Hi Thomas!
In message mid:461061460.20021027105209@;gmx.net
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:52:09 PM, you wrote:
TF> The biggest part of the message may be the body; you can search for
TF> signla strings in it. The "lower headers" are just a line or two. You
TF> cannot search for signal string
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Scott McNay wrote...
>>> MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA>> Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA>> friends that all use multipart/alternative headers for including HTML
JA>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
>> This is the reason I said I don't think it is a bug. Maybe I agree
>> it should allow you to search lower headers too... but when you
>> select the anywhere clause, I think it shouldn't actuall
Hi Jonathan!
In message mid:12151905962.20021026224406@;certiflexdimension.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:44:06 PM, you wrote:
>> MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA> Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA> friends that all use multipart/alterna
Hello Jonathan,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:41:25 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 13:41 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the "lower
>> headers", even if you tick on "anywhere".
> This is the reason I said I don't think it is a bug. Maybe I agree
>
Hello Gary,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:06:22 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 12:06 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
T>> Under the Advanced tab, make sure the radio button Kill is selected
T>> (default).
> Taking this a step further, under the advanced features.. it seems you can
> call up a file for signal strings. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
>>> Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it)
>> I wouldn't call it a bug myself, more of a design theory.
> It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not the
Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:44:06 -0500 GMT (27/10/02, 10:44 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it)
> I wouldn't call it a bug myself, more of a design theory.
It's a bug. You can search the headers, the body, but not th
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:08 PM, you put forth, in part, about "blocking IP
address vs domain name.":
T> Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download. Hit on New,
T> creating a new filter. Fill in the above IP address into the signal
T> Str
Hi Barry2,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 11:38 PM, you put forth, in part, about "blocking IP
address vs domain name.":
G>> management / mail dispatcher. You will then see you mail before it is
G>> downloaded, and you can hand delete the offending files, while it is
G&
Hello Gary,
Sunday, October 27, 2002, 3:31:23 AM, you wrote:
G> Another way of handling it is to use the mail dispatcher feature. You can
G> invoke this by Account / Dispatch mail on server, to manually start this
G> process, or set it to do it automatically in Account / properties / mail
G> man
Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:08 PM, you put forth, in part, about "blocking IP
address vs domain name.":
T> Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download. Hit on New,
T> creating a new filter. Fill in the above IP address into the signal
T> Str
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, Scott McNay wrote...
SU>> I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are
SU>> infected with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done,
SU>> but it is a real nuisance. I downloaded the bat this evening
Hello SCN,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:21:46 -0700 (PDT) GMT (27/10/02, 10:21 +0700 GMT),
SCN User wrote:
> Do you know if Outlook Express 6.0 will do this as well?
I don't understand your question, as you top-posted on my long
article. I have no idea what you mean by "do this". Do what? Spread
virus
Hi Randal!
In message mid:200210270321.UAA18081@;scn.org
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:21:46 PM, you wrote:
>>> I want to block the following IP address
>>> 66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
>>> domaing name.
>>Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective
Hi SCN,
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:55 PM, you put forth, in part, about "blocking IP
address vs domain name.":
S> I want to block the following IP address
S> 66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
S> domaing name.
Blocking is best done th
Hi Randal!
In message mid:200210270255.TAA14570@;scn.org
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:55:54 PM, you wrote:
SU> I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are infected
SU> with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done, but it is a real
SU> nuisance. I downloaded the
Do you know if Outlook Express 6.0 will do this as well?
Randal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hello SCN,
>
>On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT) GMT (27/10/02, 09:55 +0700 GMT),
>SCN User wrote:
>
>> I want to block the following IP address
>> 66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of
Hello SCN,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:55:54 -0700 (PDT) GMT (27/10/02, 09:55 +0700 GMT),
SCN User wrote:
> I want to block the following IP address
> 66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
> domaing name.
> Can this be done with "the bat"?
Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Offi
I want to block the following IP address
66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net
instead of merely the domaing name.
Can this be done with "the bat"?
I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are infected
with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done, but it is a
20 matches
Mail list logo
