Re: OT : Bahasa [ was Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...]

2001-01-20 Thread Thomas
Hallo Syafril, On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 03:14:10 +0700 GMT (21/01/2001, 04:14 +0800 GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: >>> According to my Kamus, the word "challenge" is "tantangan" in Bahasa. SH> No, Thomas correct with his Kamus (Thomas, you surprise me with your SH> word ). I have travelled in I

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Syafril, On 20 January 2001 at 03:14:46 +0700 (which was 20:14 where I live) Syafril Hermansyah wrote and made these points: >>> As for the footer, it is necessary, as most people (including >>> myself) don't always look at the head

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Urban, On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 at 20:06:21 GMT +0100(which was 1/21/2001 2:06 AM where you think I live) you told to the list : >> As for the footer, it is necessary, as most people (including >> myself) don't always look at the header, but "where is the archive" >> is one of those ques

OT : Bahasa [ was Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...]

2001-01-20 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello solid snake, On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 at 17:01:09 GMT +0700(which was 1/21/2001 5:01 PM where you think I live) you told to Thomas on this list : >> According to my Kamus, the word "challenge" is "tantangan" in Bahasa. ss> You mean in "Bahasa Indonesia" ? Bahasa means "Languange" No, Thomas

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 at 11:37:31 GMT +(which was 1/21/2001 6:37 PM where you think I live) you told to the list : [ ... ] MDP> I believe that Lija's point is that these headers are somewhat MDP> verbose, redundant and represent a theft of bandwidth, whether

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Urban
Saturday, January 20, 2001, Thomas wrote: > As for the footer, it is necessary, as most people (including myself) > don't always look at the header, but "where is the archive" is one of > those questions that come up too often otherwise. Couldn't an alternative for that be to skip the footer and

Re[3]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Jonas T Larsson
Hello solid, Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:01:09 AM, you wrote: > So Much I don't understand from you all in this world, somebody > please tell me what this sign > -:) > :P > FYI, > CMIIW > IMO > IMHO > etc... Try http://www.acronymfinder.com/ when encountering acronyms, it is amazi

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 20 January 2001 at 13:35:17 +0100 (which was 12:35 where I live) Peter Steiner wrote and made these points: PS> ... a moderator declares a _thread_ to be a dead horse. In no case PS> Brian meant that _you_ were a horse! Thanks Pete

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Peter Steiner
Hello Lija and other batters (Sorry Marck to reply to this thread declared closed by you, but I think it's necessary) On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:29:43 +0100, Lija wrote: BC>> I suspect Marck will be shooting this horse very soon. L> H, it is very sad to hear something like this in non-politica

Re[2]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Lija
L>> Oh Jesus... here we go again: BC> SooOOOoo hostile. ;-) You sound like someone I know on another list. Hostile??? BC> I suspect Marck will be shooting this horse very soon. H, it is very sad to hear something like this in non-political forum I thought we Serbs were the worst nation

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Brian, On 20 January 2001 at 05:58:47 -0500 (which was 10:58 where I live) Brian Clark wrote and made these points: L>> Oh Jesus... here we go again: BC> SooOOOoo hostile. ;-) You sound like someone I know on another list. Okay folks - let's

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Gerd Ewald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello solid snake ! On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:01:09 +0700 GMT your local time, which was 20.01.2001, 11:01 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote: > FYI, For Your Information > CMIIW Correct Me If I'm Wrong > IMO In My Opinion > IMHO In My Humble Opin

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Lija, (L == "Lija") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: L> Oh Jesus... here we go again: SooOOOoo hostile. ;-) You sound like someone I know on another list. L> Does this look like From/Reply-To/Subject etc. fields: No, it doesn't. L> ---

Re[2]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Lija
Hello Brian, BC> By any chance do you have RFC-822 Headers checked in the view menu? is BC> this what you mean? If so, you can uncheck it (or Ctrl+Shift+K) to BC> turn it off. Oh Jesus... here we go again: Brian... please read again my previous reply... that option is NOT checked. BC> If not,

Re[2]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread solid snake
Sabtu, sore sore, [..in milis thebat!..] « rest snipped » > According to my Kamus, the word "challenge" is "tantangan" in Bahasa. .. Thomas said solid# You mean in "Bahasa Indonesia" ? Bahasa means "Languange" > I challenge Ni

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Lija, (L == "Lija") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: L> For newbies it is not useless, sure, but it BECOMES very useless L> and ANNOYING when you have to read it in every post. By any chance do you have RFC-822 Headers checked in the view menu? is this what you mean? If so, you can uncheck it

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Thomas
Hi solid, On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:14:28 +0700GMT (20/01/2001, 16:14 +0800GMT), solid snake wrote: >> >> Set me straight then! Convince me! (On TBOT if need be.) >> > ..Thomas said. > What this word mean ? It's look like he use HTML mail, please don't

Re[2]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Lija
Hello Nick, NA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- NA> Hash: SHA1 What is this, more unnecessary data? :)) Just kidding, just kidding... NA> So some of the headers are redundant, so what? If you don't want to view NA> them, uncheck the item under View. This option is unchecked, of course. NA>

Re[2]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Lija
Hello Thomas, T> As for the footer, it is necessary, as most people (including myself) T> don't always look at the header, but "where is the archive" is one of T> those questions that come up too often otherwise. But why should someone look at the headers? That's pretty stupid except for spam ma

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread Brian Clark
Hello solid, (ss == "solid snake") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> Set me straight then! Convince me! (On TBOT if need be.) >> ss> ..Thomas said. ss> What this word mean ? It's look like he use HTML mail, please don't ss> use HTML mail..! Heheh,

Re[2]: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-20 Thread solid snake
Sabtu, siang siang, [..in milis thebat!..] « ..rest snipped » > > Set me straight then! Convince me! (On TBOT if need be.) > ..Thomas said. What this word mean ? It's look like he use HTML mail, please don't use HTML mail

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-19 Thread solid snake
Sabtu, pagi agak siang, [..in milis thebat!..] « ..rest snipped » > ... and PGP data... and large quotes... grmpf ;(( ... > Why do you have to make it this way? Please forgive me for my misunderstanding, > but these messages are bunch of USELESS data (well, 90% of the

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-19 Thread Thomas
Hi Nick, On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:04:43 -0800GMT (20/01/2001, 15:04 +0800GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: T>> And the PGP sigs... some people are afraid that others will impersonate T>> them or change their postings on this list. > Thomas, you are destroying my image of you! :o( I thought you were mor

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-19 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On January 19, 2001, at 8:54:51 PM, Lija Wrote: L> All of you probably know this, but take a look at it again: So some of the headers are redundant, so what? If you don't want to view them, uncheck the item under View. L> 11 useless rows in ALL mes

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-19 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On January 19, 2001, at 10:23:50 PM, Thomas Wrote: T> And the PGP sigs... some people are afraid that others will impersonate T> them or change their postings on this list. Thomas, you are destroying my image of you! :o( I thought you were more for

Re: Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-19 Thread Thomas
Hi Lija, On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 05:54:51 +0100GMT (20/01/2001, 12:54 +0800GMT), Lija wrote: > 11 useless rows in ALL message headers here in TBUDL... plus the "signature": Not that useless. Some mailers read the "List-" headers and you can pop up a window. We are hoping for this to be included in

Big useless TBUDL headers and messages...

2001-01-19 Thread Lija
Hello tbUDL, All of you probably know this, but take a look at it again: -- X-MDMailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDSend-Notifications-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Hosted-by: Duta Integrasi Prat