Re: TB and XP new SP2...

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:05:00 +0200, WilWilWil wrote: > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service > Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? > > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and > In

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:32:03 +0200, MAU wrote: > I don't use XP, but in a daily security newsletter I get they recommend > delaying (or blocking) the installation of SP2 because some applications > may cease to work. I use Office, TB, MS Streets & Trips, a few imaging programs, a fefw newsreaders.

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Zonnet @ 2004-Aug-30 3:54:51 AM "TB and XP new SP2..." <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Took me a few moments to disable the monitoring of the firewall and >> disable warnings about automatic updates. > Was that not what the whole PS2 update was about? You just di

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hello Bob, On 26 Aug 2004 at 13:14:29 +1000 GMT [05:14 CEST] you wrote: BM> I don't use XP but if you want to avoid a very large download you can BM> order the update on CD for free from Microsoft at this address: BM> BM> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/updates/sp2/cdorder/en_us/def

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hi Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 11:05:00 PM, WilWilWil wrote: W> I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service W> Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? Windows Update has not yet offered me SP2. -- Best regards, MFPA

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Ron Secord @ 2004-Aug-26 1:28:15 PM "TB and XP new SP2..." <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Unfortunately, I can't install the SP2 update. I've followed all > instructions and keep getting an "Error Code: 8007F0CC" Update > Failed message. Of course, I can f

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hello Matt, Thursday, August 26, 2004, 1:40:49 AM, you wrote (possibly edited): > I upgraded to SP2 on this machine (XP Pro) this morning and have been > using TB all day with no issues yet... Same here, I updated it last night. -- Best regards, Costas ___

Re[2]: TB and XP new SP2...

Chris [C] wrote: > Although on the surface it may seem that SP2 only updates Internet > Explorer, it actually fixes about three hundred problems. For a > complete list, please see http://snipurl.com/8hfn Unfortunately, I can't install the SP2 update. I've followed all instructions and keep gettin

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hello MAU, Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 7:32:03 PM, you wrote: >> I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with >> new Service Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher >> under SP2 ? >> >> Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

hello WilWilWil, @Donnerstag, 26. August 2004, 12:03 you wrote: > ==Original message text=== > From: ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: WilWilWil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, August 26, 2004, 11:13:10 AM > Subject: TB and XP new SP2

Re[2]: TB and XP new SP2...

==Original message text=== From: ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: WilWilWil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, August 26, 2004, 11:13:10 AM Subject: TB and XP new SP2... r> hello WilWilWil, r> @Donnerstag, 26. August 2004, 00:05 you wrote: >> I s

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

hello WilWilWil, @Donnerstag, 26. August 2004, 00:05 you wrote: > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service > Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outloo

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello WilWilWil, On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 you wrote in W> Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and W> Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? Because this upgrade seems to W> be ver

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

hello WilWilWil, @Donnerstag, 26. August 2004, 00:05 you wrote: > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service > Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outloo

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

hello WilWilWil, @Donnerstag, 26. August 2004, 00:05 you wrote: > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service > Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outloo

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

hello WilWilWil, @Donnerstag, 26. August 2004, 00:05 you wrote: > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service > Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outloo

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hello, Thursday, August 26, 2004, 12:05:00 AM, you wrote: W> I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service W> Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? No problem :-) -- Best regards, Prezes mailto:[EMAIL

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

G'day WilWilWil, Thursday, August 26, 2004, 8:05:00 AM, you wrote: [snipped] > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and > Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? Because this upgrade seems to > be very heavy ! I don't use XP but if you want to

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

WilWilWil @ 2004-Aug-25 6:05:00 PM "TB and XP new SP2..." <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with > new Service Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or > higher under SP2 ? I have not had any proble

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hello WilWilWil! On Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 5:05 PM, you wrote: W> Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft W> Outlook and Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? W> Because this upgrade seems to be very heavy ! It is 75 MB for a personal user. I downloa

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

WilWilWil wrote: I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ?

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 @ 3:32:03 PM [-0700], MAU wrote: > I don't use XP, but in a daily security newsletter I get they recommend > delaying (or blocking) the installation of SP2 because some applications > may cease to work. > ,- [ This is a quotation from an IT admin ] > | Please c

Re: TB and XP new SP2...

Hello WilWilWil, > I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with > new Service Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher > under SP2 ? > > Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft > Outlook and Internet Explorer with all his holes

TB and XP new SP2...

I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ? Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? Because this up