Hi list!,
I would like to know how can I sort the mails on a folder in order
to get at the begining the newest mails (I've tried with received
and created columns, but it doesn't order the mails properly)
PS: As you can see I've moved to TB! =), thanks to all of you for your
help!
--
Hi KoMpLoT,
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:07:17 [GMT -0300] (00:07 where I live) you wrote:
K> Hi list!,
K>I would like to know how can I sort the mails on a folder in order
K>to get at the begining the newest mails (I've tried with received
K>and created columns, but it doesn't order
Hi KoMpLoT,
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:38:51 [GMT -0300] (00:38 where I live) you wrote:
K> Hi!, Adam,
K> what? what's that?
K> thanks
All I had to do was click on the heading marked received on the message list
view. It sorts mine correctly - how is it wrong? If its reverse - click it
Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't
often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must
be waded through in a reply to read the the current (answer)
post. If I can't remember the original post, dropping to the
bottom to read the original is nicer than
Hi ETM,
On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 21:49:04 [GMT -0400] (02:49 where I live) you wrote:
E> Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't
E> often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must
E> be waded through in a reply to read the the current (answer)
E> po
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 20:49, ETM wrote:
>
> Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't
> often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must
> be waded through in a reply to read the the current (answer)
> post. If I can't remember the original post, dropping
Ahh. Then that really is the problem. Different
countries, different views or top and bottom posting.
Okay, I will stop posting here and continue to read (skipping the
colorized portions of the replies ).
Elaine
Hello Adam
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, you wrote
> Consider another analogy. T
Hi Jonathan,
On 03 Aug 2002, at 22:09:30 [GMT -0500] (04:09 where I live) you wrote:
JA> On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 20:56, KoMpLoT wrote:
>>
>>I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read
>>the first part to know what's on the e-mail...
Take for JA> example, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Etm [E] wrote:
E> Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't
E> often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must
E> be waded through in a reply to read the
Hi ETM,
On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 23:13:23 [GMT -0400] (04:13 where I live) you wrote:
E> Ahh. Then that really is the problem. Different
E> countries, different views or top and bottom posting.
E> Okay, I will stop posting here and continue to read (skipping the
E> colorized portions of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 23:13:23 [GMT -0400], ETM wrote:
E> Ahh. Then that really is the problem. Different
E> countries, different views or top and bottom posting.
E> Okay, I will stop posting here and continue to read (skipping the
E> colorized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:56:27 [GMT -0300], KoMpLoT wrote:
K> Hi! Jonathan,
K>I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read
K>the first part to know what's on the e-mail...
This was a straight reply to your e-mail. As
Hello ETM,
On Sat, 03 Aug 2002 21:49:04 -0400 GMT (04/08/02, 08:49 +0700 GMT),
ETM wrote:
E> Is it OE or is it USA programming?
Contrary to popular belief, I don't think it has to do with the MUA.
Even if the cursor is put in at the top of the quote, you can still
make a sensible reply. You are
Hello Adam,
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 04:14:33 +0100 GMT (04/08/02, 10:14 +0700 GMT),
Adam Rykala wrote:
AR> Perhaps an FAQ entry is needed, explaining the position?
It is sad that it seems to be necessary.
AR> This is now officially an ex-horse, it has ceased to be (well I think so)!
Hello Allie!
On Sunday, August 4, 2002 at 5:16:39 AM you wrote:
> b) In a democratic environment as this list, majority rules.
Since when? Let me add that I hope not, because I'd at least like to
think that rationality and logic rules. The Majority is not
necessarily well equipped to decide wha
Hello KoMpLoT!
On Sunday, August 4, 2002 at 3:56:27 AM you wrote:
>I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read
>the first part to know what's on the e-mail...
1. You left a lot of unnecessary quote in, because of top-answering.
2. The logical way to read *is* fr
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, at 12:26:29 [GMT +0700] (06:26 where I live) you wrote:
AR>> Perhaps an FAQ entry is needed, explaining the position?
TF> It is sad that it seems to be necessary.
Indeed - I agree
AR>> This is now officially an ex-horse, it has ceased to be (well I think so)
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, at 12:26:29 [GMT +0700] (06:26 where I live) you wrote:
TF> Hello Adam,
AR>> This is now officially an ex-horse, it has ceased to be (well I think
AR>> so)!
