Hallo David,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 19:17:08 +0100GMT (2-8-2005, 20:17 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DE> I want (and did have) a small regexp that will pull out an address from the
DE> body of an email. To make it easy it is always on a line that looks like.
DE> ===
Hello tbudl,
I want (and did have) a small regexp that will pull out an address from the
body of an email. To make it easy it is always on a line that looks like.
== 8< ==
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
TheBat-users,
This may belong to tbtech, but it appears to be quite simple RegExp
(although it is over my head).
I am having a person knowledgeable of RegExp help me with some RegExp, I
want to do in TB! The thing is that he does not know how TB! works.
I have a mail which contains some
Hello bats,
on Thu, 26. Feb 2004 at 00:53:16 +0100 I wrote:
> I want to search with the Message Finder for mails containing
> "([^/]++.|)" (without ") in the body, but this is not possible without
> using regular expressions and escaping nearly every character.
[snip]
no comments?
--
shinE!
h
'"' ("([^/]++.|)") gives 322 results.
Escaping the IMHO only special char '|' with itself (tried with '\'
before) gives 0 results.
Though the help says nothing about escaping '|', '&' and '~' in the
"search fo
* Timur Kadyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to filter out messages with "From:" field containing
> address that starts with "238", and then has three digits before "@".
> Regexp I'm using is ^238\d\d\d@ .
Try
(?m)^From:\s*
I'm trying to filter out messages with "From:" field containing
address that starts with "238", and then has three digits before "@".
Regexp I'm using is ^238\d\d\d@ . I tested this regexp with regular
filter -- it worked just fine (after I enabled regular
ge. It works in some cases, but not every time...
Which was why, in mine I had the following:
\s*Orig.*
Which should match any repeated number of - and/or a space... or so
matches the RegExp tester. This would mean it could match:
"Original"
"-Origin
Hello Jonathan,
31. julij 2002, 19:55:52, you wrote:
JA> Doesn't seem to match the "- Original Message -" Outlook uses,
JA> at least not here anyway, I just copied and pasted it.
Hmm... That's strange. It works in some cases, but not every time...
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Jernej Simončič wrote...
> This seems to work for me:
[snip]
Doesn't seem to match the "- Original Message -" Outlook uses,
at least not here anyway, I just copied and pasted it.
- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL P
Hello Jonathan,
31. julij 2002, 18:13:51, you wrote:
JA> And other permutations of that too. Why is it not working when listed
JA> in this format?
This seems to work for me:
%QUOTES='%SETPATTREGEXP="(?is)%-
((\s*)?\n?-BEGIN PGP SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?%-
(--+\s+.*roups.*~--\>\n.*\n-
?\n|%-
> - \s*Orig.*?|%-
> - -+\s+.*roups.*~--\>)|%-
> \n+Get your FREE download|%-
> \z)"%REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%text"%SUBPATT="4"'
Erm... due to PGP fixing those lines, they came out incorrect, remove
the "- " from the lines that have them, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm playing with the Fixing Signatures regexp on the FAQ site, and I
tried to add another line so that it strips out Outlook added reply
formatting, as a lot of my contacts use it. Here is what it looks
like:
%quotes='%SETPATTREGEXP=
Dear tbudl,
is it possible to use RegExp on HTML part?
For example to generate messages with changed background...
--
Best regards,
Sergey Uvarov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat version :1.60q/Post5/newhtml,
Running at NT 5.0, Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Hi All,
Just trying to remove the PGP Signs and everything from the emails
that keep being posted, and I remember seeing one on TB! support
pages. When I tried to use it, it generates an error saying that a )
is missing. The one on the site has :
%quotes='%SETPATTREGEXP="(?is)((\s*)?\n?-BE
I've tried messing around with regexps but can't get it to work the
way I want. How do I extract all text after a certain string?
I would appreciate not only a regexp suggestion but also an
explanation of what every single sign in that regexp does.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Usi
hi all
I created a regexp to match that email banner at the bottom of the
messages, and put it on a template based on my friends folder, but the
problem is that not all the messages contain the banner, and at these
messages, the reply is in blank
%QUOTES="%SETPATTREGEXP=""(.*?)(^(
Hello Gerard,
5. december 2001, 17:09:27, you wrote:
GdV> What I would like to do is search for something like the words Red
GdV> and Blue must be present but not the word Black.
