Re: [tex4ht] [bug #307] make4ht removes spaces in \href in LUA mode when using mathdesign package

2016-06-09 Thread Deimantas Galcius
third: it is not surprising that pdf(la)tex and lua(la)tex would find different fonts. i've never understood lualatex font lookup, and can't help there. furthermore, the actions taken by the two engines after a font is found are different. it appears that latex and dvilualatex take

[tex4ht] [bug #312] tcolorbox package does not work with tex4ht. All newlines are lost in listings

2016-06-09 Thread Nasser M. Abbasi
URL: Summary: tcolorbox package does not work with tex4ht. All newlines are lost in listings Project: tex4ht Submitted by: nma123 Submitted on: Fri 10 Jun 2016 04:25:10 AM EEST

[tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Michal Hoftich
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #309 (project tex4ht): There is missing discussion which happened on the mailing list, but anyway, there is a patch for tex4ht which enables blocking of package loading and which blocks savetrees package. I left configuration for fontspec, as it has it's own bug report.

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Michal Hoftich
Quoting Karl Berry (2016-06-09 23:20:55) > It seems to me that there is a difference between savetrees, which > simply makes no sense in HTML, and tcolorbox, which does. I don't think > Michal was advocating blanket application of blacklisting packages. Sure, we only need to take care of

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Berry
It seems to me that there is a difference between savetrees, which simply makes no sense in HTML, and tcolorbox, which does. I don't think Michal was advocating blanket application of blacklisting packages. fontspec is another case where it is clear that whatever it does in the TeX world, it has

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Nasser M. Abbasi
On 6/9/2016 9:25 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: I love the idea. IMHO it's a proper way of doing. It' far better that "\ifdefined\HCode" conditional in tex file. Sure, the conditional compilation should be the last resort. There is a patch for savetrees and fontspec, as I said, it needs testing,

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Michal, is updated usepackage.4ht: Fantastic. I'm surprised Eitan did not create a mechanism like this. Anyway, can you commit the lit changes for the new usepackage or send them to me, if nothing more is pending for it? Thanks!! -k

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Michal Hoftich
> I love the idea. IMHO it's a proper way of doing. > It' far better that "\ifdefined\HCode" conditional in tex file. > Sure, the conditional compilation should be the last resort. There is a patch for savetrees and fontspec, as I said, it needs testing, as there is potentially dangerous

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #309] tex4ht does not work with package savetrees

2016-06-09 Thread Deimantas Galcius
On 06/08/2016 12:58 PM, Michal Hoftich wrote: Another possibility I've just found is to block the loading of the package from tex4ht. What do you think? Is that change safe? I love the idea. IMHO it's a proper way of doing. It' far better that "\ifdefined\HCode" conditional in tex file.