Hello, everyone.
I'm feeling really stupid right now (hope I don't sound as stupid
as I feel 8-)).
I know I've seen a list of template macros somewhere, but I've
looked and looked through the help files and can't find such a list
anywhere.
Can someon
Is there any sort of macro definition/example list or FAQ floating
around the web or somebody's hard drive?
A lot of them are fairly obvious but a little explanation of some of
the more obscure ones sure would be nice. Then again obscurity is
totally relative isn't it?
--
- Nick
Nick D
Hi tbudl,
I try to create a macro to:
1. Assign the color
2. Park the message
I have tried the View > Shortcut and assign Alt-L to the
color but it did not do it on the message, but I also want
to park the message.
Any suggestion?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Hi, all,
On 02/10/1999, at 02:19,
Keith Russell (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
took a mike and sang on a blues tempo:
KR>I know I've seen a list of template macros somewhere, but I've
KR>looked and looked through the help files and can't find such a list
KR>
Hello, Claude.
On Friday, October 01, 1999, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote:
> Hi, all,
> On 02/10/1999, at 02:19,
> Keith Russell (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> took a mike and sang on a blues tempo:
KR>>I know I've seen a list of template macros somewhere, but I've
KR>
Release notes for 1.36 advertise
New address list macros: %TOLIST, %CCLIST, %BCCLIST, %OTOLIST, %OCCLIST, %OBCCLIST.
Where are they?
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list
Hello Batmans,
I'm interesting, does exist a possibility, to make a keyboard
macros, typing something by pressing one certain key combination ?
[skipped], :-) etc like in GoldEd
Regards,
3AHO3A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|2:5
Hi ,
I try to understand the language of macros
Macros understanding
I go to:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/macros.html
There is an example
Including the original message date in replies:
A regex based macro was created to extract the original message date and time from a
messages RFC
Well, I'm back to using TB once again since I switched away from using MSN (Thank
God!)
Unfortunately, I seem to have lost all the macros/templates that I had before...
So
Does anyone have any that they would be willing to send to me? I got all mine off of
here before and off of
TBUDL members
At 13-Mar-2004, 02:48 +0100 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
> Why Regex, what's wrong with using something like:
>
> Received : %ORCVDATE="-mm-dd"
I looked through the help files, and the ORCVDATE and ORCVTIME macros are
not documented there. I have wanted
Dear All,
can anyone post a macro to produce the information about a replied to
message as shown in the example from Marck below?
@1-Jun-2004, 19:42 -0400 (02-Jun 00:42 UK time) ETM [E] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
--
Thanks
PJ
Using TB! v2.11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings All,
I use Z and MyMAcros macro files. I load them normally, exit The Bat,
reopen it, and there is an error on each line and they are disabled.
ideas?
- --
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic
"Big Bro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings All,
According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
the latest version:
%STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
%STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
%STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours)
%STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
%STATSPAMERLETTERS(hours)
%STATSPAMERTRAFFIC
ok im kinda confused here, I've checked these 3 macros out
1)
Spam Stats, last 7 days (%BAYESITVERSION)
Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(168)
Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(168)
BayesIT guessed right %calculate="100-(%STATSPAMERLETTERS(168)/%
STATSPAMLETTERS(168))"%%
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to setup filters to bounce spam and send a CC
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should a message template starting with this
work?
%rexexpblindmatch=%ofromaddr
%setpattregexp=".*(@.*)"
%cc=postmaster%subpatt=1
Thanks,
Max
+-+
| Max Kessler +--
An idea for a new macro:
One that would list the CC recipients, much like the %ATTACHMENTS
does for any attachments now. That way the person receiving the email
would know whom else is was sent to. In case they don't have the CC
header info showing up in their email program. This came to m
s> 1. Assign the color
s> 2. Park the message
s> I have tried the View > Shortcut and assign Alt-L to the
s> color but it did not do it on the message, but I also want
s> to park the message.
s> Any suggestion?
you should create a filter with those two functions, set it as 'Manual
only' and as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi syv,
@3-Sep-2002, 09:49 -0700 (17:49 UK time) syv [S] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I try to create a macro to:
> 1. Assign the color
> 2. Park the message
> Any suggestion?