TF> ^^
TF> Have you become a moderator? ;-)
Sigh - a blatant Monty Pyth
On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 00:27, Thomas F. wrote:
>
> E> Is it OE or is it USA programming?
>
> Contrary to popular belief, I don't think it has to do with the MUA.
> Even if the cursor is put in at the top of the quote, you can still
> make a sensible reply. You are not forced to reply at the top a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Komplot [K] wrote:
K> alright, I will use that way... but the thing is, how do make TB!
K> (which macro do I have to use) cut off automatically all the part
K> of the mail that isn't usefull? (li
Hello Jonathan,
On 04 Aug 2002 08:55:13 -0500 GMT (04/08/02, 20:55 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> You are not forced to reply at the top and bottom quote the whole
>> message replied to. It is still no big effort to reply inline.
JA> The problem doing that is with Outlook you have to go
On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 10:27, Thomas F. wrote:
>
> JA> The problem doing that is with Outlook you have to go change a whole
> JA> bundle of settings so the reply is tagged with >
>
> Ups, so I am wrong and it has to do with the default setting of OL.
> (Can't MS get *anything* right?)
Some of t
Hi!, Adam,
what? what's that?
thanks
--
Regards,
KoMpLoT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Adam, wrote:
AR> Hi KoMpLoT,
AR> On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:07:17 [GMT -0300] (00:07 where I live) you wrote:
K>> Hi list!,
K>>I would like to know how can I sort the mails on a folder in order
K>>to
Hi!, Adam,
alright, I will try with that... thanks!
--
Regards,
KoMpLoT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Adam, wrote:
AR> Hi KoMpLoT,
AR> On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:38:51 [GMT -0300] (00:38 where I live) you wrote:
K>> Hi!, Adam,
K>> what? what's that?
K>> thanks
AR> All I had to do was clic
Hi! Jonathan,
I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read
the first part to know what's on the e-mail...
--
Regards,
KoMpLoT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sábado, 03 de Agosto de 2002, Jonathan, escribió:
JA> On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 18:57, KoMpLoT wrote:
>>
>>alright
Hi Mike Yetto, on Domingo, 04 de Agosto de 2002 you wrote:
MY> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MY> Hash: SHA1
MY> On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:56:27 [GMT -0300], KoMpLoT wrote:
K>> Hi! Jonathan,
K>>I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read
K>>the first part to k
Hi Allie C Martin, on Domingo, 04 de Agosto de 2002 you wrote:
ACM> Select the text you wish to quote and then hit F4 or go to specials
ACM> menu and select 'reply quoting selected text'.
--
thanks!!
thanks!
=)
--
Regards,
KoMpLoT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 18:57, KoMpLoT wrote:
>
>alright, I will try with that... thanks!
>
Eugh... top replying... an 'awful feature' of outlook. Due to TB!s
features, and automatic signature striping, if somebody was to try
replying to your email, and keeping context, they'd have to copy a
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 20:56, KoMpLoT wrote:
>
>I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read
>the first part to know what's on the e-mail...
Just as a silly question, if it is a reply, how can you always know what
is on the email? I mean, if I didn't have a clue wh
Good morning Allie,
It was foretold that on 4-8-2002 @ 22:16:39 GMT-0500 (which was
5:16:39 where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise
comments on "SORTING THE MAILS":
ACM> This is so because the preferred format offers the
ACM> following advantages:
A
On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 09:45, KoMpLoT wrote:
>
> MY> This was a straight reply to your e-mail. As you can see, everything
> MY> below your top posted signature delimiter was removed by The Bat!
> MY> This is one of the reasons to bottom post or post in context. Another
> MY> reason, is the conve
Hello Luc!
On Sunday, August 4, 2002 at 5:38:15 AM you wrote:
> Do you have to do the indent manually or is there a short cut to it?
In Editor preferences you can set Auto-indent, Smart tabs and some
other features. If you set the two mentioned, you just have to use one
for the first line of
Good afternoon Dierk,
It was foretold that on 4-8-2002 @ 09:42:58 GMT+0200 (which was
9:42:58 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote and spread these wise
comments on "Indent (was Re: SORTING THE MAILS)":
DH> In Editor preferences you can set Auto-indent
Which i alr
33 matches
Mail list logo
