Hi Thomas,
On Saturday, September 28, 2002 20:41 your local time, (19:26 my local
time), you [TF] wrote:
G>> There are already "official"connections on airports, hotels and
G>> other place were the warriors hang out.
TF> Where are these? Is there a URL listing them?
I read somewhere that Chang
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:56:26 +0200 GMT (25/09/02, 16:56 +0700 GMT),
Gerard wrote:
G> There are already "official"connections on airports, hotels and other
G> place were the warriors hang out.
Where are these? Is there a URL listing them?
G> The "unofficial" ones are the fully ope
Dear Gerard,
Going back 11:56 25.09.2002...
> There are already "official"connections on airports, hotels and other
> place were the warriors hang out.
Indeed it becomes very popular, at last :) But nonetheless, if you're
worried about security on a WLAN, provide it to yourself! :)
Seriously,
Dear Gerard,
Going back 22:50 23.09.2002...
> Or you can use postcastserver http://www.postcastserver.com/
> This sends your email directly to the mail server of the recipient,
> thereby making a providers smtp server optional :-)
> This is also great if you are a road warrior with a laptop.
An
Hello tracer,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 11:14:49 PM, you wrote:
T>>> having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server,
T>>> is there a way to setup one default smtp server for all
T>>> accounts, not only on per account basis?
t> I have an account with myrealbox.com and in the p
Hello Joan Josep,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:33:43 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 3:33:43 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Joan Josep wrote:
> Hello Tomas,
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 20:50:41 [GMT +0200]
> (which was 23/09/2002 (D/M/Y) 19:50 where I liv
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 11:00 PM, you wrote:
ACM> I've now updated the page to include information on how to autostart
ACM> Mercury at system startup and how to run it as a service if you
ACM> really wish to. Just look at the bottom of the page.
ACM> New URL (tell me if it works)
ACM>
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 11:00 PM, you wrote:
ACM> I've now updated the page to include information on how to autostart
ACM> Mercury at system startup and how to run it as a service if you
ACM> really wish to. Just look at the bottom of the page.
ACM> New URL (tell me if it works)
ACM>
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002 16:29 your local time, (15:14 my
local time), you [TF] wrote:
TF> Guess so. WLAN is an invitation for eavesdropping, I don't know
TF> why WI-FI would be.
I think we've crossed the threshold and veering into OT here, but I'll
quickly state that I've he
ON Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 12:32:38 PM, you wrote:
PP> Correct in the fact it is 'Dial-Up Network', incorrect that it has to be
PP> using 'POT' :-) Using ISDN it is still called 'DUN', albeit ISDN ain't
PP> POT anymore but a type of 'SDSL' :-)
PP> F-up2: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Peter,
I
>>> [...] I have no choice but to connect by DUN.
>> ^^^
>>|
>>What is DUN? >>-->>--->>+
> Dial UP Network, using the old POTS (Plain Old Telephone System)
> network:-)
Correct in the fact
ON Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 11:34:48 AM, you wrote:
EC> Dear Thomas,
EC> --->>> Thomas F. / Mittwoch, 25.09.2002, 09:58:49
EC> global option for smtp server
>> [...] I have no choice but to connect by DUN.
EC>
ON Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 9:58:49 AM, you wrote:
TF> Weren't we talking about "road warriors with a laptop"? I know there
TF> are some experiments under way, in both the US and Europe, with
TF> wireless internet, i.e. you just turn on your laptop and your are
TF> connected as if you were
Hello Eddie,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:34:48 +0200 GMT (25/09/02, 16:34 +0700 GMT),
Eddie Castelli wrote:
>> [...] I have no choice but to connect by DUN.
EC>^^^
EC> |
EC> What is DUN? >>-->>
Dear Thomas,
--->>> Thomas F. / Mittwoch, 25.09.2002, 11:40:29
global option for smtp server
>>> [...] I have no choice but to connect by DUN.
EC>>^^^
EC>>
Hello Sudip,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:30:20 +0545 GMT (25/09/02, 15:45 +0700 GMT),
Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
SP> More than experiments, the WI-FI certified 802.11b wireless
SP> solution is fast becoming a standard feature in laptops.
Wow, I didn't know this.
SP> But lot of issues remain.
Guess so. W
Dear Thomas,
--->>> Thomas F. / Mittwoch, 25.09.2002, 09:58:49
global option for smtp server
> [...] I have no choice but to connect by DUN.
^^^
|
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002 14:58 your local time, (13:43 my
local time), you [TF] wrote:
TF> I know there are some experiments under way, in both the US and
TF> Europe, with wireless internet, i.e. you just turn on your laptop
TF> and your are connected as if you were on a LAN.
Hello Gerard,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 22:34:11 +0200 GMT (25/09/02, 03:34 +0700 GMT),
Gerard wrote:
G> Your absolutely right about this aspect. I have been using cable and
G> ADSL for almost 5 years now, I forget that people are still using
G> dial-up accounts.
Weren't we talking about "road warrio
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:28:02 -0400 GMT (25/09/02, 07:28 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
PC> Thanks Allie, I already had the install file on my PC, I'll try it again
PC> tomorrow. Tonight I've had enough, I was in a car accident today, some
PC> moron failed to stop ( behind me) at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote:'
PC> ok, so I think I sent a message, and I have Mercury configured.
PC> What I haven't seen, and I'm not sure about is how to start it
PC> automatically when I restart XP. I
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 6:55 PM, you wrote:
PC>> Maybe Allie could give us a quick primer on Mercury32 ;) I took
PC>> a look at it before I installed postcast, but it scared me away,
PC>> Postcast was a snap to install.
ACM> Ok, this has been asked enough so I banged together this page:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote:'
PC> ok, so I think I sent a message, and I have Mercury configured.