Use a manual filter with an assigned hotkey.
-
Hi syv,
on Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:49:54 -0700GMT (03.09.02, 18:49 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
s> I try to create a macro to:
s> 1. Assign the color
s> 2. Park the message
s> Any suggestion?
Where would you place that macro?
You can easily do it with TB
Hello TBUDL list,
I am just starting to get into macros/templates etc, and wondered
whether the following was possible:-
1. When I send a message in a list folder, is it possible to fill
in to: field automatically?
2. When replying to list messages (I have already asked this
Are there macros for CC name and address?
I couldn't find them in the macros menu for a Forward template, so I
assume there isn't. So can somebody give me some hints of how that
functionality can be set up using regexp?
The situation:
I do a lot of work as a subcontractor for a
I'm frustrated with the way the "Create a New Message" button on the
main toolbar handles the address book. It used to (1.34 and before)
offer a menu with your folders and offer submenus from those to the
address entries. Now it just shows all of the entries which is a
little cumbersome. Is there
Hi, all,
On 03/10/1999, at 04:15,
Keith Russell (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
as the numerous people stopped applausing, told them:
KR> But is there no way I can access a list that I can print out?
If there is one, I don't know it.
It would be useful for me to have it, with a full explanation and
On Friday, October 08, 1999, Syllables wrote:
> Release notes for 1.36 advertise
> New address list macros: %TOLIST, %CCLIST, %BCCLIST, %OTOLIST, %OCCLIST, %OBCCLIST.
> Where are they?
If they are not on the popup menu, just type them in and see if they
work.
--
Paula Ford
The Bat!
Hi Alexander,
On 12 Apr 2000 12:39:27 +0500GMT (12/04/2000, 15:39 +0800GMT),
Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote:
AAG> I'm interesting, does exist a possibility, to make a keyboard
AAG> macros, typing something by pressing one certain key combination ?
AAG> [skipped], :-) etc like
Hi Alexander,
On 12 April 2000 at 12:39:27 GMT +0500 (which was 08:39 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Keyboard macros":
> I'm interesting, does exist a possibility, to make a keyboard
> macros, typing something by pre
Hi Alexander,
On 12 Apr 2000 17:06:32 +0500GMT (12/04/2000, 20:06 +0800GMT),
Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote:
>> If you know keyboard mapping in Windows, there should be way of
>> mapping a key (a function key probably) to a string of characters -
>> after all, that's what DB4+ did.
AAG> Are You cr
I recently noticed that when I list the Windows information using the
macros it doesn't seem to correctly list the information. For
instance,
When I list I get
%WINDOWSBUILDNUMBER 1381
%WINDOWSCSDVERSION Service Pack 5
%WINDOWSMAJORVERSION
Hi Jean,
@14-Jan-2004, 09:50 +0100 (14-Jan 08:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl:
JS> I try to understand the language of macros
...
JS> %SETPATTREGEXP="(?m-s)^Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:%-
JS> [\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))"%REGEXP
Hello All!
Visit this site http://en.barin.com.ua/ for more info.
--
Life is stranger than fiction.
-
Listening by STP now: Silence...
-
Fixer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" infor
Dear David,
@5-Mar-2004, 15:14 -0500 (05-Mar 20:14 UK time) David Calvarese [DC]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DC> Does anyone have any that they would be willing to send to me?
DC> I got all mine off of here before and off of a web page which
DC> seems to be currently down.
DC> (http://www.imme
Dear David,
@5-Mar-2004, 15:25 -0500 (05-Mar 20:25 UK time) David Calvarese [DC]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DC>>> I pretty much need ALL the cool stuff again.
MDP>> What about the Macro Library in the official FAQ?!?!?
MDP>> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html
DC> Well, I did p
Hello bats,
on Fri, 5. Mar 2004 at 15:25:38 -0500 David Calvarese wrote:
> Well, I did plunder that for some of them. But I recall getting
> some really nice templates from the group before. I just don't
> recall from who.
