Hello Jan,
Sorry it took so long to write back to you. This is my work e-mail
account and I was off for the weekend. :-)
Friday, June 29, 2001, 7:50:24 PM, you wrote:
JR Could you give me some examples to illustrate the utility of
JR Poco's scripting language vs the use of templates in
Hello Gerry,
On Monday, July 02, 2001 08:03:36 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Poco means Not Much':
Gerry I'll list more as I think of them. really, you should download the
Gerry evaluation version of Poco and see for yourself.
Thanks very much for your Poco eval notes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan and Marck,
Monday, July 02, 2001, 9:27:24 AM, you wrote:
JR Hello Gerry,
JR I think the moderators have designated this a 'dead horse' so
JR further discussion should probably move off-list or @ least to the
JR OT-list.
I really
Hello Gerry,
On Monday, July 02, 2001 11:10:17 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Poco means Not Much':
Gerry I could
Gerry SWEAR that I cut and paste Jan's actual e-mail address in the List's
Gerry place.
I think CTRL-F4 replies to the 'From:' address rather than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Don!
On Saturday, June 30, 2001 at 6:22:58 AM you wrote:
I worked in Chula Vista, CA for six years in a plant whose workforce was of
mostly Mexican origin, most of them from Tijuana or other parts of Baja. They
used poco as I described
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Carren!
On Saturday, June 30, 2001 at 6:00:28 AM you wrote:
Exactly! This is a TB!list so why are we even discussing Poco?
Because we can learn of implementations and features being perhaps
good to TB!?
Each to his own, and you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan!
On Friday, June 29, 2001 at 7:38:56 PM you wrote:
I would be interested in hearing your comments after downloading
Poco giving it a once over.
I am a *user*, who has to do work with his programme. So I chose the
conservative way:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Douglas,
On Saturday, June 30, 2001 at 21:37:24 -0600, Douglas Hinds [DH] wrote
concerning 'Poco means Not Much':
Maybe a dumb question but why are you still using TB! version 1.42?
Why didn't you upgrade to the latest version?
- --
Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 30 June 2001 at 09:20:11 +0200 (which was 08:20 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Don Zeigler and made these points:
moderator
This is not to Dierk - it's to all people involved in this thread.
/moderator
If you think being called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 30 June 2001 at 11:24:51 +0200 (which was 10:24 where I live)
David van Zuijlekom wrote to Douglas Hinds on TBUDL and made these
points:
DvZ Maybe a dumb question but why are you still using TB! version 1.42?
DvZ Why didn't you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 30 June 2001 at 09:02:47 +0200 (which was 08:02 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Carren Stuart and made these points:
Each to his own, and you have obviously already made up your mind what
you do and don't like, so what is the
Hello Listers,
Today, 29 June 2001, at 05:11:10 [GMT -0600] Douglas wrote:
DH If anyone has any relevant comparative info and cares to post it
DH here, I'll make sure it gets translated and posted to the Spanish
DH TB! list
Please do, most of Spanish users will be grateful.
--
Chema
Bernhard I'm sorry, but not much is a very derogatory translation;
Bernhard small will describe the program more precise.
PocoMail has a lot of features and probably is the more complete email
client software nowadays.
Bernhard Maybe it's not a real competitor to TB! ( and I'm using TB!
Hello Listers,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, at 13:57:43 [GMT +0200] (which was 13:57 where I
live) Bernhard wrote:
BK poco 1 (adj;pron) (sg;gen) little;
BK (pequeño) small;
BK (escaso) slight, scanty;
BK I'm sorry, but not much is a very derogatory translation; small
BK will describe the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Manuel!
On Friday, June 29, 2001 at 2:26:49 PM you wrote:
Poco has same features than TB plus:
PocoScript (powerful script language).
Useful.
Skins.
Unnecessary.
HTML message edition. (TB will have this feature in the future).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:28:59 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, June 29, 2001, 2:28:59 PM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH Hash: SHA1
DH Hello Manuel!
DH On Friday, June 29, 2001 at 2:26:49 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jamie!
On Friday, June 29, 2001 at 3:50:36 PM you wrote:
DH Useful.
We could be underestimating how useful this sort of thing is. Imagine
regular expression coupled with Perl. You'd have extremely powerful
filtering systems, mass mailing
be TBTECH - so I'll repost it there. What follows is purely
linguistic and describes the use of the word poco in Mexico, where
I've lived since 1974.
Friday, June 29, 2001, you stated regarding: Poco means Not Much:
DH poco means not much in Spanish my general feeling is that
DH it's not much
Hello Dierk,
On Friday, June 29, 2001 15:28:59 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Poco means Not Much':
Dierk If that is all Pocomail can offer additionally the point of which is
Dierk more powerful or complete is utterly superfluous.
I would be interested in hearing your
On 29-06-2001 at 15:50, Jamie Dainton kindly wrote:
Skins.
DH Unnecessary.
Yes they are. But how many skinable applications usually keep their
default skin? I rarely see any winamp user with the default skin.
Me! Me! [And I'm even a paid user - bought it in 1998,
before it went for free]
version. My hope that one of you will be able to contribute
relevant, detailed, comparative info and post it here is what
motivates this request. If that happens, I'll make sure it gets
translated and posted to the Spanish TB! list.
Douglas
P.S.
poco means not much in Spanish my general feeling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan,
Friday, June 29, 2001, 1:38:56 PM, you wrote:
Dierk If that is all Pocomail can offer additionally the point of which is
Dierk more powerful or complete is utterly superfluous.
JR I would be interested in hearing your comments after
Hello Gerry others on this TB! list following this thread,
Friday, June 29, 2001, you stated regarding why Poco means Not Much
compared to TB!:
GD I am in fact a registered user of both Poco AND The Bat!. I, of
GD course, prefer and use TB! I moved from Poco to TB!.
snip re Wife uses Poco
On 6/29/01 7:11:10 AM
Douglas Hinds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
poco means not much in Spanish my general feeling is that it's no
much of a competitor compared to TB! What I'm looking from is
confirmation of this from someone who has looked at it recently,
since I don't plan on doing
Hello Don others on this TB! list following this thread,
Friday, June 29, 2001, you stated regarding Poco means Not Much:
DZ A more correct connotation would be little one and not not much.
Not true. In Mexico, the most common use of poco is little
(quiero poco means I don't want much
Hello Douglas, TB! 1.53d Windows 98 SE
You wrote:
DH That is your privilege. Thanks for the comparison (but hold off on
DH the rest. Frankly, I don't see a need for seeking your approval
DH before stating an opinion and I'm open to reviewing whatever facts
DH
I will re-send this as for some reason it hasn't appeared on the list.
Apologies if I've duplicated.
Hello Douglas, TB! 1.53d Windows 98 SE
You wrote:
DH That is your privilege. Thanks for the comparison (but hold off on
DH the rest. Frankly, I don't see a need
27 matches
Mail list logo
