Hello Code,
> NOD32 is incapable of scanning (like .tbb) will do nothing. NOD32 is
> still incapable of peaking inside the file.
I know. But even if it was capable, I wouldn't let NOD32 (or any other
antivirus) fiddle with my mail folders.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (
ve
M> been testing also with Eicar and no, AMON scans TB's *.tmp file but does
M> not detect Eicar.
M> I've been talking with the tech support of NOD32's Spanish distributor,
M> who also distribute The Bat!, and they didn't really believe me. They
M> asked me to
es' tick
M> box at the bottom and it will now list the extensions to scan.
Be aware, though, that adding an extension of a file format which
NOD32 is incapable of scanning (like .tbb) will do nothing. NOD32 is
still incapable of peaking inside the file.
--
Code 2 :canadaflag: mailto:
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 5:41:10 PM, you wrote:
M> In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick
M> box at the bottom and it will now list the extensions to scan.
Thanks. Ticked "Analyse all files" again though...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Hello Mark,
M>> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
>
> Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty)
> list of extensions NOT to be scanned...
In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick
box at the bottom and it will n
Hello MAU,
Sunday, January 28, 2007, 1:00:38 PM, you wrote:
M> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty)
list of extensions NOT to be scanned...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The
e
been testing also with Eicar and no, AMON scans TB's *.tmp file but does
not detect Eicar.
I've been talking with the tech support of NOD32's Spanish distributor,
who also distribute The Bat!, and they didn't really believe me. They
asked me to send them a summary of the problem b
Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 12:47:29 PM, you wrote:
>> FWIW, I appear to have v2.51.26 of NOD32.
> I have 2.50.25 and clicking on "update now" tells me my
> installation is up to date and no update is required.
Latest version is 2.70.23 - however at this point you still
Hi
On Saturday 27 January 2007 at 1:06:07 AM, in
, George Mitchell
wrote:
> FWIW, I appear to have v2.51.26 of NOD32.
I have 2.50.25 and clicking on "update now" tells me my
installation is up to date and no update is required.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 at 1:25:04 AM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
> On Sunday 28 January 2007 at 12:00:38 PM, in
> , MAU wrote:
>> Check you AMON configuration. Either you have some excluded directories
>> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
> I just checked mine and added
Hi
On Sunday 28 January 2007 at 12:00:38 PM, in
, MAU wrote:
> Check you AMON configuration. Either you have some excluded directories
> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
I just checked mine and added TMP. I believe it was not there by
default, as I don't recall previously
Hello all,
Saturday, January 27, 2007, Code 2 wrote:
> You're right, George, we can use the plug-in to scan outgoing mail. I
> notice that the plug-in is a test version (version 0.1) and appears to
> have been developed several years ago for NOD32 version 1. The
> plug-in s
Hello Code,
M>> 2.- You forward the message after NOD32 signatures have been updated.
>
M>> Then there is nothing to worry about. Why? Even though NOD32's 'IMON
M>> does not scan outgoing email' and 'on-demand scanner does not scan tbb
M>> files&#
>> Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an
>> infected e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize
>> (as happened to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That
>> infected e-mail would sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several
&g
>> Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an
>> infected e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize
>> (as happened to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That
>> infected e-mail would sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several
&g
Hello Code,
> Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an infected
> e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened
> to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would
> sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD3
Code 2 wrote:
C2> You're right, George, we can use the plug-in to scan outgoing
C2> mail. I notice that the plug-in is a test version (version 0.1)
C2> and appears to have been developed several years ago for NOD32
C2> version 1. The plug-in seems to work with NOD32 version
C2>> ...a situation could arise where I receive an infected e-mail
C2>> which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened to
C2>> me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would
C2>> sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-d
Code 2 wrote:
C2> ...a situation could arise where I receive an infected e-mail
C2> which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened to
C2> me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would
C2> sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on
Here's a heads-up for users of NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!. NOD32's
technical support people confirmed to me that NOD32's on-demand
scanner cannot scan inside The Bat's messages.tbb data files and
therefore cannot spot infected e-mails. However, NOD32's IMON module
s
Hi Ted,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, at 17:45:30 [GMT+1100] (which was 17:45:30 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV?
> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by
> NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, s
Hello Ted,
Friday, January 20, 2006, 12:48:04 PM, you wrote:
> On 1/20/06, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a
>> signature:
>>
>> "Tom
>> using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32&
On 1/20/06, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a
> signature:
>
> "Tom
> using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32"
Sorry, did not want to confuse you. I am using TB but not when writing
to thi
On 1/20/06, Alexander S. Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could it be that these messages are multiparted (with attachments, signed,
> html format)? If so, the scanner may not be able to add its tagline to the
> readable part of the message.
