-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@02 May 2002, 22:28:39 -0400 (03:28 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Does this help?
I sent myself 2 test messages and they were signed, as was a message I
sent to Linna :
BTW, Your
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 7:49:06 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Hi Paul,
MDP @02 May 2002, 22:28:39 -0400 (03:28 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Does this help?
I sent myself 2 test messages and they were signed, as was a message I
sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@02 May 2002, 08:07:55 -0400 (13:07 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see Paul Cartwright's message in this thread, but I cannot read it
and the Mesage Flag shows yellow with a checkmark in it.
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:07 AM, you wrote:
poor Marck, and I told him that was the LAST message on this thread!
you have the SMIME problem I had EARLIER this week!
from your main TB window select the OPTIONS menu, then click SMIME...
change the setting from internal to Microsoft
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:19:25 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP @02 May 2002, 08:07:55 -0400 (13:07 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see Paul Cartwright's message in this thread, but I cannot read it
and the Mesage Flag shows yellow with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@02 May 2002, 08:34:21 -0400 (13:34 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How exactly do I do that in TB!?
I see no MS CryptoAPI setting in TheBat! 1.60h.
See Options | S/MIME - it's right there.
- --
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:34:21 AM, Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:19:25 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP @02 May 2002, 08:07:55 -0400 (13:07 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see Paul Cartwright's message in this thread, but
Hello Michael. Sorry for your problems however I think your
conclusion is not accurate.
At 11:02 PM on Wednesday, May 01, 2002 you wrote the
following about [The bat is a virus. goodbye]:
Michael Ever since 1.60h, after every power-cycle, all
Michael registry entries for The Bat are gone. All
,
deleting the bat, never to return. The bat is a virus.
Since when are viruses harming themselves?
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.60d on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C
Doing something
am,
deleting the bat, never to return. The bat is a virus.
Michael Wilson
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Hello Mandara,
Thursday, May 02, 2002, 8:40:09 AM, you wrote:
M I even cannot open recent Lynna's messages: only what I see is the
M line in the header window; body window retains previous body contents.
Same here.
Using The Bat! v1.53bis on Windows 98
4.10 Build 1998
--
Best regards,
they want...
One guy here is slowly learning here that every time he logs on he
gets zapped by the latest virus around... Luckily he can read from but
not write to the network...
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.60c
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C.C.S. Associates
FAX (USA): (208
to read the posts makes it difficult to
interact. Any help? Give it. I'll listen and try it. I refuse to use a
Microsoft Product for email, so to keep the discussion going, I have no
choice but Eudora.
Why instead of blaming the Bat to be a virus which it isnt, donot you
supply details
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 8:09:02 AM PST, myob wrote:
Mandara:
M I even cannot open recent Lynna's messages: only what I see is the
M line in the header window; body window retains previous body
M contents.
myob:
Same here.
If you go into
everything
MLW and went back to 1.60c, and the same thing occurs. Therefore, I am,
MLW deleting the bat, never to return. The bat is a virus.
Did you recently do any virus scans? Yes, Norton AntiVirus, two days
before 1.60h and and hour after my email disappeared.
Do you run any software to clean
Ok, I agree, let's fix it.
Michael
P.S. if you come in in the morning and turn on your computer and all your
documents and spreadsheets are gone. Everything works fine, just your data
is missing. Would the fact that you have a virus ever enter your mind?
At 09:25 AM 5/2/2002 -0400, you
At 05:48 AM 5/2/2002 -0500, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael L. Wilson [MLW] wrote:
...
MLW Messages have been posted about this and no help. The fact that I
MLW have to rebuild me entire message base just to read the posts
MLW makes it difficult to interact. Any
At 10:56 AM 5/2/2002 +0200, you wrote:
Dear Michael,
--- Michael L. Wilson / Thursday, 02.05.2002, 08:42:05
The bat is a virus. goodbye
I have been a TB user for years.
But I can only find postings from you starting Dec. 15. 2001 21:48 on
TB!udl [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mi
for The
Bat
are gone. All mail is gone, all folders are gone. I deleted everything
and went back to 1.60c, and the same thing occurs. Therefore, I am,
deleting the bat, never to return. The bat is a virus.
Since when are viruses harming themselves?
