Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-06 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Marck, On Saturday, April 2, 2011, 3:06:47 PM, Marck Pearlstone wrote: snip... URL is incorrect as it does not conform to RFC 1738. fully agree. Now I have to copy/paste the link in browser. snip...If there is tampering with the URL, it is being down by a routing MTA (transit mail

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-04 Thread Rick
Now is it possible I wonder how to create a RegEx that opens only those subject headers in plain text and the rest in HTML ? If someone can come up with THAT it would be great Until then try [shift] [control] K -- Rick When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-03 Thread MFPA
Hi On Saturday 2 April 2011 at 6:46:49 PM, in mid:1779172081.20110402134...@thebat.net, CDIsxm wrote: The fact that the problem is not present when I read the link as a plain text webmail, proves that the link is not tampered with until it is received by TB. How does the link appear you

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-03 Thread CDIsxm
Hello MFPA, snip... How does the link appear you view the message source in TB!? (Assuming the message encoding isn't something unreadable like base64.) you solved it. Thank you. It remains intact when I view it in F9. Now is it possible I wonder how to create a RegEx that opens only those

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello CDIsxm, On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:34:02 -0400 GMT (01/Apr/11, 21:34 PM +0700 GMT), CDIsxm wrote: If it's not a confidential link, could you post it here? C This is what it should look like: C

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Thomas and everyone else who tried to assist. The link is invalid because it has now expired. The platform developer blames TB and TB has not been able to solve it or acknowledge there is even a problem. So on it goes ad infinitum. The fact that the problem is not present when I read the

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Thomas, to all who tried to help. It's a lost casue. The platform provider says its TB. I will just contune gettin gthe links form webmail. -- Best regards, CDIsxmmailto:cdi...@thebat.net Current version is

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Thomas, to all who tried to help. It's a lost casue. The platform provider says its TB. I will just contune gettin gthe links form webmail. -- Best regards, CDIsxmmailto:cdi...@thebat.net Current version

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello CDIsxm, On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:26:05 -0400 GMT (03/Apr/11, 1:26 AM +0700 GMT), CDIsxm wrote: C to all who tried to help. It's a lost casue. The platform provider C says its TB. I will just contune gettin gthe links form webmail. Sorry to hear the platform provider's opinion. In fact, I

Re:is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread David Elliott
Salutation CDIsxm, On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, at 13:54:00 [which was on Saturday at 18:54 where I live] you wrote: to all who tried to help. It's a lost casue. The platform provider says its TB. I will just contune gettin gthe links form webmail. Sorry IMHO they are wrong. The URL is incorrect as

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-02 Thread Marck Pearlstone
Dear David, @2-Apr-2011, 20:01 David Elliott [DE] in mid:24585208.20110402200...@elliott.uk.com said to CDIsxm: to all who tried to help. It's a lost casue. The platform provider says its TB. I will just contune gettin gthe links form webmail. DE Sorry IMHO they are wrong. DE The URL is

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Thomas, Thanks for coming to my rescue. On Thursday, March 31, 2011, 6:20:05 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello CDIsxm, On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:04 -0400 GMT (30/Mar/11, 22:11 PM +0700 GMT), CDIsxm wrote: C My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in C the body.

Re:is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread David Elliott
Dear CDIsxm, On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, at 10:34:02 [which was on Friday at 15:34 where I live] you wrote: C My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in the body. I can C grab the mail off the server in Horde and it not altered, but when I C download it to TB is scrambles parts of the link. I

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread Sam Brown
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:04 -0400 GMT (30/Mar/11, 22:11 PM +0700 GMT), CDIsxm wrote: C My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in C the body. I can grab the mail off the server in Horde and it not C altered, but when I download it to TB is scrambles parts of

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread CDIsxm
Hello David, thx for thew confirmation. On Friday, April 1, 2011, 11:04:40 AM, David Elliott wrote: Dear CDIsxm, On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, at 10:34:02 [which was on Friday at 15:34 where I live] you wrote: C My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in the body. I can C grab the mail off

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread Bill McQuillan
I'm not going to even try to echo the urls since I don't want to further corrupt the evidence. What I noticed in David Elliot's response (that I received) was that the portions of the url in CDIsxm's message which were ...part... were changed into the math character for a partial differential.

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread CDIsxm
Hello David, On Friday, April 1, 2011, 11:04:40 AM, David Elliott wrote: Dear CDIsxm, On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, at 10:34:02 [which was on Friday at 15:34 where I live] you wrote: C My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in the body. I can C grab the mail off the server in Horde and it

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Bill, I have utf-8 and us-ascii checked. Just changed it to utf-8 only, but I tried that already with the same result. I have now contacted the platform provider, but I don't expect they will shift formats to suit me and TB. Not even sure this problem is confined to TB. It certainly

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-04-01 Thread CDIsxm
Hello Bill, snip ... Oddly, the reply by Sam Brown to the same message did NOT replace the ...part... with anything. So what encoding does Sam Brown use and I will see if we can use the same. -- Best regards, CDIsxmmailto:cdi...@thebat.net

Re: is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-03-31 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello CDIsxm, On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:04 -0400 GMT (30/Mar/11, 22:11 PM +0700 GMT), CDIsxm wrote: C My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in C the body. I can grab the mail off the server in Horde and it not C altered, but when I download it to TB is scrambles parts of

is v.4.2.42 truncated urls in the body?

2011-03-30 Thread CDIsxm
My incoming messages have partially truncated URLs in the body. I can grab the mail off the server in Horde and it not altered, but when I download it to TB is scrambles parts of the link. I turned off AV and it makes no difference. Is any one aware of this and what if any