> But for A1 or A0 posters I give pdf files to the
> print shop. As yet, as far as memory tells me (I have none to hand) they
> look like the Acrobat rendition, but others may have different experiences
> to me.
It is usual for me to have difficulty with print shops having subtle
problems with
I see now why I did not upload the example source before. It was using a
compiled Survex .3d file as the source of the survey station positions.
I have sorted that out now, with the required fragment of the cave used in
the example now included in the .th file. The example source project for my
One thing more:
I save rendered files as TIFF without compression. The reasons are - there is
no problem to manipulate with gigabyte files today, the RIP (program to print)
must raster the vector format or decompress the JPG file. TIFF file is more
fast. To add appropriate ICC profile is
Photoshop - raster to image. I use it for years.
Resolution depends on printer you will use: Canon and HP 300/600 dpi, Epson 360
dpi. Both for final size!. The reason is print in native resolution of printing
head and don't make interpolations.
m.
Dec 16, 2013 v 5:56 AM, Bruce :
>> But for
and a happy new year to all
Greetings
Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: therion-bounces at speleo.sk [mailto:therion-bounces at speleo.sk] Im
Auftrag
von Graham Mullan
Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2013 22:47
An: therion at speleo.sk
Betreff: Re: [Therion] PDF display
It's st
http://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/doku.php/contrib:externalviewers#examples_of_r
> endering_differences_between_pdf_viewers and the commentary above it.
> Bruce - that's a very handy page. But it's missing the test therion
source you used to do the test. If you could add that, then others could
do
Ah, that makes much more sense. I'll see if I can find the once from my
examples. They will be somewhere as I never delete anything!
Footleg
On 15 December 2013 21:54, Wookey wrote:
> [bloody top-posters - rearranging to make sense]
>
> Footleg [2013-12-15 21:29 +] wrote:
> > Wookey
It's strange, but I thought that the whole point of pdf was that the
document would present in identical fashion across displays and platforms.
Has anyone tried printing from different rendering engines & seeing in what
ways the results differ?
Screen display is all very well, but if you are
[bloody top-posters - rearranging to make sense]
Footleg [2013-12-15 21:29 +] wrote:
> Wookey wrote:
>> On 15 December 2013 19:30, Bruce <[1]bruce at tomo.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>> [2]http://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/doku.php/contrib:externalviewers#examples_of_r
>>>
And as for the Therion source I used to render these, it would have been
whatever the current Windows executable was current at the date I put them
onto the wiki (the wiki history should be able to tell you that). Not that
I think it will make any difference between most recent builds of Therion.
+++ Bruce [2013-12-14 09:16 +1300]:
>
> >I have just noticed that Adobe Acrobat and the (unnamed) pdf viewer
> currently opening from Firefox on this machine render coloured files very
> differently. It's not just that the tones are different, but, for example,
> in Acrobat boulders and the
Thanks Martin,
I sent my earlier reply from my phone which had not picked up Bruce's reply
at that time. So I did not know the question had been answered. Interesting
info about that PDF reader bug. I had not seen that before. The example
renderings on the wiki from various readers were generated
Footleg, read, please, that f⦠wiki first :). There is exact analysis of
this problem and it is bug (reported) in Apple PDF rendering engine. PDF
viewers which use this engine render PDFs generated by Therion incorrectly.
m.
Dec 14, 2013 v 9:48 PM, Footleg :
> I bet one pdf will show the
I am almost certain that this is one pdf reader rendering transparency, and
one cannot handle it. The boulders are partly transparent in the Therion
generated pdf, so in the reader which can render this, they will appear
darker due to the passage background colour showing through from underneath
>I have just noticed that Adobe Acrobat and the (unnamed) pdf viewer
currently opening from Firefox on this machine render coloured files very
differently. It's not just that the tones are different, but, for example,
in Acrobat boulders and the passage containing them are the same shade. In
the
I have just noticed that Adobe Acrobat and the (unnamed) pdf viewer
currently opening from Firefox on this machine render coloured files very
differently. It's not just that the tones are different, but, for example,
in Acrobat boulders and the passage containing them are the same shade. In
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