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 May 2002, at 12:02:36 -0700 Melissa wrote:
MR If you go into Options | S/MIME, and set the preference to
MR Microsoft CryptoAPI (instead of TB!'s internal S/MIME
MR implementation), you should be able to open Lynna's messages.
Ah so. OK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 0:01 op vrijdag 3 mei 2002, Mandara:
Btw, the term Microsoft anything-dealing-with-privacy-security sounds
pretty weird, nein? Do you folks really think it is a good idea making
Bat involved with a such things?
the bat! has S/MIME because
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, Michael L. Wilson wrote...
The program is there. The bat works 100% (after I re-setup the
information). Only the data is destroyed.
Michael
Probably a little late in on this thread, just joined. I was thinking
this was odd behaviour, not seeing it happen
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 5:46:48 PM, you wrote:
MLW How can I keep an email program that must be setup from scratch every time
MLW I use it? Are you willing to use a mail program that takes 30 minutes of
MLW setup and recover every time you want to send and read mail?
I understand your
Sarcasm
What a great idea. Every time I want to check my mail or send some mail, I
can import stuff into my registry, re-import all my data, send the mail,
then delete it all. I think this idea will make a million or more people
download and buy the bat.
/sarcasm
Michael
At 06:43 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 3:54:19 PM PST, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
Sarcasm
What a great idea. Every time I want to check my mail or send some
mail, I can import stuff into my registry, re-import all my data,
send the mail, then delete it
Wow, someone believes me.
Michael
At 05:32 PM 5/2/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, Michael L. Wilson wrote...
The program is there. The bat works 100% (after I re-setup the
information). Only the data is destroyed.
Michael
Probably a little late in on this thread,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 03 May 2002, at 00:27:44 +0200 Mrten wrote:
Btw, the term Microsoft anything-dealing-with-privacy-security sounds
pretty weird, nein? Do you folks really think it is a good idea making
Bat involved with a such things?
M the bat! has
y little information other than:
1) You're upset
2) You think TB is a virus
3) Your data spontaneously combusts whenever you turn off your
computer
4) Your TB configuration data equally vanishes.
There is nothing technical here. This is all pretty meaningless. You
don't say what you trie
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:54:19 PM, you wrote:
MLW Sarcasm
MLW What a great idea. Every time I want to check my mail or send some mail, I
MLW can import stuff into my registry, re-import all my data, send the mail,
MLW then delete it all. I think this idea will make a million or more people
documents and spreadsheets are gone. Everything works fine, just your data
is missing. Would the fact that you have a virus ever enter your mind?
No, and I had it happen once after an install. All it means is a
pointer somewhere to the wrong place and if it can be pinpointed what
caused
Hello Marck,
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:49:45 PM, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP I don't understand how all of that data can just be deleted. I can
MDP understand that the registry entries are lost and thus the *location*
MDP is forgotten.
MDP What the suggestion was
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:05 PM, you wrote:
JA .. I managed to solve a problem with TB!
JA closing itself when trying to compose messages, tracked it down to a
JA corrupt history when typing in addresses. I'd like to know if there is a
JA solution to the vanishing emails.
I had this happen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 2:16 op vrijdag 3 mei 2002, Mandara:
Ahhh... Bat became so excellent right because it was *different*, and
pretty independent. Ahhh... Hmmm... Grmph... Hmmm...
it is pretty because the programmers designed it right, and used the input
they got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael L. Wilson [MLW] wrote:
...
This classically sounds like a problem with the registry. TB! stores
the path to all accounts in the registry. Do you keep your accounts
in the default location or do you have them elsewhere on the system??
MLW I
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
I don't understand how all of that data can just be deleted. I can
understand that the registry entries are lost and thus the *location*
is forgotten.
Unfortunately, I experienced a 'similar' loss of data, whether from the
same cause or not is
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:05 PM, you wrote:
JA .. I managed to solve a problem with TB!
JA closing itself when trying to compose messages, tracked it down to a
JA corrupt history when typing in addresses. I'd like to know if there is a
JA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 9:59:49 PM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC Just give me an other answer but with a S/MIME Sig. After your
changes
EC you did not sign anymore so I can't confirm for validity after
your
EC changes
Okay, I had
+ when is not AVG installed and plugin is added to Virus Centre, error
message is displayed on start of The Bat!