I don't know about NOT, but you can use & for AND and | for OR w/o
regexp.
--
Jernej Simoncic, [
Hi fellow Bats,
I have been trying to search for multiple items using the search
option under Tools-search-advandced but I can't hack it.
I have the dark suspicion that I have to option regex.
What I would like to do is search for something like the words Red
and Blue must be present but
No, thank you. This is helpful.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerd Ewald
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 5:51 AM
To: Josh Rogers at TBUDL
Subject: Re: REGEXP-Definitions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Josh Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Josh Rogers !
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:50:25 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 27.01.2001, 21:50 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
> I'm almost with you. Could you give me a simple example?
I'll try one without going into details because
I'm almost with you. Could you give me a simple example?
[TEXT]=Original Message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerd Ewald
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 2:13 AM
To: Januk Aggarwal at TBUDL
Subject: Re: REGEXP-Definitions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Januk Aggarwal !
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:18:28 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 27.01.2001, 07:18 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
> Perhaps you should try to tackle something a little easier first.
Haha, I started with regex using you
Hi Jan,
Historians believe that on Sat, 20 Jan 2001 at 18:50:25 GMT -0500,
Jan Rifkinson [JR] typed:
JR> Everything is working properly now, Januk,
I'm glad to hear that.
JR> When using the %WRAPPED macro, it does not seem to obey the starting
JR> position. See the 2nd [wrapped] line in
Hello Januk,
On Friday, January 19, 2001 09:49:12 GMT -0800, you wrote the following in
regards to 'TB! v1.49 - newbie: quoting the output of a regexp':
Januk> You need another single quote at the very end of this line. So it
Januk> becomes:
Januk> %WRAPPED='On %
Hello Jan,
Historians believe that on Fri, 19 Jan 2001 at 07:58:11 GMT -0500,
Jan Rifkinson [JR] typed:
JR> %WRAPPED='On %ODATEEN %QINCLUDE="OTIME", you wrote the following in regards to
''%QINCLUDE="bracket"'':
You need another single quote at the very end of this line. So it
becomes:
%WRAP
nfo but I didn't know how else to illustrate it.
Many Thanks. JR
-|| original message ||-
On Wednesday, January 17, 2001 22:57:10 -0800 GMT you wrote the
following in regards to TB! v1.49 - newbie: quoting the output
of a regexp:
JR>> so then my macro statement s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Januk,
On Wednesday, January 17, 2001 22:57:10 -0800 GMT you wrote the
following in regards to TB! v1.49 - newbie: quoting the output
of a regexp:
JR>> so then my macro statement should look like this?
JR>> %WRAPPED=
Hello Jan,
Historians believe that on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 at 20:10:40 GMT -0500,
Jan Rifkinson [JR] typed:
JR> so then my macro statement should look like this?
JR> %WRAPPED='On %ODATEEN %QINCLUDE="OTIME", you wrote the following in regards to
%QINCLUDE='"bracket"':'
JR> (all on a single
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On 16 January 2001 at 18:28:13 -0500 (which was 23:28 where I live)
A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points:
Sorry to correct such a well worded explanation, but...
ACM> %Macro1="Macro2=""value"""
^ missing % sign, ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie, I'm going to take things a little out of order.
On Tuesday, January 16, 2001 18:28:13 -0500 you wrote the
following in regards to TB! v1.49 - newbie: quoting the output of
a regexp:
JR>> [...] I've tried the %WRAPPED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:10:03 -0500, Jan contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
JR> I was trying to put quotation marks around the output of the
JR> regexp "bracket" but it produces a blank. Can anyone show me
JR> the r
Hallo Jan,
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:10:03 -0500 GMT (16/01/2001, 22:10 +0800 GMT),
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Jan> On %ODATEEN %QINCLUDE="otime", you wrote the following in regards to
%QINCLUDE="='bracket'":
Is "barcket" (without quotes) the name of a QT that contains the
RegEx? Then why do you use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDListers.
I was trying to put quotation marks around the output of the
regexp "bracket" but it produces a blank. Can anyone show me
the right way to express this & the logic behind the form?