Not sure how to answer this. Most of my emails (A) onl
nd that was the only non TB message.
GS>> That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a
GS>> signature:
GS>> "Tom
GS>> using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32"
> Nonetheless. His message id is definitely not generated by
t message contains a
GS> signature:
GS> "Tom
GS> using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32"
Nonetheless. His message id is definitely not generated by TB.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
WinErr: 019 User error - Not our fault. Is Not! Is Not!
The Bat! 3.65.04
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
nly non TB message. And it was carrying these
> headers:
> ,- [ ]
> | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> | Content-Disposition: inline
> `-
> So Nod32 might have problems with one of those headers.
That is s
xt/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
| Content-Disposition: inline
`-----
So Nod32 might have problems with one of those headers.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
'95 - The number of calls to tech support before you can get it to run
The Bat! 3.65.04
Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hello Roelof,
Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:25:20 AM, you wrote:
> Hallo Graham,
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:11:57 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:11 +0100, where I
> live), you wrote:
GS>> I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two
GS>> messages aren&#x
Hallo Graham,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:11:57 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:11 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
GS> I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two
GS> messages aren't tagged (including the root message) and the rest are.
Be more specific please.
Of
Hello Mark,
Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:05:02 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Graham,
> Friday, January 20, 2006, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote:
>>> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV?
>>> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by
>>>
Hello Graham,
Friday, January 20, 2006, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote:
>> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV?
>> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by
>> NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem
>> to
Hello Ted Dane & everyone else,
on 20-Jan-2006 at 07:45 you (Ted Dane) wrote:
> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV?
> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by
> NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem
&
lso means that it
would really bother me to have my virus scanner include signatures to
incoming mail (and to outgoing mails they don't make any sense at all)
that I'm not knowledgeable at all about what could cause a feature
like that to function or not. (Apart from that I don't use N
Hello Ted,
Friday, January 20, 2006, 6:45:30 AM, you wrote:
> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV?
> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by
> NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem
> to be either ignored or
Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV?
I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by
NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem
to be either ignored or do not have the tag (confirming the scan).
One email was received yesterday and
Hello all,
Thursday, June 16, 2005, Vili wrote:
>>> You don't need plugin for NOD32, if You don't want to check
>>> - digitally signed/encrypted messages
>>> - partially downloaded messages (message splitted to more parts)
>>> - messages downloaded
>> You don't need plugin for NOD32, if You don't want to check
>> - digitally signed/encrypted messages
>> - partially downloaded messages (message splitted to more parts)
>> - messages downloaded via secured connection (SSL/TLS)
>> in these cases, IMON is
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, June 14, 2005, 10:46:54 PM, you wrote:
> You don't need plugin for NOD32, if You don't want to check
> - digitally signed/encrypted messages
> - partially downloaded messages (message splitted to more parts)
> - messages downloaded via secured conn
Hello all,
Wednesday, June 15, 2005, Darrin wrote:
>> I use Nod32 and wondering if there were plugins for the AV part of
>> TB!.
> I was reading this
> http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=39002&highlight=thebat
> and it looks like its not needed after a
Hello Darrin,
Tuesday, June 14, 2005, 8:20:02 PM, you wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
> I use Nod32 and wondering if there were plugins for the AV part of
> TB!.
I was reading this
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=39002&highlight=thebat
and it looks like its not needed a
Hello TBUDL,
I use Nod32 and wondering if there were plugins for the AV part of
TB!.
--
Darrin
Emailed using TheBat! V 3.5.25
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current version is 3.5.25 | '
Now it works like a charm! Thanks for all your suggestions, especially
thank you, Marek.
--
Kind regards,
Marek K. ZBOROWSKI
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' infor
Hi Marek,
On Friday, February 25, 2005, at 5:46:19 AM PST, you wrote:
Mikus>> Which version of installed NOD32 components do You use?
Mikus>> 2.12.3?
> 2.12.2 and actually I didn't know there's a newer version available.
> Will check that out.
I don't feel
Hello Marek,
25 Feb 2005 (14:50:58) you wrote:
Mikus> this is an old version of plugin, please check path to used plugin,
Mikus> new version displays virus database version number (for example
Mikus> 1.1007) and release date.
That's a real crap, and I feel like a fool=) As you point
Hello all,
Friday, February 25, 2005, M. K. ZBOROWSKI wrote:
Mikus>> column "Version" and "Status"?
> Version 0.1 and Status OK
this is an old version of plugin, please check path to used plugin,
new version displays virus database version number (for example
1.1007) and release date.