I have AVG installed and it still says that AVG is not installed :-(
Jerry
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http
Dear Lynna,
--- Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 09:40:36
Anti-Virus
[...] When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back,
they appear with the green icon and as valid. Dont know if that is a
valid way to verify or not but to me, when the come back from the
list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eddie,
@01 May 2002, 10:05:59 +0200 (09:05 UK time) Eddie Castelli wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back, they appear
with the green icon and as valid. Dont know if that is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:05:59 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC Sorry Lynna but your Signature is still *not valid*.
EC It say's: No signed attribute and your Serial Number is
075A8B
Okay, I have not a clue as to what the serial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:22:41 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
MDP This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're
not
MDP using it) and Import the certificate. You don't have the
certificate
MDP in your list of valid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lynna,
@01 May 2002, 23:40:36 -0800 (08:40 UK time) Lynna Lunsford wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back, they appear with
the green icon and as valid.
Lynna: Don't change
Dear Marck,
--- Marck D Pearlstone / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 10:22:41
Anti-Virus
This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're not
using it) and Import the certificate.
But when I look at the posting from Michael Disabato
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL P
Dear Marck,
--- Marck D Pearlstone / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 10:22:41
Anti-Virus
[...] Hang on - you may not be able to do that - you're still using
a 1.54 beta!
Mark, when under Option|S/MIME I change to 'CryptoAPI' and right click
Lynna's Signature it say that it was Imported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eddie,
@01 May 2002, 11:20:56 +0200 (10:20 UK time) Eddie Castelli wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] Hang on - you may not be able to do that - you're still using
a 1.54 beta!
Mark, when under Option|S/MIME I change to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 11:51 PM, you wrote:
wow, I think I have things all screwed up now, I'm not sure which way
is up anymore!
I did an uninstall of PGP 6.5.8 and installed pgp6.5.8ckt build 07.
I also have the box checked for pgp version pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:26 AM, you wrote:
Marck,
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by internal
S/MIME setting ?
running TB 160h with PGP6.5.8ckt 07 on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@01 May 2002, 05:52:29 -0400 (10:52 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will
MDP appear as valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says
Dear Paul,
--- Paul Cartwright / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 11:52:29
Anti-Virus
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by internal
S/MIME setting ?
Check your Menu Option and S/MIME. There you should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@01 May 2002, 05:33:25 -0400 (10:33 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wow, I think I have things all screwed up now, I'm not sure which way
is up anymore!
Looks like a case of non-terminal
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:07:55 AM, you digitally penned the following:
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked.
MDP Aha - the belt and braces ploy. Use one or the other, not both!
; ) Some of us like to feel really secure! LOL!
--
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:15:03 PM, Lynna scribbled:
LL certificate wrong or something...You signature is showing as
LL valid in h for me. I did not even have my SMIME
LL h I just did that yesterday and was trying it out. I may
LL have selected the wrong format or something...sorry.
Drat. And
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:12:23 PM, Marck scribbled:
Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed as
invalid.
MDP Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
The only problem I have with this is that, in my lexicon, Microsoft
and Security don't fit well in the same sentence, unless
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:51:01 PM, Allie scribbled:
ACM When using v1.60h, you have to enable MS CryptoAPI for S/MIME. All
ACM S/MIME signatures were invalid for me.
This is a problem for me, as I have an inherent distrust of
Microsoft's security mechanisms based on long, painful experience.
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:07:55 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
MDP Internal - the alternate setting to MS CryptoAPI.
When I had the setting Internal, I was not able to even look at the
messages from Lynna Lunsford. Though they were highligthed in the
message list, the preview pane
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, Jerry wrote:
+ when is not AVG installed and plugin is added to Virus Centre, error
message is displayed on start of The Bat!
J I have AVG installed and it still says that AVG is not installed :-(
I can confirm this on 1.60h, version 1.60c,d works
Dear Marek,
--- Marek Mikus / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 12:59:40
Anti-Virus
as I know, problem is in incompatibility between Internal S/MIME
implementation and CryptoAPI - there is used another algoritmus and
Cryptographic provider. So, messages signed by CryptoAPI are VALID
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:26:56 AM, Marck scribbled:
MDP Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear as
MDP valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says it is invalid just
MDP hasn't imported it yet (or is using version 1.60h with the
MDP internal S/MIME setting).
