Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:01:00 +0100 GMT (07/Sep/09, 7:01 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> http://example.com/ends-with-(parens)
>> both the MicroEd and Windows editors do not highlight
>> the final Parentheses.
M> Confirmed. The HTML editor does, though..
>> However if I use the sam
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 11:32:25 PM, in
, Bill McQuillan wrote:
> Although I do not remember seeing any instances of a
> URL enclosed in Parentheses,
I have definitely seen it in letters Word documents occasionally:-
"Our website (www.example.com) has full details" but that now tend
On Sun, 2009-09-06, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:22:58 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 17:22 PM +0700 GMT),
> MFPA wrote:
>>> Of course it's fixable.
M>> I'm told Thunderbird 3.0b4 manages to include the closing bracket as
M>> part of the link.
> I didn't know that, but thanks for conf
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 2:50:28 PM, in
, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
> Any applications that do it even worse cannot be used
> as a benchmark. But thans for the info, I would have
> indeed expected better from Yahoo. OTOH (and I have not
> tested this) they might have a policy that links i
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 01:14:40 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 7:14 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> It's not an excuse to not fix a bug if any other
>> application has the same bug. In fact, if all other
>> applications have the same bug, Ritlabs should race to
>> be the first one to fix it.
>> Fro
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:00:25 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 8:00 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> Of course it's fixable. The algorithms to pair
>> parenthesis are out there, many softwares do that and
>> even colour-code the left and right parenthesis in
>> nested code, so that it is easier to se
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:22:58 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 17:22 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> Of course it's fixable.
M> I'm told Thunderbird 3.0b4 manages to include the closing bracket as
M> part of the link.
I didn't know that, but thanks for confirming my logic.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
h
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, September 6, 2009, 12:16:54 PM, you wrote:
M>>> Yahoo's webmail interface ("classic" rather than the
M>>> one with the extra annoying features) does even
M>>> worse: the link ends with "Echelon_" and the whole
M>>> of "(signals_intelligence)" sits immediately after
M>>> it
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 12:44:12 AM, in
, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
> Of course it's fixable.
I'm told Thunderbird 3.0b4 manages to include the closing bracket as
part of the link.
--
Best regards
MFPA
Wisdom is a companion to age; yet age may travel
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 8:08:23 AM, in
, Jos Klaassens wrote:
M>> Yahoo's webmail interface ("classic" rather than the
M>> one with the extra annoying features) does even
M>> worse: the link ends with "Echelon_" and the whole
M>> of "(signals_intelligence)" sits immediately after
M>
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, September 6, 2009, 2:14:40 AM, you wrote:
M> Yahoo's webmail interface ("classic" rather than the one with the
M> extra annoying features) does even worse: the link ends with
M> "Echelon_" and the whole of "(signals_intelligence)" sits immediately
M> after it in normal text
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 12:44:12 AM, in
, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
> Of course it's fixable. The algorithms to pair
> parenthesis are out there, many softwares do that and
> even colour-code the left and right parenthesis in
> nested code, so that it is easier to see which pairs
> belon
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 8:26:22 PM, in
, Jos Klaassens wrote:
> Hello Bill,
> Saturday, September 5, 2009, 6:57:49 PM, you wrote:
BM>> Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right
BM>> Parenthesis is a valid character in this position,
BM>> so I have reported it in the Bug Tracker:
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 4:44:06 PM, in
, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
> Hello Jos,
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:18:59 +0200 GMT (05/Sep/09, 22:18
> PM +0700 GMT), Jos Klaassens wrote:
M>>> Interesting. Same result here in MS Word 2002.
M>>> Not sure that means it's not a TB! issue, though. A
Hello Jos,
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:26:22 +0200 GMT (06/Sep/09, 2:26 AM +0700 GMT),
Jos Klaassens wrote:
BM>> Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right Parenthesis is a valid
BM>> character in this position, so I have reported it in the Bug Tracker:
BM>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7
Hello Bill,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 6:57:49 PM, you wrote:
BM> Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right Parenthesis is a valid
BM> character in this position, so I have reported it in the Bug Tracker:
BM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7709
Fixable? See
https://www.ritlabs.com
On Sat, 2009-09-05, Jos Klaassens wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> Saturday, September 5, 2009, 5:44:06 PM, you wrote:
TF>> It's not an excuse to not fix a bug if any other application has the
TF>> same bug. In fact, if all other applications have the same bug,
TF>> Ritlabs should race to be the first o
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 5:44:06 PM, you wrote:
TF> It's not an excuse to not fix a bug if any other application has the
TF> same bug. In fact, if all other applications have the same bug,
TF> Ritlabs should race to be the first one to fix it.
TF> From a practical POV, it's sim
Hello Jos,
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:18:59 +0200 GMT (05/Sep/09, 22:18 PM +0700 GMT),
Jos Klaassens wrote:
M>> Interesting. Same result here in MS Word 2002.
M>> Not sure that means it's not a TB! issue, though. An issue with a
M>> software application doesn't *have* to be ignored just because there
Hello MFPA,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 3:36:24 PM, you wrote:
M> On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 9:11:53 AM, in
M> , Jos Klaassens wrote:
>> Probably not a TB! issue? After pasting this URL,
>> including the closing bracket :) , into OpenOffice
>> Writer same result here with Writer.
M> In
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 1:56:12 PM, in
, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> I suspect I'm missing the whole point of this thread
> here and should probably keep my big mouth out of it
> but curiously, when you click on the (complete) link,
> it takes you to a Wikipedia page whose title is MISSI
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 7:20:22 AM, in
, Bill McQuillan wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (05/Sep/09, 4:25 AM +0700 GMT),
>> MFPA wrote:
M>>> I just noticed when including the following URL in a
M>>> message:-
M>>> http://
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 9:11:53 AM, in
, Jos Klaassens wrote:
> Probably not a TB! issue? After pasting this URL,
> including the closing bracket :) , into OpenOffice
> Writer same result here with Writer.
Interesting. Same result here in MS Word 2002.
Not sure that means it's not
Hello MFPA,
M> Hi
M> I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M> that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
M> I'm using MicroEd, in case it makes a difference.
I'm not sure what's going o
Hello MFPA,
Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:25:28 PM, you wrote:
M> I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
M> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M> that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
Probably not a TB! issue? After pa
On Fri, 2009-09-04, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (05/Sep/09, 4:25 AM +0700 GMT),
> MFPA wrote:
M>> I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
M>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M>> that TB! does not treat the cl
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (05/Sep/09, 4:25 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M> I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
M> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M> that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
M> I
Hi
I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
I'm using MicroEd, in case it makes a difference.
--
Best regards
MFPA
If y
28 matches
Mail list logo
