Hi
On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 12:42:22 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
JS>>> Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
JS>>> invention.
Z>> So why is TB! using it?
> Dunno.
Z>> TB! is not know for its adherence to MS "standards" and were can I change this
Z>>
ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 2:42:22 PM, you wrote:
RO> Couldn't find a way in TB. Only thing I can think of is exporting to
RO> .msg and then attaching it.
Roelof,
I did see that possibility to.
I am wondering why they block EML and not MSG attachements when they are basicly
the same file for
Hallo Gerard,
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:36:21 +0200GMT (28-10-2004, 13:36 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JS>> Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
JS>> invention.
Z> So why is TB! using it?
Dunno.
Z> TB! is not know for its adherence to MS "standards" and w
Hello Gerard!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 7:32 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection.
G> Thanks for the reply but I was looking to change the EML extension
G> generated by TB! when you do an alternative forward with an HTML
G> msg.
Ah. I'd been reading the th
ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 2:04:34 PM, you wrote:
MB> Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection.
Hi Mary,
Thanks for the reply but I was looking to change the EML extension generated by
TB! when you do an alternative forward with an HTML msg.
I hope this make sense ;-)
--
Best re
Hello Gerard!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 6:36 AM, you wrote, in part:
G> were can I change this in TB! from EML to MSG?
Main Window of TB!, Options/Preferences/Protection.
I am so skittish of messing with TB!'s default here, however, that
before I made a change I did a C&P to SmartBat, so t
ON Thursday, October 28, 2004, 9:15:36 AM, you wrote:
JS> Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
JS> invention.
Hi Jernej,
So why is TB! using it?
TB! is not know for its adherence to MS "standards" and were can I change this
in TB! from EML to MSG?
--
Best
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 8:57:24, Gerard wrote:
> So is there an EML equivalent extension not on the ban list that you know of?
Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's
invention.
--
< Jernej Simoncic ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ >
Anticipated
ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 1:17:33 PM, you wrote:
RO> Specials -> Alternative forward
RO> or
Hi Roelof,
Look what a customer of mine received in their mail when I attached the EML
extension:
This text was added by an EDS mail relay -
ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 6:05:42 PM, you wrote:
ASK> If I forward an HTML message, the forward message should open as HTML and
ASK> the unaltered original message should be part of any forward/redirect.
Hi Alexander,
My feeling exactly.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello Michael Acklin & everyone else
27-Okt-2004 16:21, you wrote:
> I have no way of checking the actual message for sure, but I believe
> the second method, as Roelof mentioned, with the box checked will show
> the message in HTML to the person you are sending it to.
I have tried that meanwhil
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 7:02:48 AM, (Internet Time - @543) you wrote:
Hello Alexander,
ASK> When I use alternative forward, I end up with an empty reply template
ASK> and a "1.eml" attachment with the original HTML message just as you
ASK> said but em...
ASK> Well, forwarding messages
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 1:17:33 PM, you wrote:
Z>> Isn't alternative forward the same a redirect?
> No. You can forward a message in two ways, with the original message
> in the body of your message or with the original message as an
> attachment. What is normal and what is al
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:02:55 +0200, "Alexander S. Kunz"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want to forward/redirect HTML and preserve the original message -
>IMHO this is a must-have function, is this on the wishlist already?
A whole lot of flaws regarding HTML formatting should be solved ages
ago, bu
Hallo Gerard,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:03:24 +0200GMT (27-10-2004, 13:03 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
RO>> Use alternative forward, that way the original message is sent as it
RO>> is, as an attachment.
Z> lIsn't alternative forward the same a redirect?
No. You can forward a message in two way
ON Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:54:37 AM, you wrote:
RO> Use alternative forward, that way the original message is sent as it
RO> is, as an attachment.
Hi Roelof,
lIsn't alternative forward the same a redirect?
If not how do you do this alernative forward?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-
Hello Gerard,
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 11:40:40 AM, you wrote:
> Can I please get some help on forwarding a HTML mail.
[...]
Funny - I've had the same problem just yesterday...
> Does anyone have a solution for this?
I haven't, sorry. Whats worse - same happens when you choose to
redirect
Hallo Gerard,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:40:40 +0200GMT (27-10-2004, 11:40 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
Z> Can I please get some help on forwarding a HTML mail.
Z> The problem seems to be with embedded pictures. All the
Z> receiving party sees when they select the HTML part is the text and
Z> th
18 matches
Mail list logo