I suggest you tell us what you search.. :)
I'll give you a subject cle
Friday, March 5, 2004, David Calvarese wrote:
> But I recall getting some really nice templates from the group before.
> I just don't recall from who.
What did they do?
--
Urban
Strategy is when you don't let the enemy know that you are out of
ammunition, but keep on firing.
__
C>> and the other fixed the to field for mailing lists.
Hi David,
If they are not in the library Marck poinbted you to, just sya what
exactly you need, and someone will help you. And the macros will be
added to the library.
"I need something urgently but I don't remember what tha
Hello bats,
on Fri, 5. Mar 2004 at 17:55:45 -0500 rich gregory wrote:
DH>> I'll give you a subject cleaner for now:
> What does it do?
it cleans the subject when you reply to a mail; removes multiple Re's
and "was:" parts and the like at the end.
For the mailinglist functionality I have the fol
Dear Daniel,
@5-Mar-2004, 22:07 +0100 (05-Mar 21:07 UK time) dAniel hAhler [DH]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to David:
DH> I'll give you a subject cleaner for now:
... and I had to tweak it:
->>8
DH> %___%REM="clean subject - by
Saturday, March 6, 2004, David Calvarese wrote:
>>> But I recall getting some really nice templates from the group before.
>>> I just don't recall from who.
U>> What did they do?
> Unfortunately, I don't remember. I do know they were mostly for us in reply
> templates.
Ok.
I dug up the latest
Hello bats,
on Sat, 6. Mar 2004 at 10:10:30 + Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
DH>> I'll give you a subject cleaner for now:
> ... and I had to tweak it:
> This gave a double space in the subject when there was a group name.
> A simple change of the line from this:
> ( [([]+ .*? [)\]]+ \s*)* # save
Hello bats,
on Sat, 6. Mar 2004 at 11:24:17 -0500 David Calvarese wrote:
dh>> That seems a bit complicated, but is in fact very good to maintain.
dh>> And instead fiddling around with different AB templates I simply have
dh>> to adjust my main templates a bit.
> That sounds like how I'd like to g
Dear Paul,
@2-Jun-2004, 15:32 Paul Jansen [PJ] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to ETM:
PJ> can anyone post a macro to produce the information about a
PJ> replied to message as shown in the example from Marck below?
PJ> @1-Jun-2004, 19:42 -0400 (02-Jun 00:42 UK time) ETM [E] in
PJ> mid:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Michael,
Monday, August 2, 2004, 7:23:00 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Greetings All,
> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
> the latest version:
> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
Hello Morgan,
On 2 Aug 2004 at 21:08:55 +0100 GMT [22:08 CEST] you wrote:
>> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
>> the latest version:
>> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
>> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
>> %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours
he BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
>>> the latest version:
>>> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
>>> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
>>> %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours)
>>> %STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
>>> %STATSPAMERLETTERS(hours)
>>> %STATS
Hi Michael and list,
On Monday, August 2, 2004 at 14:12:45 GMT -0700 (which was 23:12 where
I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of "BayesIT Macros":
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello
Hello Michael,
Monday, August 2, 2004, 2:23:00 PM, you wrote:
MLW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MLW> Hash: SHA1
MLW> Greetings All,
MLW> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
MLW> the latest version:
MLW> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
MLW> %
AGE-
MLW>> Hash: SHA1
MLW>> Greetings All,
MLW>> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
MLW>> the latest version:
MLW>> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
MLW>> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
MLW>> %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours)
MLW>> %S
Hello Drago,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Drago mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in
part):
D> if my total spam is 270 and total clean is 246, shouldn't my spam percentage
D> be 51% - 52% since my overall spam percentage is greater than clean or is the
D> 270 my complete
On Tue 24 August 2004, 12:30:49 +1000, Drago wrote:
> ok im kinda confused here, I've checked these 3 macros out
>
<...snip...>
> if my total spam is 270 and total clean is 246, shouldn't my spam percentage
> be 51% - 52% since my overall spam percentage is greate
As Drago walked through cyberspace, he tripped on this message from Michael L.