On %ODATEEN %QINCLUDE=&quo
uld
> be so kind as to provide me with some of the more
> common/recommended ones that are in use about the mailing list.
> Especially ones for dealing with mailing lists and/or PGP.
Check out the FAQ ()
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html
For some useful regexp examples
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, at 13:20:07 [GMT -0500], David Calvarese wrote:
DC> I'm not really new to TB!, but I'm new to working with it's
DC> template's and RegExps. I was wondering if anyone out there would
DC> be so kind as to provide me with some of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
I'm not really new to TB!, but I'm new to working with it's
template's and RegExps. I was wondering if anyone out there would
be so kind as to provide me with some of the more
common/recommended ones that are in use about the ma
Hello Brian,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 at 03:36:42 GMT -0500 (which was 12:36 AM
where I live) witnesses say Brian Clark typed:
JA>> ... the delimiters for the %QUOTES macro is single double quotes.
JA>> Therefore a different delimiter needs to be used, and so double double
JA>> quotes were used.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Januk,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, at 00:04:59 (which was 08:04 where I live) you
wrote :
JA> No, it was intentional. I wanted to be consistent with what the
JA> original poster was using. :-)
Who wanted to be consistent with all the examples that he
Hello Januk,
(JA == "Januk Aggarwal") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> ... from the "Strip PGP Signatures" example
>> in the Macros section of the FAQ:
>> [one line]
>> %quotes="%SETPATTREGEXP=""(?is)(^-BEGIN PGP
>SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?(.*?)(^(-*?\s*?--
>> \s*\n|_{40,}\s*\n|-BEGIN
Hello Brian,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 at 03:16:56 GMT -0500 (which was 12:16 AM
where I live) witnesses say Brian Clark typed:
> OK, now I'm confused. I tend to get that way with plenty of things, as
> some of you *cough* Marck, Allie *cough* *cough* know.
No problem.
> ... from the "Strip PGP
So in your case you're matching everything including the
sig.
Ahh! Now that I have gone back and re-read the help pages, this
becomes clear. I thought I had tried everything but obviously not
:-)
JA> BTW, you can simplify the regexp to:
JA>
JA>
JA>
%Quotes='%SETPATTREGEXP="
Hello Januk,
(JA == "Januk Aggarwal") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> It just threw me off when you doubled-up double quotes like
>> %NAME=""value""
>> I thought you may have made a typo, and it appears that you did.
JA> No, it was intentional. I wanted to be consistent with what the
JA> origi
Hello Brian,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 at 02:34:58 GMT -0500 (which was 11:34 PM
where I live) witnesses say Brian Clark typed:
> Hello Januk,
> It just threw me off when you doubled-up double quotes like
> %NAME=""value""
> I thought you may have made a typo, and it appears that you did.
No,
Hello Januk,
(JA == "Januk Aggarwal") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JA> Hello Brian,
JA> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 at 01:25:48 GMT -0500 (which was 10:25 PM
JA> where I live) witnesses say Brian Clark typed:
>> Why are you using two sets of quotes around the value? I've seen
>> similar in some of t
order. Suppose we want to use a regular expression to clean up the
subject line.
%Subject="some regexp"
Where "some regexp" is something like:
%SETPATTREGEXP=":(.*)"%REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OFULLSUBJ"%SUBPATT="1"
Now if you were to literally replace t
Hello Januk,
(JA == "Januk Aggarwal") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JA> That's good. However, as I explained above, you're capturing one
JA> subpattern to small. Make it %SUBPATT=""1"" and it should work.
Why are you using two sets of quotes around the value? I've seen
similar in some of the exam
that the logic for the regexp
> would be:
> 1) Take all the text of the message
Correct.
> 2) Set everything up to the -=-=-=- as %SUBPATT0
Ah, this is your mistake. %SUBPATT="0" is reserved for the entire
match. So in your case you're matching everything including the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I am a new TB user and am trying to get to grips with the powerful
REGEXP within templates.
I subscribe to a mailing list which always ends it mailings with a
non-standard signature. The format of this is as below:
- -=-=-=-
[ SOME TEXT
Hi Allie,
On Saturday, November 25, 2000 @ 10:34:00 -0500, you wrote the
following about "RegExp to eliminate duplicates"
Allie> [...] The headers may be different but the message ID's the
Allie> same. If the same message is sent to different lists, the
Al
publish the identical email to all three
JR> lists & I would like to know if there is a RegExp that can handle the
JR> problem of eliminating the duplicate messages.
