Christmas Edition?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello tbudlers! Any news of Christmas Edition release??? - -- Cheers, B R i a N S Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2.4ghz with 256MB. No person can be a great leader unless he takes genuine

Christmas Edition

Hello tbudl, Is it just me or are there loads of issues with the Christmas edition??? :) Me thinks going down a version until the bugs are steamed. -- Best regards, Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I will not lie in front of the school bus with ketchup on my face http

Re: Christmas Edition?

Hello B! On Monday, December 27, 2004, 7:29 AM, you wrote: > Any news of Christmas Edition release??? Last I saw on tbbeta, the developers were "hoping" for a January release--with luck in time for the Moldavian "Old Christmas," which is celebrated January 6-7. -- Be

Re: Christmas Edition?

On Monday, December 27, 2004 at 8:29:26 AM [GMT -0500], B R I A N S wrote: > Any news of Christmas Edition release??? There'll not be one this time. This was officially announced on TBBETA. They're hoping to have a stable release out early next year, specific date yet to

Re: Christmas Edition

Hello Michael On Monday, December 15, 2003, you wrote MT> Is it just me or are there loads of issues with the MT> Christmas edition??? :) Perhaps an appropriate program at the discount . Elaine The big thieves hang the little ones. --Czech P

inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition

I have been using The Bat for years without any problems. I am running Windows ME and recently upgraded to the Christmas Edition (2.03.3). Last night I opened The Bat and started receiving my new messages. On the last message, message 88 out of 88, it gave an error like "Could not store me

Christmas edition and speech

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL list, Anyone using the latest Christmas edition with speech (specificly JFW)? The speech responsiveness has gone down a lot in this release, and the folder columns seem to be reset. Can I go back to the previous

Christmas Edition keystrokes missing

There are some keyboard shortcuts missing in the menus in the christmas Edition. I first noticed this when I tried to re-filter and 'i' did nothing. In the message pull down, mark as read, unpark, colour groups, needs action and edit colour groups all lack underlined keystroke shortcut

Re: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition

Hello Mike, On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:08:18 -0500 GMT (18/01/2004, 10:08 +0700 GMT), Mike F wrote: > I have been using The Bat for years without any problems. I am > running Windows ME and recently upgraded to the Christmas Edition > (2.03.3). Last night I opened The Bat and started rec

inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition (reposted)

I am reposting this message because I originally sent it as a reply when it should have been a new message. I have been using The Bat for years without any problems. I am running Windows ME and recently upgraded to the Christmas

Re: Christmas edition and speech

Andrew, On 10-12-2003 18:08, you [AH] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AH> Anyone using the latest Christmas edition with speech AH> (specificly JFW)? The speech responsiveness has gone down AH> a lot in this release, and the folder columns seem to be reset. AH&g

Re: Christmas edition and speech

Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 5:08:14 PM, you wrote: > Anyone using the latest Christmas edition with speech (specificly > JFW)? The speech responsiveness has gone down a lot in this > release, and the folder columns seem to be reset. Can I go back to >

Re[2]: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition

Thomas, Saturday, January 17, 2004, 10:09:22 PM, you wrote: TF> Take a look at this message directly on the server. Either message 88, TF> or 87. One of them may be damaged. Unfortunately, I didn't think of this at the time. Those messages are long gone from the server now. -- Regards, Mike F

Re[2]: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition

Allie, Saturday, January 17, 2004, 10:53:31 PM, you wrote: AM> - Do you compress your Inbox regularly? The Inbox will grow to AM> enormous sizes for those who download a lot of mail, even though AM> the mail may be filtered to other folders. Copies of all mail AM> remain in the Inbox messag

Re[3]: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition

Mike F, [MF] wrote: MF> No, I wasn't compressing my inbox. This probably explains why it was MF> getting slower and slower to display messages every time I clicked MF> on the inbox folder! I've set the inbox to compress on exit now. MF> Thanks for pointing this out. Ok. This may have been a part

Re[4]: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition

Allie, Sunday, January 18, 2004, 1:59:22 AM, you wrote: AM> Maybe. That's a huge amount of temp files. Any reason for the AM> build up? AM> I suggest downloading and running this application pretty regularly: AM> http://www.danish-shareware.dk/soft/emptemp/index.html No reason for the build up