Wilson which was posted on 24/08/2004 04:47:10 in gmane.mail.the-bat.user
>
> =
> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION)
> Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24)
> Tota
As Drago walked through cyberspace, he tripped on this message from Robin Anson
which was posted on 24/08/2004 04:53:47 in gmane.mail.the-bat.user
>
> Then the correct calculations are:
>Percentage BayesIT guessed wrong = 100*%e/(%s+%n)
>Percentage BayesIT guessed right = 100*(1-%e/(%s+%n
On Monday, August 23, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
MLW> My current macro set is
MLW> =
MLW> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION)
MLW> Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAM
Hello Jan,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in
part):
JR> Michael, Sorry to be dense but what does this QT macro look at & how
JR> do you use it -- as an "run an external" -- & if so where do you place
JR> it? TIA .
This
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson
wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros":
MLW> JR> Michael, Sorry to be dense but what does this QT macro look at & how
MLW> JR> do you use it -- as an "run an external" -- &a
Hello Jan,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in
part):
JR> Understand that. But what I'm trying to find out is what is the
JR> macro looking at? Incoming mail? Is it part of a filter action?
JR> Thanks for taking the time to reply t
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson
wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros":
MLW> There is no filter action, except the filters built into BayesIT. As
MLW> BayesIT works, it is constantly updating its records and database to
MLW&
Hello Jan,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in
part):
JR> I do use other filters to move obvious spam to my spam folder,
JR> thereby bypassing the BayesIT filter. Could that explain the
JR> difference between the real #s & the reporte
ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:10:24 PM, you wrote:
JR> I do use other filters to move obvious spam to my spam folder,
JR> thereby bypassing the BayesIT filter. Could that explain the
JR> difference between the real #s & the reported #s?
Hi Jan,
I don't think you are bypassing BasesIT. Bas
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
MLW> I let BayesIT filter everything that is spam. I use no external
MLW> notifier, and no internal spam filters. Therefore, that could be the
MLW> problem
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Zonnet
wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros":
Z> JR> I do use other filters to move obvious spam to my spam folder,
Z> JR> thereby bypassing the BayesIT filter. Could that explain the
Z> JR> di
a bit out of balance IMHO. Its nice
that you like to play with TB's macros, but please forgive my ignorance,
I'm not interested to get your personal spam statistics with each and every
mail you send to this list.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 2381539
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
24-Aug-2004 18:33, you wrote:
> Hi Gerard. If that's the case, then do you have any ideas to explain
> the difference between the BayesIT stats & the # of junk emails I
> have in my current file?
Do you have your own filters that deal with junk email, too? If those
aren't c
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz
wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros":
ASK> 24-Aug-2004 18:33, you wrote:
>> Hi Gerard. If that's the case, then do you have any ideas to explain
>> the difference between the
ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:25:53 PM, you wrote:
JR> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11)
JR> Total Spam Emails: 2
JR> Total Clean Emails: 186
JR> BayesIT guessed right 99.5% of the time
JR> My email is 1.06383% spam
JR> Now what?
Well, (2/(186+2))*100%= 1.0638% so that is correct.
Hello Michael,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 20:47:10 -0700 GMT [05:47 CEST] you wrote:
MLW> My current macro set is
MLW> =
MLW> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION)
MLW> Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24)
MLW> Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(2
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Zonnet
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
Z> ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:25:53 PM, you wrote:
Z> JR> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11)
Z> JR> Total Spam Emails: 2
Z> JR> Total Clean Emails: 1
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
24-Aug-2004 19:25, you wrote:
> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11)
> Total Spam Emails: 2
> Total Clean Emails: 186
> BayesIT guessed right 99.5% of the time
> My email is 1.06383% spam
> Now what?
Apparently, something is pretty wrong with the Bayesit stats. :-}
ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 9:09:51 PM, you wrote:
JR> And I don't know what wrong function you refer to? What do you
JR> mean?
