On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 08:30:51 -0700
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:29:26PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
> > - fix install target so we can install flood amd examples off
> > $SRCDIR- fix few more bugs from STATUS (I'm on it)
> > - move tag on changed files and ro
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:29:26PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
> - fix install target so we can install flood amd examples off $SRCDIR
> - fix few more bugs from STATUS (I'm on it)
> - move tag on changed files and roll tarball
I'm ok with whatever anyone else does, since the three of us
are the pr
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:47:14 -0700
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:29:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > I think we actually tagged "1.0" when we were doing the OSCON
> > presentation, but we never released it.
>
> Yeah, we already tagged FLOOD_1_0, so l
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:29:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I think we actually tagged "1.0" when we were doing the OSCON
> presentation, but we never released it.
Yeah, we already tagged FLOOD_1_0, so let's put up what we have.
The install targets would be nice, but we already tagged 1.0
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
> I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created
> few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against current CVS (flood,
> apr, apr-util). No segv's at all. Could we ask the person that submited
> this bug to re
This one in particular:
* DNS lookup failures in any cause segfault.
Justin says: Wow. Why?
Aaron says: Is this still happening? It's been awhile.
I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created
few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against curren