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:14:04 AM, Eddie scribbled:
EC But when I look at the posting from Michael Disabato
EC [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] there I see his S/MIME
EC as valid.
I am using 1.60c with internal S/MIME
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
... When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back, they appear with
the green icon and as valid.
MDP Lynna: Don't change anything. You are doing fine.
MDP Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear as
MDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:06:46 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC This is what just came to my mind when reading the posting from
Micael
EC Disabato. His S/MIME I can see as valid and he use it under
internal
EC Implementation.
EC So,
Dear Lynna,
--- Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 13:18:14
Anti-Virus
Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am using
the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version 160.h So as far as I
can see, I have no problems viewing emails from persons using either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@01 May 2002, 05:42:46 -0500 (11:42 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has the fact that the internal S/MIME is broken been reported to
RITLABS?
Yes.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:
...
MDP Correct. When you use the MS CryptoAPI, certificates are managed
MDP in the system certificate pool. See Control Panel (or IE)
MDP Internet Options | Content | Certificates. That's the
MDP certificates that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@01 May 2002, 20:38:15 -0500 (02:38 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
The only problem I have with this is that, in my lexicon, Microsoft
and Security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Disabato [MD] wrote:
...
MD This is a problem for me, as I have an inherent distrust of
MD Microsoft's security mechanisms based on long, painful experience.
I can understand that though there is an advantage to the concept of
keeping the
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:06:46 AM, Eddie scribbled:
EC This is what just came to my mind when reading the posting from Micael
EC Disabato. His S/MIME I can see as valid and he use it under internal
EC Implementation.
EC So, is there a TB! version that can handle it both way?
1.60c is the last
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Disabato [MD] wrote:
...
MD What does it show when you use the internal?
MD And yours are still invalid here, BTW.
Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
- --
-=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60h | Windows XP Pro
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:18:14 AM, Lynna scribbled:
LL Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am
LL using the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version 160.h So
LL as far as I can see, I have no problems viewing emails from
LL persons using either setting. AND the majority of
LL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:30:41 AM, you digitally penned the
following;
MD Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:18:14 AM, Lynna scribbled:
LL Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am
LL using the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
...
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
^^^
That should have read 'Lynna's'. My
apologies Lynna. :-)
- --
-=Allie C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:01:29 AM, you digitally penned the
following;
ACM Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
ACM ...
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
ACM ^^^
ACM That
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:17:16 PM, Marck wrote:
MDP @01 May 2002, 20:38:15 -0500 (02:38 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
The only problem I have with this is that, in my lexicon, Microsoft
and Security don't
On 01 May 2002, 09:22, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're not
using it) and Import the certificate. You don't have the certificate
in your list of valid certificates to verify with. Hang on - you may
not be able to do that - you're still
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:47:21 AM, Allie scribbled:
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
This may be semantics, but I'm getting concerned that we are heading
to a road where the CryptoAPI becomes the correct way. IMNSHO, this
is merely a work-around until Ritlabs gets the
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:33:21 AM, Allie scribbled:
ACM I can understand that though there is an advantage to the concept of
ACM keeping the keys at a central location. It avoids having to import
ACM them into TB!.
That is until I abandon IE in favor of Opera and remove it from my
system.
ACM
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:17:16 AM, Marck scribbled:
MDP LOL! Just be thankful they merely implemented rather than invented the
MDP standard! (or did they ...?)
Their implementations are the problem.
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Wednesday, May 1, 2002,
Hello udlers,
I noticed that I can couple TB! to Kaspersky's AVP (that so
bravely protects me each day against the virus roulette of
Internet). (Where) can I download the plug-in that is asked
for?
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Fré,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:20:48 PM, you wrote:
I noticed that I can couple TB! to Kaspersky's AVP (that so
bravely protects me each day against the virus roulette of
Internet). (Where) can I download the plug-in that is asked
for?
It is only possible with the Personal Pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 1:26:56 AM PST, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
Lynna: Don't change anything. You are doing fine.
Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear
as valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 4:30:41 AM PST, Michael Disabato wrote:
And yours are still invalid here, BTW.
