On Jun 7, 3:20pm, dholland-t...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote: -- Subject: Re: gets in the kernel
| On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote: | > >I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel. | > >While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a | > >different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should | > >rename this to kgets() or getl() now before it causes problems. | > | > This is not in the kernel, this is in the bootloader. So you can | > forget kgets. I don't think we need to rename it; it remains close | > to what some people may be used to seeing, and does differ that | > much. | | How about not giving people the false impression it's part of Annex K? | | > gets is not gets either, and so far nobody has complained about it. Yes, that was my point. I also wanted to remove gets() in SA completely. | Er, it was when I looked at it... or close enough It has tty display handling... christos
