM> do you know if there will be a development of the Nod32 plugin.
TM> I like that AV , but i need a working plugin. I like the
TM> posibilty to filter a Mail with a virus in
Hello Marek,
On Monday, 9. September 2002 at 17:31:41 [GMT +0200 (CEST)] you wrote:
> I'm in contact with developers from Eset, developer of Nod32. I have sent
> them source code for plugin and free licence, so please wait. They told
> me, they have a little time, but they will try to find
Sh'mae Nick,
On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, at 14:07:20 [GMT -0700] (or 22:07 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG virus checker and TB' you wrote:
NA> Hello Adam Rykala,
NA> On Sunday, September 08 2002 at 08:45 AM PDT, you wrote:
>> And if you mean turning TB! into OE then ugg
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Thomas Martin wrote:
> > AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for AVG
> > seems right, although Kaspersky and NAV usually don't score that high
> > - virtually no virus scanner does. that's why F-Secure uses two
> > (three) *different* scan engines.
>
>
Hello Allie,
On Monday, 9. September 2002 at 07:28:32 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
> Agreed. NOD32's checker window flickers into view with each
> attachment check (just a glitch) and *steals the window focus every
> time* (this is annoying).
do you know if there will be a development of the Nod32
Hi Allie,
On Monday, September 9, 2002 07:28 your local time, (18:13 my local
time), you wrote:
TM>> Its interesting, always Norton, Kapersky. What about Nod32.
TM>> vBulletin Page it has over the last years impressive results and
TM>> by the way better than Norton and Kapersky. The only thing i
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Martin [TM] wrote:'
TM> Its interesting, always Norton, Kapersky. What about Nod32. If
TM> you look at the vBulletin Page it has over the last years
TM> impressive results and by the way better than Norton and
TM> Kapersky. The only thing is t
Hello Dierk,
On Sunday, 8. September 2002 at 20:49:44 [GMT +0200] you wrote:
> AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for AVG
> seems right, although Kaspersky and NAV usually don't score that high
> - virtually no virus scanner does. that's why F-Secure uses two
> (thre
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 9:54:37 PM, you wrote:
Yeah, sorry about that, I thought I was replying individually,
apologies to all.
DH> Hello Jim!
DH> On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 7:44:18 PM you wrote:
>> Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
DH> Jim, it's nice to see someone
Hello Sudip,
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:06:58 +0545 GMT (09/09/02, 09:21 +0700 GMT),
Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
SP> http://www.hackfix.org/miscfix/icons-av-all.shtml <--- Test page
Wow. My virus scanner (PC-Cillin) got 100%. I'll stick with it. :-)
I only wonder why TB has no plugin for PC-Cillin.
--
Hello Nick!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 11:05:42 PM you wrote:
> He's not talking about an either/or situation. Rather, he inquired as to
> TB's much talked about NewsReader support via Plugin... if memory serves.
I know that he doesn't write about "either/or". I was and am against
TB! beco
Hi Dierk,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:49:44 +0200 GMT (Sep 09, 00:34 my local time),
you [DH] wrote:
DH> AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for
DH> AVG seems right,
...
What scared me about the hackfix.org tests is that few trojans in
their petri dish seemed familiar. Particu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jim Lanyon [JL] wrote:'
JL> Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
There's no need to publicly thank others for help like this. A
single reply thanking everyone would have been much better. Sending
a
Hello Adam Rykala,
On Sunday, September 08 2002 at 08:45 AM PDT, you wrote:
> And if you mean turning TB! into OE then ugghhh.
No, the only one mentioning OE was you. ;o) What he was inquiring about
is the NewsReader Plugin... no more... no less. ;o)
--
Nick Andriash
Creston, B.C. Canada
Hello Dierk,
On Sunday, September 08 2002 at 08:01 AM PDT, you wrote:
> > ...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup support?
>
> No. TB! is an e-mail client, *not* a newsreader.
He's not talking about an either/or situation. Rather, he inquired as to
TB's much talked
Hello Jim!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 7:44:18 PM you wrote:
> Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
Jim, it's nice to see someone thanking others as you do, but for one
it is not necessary - I think we all agree that thanks is - most of
the time - implicit. And even if you want to thank t
Hello Sudip!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 6:20:50 PM you wrote:
> Marck, the AV test results of hackfix.org (with random trojans) seem
> to suggest that AVG has rather low, 64% to be precise, detection rate.
> Comparatively Kaspersky and NAV have 100 and 95 percent detection rate
> respective
Hello Ben,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 1:25:32 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.si
Hello Luc,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 12:52:47 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.si
Hello Adam,
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Adam,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 12:24:01 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.
Hello Marck,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 12:20:03 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.s
Hi Marck,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:20:03 +0100 GMT (Sep 08, 17:05 my local time),
you [MDP] wrote:
MDP> Once you have the plug-in, configure TB to use it under Options |
MDP> Virus protection and all will be better than perfect.
Marck, the AV test results of hackfix.org (with random trojans) seem
Hi Ben,
on Sun, 8 Sep 2002 13:29:52 +0100GMT (08.09.02, 14:29 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP>> Once you have the plug-in, configure TB to use it under Options |
MDP>> Virus protection and all will be better than perfect.
BK> ...I think perfect is a b
Sh'mae Ben,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, at 13:29:52 [GMT +0100] (or 13:29 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG virus checker and TB' you wrote:
BK> ...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup support?
BK> What about the "Expand/Collapse All Threads" command? And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@8-Sep-2002, 13:29 Ben Kennish [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP>> ... all will be better than perfect.
BK> ...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup
BK> support? What about the "Expand/Collapse Al
Hello Ben!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 2:29:52 PM you wrote:
> ...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup support?
No. TB! is an e-mail client, *not* a newsreader.
> What about the "Expand/Collapse All Threads" command?
Expansion is supported; only collapsing is a
Hi Jim,
on Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:54:30 +0100 GMT (which was Sunday, September 8,
2002, 11:54 where I live) Jim Lanyon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others:
> Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
> would like to continue using AVG
Hi Marck,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:20:03 +0100 (08/09/2002, 12:20 my time),
you [MDP] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP> Once you have the plug-in, configure TB to use it under Options |
MDP> Virus protection and all will be better than perfect.
...I think perfect is a bit t
Good afternoon Jim,
It was foretold that on 8-9-2002 @ 10:54:30 GMT+0100 (which was
11:54:30 where I live) Jim Lanyon spread these wise comments:
JL> I would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
JL> cannot find a way to do this. Help or advice on another Virus
JL
Hi Jim,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:54:30 +0100 (08/09/2002, 10:54 my time),
you [JL] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JL> Hello ,
JL> Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
JL> would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
JL>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, September 08, 2002
8:07:40 AM
RE: "AVG virus checker and TB"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings Jim,
On Sunday, September 8, 2002, 5:54:30 AM, you wrote:
Jim> Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (th
Sh'mae Jim,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, at 10:54:30 [GMT +0100] (or 10:54 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG virus checker and TB' you wrote:
JL> Hello ,
JL> Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
JL> would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 10:54:30 AM, you wrote:
> Hello ,
> Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
> would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
> cannot find a way to do this. Help or advice on another Virus
> checker would be gratef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jim,
@8-Sep-2002, 10:54 Jim Lanyon [JL] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JL> Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from
JL> OE). I would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my
JL> E-mail and canno
Hello ,
Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
cannot find a way to do this. Help or advice on another Virus
checker would be gratefully received.
--
bat Jim mailto:[E
43 matches
Mail list logo
