On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:13:43PM +, David Holland wrote:
> > libsa is just made of many libc-like functions. getl and
> > bounded_gets are not close to anything in userland. gets_s is, even
> > though it is in annex K.
>
> It's more important not to let anyone take away the false
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:52:33PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 07/06/2016 ? 18:04, Christos Zoulas a ?crit :
> >On Jun 7, 3:20pm, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
> >-- Subject: Re: gets in the kernel
> >
> >| On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:36
Le 07/06/2016 à 18:04, Christos Zoulas a écrit :
On Jun 7, 3:20pm, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: gets in the kernel
| On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
| > >I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:04:26PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | How about not giving people the false impression it's part of Annex K?
> |
> | > gets is not gets either, and so far nobody has complained about it.
>
> Yes, that was my point. I also wanted to remove gets() in SA
On Jun 7, 3:20pm, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: gets in the kernel
| On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
| > >I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel.
| > >While this iis nice,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> >I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel.
> >While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a
> >different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should
>
Le 05/06/2016 à 20:53, Christos Zoulas a écrit :
Hi,
I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel.
While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a
different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should
rename this to kgets()
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:57:02AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel.
> > While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a
> > different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should
>
Christos Zoulas writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel.
> While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a
> different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should
> rename this to kgets() or getl() now