Hello Marek,
25 Feb 2005 (14:22:29) you wrote:
Mikus> column "Version" and "Status"?
Version 0.1 and Status OK
Mikus> Which version of installed NOD32 components do You use? 2.12.3?
2.12.2 and actually I didn't know there's a newer version available.
Wi
be checked".
Have to NOD32 installed or just the pluggin?
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'U
Hello all,
Friday, February 25, 2005, M. K. ZBOROWSKI wrote:
Mikus>> do You really have plugin nod32.BAV with size 99400 bytes and
Mikus>> dated 2.7.2004? There is one old plugin with size 97864, but it
Mikus>> doesn't work correctly.
> Yes, I do. Frankly, today I e
Hello Marek,
25 Feb 2005 (12:16:21) you wrote:
Mikus> do You really have plugin nod32.BAV with size 99400 bytes and
Mikus> dated 2.7.2004? There is one old plugin with size 97864, but it
Mikus> doesn't work correctly.
Yes, I do. Frankly, today I even downloaded it again to be a
software
> reported problem: the object can not be checked".
do You really have plugin nod32.BAV with size 99400 bytes and dated
2.7.2004? There is one old plugin with size 97864, but it doesn't work
correctly.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using
Howdy Tony,
25 Feb 2005 (11:49:43) you wrote:
Boom> But he asked which error?
The one I already described - error related to checking and sending
mail with attachments. Every time I was trying to send it I was
getting smth like that (can't remember exactly) "antivirus software
repor
Hello M.,
A reminder of what M. K. ZBOROWSKI on TBUDL typed on:
25 February 2005 at 11:38:59 GMT +0100
MKZ> and nothing changed for me, I still do get the same error
But he asked which error?
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/
Hello Marek,
25 Feb 2005 (10:13:53) you wrote:
Mikus> which error? I have sent it to more than 50 testers and they are using
Mikus> it daily with no problem. There is (propably yet) one known issue -
Mikus> You must restart system.
I've just added the plug-in, turned off TB!, restarted system.
Hello Marek,
A reminder of what Marek Mikus on TBUDL typed on:
25 February 2005 at 10:17:26 GMT +0100
MM> which error? I have sent it to more than 50 testers and they are using
MM> it daily with no problem.
I've been using it and it works perfectly with no problems at all. Like I
said earl
Hello M.,
A reminder of what M. K. ZBOROWSKI on TBUDL typed on:
25 February 2005 at 10:11:21 GMT +0100
MKZ> Yes it does work with TB! 3.x, but only until you do not try to send
MKZ> any kind of attachment, because this causes an error.
I've been using the NOD32 pluggin
Hello all,
Friday, February 25, 2005, M. K. ZBOROWSKI wrote:
Mikus>> this is the last version developed by Ritlabs and working with
Mikus>> 3.x version:
> Yes it does work with TB! 3.x, but only until you do not try to send
> any kind of attachment, because this causes an error. Are there a
Hello Marek,
25 Feb 2005 (00:26:53) you wrote:
Mikus> this is the last version developed by Ritlabs and working with
Mikus> 3.x version:
Yes it does work with TB! 3.x, but only until you do not try to send
any kind of attachment, because this causes an error. Are there any
plans to devel
"X-Rogue",":PACO:"> Hello all,
> Friday, February 25, 2005, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
>> Would someone be so kind as to direct me to the current NOD32 plug-in?
> this is the last version developed by Ritlabs and working with 3.x
> version:
> http://www.theba
Hello all,
Friday, February 25, 2005, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
> Would someone be so kind as to direct me to the current NOD32 plug-in?
this is the last version developed by Ritlabs and working with 3.x
version:
http://www.thebat.cz/stazeni/beta/nod32.rar (50kB)
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech supp
Battyfolk,
Would someone be so kind as to direct me to the current NOD32 plug-in?
Thanks.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.0.1.33, , Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' i
Hello Jan,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 8:40:40 PM, you wrote:
> Battyfolk,
> What is the most current NOD32 plug-in & can u direct me to the
> source?
> Thanks.
I don't know if you need a plugin with the trial version but ever
since ive had the retail version of NOD32
Battyfolk,
What is the most current NOD32 plug-in & can u direct me to the
source?
Thanks.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.0.1 RC7, BayesIt! 0.7.2, Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329
Current version is 3.00.00 | &#
Marek Mikus, [MM] wrote:
> did You tested first beta version of plugin for NOD32 v2? It was
> created by Maxim some weeks ago and works with last beta of NOD32,
> which has file nod32api.dll included. We have found only one issue
> yet, system must be restarted after installing bet
plug-in and you'd have to wait for a new one to be released. The same
> for NOD32.
did You tested first beta version of plugin for NOD32 v2? It was
created by Maxim some weeks ago and works with last beta of NOD32,
which has file nod32api.dll included. We have found only
On Wed 11 August 2004, 4:57:49 +1000, Chris Weaven wrote:
> As stated in the original mail, the reason I believe I need to use the
> plug-in is because when using a TLS connection with my mail server, IMON
> is unable to scan the message as it is encrypted.