Same here (Lynna's signatures show as invalid, while yours show as
valid). I'm using TB! 1.60c, and the above is true whether I'm
using
Hello Gerard!
On Wednesday 1-05-02 (20:45) you wrote:
GK It is only possible with the Personal Pro version.
--
Thanks, Gerard. AVP is a powerful tool, so I'll consider it.
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 4:47:21 AM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
Okay Allie - please explain to me how to set up my TB! 1.60c
correctly to show Lynna's signatures as valid.
I get invalid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Melissa,
@01 May 2002, 11:55:30 -0700 (19:55 UK time) Melissa Reese wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please explain this then...
I'm using 1.60c. All of Lynna's S/MIME signed messages show here as
invalid with *both* TB!'s
Hello Marck,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 9:21:17 PM you wrote (at least in part):
If I open her certificate to have a look, it says: No signed
attributes.
MDP That sounds like a non-imported certificate.
Nope :-)
1.) You don't have to have someones certificate imported for verifying
.
1.53d.
(Btw, I almost deleted entire thread since I wasn't interested about
Anti-Virus topic.)
Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
\/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE80FBrvgcu6yV9/zYRAtmxAJ9xOw9XF+bkGoa1BBxF9P3x1uy/wQCgrWVs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Melissa Reese [MR] wrote:
...
MR Okay Allie - please explain to me how to set up my TB! 1.60c
MR correctly to show Lynna's signatures as valid.
Once some of us are getting valid signatures on Lynna's messages, I
think everyone would agree that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 5:54 AM, you wrote:
M
wow, I think I have things all screwed up now, I'm not sure which way
is up anymore!
MDP Looks like a case of non-terminal confusion and crossed wires to me
g.
I did an uninstall of PGP 6.5.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:07 AM, you wrote:
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked.
MDP Aha - the belt and braces ploy. Use one or the other, not both!
ok, so in the privacy menu of the reply, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@01 May 2002, 18:34:52 -0400 (23:34 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP You have a cross-over between PGP and S/MIME. The CryptoAPI is
MDP used for S/MIME. PGP 6.5.8 is used for PGP. They are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@01 May 2002, 18:52:59 -0400 (23:52 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked
and SMIME checked.
MDP Aha - the belt and braces ploy. Use
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:03 PM, you wrote:
ok, so in the privacy menu of the reply, I UNcheck openPGP and leave
SMIME checked.
MDP Yes .. but you're still coming up PGP signed here.
I still did the pgptray signing that time. How do I know if the SMIME
works?
/ Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@02 May 2002, 19:08:01 -0400 (00:08 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, so in the privacy menu of the reply, I UNcheck openPGP and
leave SMIME checked.
MDP Yes .. but you're still coming up
A colleague of mine uses TheBat! 1.53d. He started to receive the
Nimda.enc virus today. Each time a message arrives with the Nimda.enc
virus, TheBat! 1.53d creates a bat###.TMP file in the Windows TEMP
directory in Windows 2000, Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition 7.5x detects
the virus, and he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:35:55 PM, you digitally penned the following;
MDP It doesn't. Your message would come through with a tick on the
MDP envelope in the message list and an attachment showing a valid (or an
MDP invalid) signature in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@02 May 2002, 19:43:48 -0400 (00:43 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is the TheBat! 1.53d get affected by the Nimda.enc virus?
It's not! It has to store incoming mail somewhere. NAV is b
imda.enc virus?
MDP It's not! It has to store incoming mail somewhere. NAV is being way
MDP over-zealous.
MDP There are two things he could do here:
MDP 1) Turn off NAV, let the message arrive and delete it from TB with no
MDP problem.
MDP 2) Use the mail dispatcher to delete the infected mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:35 PM, you wrote:
ok, well, I go to that section and it shows no certificates!
I go to import, select one of my certs that I think I exported, it
says successful, yet it also shows no certificates for me!
well. Of course
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:03 PM, you wrote:
MDP Aha - the belt and braces ploy. Use one or the other, not both!
ok, so in the privacy menu of the reply, I UNcheck openPGP and leave
SMIME checked.
MDP Yes .. but you're still coming up PGP signed here.
is this better ???
the answer is
601 - 700 of 1080 matches
Mail list logo
