I'm using The Bat! Version 2.10.03 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
I recovered a older installation of all the OS from a copy of
Drive Image (Power Quest).
Now when in open The Bat i am gettint a message: "it seems that
something is present in your registry, but
I'd try running a 'registry cleaner' program for invalid entries.
There are several around, one in particular is AATools
http://www.glocksoft.com/download.htm
--
Best regards,
DB
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://ww
Hi Everybody,
I've been using The Bat! for almost a month and I really love it. I've
tried numerous other e-mail clients, and this one is by far the best.
I have found the advice given on this discussion list to be very
helpful. I haven't had the need to post any questions until now. I
hope one
Hi Christine,
> For the past couple of days I have gotten this message whenever I
> send mail:
> "Exception EInvalidOperation in module THEBAT.EXE at 0005AD5B.
> Control 'eMsg' has no parent window."
It's seems no one else has run into this, at least not recently.
I guess you either discovered
Hello Christine,
Friday, August 11, 2000, 6:46:35 PM, you wrote:
CB> "Exception EInvalidOperation in module THEBAT.EXE at 0005AD5B. Control
CB> 'eMsg' has no parent window."
CB> After I click "OK" in the message box, the program closes out. When I
CB> re-open it, I find that the e-mail has been
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:53:11 +0200, Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE> I know what you mean: the last few days I receive replies before the
GE> original msg is transmitted ! Sometimes I have to wait two days for
GE> the original message.
GE> Is it only me having that problem or is it a ML-server problem ?
H
Hello Gerd Ewald,
Responding to your article on Saturday, August 12, 2000 at 15:53:11 GMT
+0200 (which was 12/08/2000 20:53 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
CB>> One odd note, when I sent my e-mail to TBUDL I didn't get that
CB>> message. [the only time I didn't] I knew there was something "magical"
Hello Marck and Nick,
why is this in the OT list?
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:22:29 +GMT (22/02/2001, 18:22 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> On 22 February 2001 at 02:15:36 -0800 (which was 10:15 where I live)
MDP> Nick Andriash wrote and made these points:
NA>> I am trying to help
Hello Ming-Li,
Friday, August 11, 2000, 11:39:02 PM, you wrote:
ML> I guess you either discovered a bug in TB or there're some
ML> compatibility issue between TB and one of your system files (like
ML> wrong version of DLL or the sort of things). I would suggest you
ML> to try out the newest beta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christine,
on Sat, 12 Aug 2000 08:55:17 -0400 GMT
your local time, which was 12.08.2000, 14:55:17 (GMT+0200) my local time,
you wrote about "Strange error message when sending":
CB> One odd note, when I sent my e-mail to TBUDL
Hello Jamie,
Friday, August 11, 2000, 3:53:25 PM, you wrote:
JD> Is that immediate send or delayed send?
I was using immediate send.
JD> Was TB! minimized to
JD> the system tray while writing the e-mail.
I had TB! maximized.
JD> In the short term it might be worth using the beta
Hallo Gerd,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:53:11 +0200 GMT (12/08/2000, 21:53 +0800 GMT),
Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE> I know what you mean: the last few days I receive replies before the original
GE> msg is transmitted ! Sometimes I have to wait two days for the original message.
GE> Is it only me having tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
Chuck wrote:
CM> Case in point, Gerd, I only received your message, just now,
CM> second-hand via Thomas' reply; I've yet to receive your original post.
CM> It's been happening to me, only with this list out of many high-volume
CM> list
Gerd,
Regarding your message dated: 13 August 2000...
GE> I can give some details to this problem: it seemes as if it has sometimes to do
GE> with Mark R. Harding's msgs (Sorry, no offence, Mark).
No offence taken! I have an idea though although I'm not sure how it
explains the problem ...
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerd,
On 13 August 2000 at 11:45:42 GMT +0200 (which was 10:45 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message
when sending)":
GE>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 13 August 2000 at 12:07:35 GMT +0100 (which was 12:07 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message when sending)":
MRH> ...
Hallo Marck,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:46:39 +0100 GMT (13/08/2000, 19:46 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
[...]
MRH>> Received: from mango.callnet0800.com [212.67.144.19] by smtp.callnet0800.com
MRH>> (SMTPD32-5.05) id A17A1222021E; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:07:38 +0100
MDP> This transit took o
Hallo Mark,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:27:23 +0100 GMT (13/08/2000, 20:27 +0800 GMT),
Mark R Harding wrote:
MRH> In case anyone is interested, "Dimension 4" is available here...
MRH> http://www.accessone.com/~thinkman/dimension4/
I use AboutTime. I used anacron for a while but was unhappy - forg
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
Responding to your article on Sunday, August 13, 2000 at 12:21:19 GMT
+0100 (which was 13/08/2000 18:21 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
[ ... ]
MDP> I agree that this is not always the case. The "retry queue" has had a
MDP> mention in this thread and I can state what
On Saturday, August 12, 2000 at 11:45 AM or thereabouts, Thomas
Fernandez wrote the following about Replies arrive before originals
(was:Re: Strange error message when sending):
Thomas> On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:53:11 +0200 GMT (12/08/2000, 21:53
Thomas> +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE>
Marck,
Regarding your message dated: 13 August 2000...
MDP> In truth, time difference in seconds can't be really be relied upon. I
MDP> once saw someone sneering at PC clock synchronizers on this list but,
MDP> IMHO, such things are a necessity for clarity and to ensure that we
MDP> are all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
on Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:07:35 +0100 GMT
your local time, which was 13.08.2000, 13:07:35 (GMT+0200) my local time,
you wrote about "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message when
sending)":
MRH> For i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
on Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:21:19 +0100 GMT
your local time, which was 13.08.2000, 13:21:19 (GMT+0200) my local time,
you wrote about "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message when
sending)":
MDP> IOW: I&
23 matches
Mail list logo