Each message is treated independently of another where filtering is
concerned. You can't tell a filter to do an action d
Hello Jan,
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 at 09:07:50 GMT -0500 (which was 6:07 AM
where I live) witnesses say Jan Rifkinson typed:
> However, at times someone may publish the identical email to all three
> lists & I would like to know if there is a RegExp that can handle the
> problem o
Dear BatListers,
I belong to 3 groups that focus on a particular subject. Each group
has a slightly different approach which is why I belong to all 3
instead of just one.
However, at times someone may publish the identical email to all three
lists & I would like to know if there is a Re
(Ma == "Marck D. Pearlstone") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MDP> On 19 November 2000 at 07:40:41 -0500 (which was 12:40 where I
MDP> live) Brian Clark wrote and made these points:
MDP>
BC>>> There has to be a way to code in that option. (I mean this mail
BC>>> client is already filled to the brim w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
On 19 November 2000 at 07:40:41 -0500 (which was 12:40 where I
live) Brian Clark wrote and made these points:
BC>> There has to be a way to code in that option. (I mean this mail
BC>> client is already filled to the brim with options ;-).
(BC == "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BC> (MDP == "Marck D. Pearlstone") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MDP>> Hi Brian,
BC> Hi Marck,
--snip-
BC>>> Yep, $Quotestyle does just what you see in this email. it works,
BC>>> but the first line is what I'm having trouble with.
M
ou wish to
MDP> and override the prefix to match what you reported by using the
MDP> %QUOTESTYLE="=xx". Just a suggestion.
I've tried this, but I have yet to perfect my regexp! Heheh.
It does work, but so far I get mixed results. I'll keep at it.
BC>> Yep, $Quo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 November, 2000, 10:04 AM, I saw Brian's comments made on
Sat, 18 Nov 2000 08:20:23 -0500, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
ACM>> Indeed it does and welcome to TBBETA. :=)
BC> Why beta? :-) You mean my client or this list? I noticed
Hi Brian,
On Saturday, November 18, 2000 @ 12:13:41 -0500, you wrote the
following about "Macros (Regexp): Two questions."
Brian> [...] I also tried this one, but it doesn't work (for me at
Brian> least). When I stick that into my template, and I try hitti
(KJ == "Kari Jakobi") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KJ> Brian Clark wrote on Samstag, 18. November 2000 15:00:59 h
KJ> about "Macros (Regexp): Two questions.":
KJ> Hello Brian,
BC>> I also have to do something about the [2]'s, [3]'s. etc. that appear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
On 18 November 2000 at 09:00:59 -0500 (which was 14:00 where I
live) Brian Clark wrote and made these points:
BC> I've tried added $QUOTESTYLE="I" as the first line, then returning
BC> ($QUOTESTYLE == etc etc..) with no effect. It's alway
Brian Clark wrote on Samstag, 18. November 2000 15:00:59 h
about "Macros (Regexp): Two questions.":
Hello Brian,
BC> I also have to do something about the [2]'s, [3]'s. etc. that appear
BC> after Re in threads.
This is one I can solve!
Just add "%SINGLERE&q
(TB == "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BC> (JR == "Jan Rifkinson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JR>> Hi Brian,
BC> Howdy!
JR>> On Saturday, November 18, 2000 @ 07:07:39 -0500 you wrote
JR>> the following in regards to Macros (Reg
(JR == "Jan Rifkinson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JR> Hi Brian,
Howdy!
JR> On Saturday, November 18, 2000 @ 07:07:39 -0500 you wrote
JR> the following in regards to Macros (Regexp): Two
JR> questions.:
JR>I am a new user as well but this functon I know
( "A. Curtis Martin") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
See what I mean..
ACM> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 07:07:39 -0500, Brian Clark wrote these
ACM> comments about 'Macros (Regexp): Two questions.':
BC>> I'm a new user; I'm waiting on my k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 07:07:39 -0500, Brian Clark wrote these
comments about 'Macros (Regexp): Two questions.':
BC> I'm a new user; I'm waiting on my key to get mailed to me :-) and I
BC> must say this client rocks.