Great. At least my efforts weren't for nothing. :)
PC> What I haven't seen, and I'm not sure about is h
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 6:55 PM, you wrote:
ACM> Ok, this has been asked enough so I banged together this page:
ACM> http://www.geocities.com/acmartin.geo/merc32config.html
ok, so I think I sent a message, and I have Mercury configured. What I
haven't seen, and I'm not sure about is
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 9:55 PM, you wrote:
PC> On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 6:55 PM, you wrote:
ACM>> Ok, this has been asked enough so I banged together this page:
ACM>> http://www.geocities.com/acmartin.geo/merc32config.html
ok, so I think I sent a message, and I have Mercury
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 9:45 PM, you wrote:
PC> On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 6:55 PM, you wrote:
PC>>> Maybe Allie could give us a quick primer on Mercury32 ;) I took
PC>>> a look at it before I installed postcast, but it scared me away,
PC>>> Postcast was a snap to install.
ACM>>
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 6:55 PM, you wrote:
ACM> Ok, this has been asked enough so I banged together this page:
ACM> http://www.geocities.com/acmartin.geo/merc32config.html
ACM> I hope that it helps those interested in using Mercury/32 or will
ACM> make those intimidated by it revisit
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 01:55:50, Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about:
global option for smtp server
> http://www.geocities.com/acmartin.geo/merc32config.html
Hello Allie
Thank you very much for the information. Great help for a beginne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote:'
PC> Maybe Allie could give us a quick primer on Mercury32 ;) I took
PC> a look at it before I installed postcast, but it scared me away,
PC> Postcast was a snap to install.
ON Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 9:08:08 PM, you wrote:
TF> There is one problem with having your own SMTP server on your machine:
TF> you need to be connected until the mail is delivered. With a dial-up
TF> connection this can be frustrating if the recipeint's server has a
TF> problem.
Your abs
Hello Gerard,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:50:00 +0200 GMT (24/09/02, 03:50 +0700 GMT),
Gerard wrote:
G> Or you can use postcastserver http://www.postcastserver.com/
G> This sends your email directly to the mail server of the recipient,
G> thereby making a providers smtp server optional :-)
G> This is
ON Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 4:22:34 PM, you wrote:
G>> More control, flexibility and power. Who can refuse this?
KhPom>Some ISPs, that's who. Some of them block the SMTP port, so you are
KhPom> forced to use theirs. Many of the "free" systems do that, so that they
KhPom> can add their
Hello Gerard,
Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 10:07:15 AM, you wrote:
G> More control, flexibility and power. Who can refuse this?
Some ISPs, that's who. Some of them block the SMTP port, so you are
forced to use theirs. Many of the "free" systems do that, so that they
can add their advertisem
ON Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 2:31:37 PM, you wrote:
LG> Hello Gerard,
LG> I've been using Postcast as well for the TBLH discussion list, but
LG> I've noticed it's a little on the slow side. Have you noticed that as
LG> well? I'm wondering if it's a configuration issue. It shouldn't be too
L
Hallo Leif,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 06:31:37 -0600GMT (24-9-02, 14:31 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
LG> The only thing dislike about doing it is that your IP address
LG> shows up in the headers which isn't the greatest thing for
LG> persistent connection people.
Most (if not all) ISP's mentio
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 8:31 AM, you wrote:
LG> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 at 13:27:31 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
G>> I suggested Postcast because I use it and its free.
LG> I've been using Postcast as well for the TBLH discussion list, but
LG> I've noticed it's a little on the slow side. Have yo
Hello Gerard,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 at 13:27:31 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
G> I suggested Postcast because I use it and its free.
I've been using Postcast as well for the TBLH discussion list, but
I've noticed it's a little on the slow side. Have you noticed that as
well? I'm wondering if it's a con
ON Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 12:38:29 PM, you wrote:
ACM> It's a far less technical venture than you think and this is why I
ACM> suggested it. :) I felt just as intimidated by the prospect before I
ACM> did it. The term 'server' tends to alarm the passing end user. 'What
ACM> do I need that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tomas [T] wrote:'
T> thanks for all the suggestions. I am not that technical type,
T> so was surprised about possibility of running own smtp server.
It's a far less technical venture than you think and
Dear all,
thanks for all the suggestions. I am not that technical type,
so was surprised about possibility of running own smtp server.
Anyway first I will try X-Ray according to Sudip´s suggestion,
seems good.
Best regards,
Tomas
Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 1:55:35 AM, you wrote:
> If I unders
Hi Tomas,
On Monday, September 23, 2002 20:50 your local time, (Tuesday, 00:35
my local time), you [T] wrote:
T> having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server, is there a
T> way to setup one default smtp server for all accounts, not only on
T> per account basis?
If I understand your p
ON Monday, September 23, 2002, 10:33:43 PM, you wrote:
JJ> Hello Tomas,
JJ> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 20:50:41 [GMT +0200]
JJ> (which was 23/09/2002 (D/M/Y) 19:50 where I live) you wrote:
T>> having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server,
T>> is there a way to setup one def
Hello Tomas,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 20:50:41 [GMT +0200]
(which was 23/09/2002 (D/M/Y) 19:50 where I live) you wrote:
T> having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server,
T> is there a way to setup one default smtp server for all
T> accounts, not only on per account basis?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tomas [T] wrote:'
T> Having to change smtp server 3 or more accounts, eventhough
T> it is not very often, is pain in the ass.
You need to outfit yourself with your own SMTP server. I suggest
running Mer
Hello,
having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server,
is there a way to setup one default smtp server for all
accounts, not only on per account basis?
Having to change smtp server 3 or more accounts, eventhough
it is not very often, is pain in the ass.
--
Best regards,
Tomas
_
45 matches
Mail list logo