>
> Is this the case?
The transport lin
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 2:59:36 PM, you wrote:
PC>> I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could
PC>> not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from
PC>> eset, so I went back to AVG.
CW> Hmm, that's not
Hi Paul,
On Monday, August 9, 2004 17:05 your local time, which was 22:05 my
local time, Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote;
PC> I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could
PC> not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from
PC> eset, so I went ba
Hi Michael,
On Monday, August 9, 2004 17:17 your local time, which was Tuesday,
August 10, 2004 at 01:17 my local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote;
MLW> I have been using nod32 for several years, and have never used a BAT!
MLW> plug-in. I do not need one. Nod32 will monitor any port yo
Michael-
Ditto here. I run nod32 on the server and I also run Norton AV on my
workstations just because I don't trust *anything* completely. But
nod32 has _never_ let anything through for Norton to catch.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service P
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Chris mused about "NOD32 Plug-In Beta." (at least
in part):
CW> NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
CW> plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
CW> mail is received via
Hello Chris,
Monday, August 9, 2004, 4:51:14 PM, you wrote:
CW> NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
CW> plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
CW> mail is received via TLS and I am led to believe proxy scanners s
Hi all,
Unfortunately I'm having major problems with the Kaspersky plug-in and
TB!, which in a nutshell means, my incoming mail is unscanned at client
level.
Therefore, I'm having to assess the options.
NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
plug-in a
Hello Carsten
Thank you for your email dated Sunday, February 1, 2004, 5:44:39 PM,
in which you wrote:
>> What do you mean "NOD32 does not detect new viruses"?
CT> I mean virus scanners don't detect unknown viruses.
Unless they are caught by Nod's heuristic det
* Clive Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Carsten,
>> I don't believe you because even NOD32 does not detect /new/
>> viruses. IMHO this is an important fact many users seem to forget
>> these days
> What do you mean "NOD32 does not detect new virus
Hello all,
Sunday, February 1, 2004, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> If I remember this right, NOD32 developers already have the
> BAV specification... Anyway, nothing was changed here comparing to v1
Yes, they have it, but as they told me in October 2003 on Invex
tradefair, they do not plan it
Hello Clive,
Sunday, February 1, 2004, 10:05:59 AM, you wrote:
CT> Not for v2
If I remember this right, NOD32 developers already have the
BAV specification... Anyway, nothing was changed here comparing to v1
CT> and you dont need one anyway, because NOD32 will intercept
CT> infe
At 6:53 AM on 2/1/2004, Clive Taylor typed ...
C> What do you mean "NOD32 does not detect new viruses"? It's one of the
C> best out there at detecting viruses and updating itself against new
C> threats. It's proven - especiall here in the past few days with the
Hello Carsten,
Sunday, February 1, 2004, 10:13:53 AM, you wrote:
CT> I don't believe you because even NOD32 does not detect /new/
CT> viruses. IMHO this is an important fact many users seem to forget
CT> these days.
Of course it is possible that I am mistaken, or that there is so
* Clive Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Anyway ...is there a NOD32 plugin?
> Not for v2 ? and you don?t need one anyway, because NOD32 will
> intercept infected mail at a system level and, believe me, you WILL
> get a notification if there?s a virus in your mail!
Hello S & J Love,
zondag 1 februari 2004, 5:53:42, you wrote:
SJL> Anyway ...is there a NOD32 plugin?
Yes there is, you can find it here (site is in German)
http://www.thebatworld.de/modules/download/index.php?op=viewlinkdetails&lid=33&ttitle=Nod_32
--
Kind regards,
Gerda Ilmer
Dear tbudl,
I searched the knowledge database and couldn't get an answer on where
to get the NOD32 plugin for The Bat!
Previously I have used AVG...and its TheBat! plugin -with no
worries...but I thought I would try NOD32 - though not a
freebie...because it seems to be a better AV progra
Hello Steve!
On Monday, January 19, 2004, 5:07 AM, you wrote:
SM> You certainly put me going in the right direction here as the error is
SM> caused when NOD32 tries to access MAPI32.dll and when TB! is installed
SM> as a simple MAPI request handler (Options | Preferences |
SM> Appl
Hi Terry and thanks for replying
> http://www.nod32.com/support/ans/6h.htm
> I use NOD32 2.000.6.