Ind
Hi Brian,
On Saturday, November 18, 2000 @ 07:07:39 -0500 you wrote
the following in regards to Macros (Regexp): Two
questions.:
BC> Can anyone tell me if there is a variable that holds just the initials
BC> (or whatever is chosen for the quoted text
I am a new user as well bu
Greetings,
I'm a new user; I'm waiting on my key to get mailed to me :-) and I must say this
client rocks.
My questions.
First:
Can anyone tell me if there is a variable that holds just the initials
(or whatever is chosen for the quoted text -- be it initials or first
name, etc.). If I have I
before it to make it
JT> appear "right justified". Since I keep up with the beta versions of
JT> TB, the %thebatversion string is frequently changing in length, so
JT> every time it changes I have to edit the number of spaces in my
JT> signature template.
JT> My question is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, September 15, 2000, 11:21:25 AM, Jason wrote:
> My question is, can TB do this work for me with a regexp? The number
AFAIK, no. Regexp is pattern matching and string replacement but does not
have such capabilities.
- --
St
ppear "right justified". Since I keep up with the beta versions of
TB, the %thebatversion string is frequently changing in length, so
every time it changes I have to edit the number of spaces in my
signature template.
My question is, can TB do this work for me with a regexp? The number
Hello Mogens Holst,
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 22:14:22 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 4:14:22 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Mogens Holst wrote:
Mogens> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 21:46:22 +0300
Mogens> "Alexander V. Kiselev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> O
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 21:46:22 +0300
"Alexander V. Kiselev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On 21 Dec 99, at 18:53, Jast wrote
> about "Re[2]: SOT: Windows language versions...":
>
>
> I just imagined what a mess is your registry now!:-) Besides,
> it's just plain interesting ho
Hi there!
On 21 Dec 99, at 18:53, Jast wrote
about "Re[2]: SOT: Windows language versions...":
> Thomas>> Apart from the fear of instability, kindly allow me a stupid question:
> Thomas>> Will this (installing another Win98 over an existing Win) reformat my
> Thomas>> hard disk?
> > Instabil
Morning tracer,
> I do... I suggest you first backup all your data as with almost total
> certainty your days of Chinese windows will be over if you stick Thai
> on top!
>
Thomas>> Apart from the fear of instability, kindly allow me a stupid question:
Thomas>> Will this (installing another Win98
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:59:17 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 5:59:17 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hi Rob,
Thomas> on Monday, December 20, 1999, 6:57:50 PM GMT+0800, Rob wrote:
>>> Will this (installing anoth
Hi Steve,
on Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:52:04 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> If you have a programme that will partition my hard disk without
>> reformat, please let me know. I would even make an extra partition for
>> Linux. :-)
SL> Partition Magic.
Thanks - everybody seems to agre
Monday, December 20, 1999, 2:59:17 AM, Thomas wrote:
> If you have a programme that will partition my hard disk without
> reformat, please let me know. I would even make an extra partition for
> Linux. :-)
Partition Magic.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
TF> If you have a programme that will partition my hard disk without
TF> reformat, please let me know. I would even make an extra partit
Hi Rob,
on Monday, December 20, 1999, 6:57:50 PM GMT+0800, Rob wrote:
>> Will this (installing another Win98 over an existing Win) reformat my
>> hard disk?
R> no, it will not. but if you want a clean Thai install, you better start on a
R> clean disk.
R> or if you have enough disk space, inst
Hi there!
On 20 Dec 99, at 23:57, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: SOT: Windows language versions ":
> AVK> No problem whatsoever. Get Partition Magic from
> AVK> www.powerquest.com, install it, and you're done. That's instead
> AVK> of Fdisk. Then, instead of the dual boot, there's a nic
Hallo tracer,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 at 23:15:35 [GMT +0700], you wrote:
t> I tried it once with japanese and English...
t> Donot forget that you have to prevent scandisk etc to run on the
t> 'wrong' parition as otherwise ms cleans your stuff the hardway.
OK. ;-)
t> Anyway if you got the v2 of Th
Hello Ali,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:13:37 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 12:13:37 AM (GMT+0800) my local time,
Ali Martin wrote:
AM> []
>> I downloaded the self-extracting .exe from the web page today. I find
>> a file the-bat.hlp that dates 9.December 99 in my
Hallo Ali,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 at 11:12:46 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
>> I'm checking the web site and think this is exactly what I need! Thank
>> you multifold!
