Hello Keith,
On Thu, 23 May 2002 22:35:56 -0600 GMT (24/05/02, 11:35 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8sxc Upgrade to 160m? (It does look like you're running it.) I
8sxc definitely have to have it set to Microsoft with h.
The S/Mime bug was fixed with 1.60k. The whole point of Greg's
Hi there, Graeme,
Thursday, May 23, 2002, 7:16:02 AM, you wrote:
GJH Julius,
Still don't get any prompts on the toolbar buttons. Been trying to fix with
ver 160c, 160k, and now with 160m. No luck. Button darkens, but no prompt
and I have to guess at what pictogram in button means... usually
Hello Allie!
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 10:53:33 PM you wrote:
A sensitive and frustrated user with TB! problems may think he meant
this but I'm sure he didn't. :-)
He did something that is not all to common nowadays: Instead of just
stating his discontent, he just wanted to notice the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:
...
DH Considering that many people make their discontent with an
DH application into a What a crap statement, it was high time to
DH read something positive.
My sentiments exactly.
It was a breath of fresh air reading it.
Julius,
Still don't get any prompts on the toolbar buttons. Been trying to fix with
ver 160c, 160k, and now with 160m. No luck. Button darkens, but no prompt
and I have to guess at what pictogram in button means... usually
screw-up... groan!!
What version of Windows are you running? Older
On Wed, 22 May 2002 13:15:04 -0400, Bill Blinn,
Technology Editor wrote:
R I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever
had any issues R like the ones people post here.
Nor I ... couple of small glitches on migrating to
Win2kPro, which this list dealt with very promptly.
Thanks again
23 May 2002, 15:02, you wrote:
LT FWIW, I have been looking at Poco Mail, because several
LT people (not on this list :-D) have told me it's much
LT better/easier than TB,
What I don't like about PocoMail is that there's no way to turn off
received HTML. If you've found the option I'd like
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Thursday, May 23 2002 at 12:14 AM PDT, you wrote:
Considering that many people make their discontent with an application
into a What a crap statement, it was high time to read something
positive.
There have been many positive Postings about TB in this List, but this
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Thu, 23 May 2002 17:45:57 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, May 23, 2002, 10:45:57 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Dierk Haasis wrote:
Hello Nick!
On Thursday, May 23, 2002 at 5:29:51 PM you wrote:
There have been many positive Postings about TB in this
Hello Nick!
On Thursday, May 23, 2002 at 5:29:51 PM you wrote:
There have been many positive Postings about TB in this List, but this
individual wrote in effect: I do not have any problems with TB so I do not
understand why everyone else is having problems. It served no purpose
whatsoever
On 5/24/02 at 12:20 AM tracer wrote:
Everybody uses a program in his own way and some people are masters in
breaking 'perfect' software. Thats why they are wanted as
betatesters...
having spend years in software and hardware support besides being in
the development I can assure you that its
Replying to your message of Thursday, May 23, 2002, 11:40:45 AM:
R I am tired of seeing so many posts from people spewing that TheBat!
R did this evil thing to my system, or If this isn't fixed, I am going
R back to FREE OE blah blah..
The Bat! seems to be a very simple piece of software but
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Thursday, May 23 2002 at 08:45 AM PDT, you wrote:
I didn't read that in his statement.
Obviously I and the others were reading too much into the original Posting.
In all fairness, I think our 'reactions' are more a reflection of the
undeniable frustration the Users are
Hi, Bill.
On Thu, 23 May 2002 19:40:27 -0400 GMT your local time, which was
Thursday, May 23, 2002, 5:40 PM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
Earlier today there was a report that the message pane goes blank in
XP. I replied saying that I'd seen the problem, but that it apparently
had gone away
Hello...
this is the exact issue i had earlier, except when I opened the
message the message title said view folder for ... whatever folder
the message was in. I also was running XP.
It has to do with an invalid sig.
upgrade to latest, which is what i did and it solved the issue.
Or, do what was
Hi, RapidFX.
On Thu, 23 May 2002 18:58:01 -0800 GMT your local time, which was
Thursday, May 23, 2002, 8:58 PM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
this is the exact issue i had earlier, except when I opened the
message the message title said view folder for ... whatever folder
the message was in.
Hello Julius,
On Tue, 21 May 2002 23:49:48 -0400 GMT (22/05/02, 10:49 +0700 GMT),
Julius S. wrote:
JS Ready to go back to FREE no hastle Outlook Express.
Do they also give you several updates per month? You see, you don't
need to outdate TB if you don't want to. Friends of mine just do it
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 8:21:37 AM you wrote:
JS Ready to go back to FREE no hastle Outlook Express.
No update no hassle!
No hassle with OE? Only when one doesn't pay attention to warnings
about security holes. One of the most frequent tips for being on the
safe side is,
Hello...
I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever had any issues
like the ones people post here.
I know that means nothing to those that do seem to have issues, but
I just fail to understand how you all run into these problems. I have
used TheBat! on Win95, Win98, Win98se, Win2kPro,
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 6:50:38 PM, you wrote:
R Hello...
R I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever had any issues
R like the ones people post here.
R I know that means nothing to those that do seem to have issues, but
R I just fail to understand how you all run into these
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 8:25:14 PM, you wrote:
R Hello...
R If you can't figure it out from my post
I was just wondering if you were saying we are all dumbo's who don't get
it, or that you are just incredibly smart.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Insert Cookie Here-- Ho! Ha! Guard! Turn!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard [G] wrote:
...
G I was just wondering if you were saying we are all dumbo's who
G don't get it, or that you are just incredibly smart.
A sensitive and frustrated user with TB! problems may think he meant
this but I'm sure he didn't. :-)
- --
Hello...
If you can't figure it out from my post
Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:15:13 AM, you wrote:
G Hi RapidFX,
G and your point being that ..?
G ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 6:50:38 PM, you wrote:
R Hello...
R I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever had any issues
R like
It seems that RapidFX said ...
R I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever had any issues
R like the ones people post here.
I, too, have been using The Bat for several years. Some programs have
a more modern interface (Eudora, for example) but are nowhere near as
flexible as The Bat.
Hello...
No, and I never said anything like that.
I said, I do not understand how so many seem to have
problems, (crashes, buttons missing, emails being deleted)
when myself and others at our office never have.
It was not intended to be any sort of insult, or to pump up my ego.
I was just stating
Hi there, gurus,
I just can't get the hang of this!!
I D/L 1.60m in the form of the_bat.exe (2460 KB) from RIT site. I copied it to my
current BAT directory, but left previous thebat.exe which is ver 1.60k
there.
I ran the new and nothing happens.
The earlier version 1.60k had to be extracted
Hello Julius S.,
On Tuesday, May 21 2002 at 08:49 PM PDT, you wrote:
I D/L 1.60m in the form of the_bat.exe (2460 KB) from RIT site. I
copied it to my current BAT directory, but left previous thebat.exe
which is ver 1.60k there.
Julius, 1.60m I believe was a full install so all you had to
Hi there, Nick,
Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 12:11:35 AM, you wrote:
NA Julius, 1.60m I believe was a full install so all you had to do was double
NA click on it. Why don't you just pull it out of your TB Directory, put it
NA in a Temp Directory somewhere and simply double click on it. It should
28 matches
Mail list logo