Hi Jan,
I have been playing with BayesIT functions myself. Here is a list I known
is available:
,- [ ]
| Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48)
| Spam traffic: %S
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
24-Aug-2004 21:09, you wrote:
Z>> I am not sure how BayesIT calculates the "guessed right" statistic but
Z>> I would assume that it looks at how many Spam or Ham msg you correct by
Z>> using the "mark as (NOT) junk " function.
> Geez, why would I do that? I'd be busy most of
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Zonnet
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
Z> ,- [ ]
Z> | Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48)
Z> | Spam traffic: %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(48)
Z> | Stat no spam leters: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(48)
Z> | Stat no spam Trafic:
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
ASK> If I were you, I'd disable your own filters that catch spam temporarily, and
ASK> only train BayesIt for a while. After all, it is a *learning* filter t
Hello Jan,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:01:13 -0400 GMT [22:01 CEST] you wrote:
JR> Yes, of course you are right about your second poing but, just to
JR> be stubborn for one more moment, If BayesIT filters see msgs
JR> before TB! filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I
JR> can't ge
Hello Zonnet,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:52:57 +0200 GMT [21:52 CEST] you wrote:
Z> ,- [ ]
Z> | Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48)
Z> | Spam traffic: %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(48)
Z> | Stat no spam leters: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(48)
Z> | Stat no spam Trafic: %STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(48)
Z> | Stat spam letters: %STA
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Andre Wichartz
wrote the following in reply to my comments re: to "BayeIT Macros":
AW> [snip] If BayesIT filters see msgs
AW> JR> before TB! filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I
AW> JR> can't get a de
ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 9:57:43 PM, you wrote:
JR> Take a look @ Menu -> Options | Preferences | Plug-Ins
JR> Click plug-in
JR> click Information
JR> Scroll down to the bottom
Hi Jan,
I finally found that the difference between spam letters and traffic.
Letters is obvious but traffic
Hello Andre,
Just checking my self following macro combination:
Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION)
Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24)
Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(24)
BayesIT guessed right %-
%calculate="100-(%STATSPAMERLETTERS(24)/%STATSPAMLETTERS(24))"%% of the time
My
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
24-Aug-2004 22:01, you wrote:
> Yes, of course you are right about your second poing but, just to be
> stubborn for one more moment, If BayesIT filters see msgs before TB!
> filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I can't get a
> definite answer to this question
On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz
wrote the following in reply to my comments re: to "BayeIT Macros":
>> Yes, of course you are right about your second poing but, just to be
>> stubborn for one more moment, If BayesIT filters see msgs before TB
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
ASK> 24-Aug-2004 19:25, you wrote:
>> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11)
>> Total Spam Emails: 2
>> Total Clean Emails: 186
>> BayesIT
Hello Jan,
On 26 Aug 2004 at 19:18:06 -0400 GMT [01:18 CEST] you wrote:
JR> Anyone have any ideas beyond the notion that the macros don't
JR> work. Or put it another way, has anyone found that the macros do
JR> work & represent some real numbers?
My junk folder shows
re are my stats
Those 376 junk mails are a "total", correct?
I mean...
> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11)
... :-)
> Anyone have any ideas beyond the notion that the macros don't work. Or
> put it another way, has anyone found that the macros do work & repres
On Thursday, August 26, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
>> So, tonight I have 376 msgs in my junk folder. I marked none of them as
>> junk, i.e. they were all junked automatically -- presumably by BayesIT.
>&g
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
26-Aug-2004 19:12, you wrote:
ASK>> Those 376 junk mails are a "total", correct?
> yes. However, at this point I have 651.
Nearly 300 junk mails in 1 day? Well... even without correct statistics
from BayesIt the other conclusion for me would be dropping that mail
account. :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan,
on Wednesday, 25. August 2004, at 11:18:20 [GMT -0400] you wrote
regarding "BayesIt Macros":
> What I mean is if BayesIT filters come first & I de-activated all my
> own TB! filters, then I can see how accurate Ba
On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 it appears that Thomas Martin
wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
TM> Following order is proofed:
TM> 1. AntiVirus Plugin
TM> 2. AntiSpam Plugin
TM> 3. Filters of the Filtermanager
Hi Thomas.