Me too. Just the trial version though as would like to evaluate before
I fork out any cash for it
> NOD32 Control Center/NOD32 System Tools/NOD32 System
> Setup/Setup/Notifications/
&
Hi Steve,
On Monday, January 19, 2004 at 9:16 AM, Steve wrote:
> Does anyone use TB with NOD32 Anti-Virus? If so does anyone, on running
> NOD32, experience a message that says words to the effect of "Either
> there is no default mail client or the mail client cannot fulfill t
Hello Steve Mulhall,
maandag 19 januari 2004, 10:16:39, you wrote:
SM> Hi guys,
SM> Does anyone use TB with NOD32 Anti-Virus? If so does anyone, on running
SM> NOD32, experience a message that says words to the effect of "Either
SM> there is no default mail client or the m
Hi guys,
Does anyone use TB with NOD32 Anti-Virus? If so does anyone, on running
NOD32, experience a message that says words to the effect of "Either
there is no default mail client or the mail client cannot fulfill the
messaging request. Please run Microsoft Outlook and set it as the
de
On Friday, September 05, 2003 at 7:16 AM, Stefan wrote:
> AFAIK, the old plug-in for NOD32 should work. I do not know any
> anti-virus software which is able to monitor a secured connection,
> this is one of the points of providing plug-in interface in The Bat!
Thanks, Stefan, for th
Hello Terry,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:26:51 AM, you wrote:
T> If I upgrade to version 2 and utilize the Bayesian plug-in, will I
T> also be able to use TLS?
Absolutely. :-)
T> And, am I correct in assuming that until Eset comes up with a NOD32
T> version 2 plug-in for TB ver
Hi all,
If I upgrade to version 2 and utilize the Bayesian plug-in, will I
also be able to use TLS? And, am I correct in assuming that until Eset
comes up with a NOD32 version 2 plug-in for TB version 2, IMON won't
work with TLS?
--
Regards,
Terry
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 200
Marck-
Friday, July 11, 2003, 4:27:38 AM, you wrote:
MDP> It's not for me - I use AVG. It's for someone who wants his
MDP> outbound messages certified virus free by NOD. NOD is saying that
MDP> the attachment is not valid and stalling the mail send.
1. Add a line to the template that says "cert
Marck-
I use NOD32 *without* the plugin and it seems to work just fine. I
don't scan outgoing emails, though, and there's a long-standing
controversy about the value of doing this. If that's the real crux of
the matter, then I can't be of much help.
-Mark Wieder
Using The
Hello ravi,
Friday, July 11, 2003, 11:23:18 AM, you wrote:
r> As I said, one could have received a virus before the virus
r> signature was updated to detect it.
Yes, I got it. That would be possible, but likely for me. I would really
have to be out of my mind to forward a message to some
r>> A virus could have been received and not detected prior
r>> to a signature update.
> Assuming you are forwarding a message that has already been scanned,
> it should have been caught during incoming. If it didn't, even
> outgoing scan won't catch it.
As I said, one could have received a viru
Hello ravi,
Friday, July 11, 2003, 10:14:43 AM, you wrote:
r> How about forwarding an an infected message including the
r> attachment?
r> A virus could have been received and not detected prior to a
r> signature update.
Assuming you are forwarding a message that has already been scanned,
it sho
On Friday, July 11, 2003 at 2:22 PM, Marck wrote:
> It seems to work for incoming mail, just not for outbound. That's
> why I was asking the question in the first place.
It wasn't clear to me that you were using the old plug-in. Wishful
thinking on my part that there was a new one. :) Thanks fo
> Sorry about that. You still don't need the plug in. The
> AMON will catch the virus infected file if you try to
> attach the file using the BAT's "attach a file" command.
How about forwarding an an infected message including the
attachment?
A virus could have been received and not detected pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Terry,
@11-Jul-2003, 13:37 Terry [T] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
>>>> NOD32 have just released v2, but the TB plug-in isn't working
>>>> right when using it to check outbound mail with attachments. Is
>
Hello Marck,
Friday, July 11, 2003, 7:27:38 AM, you wrote:
MDP> It's not for me - I use AVG. It's for someone who wants his
MDP> outbound messages certified virus free by NOD. NOD is saying that
MDP> the attachment is not valid and stalling the mail send.
I see. Interesting. This has never ha
On Friday, July 11, 2003 at 11:52 AM, Marck wrote:
>>> NOD32 have just released v2, but the TB plug-in isn't working
>>> right when using it to check outbound mail with attachments. Is
>>> there a way to configure it to work correctly?
Is there a new plug-in for
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