Re: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition (reposted)

Hello Mike, Sunday, January 18, 2004, 7:03:16 AM, you wrote: MF> Last night I opened The Bat and started receiving my new messages. MF> On the last message, message 88 out of 88, it gave an error like MF> "Could not store message, saving as C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\bat81C4.TMP." The problem might be in y

Re: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition (reposted)

Hello Stefan, On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:18:45 +0200 GMT (18/01/2004, 16:18 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Basically, you can easily remove all files with the .TMP extension > from there and add the line > del %TEMP%\*.TMP > to the end of the AUTOEXEC.BAT. I wouldn't do that. Sometimes when

Re: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition (reposted)

Mike- Sunday, January 18, 2004, 2:19:18 AM, you wrote: MF> OK, my TEMP directory is now 74MB. !!! Mine is zero k. Even my WINNT\TEMP directory is only 2k (after cleaning). -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 _

The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, New Edition - -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.01.3, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 To have the reputation of possessing the most perfect social tact, talk to every woman as if you loved her, and to every man as if he bore

2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size

Is anyone else having any problem with the opening window size in version 2.02.3 Christmas Edition. My installation keeps opening in the "restored" state, 1/2 of the window off the screen. I would like it to open maximized. I did not have this problem with any other previous versio

Re[2]: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition (reposted)

Stefan, Sunday, January 18, 2004, 4:18:45 AM, you wrote: ST> The problem might be in your TEMP directory - the slowdown and the ST> directory's size (4 G) tells clearly about that. Basically, you ST> can easily remove all files with the .TMP extension from there and ST> add the line OK, my TEMP

Re[2]: inbox corrupted - Christmas Edition (reposted)

TF> I wouldn't do that. Sometimes when you install new programs, they TF> program asks for a reboot - and will use files it put in the temp TF> folder to complete the installation. I don't know whether they are TF> necessarily named *.tmp, I wouldn't do that if I were the programmer, TF> but you ne

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Hi Edgar, On Tuesday, December 09, 2003, at 12:01:58 PM PST, you wrote: > New Edition Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders and completely start over with arranging message list columns, threading and sorting preferences, etc. What a pain. :-( I sure do hope all my filters a

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Hello Melissa, >> New Edition > > Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders and > completely start over with arranging message list columns, threading > and sorting preferences, etc. What a pain. :-( Yeap. TG I found out in time. This is what I wrote yesterday in TBBeta: ,-

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

>> Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders >> and completely start over with arranging message list >> columns, threading and sorting preferences, etc. What a >> pain. :-( M> Yeap. TG I found out in time. This is what I wrote yesterday in TBBeta: Is

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Melissa Reese, [MR] wrote: MR> Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders and MR> completely start over with arranging message list columns, threading MR> and sorting preferences, etc. What a pain. :-( How did you fare? Setting things up in way that's trouble free can be tricky. T

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

On Tuesday, December 9, 2003 at 8:50:14 PM, Allie Martin wrote in the message "The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders and >> completely start over with arranging message list colum

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Hello Chris, On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 3:53:34 AM, you wrote: > On Tuesday, December 9, 2003 at 8:50:14 PM, Allie Martin wrote in the > message "The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *" > <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Eek! After installing, I ha

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Hello ETM, > Is the Christmas Edition mouse worth doing the extra work? I > would love to get rid of the Johnny Roventini clone. I haven't even tried the CE but I don't think so. Al least for me that I have nearly 500 folders. As I have said somewhere else, I think I'll wa

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Hello MAU On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, you wrote M> I haven't even tried the CE but I don't think so. Al least for me that I M> have nearly 500 folders. As I have said somewhere else, I think I'll M> wait for the SE (Spring Edition :) Thanks, Miguel, I think I also will wait, am sitting on 2

Re: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Hello ETM, > Happy Holidays everyone! Heyyy, that's right! Just half an hour ago it was still summer and here we are now with Xmas coming in 10 minutes. Happy Holidays!! -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: ___

