==Original message text===
From: Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WilWilWil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, September 26, 2004, 3:28:02 PM
Subject: Cursor problem with V3
PC> Hello expires30sept04,
PC> Sunday, September 26, 2004, 9:19:50 AM, you wrote:
>>> Since I
==Original message text===
From: Paul Cartwright
To: WilWilWil
Date: Sunday, September 26, 2004, 3:28:02 PM
Subject: Cursor problem with V3
PC> Hello expires30sept04,
PC> Sunday, September 26, 2004, 9:19:50 AM, you wrote:
>>> Since I've installed TB V3, my template who p
==Original message text===
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WilWilWil
Date: Sunday, September 26, 2004, 3:19:50 PM
Subject: Cursor problem with V3
eycu> Hi
eycu> Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 11:45:00 PM, WilWilWil wrote:
>> IO,
>> Since I've installed TB V3, my template who
Hi Marck,
Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 3:43:57 PM, you wrote:
> This is the result of using the auto-format.
Thanks for the prompt reply Marck :)
Best,
Tim
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, May 06, 2001, 12:45:47 AM, you wrote:
T> I sort by received time. I open a folder with "many" new messages in
T> the main window, TB goes - splash - into a new message without
T> apparent logic. This message is now marked "read", so if I hit enter
T> to go to the Folder View
Hi Allie,
On Monday, February 19, 2001 15:36:04 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'cursor position':
Allie> TB! will always start in the To:
Allie> field when creating a new message, even though you created the message
Allie> from the address book or used the %To macro to autom
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, at 20:34:56 [GMT +] you wrote:
Cc>> When selecting 'create a new message' TB! places the cursor in
Cc>> 'To:' header field, even when the default template includes
Cc>> %TO="address". This is in contrast to 'reply to message' which
Cc>> places the cursor in
Hello Thomas
On 29 September 2000, at 08:28, you wrote
This is not a bug. If the connection fails, TB makes anotehr attempt.
CTc>> And a very laudable action that is too, but one I would like to
CTc>> control. The addition of "If connections fails, attempt to establish a
CTc>> new connecti
Hello Thomas
On 29 September 2000, at 08:25, you wrote
CTc>> Sorry to appear contradictory, but in my case it does. TB will merrily
CTc>> go attempting to establish connections at intervals - as set in
CTc>> options, periodical checking. I have stopped this by un-checking
CTc>> periodical checki
Hello Thomas
On 28 September 2000, at 11:22, you wrote
TF> OK, what I would suggest the offline button to do: if, and only if,
TF> you are connected to the internet, and you press this button,
TF> periodical check will be suspended for all acounts.
TF> If you disconnect while you're offline, an
Hello Tobias
On 28 September 2000, at 14:28, you wrote
>> This is not a bug. If the connection fails, TB makes anotehr attempt.
And a very laudable action that is too, but one I would like to
control. The addition of "If connections fails, attempt to establish a
new connection?" would do nicely
Hello Thomas
On 28 September 2000, at 03:01, you wrote
TF> If you press the cancel button, *this* attempt will be cancelled, and
TF> another attempt will be made later. However, since a few versions ago,
TF> we also have an *Abort* button, and when you press that one, TB will
TF> not make anothe
Hello Thomas
On 28 September 2000, at 03:02, you wrote
ACM>>> Actually, you *can* prevent it from checking while you're offline.
ACM>>> Do the following:
TF> [...]
CTc>> I've tried that, and I assure you that TB *still* insists on trying to
CTc>> establish a dial-up connection when offline.
TF
Hello Thomas
On 27 September 2000, at 13:01, you wrote
TF>>> You have to set up your dialling instructions *inly* under Options /
TF>>> Network & Admin.
TF> = "only"
Yep, done that.
CTc>> I only had my main
Hello A
On 27 September 2000, at 20:26, you wrote
CTc>> I've a feeling I may be doing something wrong here, so please bear
CTc>> with me on this one. What happens to you (and other TB users) when
CTc>> you run TB while off-line? For me TB will repeatedly attempt to
CTc>> establish a dial-up conn
Hello A
On 27 September 2000, at 18:31, you wrote
TF>> Since you trash them after reading them, I think this would make
TF>> sense for you too. Would it?