>>
>> You're sure it works - I mean, no data will be lost?
>>
AM> Absolutely. I've used it myself on many occasions and it hasn't let
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 23:57:53 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 10:57:53 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AVK>> No problem whatsoever. Get Partition Magic from
AVK>> www.powerquest.com, install it, and you're done. That's i
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 23:57:53 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I'm checking the web site and think this is exactly what I need! Thank
> you multifold!
>
> You're sure it works - I mean, no data will be lost?
>
Absolutely. I've used it myself on many occasions and it hasn't let me
down once. T
Hallo Alexander,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 at 17:08:52 [GMT +0300], you wrote:
>> R> or if you have enough disk space, install the Thai version on a different
>> R> partition ...
>>
>> How do I do that?
AVK> No problem whatsoever. Get Partition Magic from
AVK> www.powerquest.com, install it, and y
Hi there!
On 20 Dec 99, at 20:09, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: SOT: Windows language versions ":
> >> Will this (installing another Win98 over an existing Win) reformat my
> >> hard disk?
>
> R> no, it will not. but if you want a clean Thai install, you better start on a
> R> clean di
Hello Rob,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:57:50 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 5:57:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rob wrote:
>> but I am afraid that it will just make my machine unstable.
Rob> it will !! i've read/heard about installing different language Windows on t
Hello Rob,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 12:25:13 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 6:25:13 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rob wrote:
>>or if you have enough disk space, install the Thai version on a different
>>partition ... you could even dual-boot.
Rob> oops, forget that !!
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 17:10:31 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 4:10:31 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> On my home computer: because in the shop - where they didn't speak any
Thomas> English - they didn't have an E
Hallo Rob,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 at 11:57:50 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
>> Will this (installing another Win98 over an existing Win) reformat my
>> hard disk?
R> no, it will not. but if you want a clean Thai install, you better start on a
R> clean disk.
R> or if you have enough disk space, install
t;>> Another possibility is going to www.perl.com --- they have a set
AVK>>> of links pointing to regexp manuals there...
I just downloaded the full version on the www page again. Opened the
help file and inserted reg as key word for finding help topics.
Nothing. How do I find the help t
Hi Alexander,
on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:02:56 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>> Do we have different help files? Mine doesn't have an entry under
>> "Reg..."
AVK> Apparently we do: the help file had been updated once more
AVK> with 1.38e:-)
OK, so how do I find anything about
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 13:50:19 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[]
> OK, so how do I find anything about Regular Expressions in the
> helpfile? My 1.38e dates from today.
There is a whole section in the v1.38e help file titled 'Regular
Expressions.' You simply can't miss it. Updating the thebat.
> Do we have different help files? Mine doesn't have an entry under
Thomas>>> "Reg..."
t>> I downloaded in the end the full bat 1.38 and that has the helpfile
t>> included
AVK>>>> Another possibility is going to www.perl.com --- they have a set
AVK&g
>or if you have enough disk space, install the Thai version on a different
>partition ... you could even dual-boot.
oops, forget that !! just read that you cannot make Win98 and Win95 dual-boot,
so 2 Win98's will also be impossible i guess ...
--
---
Hi Ali,
on Monday, December 20, 1999, 2:48:48 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:
AM> []
>> OK, so how do I find anything about Regular Expressions in the
>> helpfile? My 1.38e dates from today.
AM> There is a whole section in the v1.38e help file titled 'Regular
AM> Expressions.' You simply can
Hi Rob,
on Monday, December 20, 1999, 5:03:38 PM GMT+0800, Rob wrote:
>> (they are both in Chinese on my computers, so I didn't
>> know which one says "contents").
R> eh ??
R> why are you using a Chinese windows if you don't speak (read) Chinese ?? ;-)
On this (office) computer: Because they
> They hadn't thought that some people might not be able to read Chinese.
i wouldn't like to use Windows in a language i couldn't read ; i'm having
enough problems using it as it is ... ;-)
> but I am afraid that it will just make my machine unstable.
it will !! i've read/heard about installi
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
