I'm glad that the Linux-Unix-Debian-pdftex contingent can now sleep soundly. I
also see exactly how the new PMX etex-demanding commands got into the mix (when
the embedded examples were compiled with mtx/pmx).
But there are still a few mysteries I'd like to pursue, for my own satisfaction
if no
Hi,
On 05/02/2011 05:33 PM, Simon Dreher wrote:
> it seems to work if you add the line
> \usepackage{etex}
> directly after the \documentclass[11pt]{article} line.
Thanks for all your suggestions! Adding the above line to mtxdoc.tex,
halleluja.ltx and kanons.ltx fixes the problem. (Doing it the o
Hi,
On 05/02/2011 06:09 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> I use Ubuntu, which has the identical pdfTeX version as you have,
> with no problems.
Of course it works, because it's from me. :-) Ubuntu always just takes
the (e.g. pmx) package that I create in Debian. As described, the
previous version in Debia
Dirk Laurie wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:03:30PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >
> > upon compiling mtxdoc.tex (from latest m-tx 0.60d), I get the
> > following
> > error:
> >
> > ==
> > ==
> > pdflatex mtxdoc
> > This is pd
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:03:30PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
>
> upon compiling mtxdoc.tex (from latest m-tx 0.60d), I get the following
> error:
>
>
> pdflatex mtxdoc
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live
Am 02.05.2011 17:37, schrieb Don Simons:
[...]
Also, the "\setmaxinstruments{24}..." commands in the earlier message are a
bit mysterious...I'm pretty sure the original mtx source didn't have them,
and I doubt if the mtx doc requires them.
The original sources are in m-tx, processed then with pmx
The "undefined control sequence" is what happens when you try to compile a
latex document with plain tex. I assume the mtx document is latex, and I
erred in saying to try tex or etex; I should have said latex.
Also, the "\setmaxinstruments{24}..." commands in the earlier message are a
bit mysterio
Hi,
it seems to work if you add the line
\usepackage{etex}
directly after the \documentclass[11pt]{article} line.
Has anybody an idea why this is necessary?
Perhaps this line should be included in mtxdoc.tex ?
Simon
On 05/02/2011 04:17 PM, Simon Dreher wrote:
upon compiling mtxdoc.tex (from
Hi,
On 05/02/2011 05:02 PM, Don Simons wrote:
> I suggest trying to compile the document the old fashioned way, first with
> tex (or etex), then dvips, then convert to a pdf with gsview or ghostscript
> or acrobat if you really need a pdf. I know it doesn't answer the original
> question, but whet
I don't know about pdflatex, but my understanding is that "latex" invokes
etex automagically.
Also, unless certain MusiXTeX commands are used or certain parameter values
exceeded, I believe musixtex.tex 1.15 can be processed with ordinary tex.
I suggest trying to compile the document the old fas
Hi,
thanks for the fast reply! :-)
On 05/02/2011 04:17 PM, Simon Dreher wrote:
>> upon compiling mtxdoc.tex (from latest m-tx 0.60d), I get the following
>> error:
> [...]
>> pdflatex mtxdoc
> [...]
>> ! No room for a new \count .
>> \ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
>>
Welcome to the wonderful world of PMX!
Well, not 100% wonderful, because coda is not included, so you have to use
in-line TeX:
=
1 1 4 4 4 4 0 0
1 1 20 0.08
t
.\
g04 | \coda{10}\ g2 \coda{10}\ g /
=
It's a non-spaci
Hallo Roland,
upon compiling mtxdoc.tex (from latest m-tx 0.60d), I get the following
error:
[...]
pdflatex mtxdoc
[...]
! No room for a new \count .
\ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
\fi
l.11 \setmaxslurs{24}
Hi,
upon compiling mtxdoc.tex (from latest m-tx 0.60d), I get the following
error:
pdflatex mtxdoc
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)
entering extended mode
(./mtxdoc.tex
LaTeX2e <2009/09/24>
Ba
Hi evrybody!
I am not so experienced with MusiXTeX.
Can anybody help me to set a Coda sign within PMX?
Kind regards
Dieter Gloetzel
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
15 matches
Mail list logo