ACM> He threads his messages. I understand what he's saying.
ACM> Take Gravity for instance, you can have it check the newservers at
ACM> us
Hello Tobias
On 27 September 2000, at 15:32, you wrote
TF>>> What should this do exactly?
>> Reading or writing e-mail off-line... hitting an off-line button would
>> prevent auto-checking of mailboxes. Those with permanent connections
>> connection (unmetered Telco charges) wouldn't of course
Hello Thomas
On 26 September 2000, at 14:28, you wrote
TF> Hallo Charlie,
TF> On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:53:39 +0100 GMT (26/09/2000, 04:53 +0800 GMT),
TF> Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc>> Does anyone else think an on-line/off-line button for the main tool
CTc>> bar a useful idea.
TF> W
Hello Tony
On 25 September 2000, at 22:43, Tony wrote
TB> This message: 25/09/2000 22:36 GMT.
TB> Hello Charlie,
TB> A reminder of what Charlie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
TB> 25 September 2000 at 21:53:39 GMT +0100
CTc>> For example, if I go to my address book and select an entry; rig
Hello Tobias
On 25 September 2000, at 22:18, Tobias wrote
TW> Hello Charlie,
TW> On Montag, 25. September 2000 at 22:53:39 you wrote:
>> I have a couple of accounts set to check mail boxes every 5 minutes
>> by default, as a result I have TB trying to establish a connection
>> at the same time
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, March 02, 2000, Paula Ford wrote to Allie Martin about
%Cursor query:
PF> The conclusion of the thread was a suggestion to add a macro that would
PF> put the focus in the message composition. Perhaps it's on RIT's to-do
PF> list.
And I would like
Morning Steve Lamb,
My reply to this is a little belated, I guess. I just remembered what
I wanted to write ;-)
> Toggle macros are just like checkboxes. On, off. OTOH, they do take
> up space[*] unless you tack them onto the end of a line somewhere
> and then you can't see them.
That's just
Morning Steve Lamb,
> That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not
> sure if I want to fully endorse another template macro which is
> nothing more than a toggle that is better served, IMHO, by
> checkboxes on the templates.
I prefer template macros. They are more versatile
Hi Steve,
on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:33:19 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:15:22 AM, Thomas wrote:
>> You mean a switch like a %SkipHeader macro?
SL> That would work. I'd actually like to see the current behavior of the
SL> reply template changed so
Hallo Christopher,
On Saturday, November 20, 1999, 7:38:16 PM (GMT+0800), Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
CJT> On Thursday, November 18, 1999 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> I motion to change that. I don't need a cursor command if I have to
>> hit TAB three or four times, or use the mouse anyway. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, after reading the almost 40 messages generated to reply to my
question I have gotten answers to most of my questions and have
realized that this thread begs me to learn how to setup a kill file.
Hi Syafril,
on Friday, November 19, 1999, 6:38:36 PM GMT+0800, Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
SH> You're right, MUA = Mail User Agent. It is standard name in RFC
SH> related to E-mail; and SMTP Mail Server mostly said as MTA (Mail
SH> Transfer Agent).
I stand corrected.
--
Best regar
Hi Paula,
on Friday, November 19, 1999, 6:24:10 PM GMT+0800, Paula Ford wrote:
>> I don't even know what an MUA is.
PF> Me neither and it's not listed in the Webopaedia. Internet search turned
PF> up:
[lovable a well-researched list skipped]
PF> So, I'm guessing it's (E-)Mail User Agent and n
Hi Steve,
on Thursday, November 18, 1999, 11:11:47 PM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Does anybody second the motion, so we can put it on the (mysterious, as
>> never seen or published) wish-list?
SL> No. Because it works as expected.
Not as expected by me.
SL> Quite frankly, I just shook
29 matches
Mail list logo