Re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size

Hello Wayne, On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 11:52:23 AM, you wrote re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size: WH> Is anyone else having any problem with the opening window size in WH> version 2.02.3 Christmas Edition. My installation keeps opening in the WH> "restored"

Re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size

Hello Wayne, On Friday, December 12, 2003, 6:38:17 PM, you wrote: > Hello Wayne, > On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 11:52:23 AM, you wrote > re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size: WH>> Is anyone else having any problem with the opening window size in WH>> ver

Re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size

Wayne, On 12-12-2003 18:38, you [WH] wrote in : WH> Am I the only one having this particular problem? I don't. Do you run any type of window managers that may interfere? Have you changed the setting in the shortcut you use for starting TB? -- Best regards Peter Fjelst

Re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size

Hello Peter, On Friday, December 12, 2003, at 5:34:32 PM, you wrote re: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size: PF> I don't. Do you run any type of window managers that may interfere? Have PF> you changed the setting in the shortcut you use for starting TB? No and No. It wor

Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hi, I'm considering upgrading to the xmas edition, but remember many posts recently on how all the folder columns were messed up until you figured out how to use views. Are people upgrading despite that? Put another way, are there any compelling reasons to upgrade? Cheers, -- Vishal

Re[2]: The Bat! Ver.2.02 Christmas Edition *

Tuesday, December 9, 2003, 6:03:53 PM, you wrote: > Hi Edgar, > On Tuesday, December 09, 2003, at 12:01:58 PM PST, you wrote: >> New Edition > Eek! After installing, I had to go through all my folders and > completely start over with arranging message list columns, threading > and sorting prefe

Re[2]: 2.02.3 Christmas Edition Open Window Size

Wayne Howard wrote: PF>> I don't. Do you run any type of window managers that may PF>> interfere? Have you changed the setting in the shortcut you use PF>> for starting TB? WH> No and No. It worked fine in 2.01.3. The only thing I can add here is to think widely on the cause. Just yesterday, I

Re: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Vishal Nakra wrote: VN> I'm considering upgrading to the xmas edition, but remember many VN> posts recently on how all the folder columns were messed up until VN> you figured out how to use views. Are people upgrading despite VN> that? Put another way, are there any compelling reasons to VN> upgra

Re: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Monday, December 29, 2003 at 8:04 AM (Pacific Time) Hello Vishal, This is a reply to your message dated Monday, December 29, 2003 at 6:34:56 AM, when you wrote: VN> I'm considering upgrading to the xmas edition, but remember many VN> posts recently on how all the folder columns were messed up unt

Re: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hi Vishal, @30-Dec-2003, 00:37 -0500 (30-Dec 05:37 UK time) Vishal Nakra [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie: AM>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=389 V> I did look at that but was wondering if there were any major bugs V> with those features. The folder views

Re[2]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Monday, December 29, 2003, 11:06:13 AM, you wrote: WB> The best reason from now until January 10th is the price. WB> Thanks Wayne. I have to agree there. Cheers, -- Vishal Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.

Re[2]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hi Allie Monday, December 29, 2003, 10:39:23 AM, you wrote: AM> I'm unable to help you since I don't really know what options/features AM> mean a lot to you. The best thing to do would be to look at what's AM> new here: AM> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=389 I did

Re[3]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

x27;ve VN> heard about (maybe one or two more). My 2 cents. I haven't found ANY advantage to upgrading to 2.0 but did so because of the Christmas Edition offer. The new features mentioned in the link above didn't really - IMO - qualify as a major upgrade. Here are my current issues:

Re[4]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hello jon, Tuesday, December 30, 2003, 9:38:50 AM, you wrote: > On Tuesday, December 30, 2003, 12:37:16 AM, Vishal Nakra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) I can't stand the new search for message implementation, especially the removal > of the search subfolders option. It's much more cumbersome to

Re[2]: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

Hi Marck Tuesday, December 30, 2003, 5:44:14 AM, you wrote: MDP> ... although that's hit smooth running now and is an absolute gem of MDP> a new feature. The current beta (25) is running pretty stable. sounds good! Cheers, -- Vishal Curren