Thank you for proofing. That answ
Hello,
i need some help to accomplish the following: i have a certain group
in my adress book, called e.g. "A". Most of the entries have first
name and last name but some don't. So the template for this group for
new mails, replies and forwards is %ABTOFIRSTNAME %ABTOLASTNAME. But
like i
Batfolk,
I use MyMacros v1.11a for TB! I actually only use these macros for a single
function %InputBox which allows a quick template to request input when it runs.
I wanted to make more use of these macros and went to the help file to learn
more about them, but unfortunately when I try to open
well they work.
What is recommended to try to create more aesthetic templates, or other useful
macros to enliven The Bat!?
Using Windows XP.
Thanks for the guidance.
Regards,
Gary Odom
g...@waterfire.us
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUD
Dear TB Users
I have noticed that if I use an applications "Send Mail" command
(usually found in the File menu) then some macros don't appear to
work.
I have a new mail template set up which uses %TOFNAME and
%CURSOR.
In normal operation, say creat
Hello All,
I have a question...
First off, how much can we store in the cookies template in account
properties?
Second, will this macro work to wrap cookies that are really long?
%WRAPPED="%COOKIE"
--
Best regards,
David
Heaven won't have me and Hell's afraid I'll take over.
Using The Bat!
TBUDL members
I have a useful quick template created at some stage by Carsten Thönges
that allows me to include blank lines in the quoted text in my reply
template. Unfortunately this breaks in v2.
I note on the TBTECH archive a quick template that Januk Aggarwal has
created that provides a simil
On Tuesday, May 02, 2000 at 19:03:38 GMT -0400 (EDT)
(which was 7:03 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hello Max,
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a way to setup filters to bounce spam and send a CC
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should a message template starting with this
> work?
> %rexexpb
ND> An idea for a new macro:
ND>One that would list the CC recipients, much like the %ATTACHMENTS
ND> does for any attachments now. That way the person receiving the email
ND> would know whom else is was sent to. In case they don't have the CC
ND> header info showing up in their email pr
In Reference to "Macros Addition" From Tom Plunket:
T> Force someone to see something if they've got the program set up to
T> not show them this information? Sorry, I think that's a not-good
T> thing.
Not a good thing? Listing the people you copy a message to
>> for a shortcut so I don't have to manually type in 10-12 names on
ND>> certain messages.
TS> I'd like to see this macro to! So the Names are shown in the
TS> Message text which is pretty helpful on a printed mail! Where you
TS> don't see the CC field any
T>> Force someone to see something if they've got the program set up to
T>> not show them this information? Sorry, I think that's a not-good
T>> thing.
ND> Not a good thing? Listing the people you copy a message to in the
ND> actual message is good business practice. At least in all the busine
In Reference to "Macros Addition" From Tom Plunket:
T> So you think it's common to have the CC list twice?
No, I think it's common to have a CC: list at the end of a business
message.
T> My point is, if people want to see it, I would think they would
T> lo
Monday, June 26, 2000, 11:43:13 AM, Nick wrote:
> No, I think it's common to have a CC: list at the end of a business
> message.
And a business message is often sent via snail mail, not email.
> ..and I think it's more a thing of proper business etiquette for them
> to be in the message body
In Reference to "Macros Addition" From Steve Lamb:
Cool, I've awakened the wrath of Lamb! Not sure I've ever had the
pleasure before. ;-)
S> Nick "My middle name is" Danger
S> 1234 Newbie Way.
S> N3xt T1m3 U$3, KY 54321
Hey, how did you find out wher
Hello Andrew,
On Wednesday, September 05, 2001 at 11:51:03 PM you wrote:
AH> Hello TBUDL list,
AH> I am just starting to get into macros/templates etc, and wondered
AH> whether the following was possible:-
AH> 1. When I send a message in a list folder, is it possible to f
1 - 100 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
